[JBoss JIRA] Created: (GPD-33) remember the previous form generation data fields
by Koen Aers (JIRA)
remember the previous form generation data fields
-------------------------------------------------
Key: GPD-33
URL: http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/GPD-33
Project: JBoss jBPM GPD
Issue Type: Feature Request
Components: jpdl
Affects Versions: jBPM JPDL Designer 3.1.0 alpha1
Reporter: Koen Aers
Assigned To: Koen Aers
Fix For: jBPM JPDL Designer 3.1.0.alpha3
In the form generation, we currently start from the data entered in the task controller (if any)
Whenever a form is generated, I would like the form generation data to be stored in the gpd.xml. Then, whenever the user does a second generation, the taskform generation form is prefilled with the previous data instead of starting from the controller data again.
The motivation for this is that mostly people will not have controllers. Then if they have 5 data items to display and collect, it takes a lot of clicking. Users don't want to redo this effort for every little change they want to make to the form (additions and removals of fields).
I think users should be able to live with the fact that controller data items are not kept automatically in sync with the task form data items.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://jira.jboss.com/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
16 years, 5 months
[JBoss JIRA] Created: (GPD-20) refactor naming strategy
by Koen Aers (JIRA)
refactor naming strategy
------------------------
Key: GPD-20
URL: http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/GPD-20
Project: JBoss jBPM GPD
Issue Type: Task
Components: jpdl
Affects Versions: jBPM JPDL Designer 3.1.0 alpha1
Reporter: Koen Aers
Assigned To: Koen Aers
Fix For: jBPM JPDL Designer 3.1.0.alpha3
1) generate default node names when nodes are created: {node1, node2, ...}. use this naming strategy for each node type.
2) do not generate a node name for the start-state. users should be able to give the start-state a name, though.
3) use the following naming strategy for end states: {end, end2, end3, end4, ...}
4) do not generate names for transitions. the problem reporting should generate warnings if a node-type requires named nodes. the correlation between the graphical information and the processdefinition.xml will be done based on the position (index), rather then on the name.
5) disallow slashes in names in a process definition (nodes, transitions, process definition, actions, ...) Because slashes will be used as a separator in hierarchical names. We should also investigate if it would be useful to specify a strict set of chars that can be used like e.g. 0-9,a-z,A-Z,space,dot
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://jira.jboss.com/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
16 years, 5 months
[JBoss JIRA] Created: (GPD-31) Make sure all tasks in a process definition have a unique name
by Koen Aers (JIRA)
Make sure all tasks in a process definition have a unique name
--------------------------------------------------------------
Key: GPD-31
URL: http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/GPD-31
Project: JBoss jBPM GPD
Issue Type: Task
Components: jpdl
Affects Versions: jBPM JPDL Designer 3.1.0 alpha1
Reporter: Koen Aers
Assigned To: Koen Aers
Fix For: jBPM JPDL Designer 3.1.0.alpha3
When retrieving all tasks from a process definition like so:
processDefinition.getTaskMgmtDefinition().getTasks()
it returns a MAP of tasks, keyed by task name. This is a problem if two tasks anywhere in the same process definition have the same name.
By default, the GPD creates all tasks as "task1" when it is the first task on a task node. If none of these were renamed, you would only get a single task when trying to get all of them for the process definition.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://jira.jboss.com/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
16 years, 5 months
[JBoss JIRA] Created: (JBAS-3521) OptimisticLockUnitTestCase Intermittently Fails
by Matt Wringe (JIRA)
OptimisticLockUnitTestCase Intermittently Fails
-----------------------------------------------
Key: JBAS-3521
URL: http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBAS-3521
Project: JBoss Application Server
Issue Type: Bug
Security Level: Public (Everyone can see)
Components: Test Suite
Affects Versions: JBossAS-4.0.4.GA
Environment: Sun 1.4.2_12 JVM
RHEL 4, Linux Kernel 2.6.9
Reporter: Matt Wringe
The OptimisticLockUnitTestCase testBug1006723 test seems to fail randomly. This is a known issue, and is described here:
http://wiki.jboss.org/wiki/Wiki.jsp?page=TestsuiteTroubleShooting
But there does not appear to be a bug filed about this issue, nor can I find bug 1006723
"Problem OptimisticLockUnitTestCase fails
Suite: org.jboss.test.cmp2.optimisticlock.test.OptimisticLockUnitTestCase Test: testBug1006723 Type: error Exception: javax.ejb.CreateException Message: Error checking if entity exists:java.sql.SQLException: Column not found: \ OIDCMP in statement SELECT COUNT(*) FROM ENTITYA WHERE OIDCMP=?
