November 2007 - jboss-jira - Jboss List Archives

by Amit Kasher (JIRA)

Add ---- Key: JBWEB-70 URL: http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBWEB-70 Project: JBoss Web Issue Type: Feature Request Security Level: Public (Everyone can see) Reporter: Amit Kasher Assigned To: Mladen Turk -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://jira.jboss.com/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa - For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

18 years

2
2
0 / 0

[JBoss JIRA] Created: (JBWEB-65) context.xml is ignored.

by Nicolas Leroux (JIRA)

context.xml is ignored. ----------------------- Key: JBWEB-65 URL: http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBWEB-65 Project: JBoss Web Issue Type: Bug Security Level: Public (Everyone can see) Affects Versions: JBoss Web Standalone 4.0.4 RC1 Reporter: Nicolas Leroux Assigned To: Mladen Turk The context.xml file is ignored by jboss. It's thus impossible to setup the docRoot property. I followed the wiki: http://wiki.jboss.org/wiki/Wiki.jsp?page=UsingContextDotXML without any success (The context.xml is in my META-INF). -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://jira.jboss.com/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa - For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

18 years

2
2
0 / 0

[JBoss JIRA] Created: (JBAS-4282) Can't create a root context web app

by Stan Silvert (JIRA)

Can't create a root context web app ----------------------------------- Key: JBAS-4282 URL: http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBAS-4282 Project: JBoss Application Server Issue Type: Bug Security Level: Public (Everyone can see) Components: Web (Tomcat) service Affects Versions: JBossAS-5.0.0.Beta2 Reporter: Stan Silvert Assigned To: Remy Maucherat I am unable to deploy a web app as root context using the instructions here: http://wiki.jboss.org/wiki/Wiki.jsp?page=SetupARootContextApp One thing that is unclear is if ROOT.war "must" be removed from /deploy. In 4.2, root context web apps do not require removal of ROOT.war. IMHO, this is how it should work. If you deploy a WAR as the root context, it should simply override whatever was there before. If ROOT.war is removed, 5.0 will allow a root context web app as long as it is deployed from an EAR and specified as such in application.xml. Otherwise, it will fail. If you choose to deploy a stand-alone WAR and specify it as root context using jboss-web.xml, it will always fail - regardless of whether or not you remove ROOT.war. I have committed a test for root deployment in both 4.2 and 5.0. The test passes in 4.2, but not in 5.0. You can run it with: build one-test -Dtest=org.jboss.test.web.test.RootContextUnitTestCase -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://jira.jboss.com/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa - For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

18 years

3
3
0 / 0

[JBoss JIRA] Created: (JGRP-494) Investigate marshalling format to simplify wireshark / ethereal plugin

by Bela Ban (JIRA)

Investigate marshalling format to simplify wireshark / ethereal plugin ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Key: JGRP-494 URL: http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JGRP-494 Project: JGroups Issue Type: Feature Request Reporter: Bela Ban Assigned To: Bela Ban Fix For: 2.5 Currently, parsing JGroups network data via wireshark is difficult: - message lists don't have (a) total number of bytes and (b) bytes/message and - headers don't have (a) total bytes for all headers and (b) bytes / header Investigate whether we can change the marshalling format to accommodate the wireshark plugin. This has the nice side effect that the JGroups wire format becomes standardized, ie. each header has the same format. This allows us to display a header even if we don't know how to parse it. In this case, we'd simply display the name and number of bytes. Caveat: we want to avoid having to make messages bigger when marshalled. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://jira.jboss.com/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa - For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

18 years

2
5
0 / 0

[JBoss JIRA] Created: (JBAS-3911) Default max-pool-size in DataSource configuration

by Shrinivas Joshi (JIRA)

Default max-pool-size in DataSource configuration ------------------------------------------------- Key: JBAS-3911 URL: http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBAS-3911 Project: JBoss Application Server Issue Type: Feature Request Security Level: Public (Everyone can see) Components: JCA service Affects Versions: JBossAS-4.0.5.GA Reporter: Shrinivas Joshi Assigned To: Weston Price In *-[xa]-ds.xml if max-pool-size is not specified and only min-pool-size is specified then max-pool-size should be set = min-pool-size whereas it defaults to 20 rendering min-pool-size setting of no use. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://jira.jboss.com/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa - For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

18 years

6
8
0 / 0

[JBoss JIRA] Created: (EJBTHREE-1116) Clustered container sees requests during shutdown

by Brian Stansberry (JIRA)

