On 6 Apr 2010, at 19:37, Manik Surtani wrote:
On 2 Apr 2010, at 00:59, Mircea Markus wrote:
>> I foresee making the hash space size a tuning parameter in the future. This is
independent of hash function used.
> Are all the hash functions going to have an hash space parameter? Other functions
might need some additional config params. What about not "hardcoding" params in
the protocol itself, but use a generic way to send them over:
> ... bytes[ h f version] [param number] [param name 1] [param value 1] etc.
> Each function should be able to read its own params.
I don't see what other params could exist? Any examples?
nr of virtual nodes
for a different implementation. In future we might also want to send the number of owners.
Another impl might come with its own params.
--
Manik Surtani
manik(a)jboss.org
Lead, Infinispan
Lead, JBoss Cache
http://www.infinispan.org
http://www.jbosscache.org
_______________________________________________
infinispan-dev mailing list
infinispan-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/infinispan-dev