[JBoss JIRA] Created: (JBAS-9053) cli: buffer index in the command completer needs correction
by Alexey Loubyansky (JIRA)
cli: buffer index in the command completer needs correction
-----------------------------------------------------------
Key: JBAS-9053
URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBAS-9053
Project: JBoss Application Server
Issue Type: Bug
Security Level: Public (Everyone can see)
Reporter: Alexey Loubyansky
Assignee: Alexey Loubyansky
Fix For: 7.0.0.Beta2
It's a minor issue. In case of leading whitespaces before the command part, pressing tab will remove the leading whitespaces and the chunk (or completed command) will appear at the beginning of the line.
This could be fixed by correcting the returned buffer index by the command completer.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
15 years, 3 months
[JBoss JIRA] Created: (JBAS-8825) Default interface for a socket binding should come via SocketBindingManagerService
by Brian Stansberry (JIRA)
Default interface for a socket binding should come via SocketBindingManagerService
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Key: JBAS-8825
URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBAS-8825
Project: JBoss Application Server
Issue Type: Bug
Security Level: Public (Everyone can see)
Components: Domain Management
Affects Versions: 7.0.0.Alpha1
Reporter: Brian Stansberry
Assignee: Emanuel Muckenhuber
Fix For: 7.0.0.Beta1
The default interface used for socket bindings comes from an attribute on the socket-binding-group element. The XML parser tracks the value and then adds it to the operation to create a socket-binding if the <socket-binding> element doesn't declare an interface.
This parser-based approach isn't sufficient as it only works for the parsing use case. Applying it elsewhere forces operations on child model resources (socket-bindings) to find out information stored in parent resources, which we want to avoid.
Better IMO is to make the "interface" field on the model representation of a socket binding nullable; the parser should just pass through what the XML says. The SocketBindingManagerService should store the default interface, like it currently stores the port offset. SocketBinding.getAddress() can then ask for the default address from SocketBindingManagerService if its own networkInterface field is null.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
15 years, 3 months
[JBoss JIRA] Created: (JBAS-8826) No way to apply a socket binding port offset to a standalone server
by Brian Stansberry (JIRA)
No way to apply a socket binding port offset to a standalone server
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Key: JBAS-8826
URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBAS-8826
Project: JBoss Application Server
Issue Type: Bug
Security Level: Public (Everyone can see)
Components: Domain Management
Affects Versions: 7.0.0.Alpha1
Reporter: Brian Stansberry
Assignee: Emanuel Muckenhuber
Fix For: 7.0.0.Beta1
There is no place to store the SocketBindingManagerService's port-offset in standalone.xml. Currently it gets passed in as a special value by the HostController, which only works in the domain mode use case.
I think the most intuitive thing to do is to add a port-offset attribute to standalone-socket-binding-groupType.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
15 years, 3 months
[JBoss JIRA] Created: (JBAS-8801) Undeployment leaks root deployment service
by Thomas Diesler (JIRA)
Undeployment leaks root deployment service
------------------------------------------
Key: JBAS-8801
URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBAS-8801
Project: JBoss Application Server
Issue Type: Bug
Security Level: Public (Everyone can see)
Reporter: Thomas Diesler
To reproduce
#1 do a hot-deploy
#2 do a hot-undeploy
#3 use jconsole to check the installed services. you should see jboss.deployment.yourdeployment
As a result redeploy fails with
Caused by: org.jboss.as.server.deployment.DeploymentUnitProcessingException: Failed to mount deployment content
at org.jboss.as.server.deployment.module.DeploymentRootMountProcessor.deploy(DeploymentRootMountProcessor.java:69)
at org.jboss.as.server.deployment.DeploymentUnitPhaseService.start(DeploymentUnitPhaseService.java:85)
... 4 more
Caused by: java.io.IOException: Filsystem already mounted at mount point ""/content/example-simple.jar""
at org.jboss.vfs.VFS.mount(VFS.java:159)
at org.jboss.vfs.VFS.doMount(VFS.java:379)
at org.jboss.vfs.VFS.mountZip(VFS.java:405)
at org.jboss.as.server.deployment.impl.ServerDeploymentRepositoryImpl.mountDeploymentContent(ServerDeploymentRepositoryImpl.java:78)
at org.jboss.as.server.deployment.module.DeploymentRootMountProcessor.deploy(DeploymentRootMountProcessor.java:65)
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
15 years, 3 months
[JBoss JIRA] Created: (JBAS-8513) Managed bean @Resource injection is premature
by Brian Stansberry (JIRA)
Managed bean @Resource injection is premature
---------------------------------------------
Key: JBAS-8513
URL: https://jira.jboss.org/browse/JBAS-8513
Project: JBoss Application Server
Issue Type: Bug
Security Level: Public (Everyone can see)
Components: Other
Reporter: Brian Stansberry
Fix For: 7.0.0.M1
The way this works now, for a given managed bean type T, the ManagedBeanService<T> would have an instance of each @Resource bean injected as part of start(). Thereafter whenever ManagedBeanContainer.createInstance() is invoked, the same bean instance would be injected into the newly created bean. AIUI what should happen is createInstance() should result in a new naming lookup for each @Resource bean, which in turn would trigger creation of a new instance of that bean.
This also causes classloading problems, since doing the injection during the MSC StartTask results in the ManagedBeanObjectFactory not being visible. See forum thread for effect of this.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: https://jira.jboss.org/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
15 years, 3 months
[JBoss JIRA] Created: (JBJCA-528) correct ConfigProperty merging about ConfigProperty16Impl
by Jeff Zhang (JIRA)
correct ConfigProperty merging about ConfigProperty16Impl
----------------------------------------------------------
Key: JBJCA-528
URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBJCA-528
Project: IronJacamar
Issue Type: Task
Components: Core
Affects Versions: 1.0.0.Beta4
Reporter: Jeff Zhang
Assignee: Jeff Zhang
Fix For: 1.0.0.Beta5
common/src/main/java/org/jboss/jca/common/metadata/merge/Merger.java
ConfigProperty16 newProp = new ConfigProperty16Impl(c.getDescriptions(), c.getConfigPropertyName(),
- c.getConfigPropertyName(), newValue,
+ c.getConfigPropertyType(), newValue,
c16.getConfigPropertyIgnore(),
c16.getConfigPropertySupportsDynamicUpdates(),
c16.getConfigPropertyConfidential(), c.getId());
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
15 years, 3 months