Clustered container sees requests during shutdown ------------------------------------------------- Key: EJBTHREE-1116 URL: http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/EJBTHREE-1116 Project: EJB 3.0 Issue Type: Bug Components: Clustering Affects Versions: AS 4.2.2.GA Reporter: Brian Stansberry Assigned To: Brian Stansberry See http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&t=123677 -- during undeploy the cache is being asked for beans after it has already gone into cleanup. It should not be exposed to requests at this point. A couple points: 1) StatefulContainer.stop() does this: if (cache != null) cache.stop(); super.stop(); Basically the cache is stopped before anything else. 2) The HA versions of the old detached invokers included this kind of logic in invoke(): HATarget target = (HATarget)beanMap.get(invocation.getObjectName()); if (!target.invocationsAllowed ()) throw new GenericClusteringException(GenericClusteringException.COMPLETED_NO, "invocations are currently not allowed on this target"); .... else continue on and handle call An HA proxy will catch the GenericClusteringException and fail over. There is no equivalent interceptor in EJB3. In the container stop() methods there is a usage of Dispatcher.singleton.unregisterTarget(...) which will lead to an exception being thrown if a call comes in for the container, and an HA proxy will catch that exception and fail over. So, adding an interceptor to check the HATarget *may* not be necessary, if we are sure that Dispatcher.singleton.unregisterTarget(...) is always called very early in the stop() process. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://jira.jboss.com/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa - For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

18 years

3
5
0 / 0

[JBoss JIRA] Created: (JBPORTAL-1757) Update workflow chapter as it doesn't take into account the fact that the workflow service has been extracted... Should also document how to use the service in portlets.

by Chris Laprun (JIRA)

Update workflow chapter as it doesn't take into account the fact that the workflow service has been extracted... Should also document how to use the service in portlets. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Key: JBPORTAL-1757 URL: http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBPORTAL-1757 Project: JBoss Portal Issue Type: Sub-task Security Level: Public (Everyone can see) Reporter: Chris Laprun -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://jira.jboss.com/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa - For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

18 years

2
5
0 / 0

[JBoss JIRA] Created: (JBPORTAL-1726) Failed status of service factories is not always properly managed.

by Chris Laprun (JIRA)

Failed status of service factories is not always properly managed. ------------------------------------------------------------------ Key: JBPORTAL-1726 URL: http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBPORTAL-1726 Project: JBoss Portal Issue Type: Bug Security Level: Public (Everyone can see) Components: Portal WSRP Affects Versions: 2.6.2 Final Reporter: Chris Laprun Assigned To: Chris Laprun Fix For: 2.6.3 Final, 2.8 Final -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://jira.jboss.com/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa - For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

18 years

1
5
0 / 0

[JBoss JIRA] Created: (JBWEB-83) When the native libraries are missing it is not possible to use ajp

by Jean-Frederic Clere (JIRA)

When the native libraries are missing it is not possible to use ajp ------------------------------------------------------------------- Key: JBWEB-83 URL: http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBWEB-83 Project: JBoss Web Issue Type: Bug Security Level: Public (Everyone can see) Affects Versions: JBoss Web Server 1.0.1 GA Environment: Any Reporter: Jean-Frederic Clere Assigned To: Mladen Turk When the ./bin/native/libtcnative-1.so or one of the components of Jboss Web native is missing. The ajp connector is defaulted to a http one: +++ 17:37:05,565 ERROR [AprLifecycleListener] The Apache Tomcat Native library that JBoss Web requires (only the HTTP connector will be available) was not found on the java.library.path: /home/jfclere/TMP/jbossweb-1.0.1.GA/bin/native 17:37:05,636 INFO [Http11Protocol] Initializing Coyote HTTP/1.1 on http-0.0.0.0-8080 17:37:05,637 INFO [Http11Protocol] Initializing Coyote HTTP/1.1 on http-0.0.0.0-8009 +++ -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://jira.jboss.com/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa - For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

18 years

2
2
0 / 0

[JBoss JIRA] Created: (JBWEB-66) basic-auth broken

by Mark Stewart (JIRA)

basic-auth broken ----------------- Key: JBWEB-66 URL: http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBWEB-66 Project: JBoss Web Issue Type: Bug Security Level: Public (Everyone can see) Affects Versions: JBoss Web Server 1.0.0 GA Environment: Linux Reporter: Mark Stewart Assigned To: Mladen Turk Assuming that Jboss Web is configured identically to the web container in AS, it seems that basic-auth support is broken. That is, the server doesn't send a 401 for protected urls. Here's the post I made three weeks ago on the Jboss Web Server forum: "I have a webapp I usually run in JBoss AS that I'm trying to get running under JBossWeb. I've added the same entry to login-module.xml in the default/conf/ directory and a jboss-web.xml file whose <security-domain> tag points at the entry in default/deploy/<my-web-app.war>/WEB-INF. JBossWeb doesn't block the access to the protected pages, however." This is tested by the J2EE CTS so I guess JBossWeb wasn't tested against it (or the failure was ignored) prior to the GA release. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://jira.jboss.com/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa - For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

18 years

3
2
0 / 0

2026

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

jboss-jira November 2007