Re: [infinispan-dev] Fwd: still to do on HR-embedded integration in ISPN-2281
Hey,
so I have some good news. I've re-ran my tests for memory consumption
where I store 100MB of data and here's the results for in-VM mode and
client-server with HotRod:
Previously, the memory overhead for HotRod was (can be found at
http://infinispan.blogspot.cz/2013/01/infinispan-memory-overhead.html):
entry size -> overhead per entry
512B -> ~174B
1kB -> ~178B
10kB -> ~176B
1MB -> ~245B
Now it is:
512B -> ~159 (~ -9%)
1kB -> ~159 (~ -11%)
10kB -> ~154 (this is perhaps affected by the low number of entries
stored in mem.)
1MB -> ~184 (the same applies here)
For in-VM mode it was:
512B -> ~151B
1kB -> ~151B
10kB -> ~155B
1MB -> ~143B
Now it is:
512B -> ~150
1kB -> ~150
10kB -> ~149 (this is perhaps affected by the low number of entries
stored in mem.)
1MB -> ~143 (the same applies here)
Summary: Almost no change for in-VM mode but a nice improvement for the
HotRod client.
I can make a blog post once we have this for Memcached and REST. I guess
it is not ready yet.
Cheers,
Martin
Dne 6.5.2013 08:57, Martin Gencur napsal(a):
Hi Mircea,
yes, I'll try to run the tests this week.
Martin
Dne 3.5.2013 00:40, Mircea Markus napsal(a):
> Hi Martin,
>
> The server memory consumption should improve now that we have
> ISPN-2281 integrated. would it be possible to run the memory
> consumption tests to see where we are?
>
> Begin forwarded message:
>>> I've just integrated the implementation for ISPN-2281 - great stuff!
>>>
>>>
>>> As this is a very intrusive change it is important to know to
>>> measure the gain in memory consumption. i.e. would be great to see
>>> some figures on memory usage before this optimisation and after it
>>> in your blog post.
>> ^ QE guys have some memory tests already, why don't we get them to
>> re-run those tests? :)
> Cheers,
Attachments:
- attachment.html (text/html — 4.1 KB)