Re: [infinispan-dev] JGroups 2.8 and Infinispan

Guys I am seeing problems here again. Vladimir, you mentioned the problems you saw earlier had to do with nodes not being in the initial TCPPING discovery list. In one of my dist rehash tests, I see this as well, although I don't think it has to do with the initial discovery list. The test (will be in SVN soon) is o.i.distribution.RehashTest#testNoDataLoss() The test starts 3 caches, populates state. So far so good. Adds 3 more caches to the cluster. Now here, in the process of adding these, some of the original nodes cannot "see" some new nodes even though views have been installed, leading to dropped packets. (the next part of the test kills the 3 original nodes, but the test never gets this far). This is the sort of message we see in the logs. Wonder if the "no physical address" bit sheds any light. (Note that the JGroups address has been replaced with CACHE1..CACHE6 in the logs for readability) 2009-06-11 11:28:59,854 WARN [org.jgroups.protocols.TCP] (OOB-6,Infinispan-Cluster,CACHE3) no physical address for CACHE5, dropping message Also, just so you know, this works perfectly well with JGroups 2.7.0.GA. Any thoughts/ideas? Cheers -- Manik Surtani manik(a)jboss.org Lead, Infinispan Lead, JBoss Cache http://www.infinispan.org http://www.jbosscache.org _______________________________________________ infinispan-dev mailing list infinispan-dev(a)lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/infinispan-dev