Using a common annotation sounds good but a down side is that the
annotation shares the package with a set of other annotations we do not
support - users my inadvertently think these are supported as well.
Regards,
Darran Lofthouse.
On 06/10/2011 05:09 PM, Marcus Moyses wrote:
I think it would be a good idea to use the same annotation for
servlets
too.
If the EJB3 team is ok with using PB's annotation I can take a look at
integration it with servlets
On 06/10/2011 01:06 PM, Darran Lofthouse wrote:
> On 06/10/2011 05:03 PM, Marcus Moyses wrote:
>>> i.e. Specifying the<security-domain> element in the deployment
>>> descriptors or using the SecurityDomain annotation on specific beans.
>> Yes, the<security-domain> element is still used, at least in WARs. I
>> think it should be used for EARs as well.
>> There is SecurityDomain annotation in the PicketBox project but it has
>> never been used for EJB3s. I think we should start using it to avoid
>> having 2 different annotations. Customers get confused with that.
>>> Has there been any consideration regarding assigning a security domain
>>> as part of the actual deployment process i.e. deploy this archive and
>>> use domain X.
>
> Is there any plan to use this annotation with servlets?