On Sep 13, 2010, at 11:06 PM, Manik Surtani wrote:
On 13 Sep 2010, at 19:26, Sanne Grinovero wrote:
> An important feature I'm missing when using batches but not using a
> transaction manager is the capability to eagerly lock keys, because
> there's no unlock.
This applies to regular JTA transactions as well as batching, correct?
As a side note, this goes back, slightly, to my original question on batching.
Does batching (without a TM) make sense with eager locking? With JTA, we know locks are
released at commit time thanks to multi node coordination.
However, does multi node coordination happen when batching without TM is used? If not,
eager locking does not make sense with batching.
--
Manik Surtani
manik(a)jboss.org
Lead, Infinispan
Lead, JBoss Cache
http://www.infinispan.org
http://www.jbosscache.org
_______________________________________________
infinispan-dev mailing list
infinispan-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/infinispan-dev
--
Galder Zamarreño
Sr. Software Engineer
Infinispan, JBoss Cache