Re: [infinispan-dev] Should Tree module be deprecated?
+1 to deprecate it, then we can deprecate AtomicHashMap as well :)
OTOH the scenario in the question seems really basic, we should have
some distributed mode tests to cover it, even if we decide to
deprecate the module.
Dan
On Thu, Apr 7, 2016 at 3:20 PM, Tristan Tarrant <ttarrant(a)redhat.com> wrote:
We should really try to understand the reason why people want a
treecache. If it is just for ease of porting from JBossCache, then we
should write an article detailing different strategies on migrating to
the Map before we proceed with the deprecation (although I'm strongly in
favour of it).
Tristan
On 01/04/2016 18:47, William Burns wrote:
> I think we should at least deprecate it for 9.0, if not totally remove
> it (although I understand we probably can't remove it yet)
>
> TreeCache seems to pop up a lot with people complaining about it.
>
> - Will
>
> On Tue, Mar 29, 2016 at 3:48 AM Galder Zamarreño <galder(a)redhat.com
> <mailto:galder@redhat.com>> wrote:
>
> Re:
>
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/29673123/infinispan-treecache-not-gett...
>
> Cheers,
> --
> Galder Zamarreño
> Infinispan, Red Hat
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> infinispan-dev mailing list
> infinispan-dev(a)lists.jboss.org <mailto:infinispan-dev@lists.jboss.org>
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/infinispan-dev
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> infinispan-dev mailing list
> infinispan-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/infinispan-dev
>
--
Tristan Tarrant
Infinispan Lead
JBoss, a division of Red Hat
_______________________________________________
infinispan-dev mailing list
infinispan-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/infinispan-dev