Interesting. Do you see any immediate possibilities?
On 15 Oct 2012, at 10:53, Galder Zamarreño <galder(a)redhat.com> wrote:
FYI:
http://gee.cs.oswego.edu/dl/jsr166/dist/jsr166edocs/jsr166e/StampedLock.html
Could some our internal locks (not requiring reentrancy) be moved to this?
Cheers,
Begin forwarded message:
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 2
> Date: Fri, 12 Oct 2012 10:19:42 -0400
> From: Doug Lea <dl(a)cs.oswego.edu>
> To: "Concurrency-interest(a)cs.oswego.edu"
> <Concurrency-interest(a)cs.oswego.edu>
> Subject: [concurrency-interest] StampedLock
> Message-ID: <507826FE.7010107(a)cs.oswego.edu>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
>
>
> As promised (several months ago) an initial version of
> class jsr166e.StampedLock is now available. This is
> a combined write/read/optimistic lock that has some nice
> properties and good performance. For description, see
>
http://gee.cs.oswego.edu/dl/jsr166/dist/jsr166edocs/jsr166e/StampedLock.html
> And see the usual links from
>
http://gee.cs.oswego.edu/dl/concurrency-interest/index.html
> for jsr166e jars and sources.
>
> Reports about usage experiences would be very welcome!
>
> SequenceLock is now moved to "jsr166e.extra" and no longer
> a candidate for inclusion in JDK8.
>
> -Doug
>
--
Galder Zamarreño
galder(a)redhat.com
twitter.com/galderz
Project Lead, Escalante
http://escalante.io
Engineer, Infinispan
http://infinispan.org
_______________________________________________
infinispan-dev mailing list
infinispan-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/infinispan-dev
--
Manik Surtani
manik(a)jboss.org
twitter.com/maniksurtani
Platform Architect, JBoss Data Grid
http://red.ht/data-grid