On 21 March 2016 at 13:30, Pedro Ruivo <pedro(a)infinispan.org> wrote:
On 03/21/2016 12:53 PM, Sanne Grinovero wrote:
>
> I'd rather question why this wasn't done than question which use cases
> are appropriate, as I don't see what benefit it brings to consider
> each cache a different resource? Am I missing a trade-off or is it
> fair to say that there are no drawbacks in improving this?
I'm not aware of any issue with it except code simplicity :)
I've added this to 9.x wishlist.
Thanks!