[JBoss JIRA] (AS7-3741) AS 7.01CR1B (jbosss-as-cmp) does not compile using eclipse
by shay Matasaro (JIRA)
shay Matasaro created AS7-3741:
----------------------------------
Summary: AS 7.01CR1B (jbosss-as-cmp) does not compile using eclipse
Key: AS7-3741
URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/AS7-3741
Project: Application Server 7
Issue Type: Bug
Components: Build System
Affects Versions: 7.1.0.CR1b
Environment: Ubuntu 64 , Eclispe Indigo clean install , latest M2E
Reporter: shay Matasaro
Assignee: Paul Gier
AS-CMP fails to compile due to missing simbols , the reason for that is that a maven JAVACC plugin that auto-generates some files , does not add the new sources directory to the build path.
Also it looks like JBOSS is suing 2 different version of JAVACC 2.5 and 2.6
Installing the javacc m2e connector does not help due to the version mismatch as well as the connector not being mature enough.
possible solutions are :
1) rewrite the javacc maven plug-in
2) fix the javacc m2e connector
3) add the required folder to the build path.
option 3 seems to be the easiest and the best short term fix.
I have tested the fix and will try to merge it into the code base(this is my first time revising jboss)
Shay
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: https://issues.jboss.org/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
14 years, 4 months
[JBoss JIRA] (AS7-3190) Poor error message when attempting to undeploy something that isn't deployed
by Brian Stansberry (Created) (JIRA)
Poor error message when attempting to undeploy something that isn't deployed
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Key: AS7-3190
URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/AS7-3190
Project: Application Server 7
Issue Type: Bug
Components: Domain Management
Affects Versions: 7.1.0.CR1b, 7.0.2.Final
Reporter: Brian Stansberry
Fix For: 7.1.0.Final
I see messages like the following in the testsuite logs after some problem results in a failed deployment. I *believe* this happens when Arquillian attempts to undeploy at the end of the test; the "undeploy" is invalid because the "deploy" was rolled back. In this situation having the "undeploy" fail is fine (it is in fact an error); the problem is the error is completely confusing.
04:44:08,190 ERROR [org.jboss.as.controller.management-operation] (management-handler-threads - 7) JBAS014612: Operation ("undeploy") failed - address: ([("deployment" => "testTimerServiceSimple.war")]): java.util.NoSuchElementException: No child 'runtime-name' exists
at org.jboss.dmr.ModelValue.requireChild(ModelValue.java:362) [jboss-dmr-1.1.1.Final.jar:1.1.1.Final]
at org.jboss.dmr.ModelNode.require(ModelNode.java:812) [jboss-dmr-1.1.1.Final.jar:1.1.1.Final]
at org.jboss.as.server.deployment.DeploymentUndeployHandler.execute(DeploymentUndeployHandler.java:58)
at org.jboss.as.controller.AbstractOperationContext.executeStep(AbstractOperationContext.java:359) [jboss-as-controller-7.1.0.Final-SNAPSHOT.jar:7.1.0.Final-SNAPSHOT]
at org.jboss.as.controller.AbstractOperationContext.doCompleteStep(AbstractOperationContext.java:254) [jboss-as-controller-7.1.0.Final-SNAPSHOT.jar:7.1.0.Final-SNAPSHOT]
at org.jboss.as.controller.AbstractOperationContext.completeStep(AbstractOperationContext.java:190) [jboss-as-controller-7.1.0.Final-SNAPSHOT.jar:7.1.0.Final-SNAPSHOT]
at org.jboss.as.controller.CompositeOperationHandler.execute(CompositeOperationHandler.java:84) [jboss-as-controller-7.1.0.Final-SNAPSHOT.jar:7.1.0.Final-SNAPSHOT]
at org.jboss.as.controller.AbstractOperationContext.executeStep(AbstractOperationContext.java:359) [jboss-as-controller-7.1.0.Final-SNAPSHOT.jar:7.1.0.Final-SNAPSHOT]
at org.jboss.as.controller.AbstractOperationContext.doCompleteStep(AbstractOperationContext.java:254) [jboss-as-controller-7.1.0.Final-SNAPSHOT.jar:7.1.0.Final-SNAPSHOT]
at org.jboss.as.controller.AbstractOperationContext.completeStep(AbstractOperationContext.java:190) [jboss-as-controller-7.1.0.Final-SNAPSHOT.jar:7.1.0.Final-SNAPSHOT]
at org.jboss.as.controller.ModelControllerImpl$DefaultPrepareStepHandler.execute(ModelControllerImpl.java:432) [jboss-as-controller-7.1.0.Final-SNAPSHOT.jar:7.1.0.Final-SNAPSHOT]
at org.jboss.as.controller.AbstractOperationContext.executeStep(AbstractOperationContext.java:359) [jboss-as-controller-7.1.0.Final-SNAPSHOT.jar:7.1.0.Final-SNAPSHOT]
at org.jboss.as.controller.AbstractOperationContext.doCompleteStep(AbstractOperationContext.java:254) [jboss-as-controller-7.1.0.Final-SNAPSHOT.jar:7.1.0.Final-SNAPSHOT]
at org.jboss.as.controller.AbstractOperationContext.completeStep(AbstractOperationContext.java:190) [jboss-as-controller-7.1.0.Final-SNAPSHOT.jar:7.1.0.Final-SNAPSHOT]
at org.jboss.as.controller.ModelControllerImpl.execute(ModelControllerImpl.java:119) [jboss-as-controller-7.1.0.Final-SNAPSHOT.jar:7.1.0.Final-SNAPSHOT]
at org.jboss.as.controller.remote.ModelControllerClientOperationHandler$ExecuteRequestHandler.doExecute(ModelControllerClientOperationHandler.java:121) [jboss-as-controller-7.1.0.Final-SNAPSHOT.jar:7.1.0.Final-SNAPSHOT]
