[JBoss JIRA] Closed: (JBAS-3158) Need a way to detect collisions between JSF RI and JSF MyFaces
by Stan Silvert (JIRA)
[ http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBAS-3158?page=all ]
Stan Silvert closed JBAS-3158.
------------------------------
Resolution: Done
> Need a way to detect collisions between JSF RI and JSF MyFaces
> --------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: JBAS-3158
> URL: http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBAS-3158
> Project: JBoss Application Server
> Issue Type: Feature Request
> Security Level: Public(Everyone can see)
> Components: JavaServerFaces
> Reporter: Stan Silvert
> Assigned To: Stan Silvert
> Priority: Minor
> Fix For: JBossAS-4.2.1.CR1
>
>
> Developers who choose to bundle the Sun JSF Reference Implementation with their WAR will get strange errors like ERROR [javax.faces.webapp.UIComponentTag] Faces context not found. getResponseWriter will fail. Check if the FacesServlet has been initialized at all in your web.xml.
> This is because of collisions between classes provided in both implementations which are required to have the same javax.faces package name. We should be able to detect if the RI is present and tell the user to either remove the RI, remove MyFaces, or scope the deployment.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://jira.jboss.com/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
19 years, 3 months
[JBoss JIRA] Updated: (JBAS-3158) Need a way to detect collisions between JSF RI and JSF MyFaces
by Stan Silvert (JIRA)
[ http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBAS-3158?page=all ]
Stan Silvert updated JBAS-3158:
-------------------------------
Component/s: JavaServerFaces
> Need a way to detect collisions between JSF RI and JSF MyFaces
> --------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: JBAS-3158
> URL: http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBAS-3158
> Project: JBoss Application Server
> Issue Type: Feature Request
> Security Level: Public(Everyone can see)
> Components: JavaServerFaces
> Reporter: Stan Silvert
> Assigned To: Stan Silvert
> Priority: Minor
> Fix For: JBossAS-4.2.1.CR1
>
>
> Developers who choose to bundle the Sun JSF Reference Implementation with their WAR will get strange errors like ERROR [javax.faces.webapp.UIComponentTag] Faces context not found. getResponseWriter will fail. Check if the FacesServlet has been initialized at all in your web.xml.
> This is because of collisions between classes provided in both implementations which are required to have the same javax.faces package name. We should be able to detect if the RI is present and tell the user to either remove the RI, remove MyFaces, or scope the deployment.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://jira.jboss.com/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
19 years, 3 months
[JBoss JIRA] Updated: (JBAS-3158) Need a way to detect collisions between JSF RI and JSF MyFaces
by Stan Silvert (JIRA)
[ http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBAS-3158?page=all ]
Stan Silvert updated JBAS-3158:
-------------------------------
Fix Version/s: JBossAS-4.2.1.CR1
Added a warning message in 4.2 if MyFaces classes can be loaded.
> Need a way to detect collisions between JSF RI and JSF MyFaces
> --------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: JBAS-3158
> URL: http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBAS-3158
> Project: JBoss Application Server
> Issue Type: Feature Request
> Security Level: Public(Everyone can see)
> Components: JavaServerFaces
> Reporter: Stan Silvert
> Assigned To: Stan Silvert
> Priority: Minor
> Fix For: JBossAS-4.2.1.CR1
>
>
> Developers who choose to bundle the Sun JSF Reference Implementation with their WAR will get strange errors like ERROR [javax.faces.webapp.UIComponentTag] Faces context not found. getResponseWriter will fail. Check if the FacesServlet has been initialized at all in your web.xml.
> This is because of collisions between classes provided in both implementations which are required to have the same javax.faces package name. We should be able to detect if the RI is present and tell the user to either remove the RI, remove MyFaces, or scope the deployment.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://jira.jboss.com/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
19 years, 3 months
[JBoss JIRA] Commented: (JBAS-2470) Test multiple partitions and subsequent merges using Gossip Router
by Jerry Gauthier (JIRA)
[ http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBAS-2470?page=comments#action_12351668 ]
Jerry Gauthier commented on JBAS-2470:
--------------------------------------
See JBAS-2560. Modified DRMTestCase.testIsMasterReplica() as specified to provide a test of multiple partitions with a subsequent merge using a GossipRouter.
