All, I've managed to replicate this locally and I'm now looking at the heap
dumps.
Cheers,
On May 27, 2013, at 5:34 PM, Galder Zamarreño <galder(a)redhat.com> wrote:
Hmmmm, not the expected results. There's no way we should be
consuming more memory per entry. It should definitely be less, particularly for Hot Rod
and Memcached and about the same for REST. The fact that all of them grow seems to be
there's an issue in the core impl.
@Martin, can you generate a heap dump, say for Hot Rod (with 512b entries) at the end of
the test (when the cache is still populated)?
Cheers,
On May 24, 2013, at 2:50 PM, Martin Gencur <mgencur(a)redhat.com> wrote:
> Hi,
> so I gave it another try with latest Infinispan and Infinispan-server snapshots
(HEAD: a901168, resp. bc432fa) . In short, the results are still the same for inVM mode
but worse for client-server mode. Of course, I haven't changed anything in the test
since last time.
>
> This time, I left out the results for 1MB entries because there's high distortion
due to the low number of entries stored in a cache (storing 100MB of data).
Previously, the results looked better for HotRod compared to the first round of tests I
did for ISPN 5.2. Now the results for HotRod are worst of the three measurements, inVM
mode remains the same:
>
> HotRod (ISPN 5.2):
> entry size -> overhead per entry
> 512B -> 174B
> 1kB -> 178B
> 10kB -> 176B
>
> HotRod (ISPN 5.3-SNAPSHOT, a few weeks ago)
> 512B -> 159 (~ -9%)
> 1kB -> 159 (~ -11%)
> 10kB -> 154 (this is perhaps affected by the low number of entries stored in
mem.)
>
> HotRod (ISPN 5.3-SNAPSHOT, now)
> 512B -> 191
> 1kB -> 191 (measured twice)
> 10kB -> 186 (looks a bit distorted already)
>
> ------------------------
>
> Memcached (ISPN 5.2)
> 512B -> 184
> 1kB -> 181
> 10kB -> 182
>
> Memcached (ISPN 5.3-SNAPSHOT)
> 512 -> 228
> 1kB -> 227
> 10kB -> 235
>
> --------------------------------
>
> REST (ISPN 5.2)
> 512B -> 208
> 1kB -> 205
> 10kB -> 206
>
> REST (ISPN 5.3-SNAPSHOT)
> 512 -> 247
> 1kB -> 247
> 10kB -> 251
>
> ------------------------------------
>
> inVM (ISPN 5.2)
> 512B -> 151
> 1kB -> 151
> 10kB -> 155
>
> inVM (ISPN 5.3-SNAPSHOT)
> 512 -> 150
> 1kB -> 150
> 10kB -> 150
>
>
> Martin
>
>
> Dne 23.5.2013 18:13, Mircea Markus napsal(a):
>> Hi Martin,
>>
>> Galder has finalised the remaining bits of ISPN-2281. Is it possible for you to
re-run the test to see where we are with the memory consumption?
>>
>> On 13 May 2013, at 10:44, Galder Zamarreño
>> <galder(a)redhat.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>
>>>> On May 7, 2013, at 4:55 PM, Manik Surtani <msurtani(a)redhat.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> On 7 May 2013, at 15:39, Martin Gencur <mgencur(a)redhat.com>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> I can make a blog post once we have this for Memcached and REST.
I guess it is not ready yet.
>>>>>>
>>>>> Yes please. Nice work. :)
>>>>>
>> Cheers,
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> infinispan-dev mailing list
> infinispan-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/infinispan-dev
--
Galder Zamarreño
galder(a)redhat.com
twitter.com/galderz
Project Lead, Escalante
http://escalante.io
Engineer, Infinispan
http://infinispan.org
_______________________________________________
infinispan-dev mailing list
infinispan-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/infinispan-dev