[JBoss JIRA] Created: (JBLOGGING-62) Contribute to SLF4J API
by Hendy Irawan (JIRA)
Contribute to SLF4J API
-----------------------
Key: JBLOGGING-62
URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBLOGGING-62
Project: JBoss Logging
Issue Type: Enhancement
Security Level: Public (Everyone can see)
Components: jboss-logging-spi
Affects Versions: 3.0.0.Beta4-jboss-logging
Reporter: Hendy Irawan
Assignee: David Lloyd
I do see merits in JBoss Logging when compared to SLF4J.
However I would love the JBoss Logging team to contribute directly and influence the direction of SLF4J (the API, not implementation) than to create a competing API (of which there are overlap, and JBoss Logging adds some powerful features to the API, like internationalization and more).
JBoss Logging can still retain its own logging implementation, much like the way Logback is the implementation of SLF4J API.
My suggestion is that the JBoss should submit API improvements to SLF4J, so that on the API level it everybody can use the same rich API that JBoss Logging provided in SLF4J. This would benefit both JBoss and SLF4J communities.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
15 years, 3 months
[JBoss JIRA] Created: (JBAS-9088) Prevent concurrent conflicting write requests to the management model
by Brian Stansberry (JIRA)
Prevent concurrent conflicting write requests to the management model
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Key: JBAS-9088
URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBAS-9088
Project: JBoss Application Server
Issue Type: Task
Security Level: Public (Everyone can see)
Components: Domain Management, EJB2
Reporter: Brian Stansberry
Fix For: 7.0.0.Beta3
The way the ModelControllers works makes it easy to support concurrent reads or reads occurring concurrently with writes. Reads get their own copy of the model; writes aren't reflected in the underlying model until the operation handler returns. But we need proper support for dealing with concurrent writes. Currently if two write execute concurrently, the "last one wins" i.e. its updated model gets written into the actual model, perhaps overwriting the changes made by earlier updates.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
15 years, 3 months
[JBoss JIRA] Created: (JBAS-9178) Ability to specify config file from the command line
by Brian Stansberry (JIRA)
Ability to specify config file from the command line
----------------------------------------------------
Key: JBAS-9178
URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBAS-9178
Project: JBoss Application Server
Issue Type: Feature Request
Security Level: Public (Everyone can see)
Components: Domain Management
Reporter: Brian Stansberry
Fix For: 7.0.0.Beta4
The standalone server and ProcessController/HostController main methods should take a switch specifying the name of the config file to use (files, in the case of ProcessController/HostController), with "standalone.xml", "host.xml" and "domain.xml" being the default.
This allows things like devs having different standalone mode profiles configured and switching between them, multiple host configs in a production distribution with environment variables on different hosts causing the right one to be used, etc.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
15 years, 3 months
[JBoss JIRA] Assigned: (JBRULES-2961) Invalid org.drools.eclipse plugin
by Nick Boldt (JIRA)
[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBRULES-2961?page=com.atlassian.jira.plug... ]
Nick Boldt reassigned JBRULES-2961:
-----------------------------------
Assignee: Geoffrey De Smet (was: Nick Boldt)
Assigning to Geoffrey as he handles builds for Drools now.
> Invalid org.drools.eclipse plugin
> ---------------------------------
>
> Key: JBRULES-2961
> URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBRULES-2961
> Project: Drools
> Issue Type: Bug
> Security Level: Public(Everyone can see)
> Components: drools-eclipse
> Affects Versions: 5.2.0.M2
> Environment: 3.2_stable_branch.2011-04-15_00-38-24-H707
> Reporter: Snjezana Peco
> Assignee: Geoffrey De Smet
>
> The org.drools.eclipse_5.2.0.201104120641 plugin isn't built correctly. It is about 57 mb big (org.drools.eclipse_5.2.0.v20110116-0638-H14 is about 8MB) and includes all required eclipse plugins in the lib directory.
> It doesn't export the org.drools.eclipse.util package. See JBIDE-8730.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
15 years, 3 months
[JBoss JIRA] Moved: (JBRULES-2961) Invalid org.drools.eclipse plugin
by Nick Boldt (JIRA)
[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBRULES-2961?page=com.atlassian.jira.plug... ]
Nick Boldt moved JBIDE-8740 to JBRULES-2961:
--------------------------------------------
Project: Drools (was: Tools (JBoss Tools))
Key: JBRULES-2961 (was: JBIDE-8740)
Affects Version/s: 5.2.0.M2
(was: 3.2.1)
Component/s: drools-eclipse
(was: Build/Releng)
Security: Public
> Invalid org.drools.eclipse plugin
> ---------------------------------
>
> Key: JBRULES-2961
> URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBRULES-2961
> Project: Drools
> Issue Type: Bug
> Security Level: Public(Everyone can see)
> Components: drools-eclipse
> Affects Versions: 5.2.0.M2
> Environment: 3.2_stable_branch.2011-04-15_00-38-24-H707
> Reporter: Snjezana Peco
> Assignee: Nick Boldt
>
> The org.drools.eclipse_5.2.0.201104120641 plugin isn't built correctly. It is about 57 mb big (org.drools.eclipse_5.2.0.v20110116-0638-H14 is about 8MB) and includes all required eclipse plugins in the lib directory.
> It doesn't export the org.drools.eclipse.util package. See JBIDE-8730.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
15 years, 3 months
[JBoss JIRA] Created: (EJBTHREE-1166) jta-data-source / non-jta-data-source
by Jesper Pedersen (JIRA)
jta-data-source / non-jta-data-source
-------------------------------------
Key: EJBTHREE-1166
URL: http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/EJBTHREE-1166
Project: EJB 3.0
Issue Type: Bug
Environment: JBoss AS: SVN / trunk (rev 68402)
jboss-ejb3-cache version="0.11.1"
jboss/jboss-ejb3-ext-api version="0.1.2.Beta1"
jboss/jboss-ejb3-impl version="0.1.2.Beta1"
Reporter: Jesper Pedersen
I get the following:
persistence.units:ear=rasp-sender.ear,unitName=e-akten-test -> java.lang.RuntimeException: Specification violation [EJB3 JPA 6.2.1.2] - You have not defined a non-jta-data-source for a RESOURCE_LOCAL enabled persistence context named: e-akten-test
persistence.units:ear=rasp-sender.ear,unitName=e-akten -> java.lang.RuntimeException: Specification violation [EJB3 JPA 6.2.1.2] - You have not defined a jta-data-source for a JTA enabled persistence context named: e-akten
The EJB3 persistence spec section 6.2.1.5 states:
"In Java EE environments, the jta-data-source and non-jta-data-source elements are used
to specify the global JNDI name of the JTA and/or non-JTA data source to be used by the persistence
provider. If neither is specified, the deployer must specify a JTA data source at deployment or a JTA
data source must be provided by the container, and a JTA EntityManagerFactory will be created to cor-
respond to it."
I'm counting on the last case -- data source must be provided by container + entity manager.
Hope this helps !
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://jira.jboss.com/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
15 years, 3 months