This change was successfully implemented in 4.2.0.CR1; the cluster merged properly when the router was restarted.
This change was also implemented in 5.0.1.Beta2; the cluster failed to merge properly when the router was restarted. This is currently under investigation.
> Test multiple partitions and subsequent merges using Gossip Router
> ------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: JBAS-2470
> URL: http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBAS-2470
> Project: JBoss Application Server
> Issue Type: Task
> Security Level: Public(Everyone can see)
> Components: Clustering
> Reporter: Brian Stansberry
> Assigned To: Jerry Gauthier
> Fix For: JBossAS-5.0.1.CR1
>
>
> Create tests of the merge handling of HAPartition and related classes by using a GossipRouter in the JGroups config. A split in the partition can be simulated by killing the GR, merge
> can be triggered by restarting it.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://jira.jboss.com/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
19 years, 3 months
[JBoss JIRA] Created: (JBAS-4019) failing org.jboss.test.security.test.SRPUnitTestCase - unlimited crypto support needed
by Dimitris Andreadis (JIRA)
failing org.jboss.test.security.test.SRPUnitTestCase - unlimited crypto support needed
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Key: JBAS-4019
URL: http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBAS-4019
Project: JBoss Application Server
Issue Type: Sub-task
Security Level: Public (Everyone can see)
Components: Test Suite
Environment: Java Version 1.5.0_10
Java Vendor Sun Microsystems Inc.
Java VM Name Java HotSpot(TM) Server VM
Java VM Version 1.5.0_10-b03
Java VM Info mixed mode
OS Name Linux
OS Version 2.6.9-42.0.2.ELsmp
OS Arch i386
Reporter: Dimitris Andreadis
Assigned To: Ryan Campbell
Priority: Critical
Fix For: JBossAS-4.2.0.CR1
This is a recurring testsuite failure, whevever we update JDKs, in this case
Java Version 1.5.0_10
Java Vendor Sun Microsystems Inc.
The JDKs must be configured for unlimited crypto support as see in the linked case.
To avoid this problem in the future, configuring crypto support should be part of the process of installing a new JDK.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://jira.jboss.com/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
19 years, 3 months
[JBoss JIRA] Created: (JBAS-4020) is system property for jgroups/jboss mcast_port missing?
by David (JIRA)
is system property for jgroups/jboss mcast_port missing?
--------------------------------------------------------
Key: JBAS-4020
URL: http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBAS-4020
Project: JBoss Application Server
Issue Type: Feature Request
Security Level: Public (Everyone can see)
Components: Clustering
Affects Versions: JBossAS-4.0.5.GA
Environment: windows/linux, java 1.5.0_09, jboss 4.0.5GA, ejb3, clustered
Reporter: David
Assigned To: Brian Stansberry
Priority: Minor
The inclusion of system properties in cluster configuration is a very nice feature.
It is my understanding that to make a unique cluster(when using UDP), one must specify all three of "mcast_addr", "mcast_port", and "jboss.partition.name:DefaultPartition".
If this is the case, then would it make sense to include "mcast_port" system property and a related run.sh argument ?
I've changed my cluster-service.xml to include this, and it does work(also nice that it works for this attribute as well)
<UDP
mcast_addr="${jboss.partition.udpGroup:228.1.2.3}"
mcast_port="${jboss.partition.mcastPort:45566}"
ip_ttl="${jgroups.mcast.ip_ttl:8}"
ip_mcast="${jboss.cluster.mcast.enabled:true}"
mcast_recv_buf_size="2000000" mcast_send_buf_size="640000"
ucast_recv_buf_size="2000000" ucast_send_buf_size="640000"
loopback="${jboss.cluster.use.loopback:false}"/>
run.sh -c all -u224.1.1.39 -Djboss.partition.mcastPort=45577
This is probably only an issue if running more than one node on a machine
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://jira.jboss.com/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
19 years, 3 months