This test passes intermintently. Run it a few times"
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://jira.jboss.com/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
16 years, 6 months
[JBoss JIRA] Created: (JBAS-3405) Unable to secure JMX Invoker
by amdonov (JIRA)
Unable to secure JMX Invoker
----------------------------
Key: JBAS-3405
URL: http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBAS-3405
Project: JBoss Application Server
Issue Type: Bug
Security Level: Public (Everyone can see)
Affects Versions: JBossAS-4.0.3 SP1
Environment: Windows Sun JDK 1.5
Reporter: amdonov
I am having the same problem securing the JMX invoker as the user in the referenced forum thread. However, I'm running 4.0.4.GA instead of 4.0.3 SP1. When, performing a clean installation using the installer. I selected the default configuration and elected to secure the invokers. The install completes without error. JBoss has the following error which is unfortunatly only written at the DEBUG level.
2006-07-20 10:40:47,541 DEBUG [org.jboss.mx.modelmbean.ModelMBeanInvoker] Failed to invoke ctor(MBeanInvoker) for: class org.jboss.jmx.connector.invoker.AuthenticationInterceptor
java.lang.NoSuchMethodException: org.jboss.jmx.connector.invoker.AuthenticationInterceptor.<init>(org.jboss.mx.server.MBeanInvoker)
at java.lang.Class.getConstructor0(Class.java:2647)
at java.lang.Class.getConstructor(Class.java:1629)
at org.jboss.mx.modelmbean.ModelMBeanInvoker.getInterceptors(ModelMBeanInvoker.java:739)
at org.jboss.mx.modelmbean.ModelMBeanInvoker.configureInterceptorStack(ModelMBeanInvoker.java:678)
at org.jboss.mx.modelmbean.XMBean.configureInterceptorStack(XMBean.java:400)
at org.jboss.mx.modelmbean.ModelMBeanInvoker.init(ModelMBeanInvoker.java:504)
at org.jboss.mx.modelmbean.ModelMBeanInvoker.invokePreRegister(ModelMBeanInvoker.java:486)
at org.jboss.mx.server.AbstractMBeanInvoker.preRegister(AbstractMBeanInvoker.java:654)
at org.jboss.mx.server.registry.BasicMBeanRegistry.invokePreRegister(BasicMBeanRegistry.java:697)
at org.jboss.mx.server.registry.BasicMBeanRegistry.registerMBean(BasicMBeanRegistry.java:211)
at sun.reflect.GeneratedMethodAccessor2.invoke(Unknown Source)
at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:25)
at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:585)
at org.jboss.mx.interceptor.ReflectedDispatcher.invoke(ReflectedDispatcher.java:155)
at org.jboss.mx.server.Invocation.dispatch(Invocation.java:94)
at org.jboss.mx.interceptor.AbstractInterceptor.invoke(AbstractInterceptor.java:133)
at org.jboss.mx.server.Invocation.invoke(Invocation.java:88)
at org.jboss.mx.interceptor.ModelMBeanOperationInterceptor.invoke(ModelMBeanOperationInterceptor.java:142)
at org.jboss.mx.server.Invocation.invoke(Invocation.java:88)
at org.jboss.mx.server.AbstractMBeanInvoker.invoke(AbstractMBeanInvoker.java:264)
at org.jboss.mx.server.MBeanServerImpl.invoke(MBeanServerImpl.java:659)
at org.jboss.mx.server.MBeanServerImpl$3.run(MBeanServerImpl.java:1422)
at java.security.AccessController.doPrivileged(Native Method)
at org.jboss.mx.server.MBeanServerImpl.registerMBean(MBeanServerImpl.java:1417)
at org.jboss.mx.server.MBeanServerImpl.registerMBean(MBeanServerImpl.java:1350)
at org.jboss.mx.server.MBeanServerImpl.createMBean(MBeanServerImpl.java:345)
at org.jboss.system.ServiceCreator.install(ServiceCreator.java:181)
at org.jboss.system.ServiceConfigurator.internalInstall(ServiceConfigurator.java:449)
at org.jboss.system.ServiceConfigurator.install(ServiceConfigurator.java:171)
at org.jboss.system.ServiceController.install(ServiceController.java:226)
at sun.reflect.GeneratedMethodAccessor7.invoke(Unknown Source)
at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:25)
at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:585)
at org.jboss.mx.interceptor.ReflectedDispatcher.invoke(ReflectedDispatcher.java:155)
at org.jboss.mx.server.Invocation.dispatch(Invocation.java:94)
