I think Jason comment about the "Gold Master" is a very good one. It's what
the vast majority of our customers do, so I think that the use case for having data
sources and their driver be a module will be more common than we may have thought before.
Andy
----- Original Message -----
From: "Brian Stansberry"
<brian.stansberry(a)redhat.com>
To: jboss-as7-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
Sent: Monday, June 6, 2011 8:02:55 AM
Subject: Re: [jboss-as7-dev] How to install a JDBC driver as a module
via CLI or console?
On 6/6/11 2:15 AM, Heiko Braun wrote:
>
> On Jun 6, 2011, at 9:09 AM, Jaikiran Pai wrote:
>
>>> when creating a datasource.
>> As a deployment, it's easy. But deploying it as a module is more
>> involved and most of it is
>>
boilerplatehttp://community.jboss.org/wiki/DataSourceConfigurationinAS7#I....
>> So I was thinking if we should simplify adding it as a module via
>> admin console (autogenerate the module.xml and other stuff based
>> on
>> the user input) or even the CLI perhaps. Having said that, I don't
>> know how many users will be opting for deploying the JDBC driver
>> as a
>> module.
>
>
>
> The question is: why would you chose a module configuration opposed
> to a
> deployment?
> To be honest, I cannot tell the difference. It will probably have a
> different scope/visibility, no?
>
This post on a separate thread explains the use case for using a
module:
At this point the assumption is that modules are provisioned by the
end
user as part of their process of install the AS on the system. That
is,
the users copy the module to the modules/ dir. As Jason mentions
above,
at some point we'd like to add capabilities to the management layer
to
assist users with this. But it's not going to happen for 7.0 and
isn't a
critical requirement for 7.1.
--
Brian Stansberry
Principal Software Engineer
JBoss by Red Hat
_______________________________________________
jboss-as7-dev mailing list
jboss-as7-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jboss-as7-dev