Hi Olaf,
On Mar 28, 2011, at 1:42 PM, Olaf Bergner wrote:
Hello,
I've decided that Spring Infinispan is where it ought to be right now,
feature-wise and documentation-wise. There's obviously a lot that could
be done to improve it. Yet I don't deem it prudent to go any further as
long as the fine folks over in Spring land are pondering whether and in
what way to accept our offer. If you wish, you may have a look at what
I've done so far at
https://github.com/obergner/spring-infinispan
Hmmm, very weird, I'm getting "This tree seems to be invalid" errors when
navigating through the code?
So, time permitting, I'm willing to tackle the next challenge and
thought about turning my attention to either
https://issues.jboss.org/browse/ISPN-78 - Large Object Support
or
https://issues.jboss.org/browse/ISPN-984 - Add ability to retrieve cache
names remotely in Hot Rod,
depending on which of the two you consider to be more pressing at the
moment. Of course, I'm willing to take on other tasks in case there's
something that needs to be done more urgently. What do you think?
Actually, it would be a good time to do
https://issues.jboss.org/browse/ISPN-78 cos it
requires new API and if we're gonna add new API, better do it in the 5.0 timeframe.
As indicated in a separate email, we've decided against
https://issues.jboss.org/browse/ISPN-984 for the time being since we don't want to
polute the Hot Rod protocol
Cheers,
Olaf
_______________________________________________
infinispan-dev mailing list
infinispan-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/infinispan-dev
--
Galder Zamarreño
Sr. Software Engineer
Infinispan, JBoss Cache