at org.jboss.mx.server.Invocation.invoke(Invocation.java:86)
at org.jboss.mx.server.AbstractMBeanInvoker.invoke(AbstractMBeanInvoker.java:264)
at org.jboss.mx.server.MBeanServerImpl.invoke(MBeanServerImpl.java:659)
at org.jboss.mx.util.MBeanProxyExt.invoke(MBeanProxyExt.java:210)
at $Proxy4.install(Unknown Source)
at org.jboss.deployment.SARDeployer.create(SARDeployer.java:249)
at org.jboss.deployment.MainDeployer.create(MainDeployer.java:953)
at org.jboss.deployment.MainDeployer.deploy(MainDeployer.java:807)
at org.jboss.deployment.MainDeployer.deploy(MainDeployer.java:771)
at sun.reflect.GeneratedMethodAccessor8.invoke(Unknown Source)
at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:25)
at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:585)
at org.jboss.mx.interceptor.ReflectedDispatcher.invoke(ReflectedDispatcher.java:155)
at org.jboss.mx.server.Invocation.dispatch(Invocation.java:94)
at org.jboss.mx.interceptor.AbstractInterceptor.invoke(AbstractInterceptor.java:133)
at org.jboss.mx.server.Invocation.invoke(Invocation.java:88)
at org.jboss.mx.interceptor.ModelMBeanOperationInterceptor.invoke(ModelMBeanOperationInterceptor.java:142)
at org.jboss.mx.server.Invocation.invoke(Invocation.java:88)
at org.jboss.mx.server.AbstractMBeanInvoker.invoke(AbstractMBeanInvoker.java:264)
at org.jboss.mx.server.MBeanServerImpl.invoke(MBeanServerImpl.java:659)
at org.jboss.mx.util.MBeanProxyExt.invoke(MBeanProxyExt.java:210)
at $Proxy6.deploy(Unknown Source)
at org.jboss.deployment.scanner.URLDeploymentScanner.deploy(URLDeploymentScanner.java:421)
at org.jboss.deployment.scanner.URLDeploymentScanner.scan(URLDeploymentScanner.java:634)
at org.jboss.deployment.scanner.AbstractDeploymentScanner$ScannerThread.doScan(AbstractDeploymentScanner.java:263)
at org.jboss.deployment.scanner.AbstractDeploymentScanner.startService(AbstractDeploymentScanner.java:336)
at org.jboss.system.ServiceMBeanSupport.jbossInternalStart(ServiceMBeanSupport.java:289)
at org.jboss.system.ServiceMBeanSupport.jbossInternalLifecycle(ServiceMBeanSupport.java:245)
at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:39)
at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:25)
at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:585)
at org.jboss.mx.interceptor.ReflectedDispatcher.invoke(ReflectedDispatcher.java:155)
at org.jboss.mx.server.Invocation.dispatch(Invocation.java:94)
at org.jboss.mx.server.Invocation.invoke(Invocation.java:86)
at org.jboss.mx.server.AbstractMBeanInvoker.invoke(AbstractMBeanInvoker.java:264)
at org.jboss.mx.server.MBeanServerImpl.invoke(MBeanServerImpl.java:659)
at org.jboss.system.ServiceController$ServiceProxy.invoke(ServiceController.java:978)
at $Proxy0.start(Unknown Source)
at org.jboss.system.ServiceController.start(ServiceController.java:417)
at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:39)
at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:25)
at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:585)
at org.jboss.mx.interceptor.ReflectedDispatcher.invoke(ReflectedDispatcher.java:155)
at org.jboss.mx.server.Invocation.dispatch(Invocation.java:94)
at org.jboss.mx.server.Invocation.invoke(Invocation.java:86)
at org.jboss.mx.server.AbstractMBeanInvoker.invoke(AbstractMBeanInvoker.java:264)
at org.jboss.mx.server.MBeanServerImpl.invoke(MBeanServerImpl.java:659)
at org.jboss.mx.util.MBeanProxyExt.invoke(MBeanProxyExt.java:210)
at $Proxy4.start(Unknown Source)
at org.jboss.deployment.SARDeployer.start(SARDeployer.java:302)
at org.jboss.deployment.MainDeployer.start(MainDeployer.java:1007)
at org.jboss.deployment.MainDeployer.deploy(MainDeployer.java:808)
at org.jboss.deployment.MainDeployer.deploy(MainDeployer.java:771)
at org.jboss.deployment.MainDeployer.deploy(MainDeployer.java:755)
at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:39)
at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:25)
at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:585)
