[JBoss JIRA] Created: (JBXB-90) Wildcard bindings are not detected in complicated/nested model groups
by Adrian Brock (JIRA)
Wildcard bindings are not detected in complicated/nested model groups
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Key: JBXB-90
URL: http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBXB-90
Project: JBoss XML Binding (JBossXB)
Issue Type: Bug
Affects Versions: JBossXB-1.0.0.CR7
Reporter: Adrian Brock
Assigned To: Adrian Brock
Fix For: JBossXB-1.0
Nested wilcard bindings are not detected if the model group contains a nested wildcard with
another nested model group before the wildcard.
This example shows the problem:
<xsd:complexType name="nested-wildcard" mixed="true">
<xsd:sequence>
<xsd:element name="e1" type="xsd:string"/>
<xsd:choice minOccurs="0">
<!-- This nested model group "masks" the later wildcard binding -->
<xsd:sequence>
<xsd:element name="e2" type="xsd:string" minOccurs="0"/>
<xsd:element name="e3" type="xsd:string" minOccurs="0" maxOccurs="unbounded"/>
</xsd:sequence>
<xsd:element name="e4" type="xsd:string"/>
<xsd:any namespace="##other" processContents="strict"/>
</xsd:choice>
</xsd:sequence>
</xsd:complexType>
I've created a NestedWilcardUnitTestCase for this.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://jira.jboss.com/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
19 years, 8 months
[JBoss JIRA] Created: (JBESB-244) Transient junit failures running tests
by Kevin Conner (JIRA)
Transient junit failures running tests
--------------------------------------
Key: JBESB-244
URL: http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBESB-244
Project: JBoss ESB
Issue Type: Bug
Security Level: Public (Everyone can see)
Reporter: Kevin Conner
Assigned To: Kevin Conner
I have been seeing transient junit failures while running the tests. This failure manifiests itself as the corruption of the junit report files.
The corruption of the files is caused by the HSQL database issuing a call to System.exit() before junit has managed to write the complete report.
The utility classes should be modified to pass in the '-no_system_exit true' configuration parameter when starting the invm database.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://jira.jboss.com/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
19 years, 8 months
[JBoss JIRA] Created: (JBMICROCONT-111) ControllerContext state is updated outside the controller's lock
by Adrian Brock (JIRA)
ControllerContext state is updated outside the controller's lock
----------------------------------------------------------------
Key: JBMICROCONT-111
URL: http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBMICROCONT-111
Project: JBoss MicroContainer
Issue Type: Bug
Components: Dependency
Affects Versions: JBossMC_2_0_0M1
Reporter: Adrian Brock
Assigned To: Adrian Brock
Fix For: JBossMC_2_0_0 Beta
The controller context state is updated outside the read/write lock of the controller
in the install/uninstall callbacks of AbstractControllerContext
This can lead to race conditions like JBAS-3865
The context state should be updated at the same time as the controller's internal state.
This requires a change to the spi to introduce
ControllerContext.setState()
For anybody extending AbstractControllerContext (which includes all JBoss impls)
this change will picked up automatically.
For any others, the updating of the state needs to be moved from the install/uninstall methods
to the new method of that implementation.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://jira.jboss.com/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
19 years, 8 months
[JBoss JIRA] Created: (JBAS-3880) java.rmi.ConnectException: Failed to communicate (java.net.SocketTimeoutException: Read timed out)
by nishu_saini (JIRA)
java.rmi.ConnectException: Failed to communicate (java.net.SocketTimeoutException: Read timed out)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Key: JBAS-3880
URL: http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBAS-3880
Project: JBoss Application Server
Issue Type: Bug
Security Level: Public (Everyone can see)
Components: EJB2
Affects Versions: JBossAS-4.0.4RC1, JBossAS-4.0.3 SP1
Environment: Windows 2003 Server, Windows XP, J2SDK 1.4.2, JDK 1.5.0_09
Reporter: nishu_saini
Assigned To: Scott M Stark
Hi
I have a client application which is accessing a Remote EJB deployed over JBoss AS 4.0.4 RC1 and JBoss AS 4.0.3 SP1. The client sends and recieves some large chunks of data to and from the server. But the following exception has started to come on client very frequently. Can we increase The Time out? Is the time out occurring during the reciept or sending of data or during the ping pong between server and client?
How can we solve this problem? What is the cause of this problem?
java.rmi.ConnectException: Failed to communicate; nested exception is:
java.net.SocketTimeoutException: Read timed out
at org.jboss.invocation.pooled.interfaces.PooledInvokerProxy.invoke(PooledInvokerProxy.java:382)
at org.jboss.invocation.InvokerInterceptor.invokeInvoker(InvokerInterceptor.java:227)
at org.jboss.invocation.InvokerInterceptor.invoke(InvokerInterceptor.java:167)
at org.jboss.proxy.TransactionInterceptor.invoke(TransactionInterceptor.java:46)
at org.jboss.proxy.SecurityInterceptor.invoke(SecurityInterceptor.java:55)
at org.jboss.proxy.ejb.StatelessSessionInterceptor.invoke(StatelessSessionInterceptor.java:97)
at org.jboss.proxy.ClientContainer.invoke(ClientContainer.java:86)
... 8 more
Caused by: java.net.SocketTimeoutException: Read timed out
at java.net.SocketInputStream.socketRead0(Native Method)
at java.net.SocketInputStream.read(Unknown Source)
at java.io.BufferedInputStream.fill(Unknown Source)
at java.io.BufferedInputStream.read(Unknown Source)
at java.io.ObjectInputStream$PeekInputStream.peek(Unknown Source)
at java.io.ObjectInputStream$BlockDataInputStream.peek(Unknown Source)
at java.io.ObjectInputStream$BlockDataInputStream.peekByte(Unknown Source)
at java.io.ObjectInputStream.readObject0(Unknown Source)
at java.io.ObjectInputStream.readObject(Unknown Source)
at org.jboss.invocation.pooled.interfaces.PooledInvokerProxy.invoke(PooledInvokerProxy.java:366)
... 14 more
If any body finds the solution of this problem, please tell us.
Thanks
Nishant Saini
http://www.simplyjava.com
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://jira.jboss.com/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
19 years, 8 months
[JBoss JIRA] Commented: (JBAS-3158) Need a way to detect collisions between JSF RI and JSF MyFaces
by Dimitris Andreadis (JIRA)
[ http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBAS-3158?page=comments#action_12347751 ]
Dimitris Andreadis commented on JBAS-3158:
------------------------------------------
Stan, do you want to schedule this for 4.2.0.CR1 ?
> Need a way to detect collisions between JSF RI and JSF MyFaces
> --------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: JBAS-3158
> URL: http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBAS-3158
> Project: JBoss Application Server
> Issue Type: Feature Request
> Security Level: Public(Everyone can see)
> Reporter: Stan Silvert
> Assigned To: Stan Silvert
> Priority: Minor
>
> Developers who choose to bundle the Sun JSF Reference Implementation with their WAR will get strange errors like ERROR [javax.faces.webapp.UIComponentTag] Faces context not found. getResponseWriter will fail. Check if the FacesServlet has been initialized at all in your web.xml.
> This is because of collisions between classes provided in both implementations which are required to have the same javax.faces package name. We should be able to detect if the RI is present and tell the user to either remove the RI, remove MyFaces, or scope the deployment.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://jira.jboss.com/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
19 years, 8 months