On Nov 29, 2013, at 1:46 PM, Mark Little <mlittle(a)redhat.com> wrote:
Why do you think there are no consistency guarantees? Again this may
be a difference in the way you use the term 1PC versus how it's used and implemented
elsewhere.
Indedd, 1PC here has to do with the consensus protocol used by Infinispan internally to
update the same data on multiple nodes. Doesn't have to do with the
XAResource.commit(xid, isOnePhase) at all (we actually plan to implement that 1PC
optimization in the case a single node needs to be updated).
Mark.
On 8 Nov 2013, at 15:28, Mircea Markus wrote:
> 4. Remove 1PC option
> - I'm not totally sure about it, but does it really make sense to have 1PC as an
option? they don't offer any consistency guarantees so async API + non tx do about the
same thing
Cheers,
--
Mircea Markus
Infinispan lead (
www.infinispan.org)