Am 20.04.11 00:35, schrieb Mircea Markus:
On 19 Apr 2011, at 18:17, Olaf Bergner wrote:
> Am 19.04.11 16:59, schrieb Mircea Markus:
> I personally favor a separate dedicated interface, e.g. StreamingCache
> as has been suggested, and maybe a method getStreamingCache() on Cache.
yes, that would do it indeed. Just not sure about the name: as long as you have Cache in
it users might expect to extend the Cache interface. StreamingHandler perhaps?
Yes,
I like that. This name suggests that the object returned will
handle streams on behalf of the cache returning it. And this is
precisely what StreamingHandler does. Barring any opposition I will go on to
* move existing logic to StreamingHandlerImpl and
* add and implement Cache.getStreamingHandler()
OK?
>> _______________________________________________
>> infinispan-dev mailing list
>> infinispan-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/infinispan-dev
>>
> _______________________________________________
> infinispan-dev mailing list
> infinispan-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/infinispan-dev
_______________________________________________
infinispan-dev mailing list
infinispan-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/infinispan-dev