at org.jboss.mx.interceptor.ReflectedDispatcher.invoke(ReflectedDispatcher.java:155)
at org.jboss.mx.server.Invocation.dispatch(Invocation.java:94)
at org.jboss.mx.interceptor.AbstractInterceptor.invoke(AbstractInterceptor.java:133)
at org.jboss.mx.server.Invocation.invoke(Invocation.java:88)
at org.jboss.mx.interceptor.ModelMBeanOperationInterceptor.invoke(ModelMBeanOperationInterceptor.java:142)
at org.jboss.mx.server.Invocation.invoke(Invocation.java:88)
at org.jboss.mx.server.AbstractMBeanInvoker.invoke(AbstractMBeanInvoker.java:264)
at org.jboss.mx.server.MBeanServerImpl.invoke(MBeanServerImpl.java:659)
at org.jboss.mx.util.MBeanProxyExt.invoke(MBeanProxyExt.java:210)
at $Proxy5.deploy(Unknown Source)
at org.jboss.system.server.ServerImpl.doStart(ServerImpl.java:482)
at org.jboss.system.server.ServerImpl.start(ServerImpl.java:362)
at org.jboss.Main.boot(Main.java:200)
at org.jboss.Main$1.run(Main.java:464)
at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:595)
2006-07-20 10:40:47,551 DEBUG [org.jboss.system.ServiceCreator] Created bean:
Access to the adaptors is not restricted.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://jira.jboss.com/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
16 years, 8 months
[JBoss JIRA] Created: (JBAS-3644) ejbqltosql92compiler creates LEFT OUTER JOIN when INNER JOIN would be faster
by anajavi (JIRA)
ejbqltosql92compiler creates LEFT OUTER JOIN when INNER JOIN would be faster
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Key: JBAS-3644
URL: http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBAS-3644
Project: JBoss Application Server
Issue Type: Feature Request
Security Level: Public (Everyone can see)
Components: CMP service
Affects Versions: JBossAS-4.0.3 SP1
Environment: JBoss 4.0.3SP1, Sybase 12.5 (and Sybase 15.0)
Reporter: anajavi
Assigned To: Alexey Loubyansky
Ejbqltosql92compiler creates LEFT OUTER JOIN's when INNER JOIN could be used. This leads to bad performance, because database server does table scan instead of using index.
Running INNER JOIN instead of LEFT OUTER JOIN gives 10x better performance (0,6s/query vs. 0,06s/query).
I submitted this as a feature request because it is about performance, not bug. However, this bad performance prevents us from using cmp2.x jdbc2 pm, which we would seriously need.
I tried to go through ejbqltosql92compiler's source, but could not figure out a clean way to make it use INNER JOIN when joining is caused by a path in WHERE-clause (not containing OR).
I also tried tweaking RDBMS optimizer and upgrading to newer version, but it did not help.
Example:
Original EJBQL:
SELECT OBJECT(o) FROM Rooli AS o WHERE o.toimipaikka.yritys.id=?1 AND o.rooli.nimi=?2
Generated SQL:
SELECT t0_o.id, t0_o.sahkoposti, t0_o.oletusrooli, t0_o.elinkaaren_pvm, t0_o.elinkaaren_tila, t0_o.fk_henkilo, t0_o.fk_toimipaikka, t0_o.fk_kooditus_rooli, t0_o.meta_fk_creator, t0_o.fk_osoite
FROM rooli t0_o
LEFT OUTER JOIN kooditus_arvo t2_o_rooli ON t0_o.fk_kooditus_rooli=t2_o_rooli.id
LEFT OUTER JOIN toimipaikka t3_o_toimipaikka ON t0_o.fk_toimipaikka=t3_o_toimipaikka.id
LEFT OUTER JOIN yritys t1_o_toimipaikka_yritys ON t3_o_toimipaikka.fk_yritys=t1_o_toimipaikka_yritys.id
WHERE t1_o_toimipaikka_yritys.id = 42447 AND t2_o_rooli.nimi = 'aaa'
10x faster SQL:
SELECT t0_o.id, t0_o.sahkoposti, t0_o.oletusrooli, t0_o.elinkaaren_pvm, t0_o.elinkaaren_tila, t0_o.fk_henkilo, t0_o.fk_toimipaikka, t0_o.fk_kooditus_rooli, t0_o.meta_fk_creator, t0_o.fk_osoite
FROM rooli t0_o
INNER JOIN kooditus_arvo t2_o_rooli ON t0_o.fk_kooditus_rooli=t2_o_rooli.id
INNER JOIN toimipaikka t3_o_toimipaikka ON t0_o.fk_toimipaikka=t3_o_toimipaikka.id
INNER JOIN yritys t1_o_toimipaikka_yritys ON t3_o_toimipaikka.fk_yritys=t1_o_toimipaikka_yritys.id
WHERE t1_o_toimipaikka_yritys.id = 42447 AND t2_o_rooli.nimi = 'aaa'
Thank you.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://jira.jboss.com/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
16 years, 8 months