On 4/18/11 9:56 AM, David M. Lloyd wrote:
On 04/18/2011 09:51 AM, Brian Stansberry wrote:
> If we're going to do it as a true deployment (i.e. one that shows up in
> the config file's<deployments> section and not a hack like we did in
> Alpha1 for the jdbc rars) then we need to do JBAS-9020 and treat it as
> "unmanaged" content
>
> <deployment name="ROOT.war" runtime-name="ROOT.war">
> <fs-archive path="ROOT.war"
> relative-to="jboss.server.system.content.dir"/>
> </deployment>
>
> Treating it as managed content ain't gonna fly.
>
> <!-- No way!
> <deployment name="ROOT.war" runtime-name="ROOT.war">
> <content id="d37ede977b022a1456ec5e7a5eee07549cb1c414"/>
> </deployment>
> -->
Yeah this is what I was getting at. To Remy's point though we will
probably want a nice name like "jboss-welcome.war" or something.
Yeah I agree that 9020 is the way to go IF it makes sense as a deployment.
--
Jason T. Greene
JBoss, a division of Red Hat