I would rather leave this alone for now. Once JSR-107 is complete we'll need to
change Listenable to be compatible anyway so may as well just do it once.
And re: fluent API for listeners, why not suggest that on the JSR-107 Google Group. :)
On 19 Jul 2011, at 13:16, Mircea Markus wrote:
This is isolated and won't break API compatibility so I think it
makes sense.
On 19 Jul 2011, at 09:50, Galder ZamarreƱo wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> What do people think of changing the addListener() APIs to be more fluent?
>
> We could either:
>
> 1. Change Listenable to be Listenable<T> and then have:
>
> <T> addListener(Object listener);
>
> So, implementers such as EmbeddedCacheManager would implement
Listenable<EmbeddedCacheManager> and so would implement:
>
> EmbeddedCacheManager addListener(Object listener);
>
> 2. Or, more simply, have Listenable define:
>
> Object addListener(Object listener);
>
> and EmbeddedCacheManager using covariants to implement:
>
> EmbeddedCacheManager addListener(Object listener);
>
> Btw, the same would apply to removeListener.
>
> Thoughts?
> --
> Galder ZamarreƱo
> Sr. Software Engineer
> Infinispan, JBoss Cache
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> infinispan-dev mailing list
> infinispan-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/infinispan-dev
_______________________________________________
infinispan-dev mailing list
infinispan-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/infinispan-dev
--
Manik Surtani
manik(a)jboss.org
twitter.com/maniksurtani
Lead, Infinispan
http://www.infinispan.org