at org.jboss.as.controller.remote.ModelControllerClientOperationHandler$ExecuteRequestHandler$1.execute(ModelControllerClientOperationHandler.java:98) [jboss-as-controller-7.1.0.Final-SNAPSHOT.jar:7.1.0.Final-SNAPSHOT]
at org.jboss.as.protocol.mgmt.AbstractMessageHandler$3$1.doExecute(AbstractMessageHandler.java:268) [jboss-as-protocol-7.1.0.Final-SNAPSHOT.jar:7.1.0.Final-SNAPSHOT]
at org.jboss.as.protocol.mgmt.AbstractMessageHandler$AsyncTaskRunner.run(AbstractMessageHandler.java:424) [jboss-as-protocol-7.1.0.Final-SNAPSHOT.jar:7.1.0.Final-SNAPSHOT]
at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.runTask(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:886) [:1.6.0_29]
at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:908) [:1.6.0_29]
at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:662) [:1.6.0_29]
at org.jboss.threads.JBossThread.run(JBossThread.java:122) [jboss-threads-2.0.0.GA.jar:2.0.0.GA]
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: https://issues.jboss.org/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
14 years, 4 months
[JBoss JIRA] (AS7-3847) Non-standard format of IPv6 address(-es) in LOG files
by Pavel Janousek (JIRA)
[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/AS7-3847?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.s... ]
Pavel Janousek moved JBPAPP-8164 to AS7-3847:
---------------------------------------------
Project: Application Server 7 (was: JBoss Enterprise Application Platform)
Key: AS7-3847 (was: JBPAPP-8164)
Workflow: GIT Pull Request workflow (was: jira)
Affects Version/s: 7.1.0.Final
(was: EAP 6.0.0 DR 13)
Security: (was: JBoss Internal)
Docs QE Status: (was: NEW)
> Non-standard format of IPv6 address(-es) in LOG files
> -----------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: AS7-3847
> URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/AS7-3847
> Project: Application Server 7
> Issue Type: Bug
> Affects Versions: 7.1.0.Final
> Reporter: Pavel Janousek
> Priority: Critical
>
> There are several places where some IPv6 address related info is logged. The format of a such info is formally correct, but used format is against [RFC-5952|http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5952] - this RFC has status of +Proposed standard+ and I don't know any software product which doesn't follow it (at least by-default).
> I think in enterprise product we should not violate this RFC.
> I'm mentioning about LOG messages like:
> {code}
> 15:14:15,985 INFO [org.jboss.as.remoting] (MSC service thread 1-2) JBAS017100: Listening on /0:0:0:0:0:0:0:1%1:9999
>
> 15:14:15,990 INFO [org.jboss.as.remoting] (MSC service thread 1-2) JBAS017100: Listening on localhost6.localdomain6/0:0:0:0:0:0:0:1%1:4447
> {code}
> In both lines IPv6 address should be stretched to "::1" string.
> More "funny" and obfuscated version of the same LOG content is LOG line like this:
> {code}
> 15:14:14,363 INFO [org.apache.coyote.http11.Http11Protocol] (MSC service thread 1-1) Starting Coyote HTTP/1.1 on http--0%3A0%3A0%3A0%3A0%3A0%3A0%3A1%251-8080
> {code}
> But both version of the issue is almost unreadable by human.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: https://issues.jboss.org/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
14 years, 4 months
[JBoss JIRA] (AS7-3839) WebSecurityJBossSimpleRoleMappingTestCase fails during testsuite execution
by Jan Lanik (JIRA)
Jan Lanik created AS7-3839:
------------------------------
Summary: WebSecurityJBossSimpleRoleMappingTestCase fails during testsuite execution
Key: AS7-3839
URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/AS7-3839
Project: Application Server 7
Issue Type: Bug
Components: Test Suite
Environment: commit 4620414e3c56a171c6cd6952ddad26d88c86f355
Reporter: Jan Lanik
Assignee: Peter Skopek
Run testsuite as follows:
$ ./integration-tests.sh clean install -Dts.basic
Usually, the run fails with following error:
Results :
Failed tests: testPasswordBasedUnsuccessfulAuth(org.jboss.as.test.integration.web.security.WebSecurityJBossSimpleRoleMappingTestCase): expected:<403> but was:<200>
testPrincipalMappingOnRole(org.jboss.as.test.integration.web.security.WebSecurityJBossSimpleRoleMappingTestCase): expected:<200> but was:<403>
I'll add surefire reports and server log.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: https://issues.jboss.org/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
14 years, 4 months
[JBoss JIRA] (JBRULES-3385) Rule not fired depending on the class loading order
by Manuel Reinaldo Falagan (JIRA)
Manuel Reinaldo Falagan created JBRULES-3385:
------------------------------------------------
Summary: Rule not fired depending on the class loading order
Key: JBRULES-3385
URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBRULES-3385
Project: Drools
Issue Type: Bug
Security Level: Public (Everyone can see)
Affects Versions: 5.3.0.Final, 5.2.0.Final
Environment: SLES11 SP1 with java 1.6.0_14-b08 (32bit and 64bit) or XP with jdk1.6.0_22 (32 or 64 bit)
Reporter: Manuel Reinaldo Falagan
Assignee: Mark Proctor
Priority: Blocker
A very simple example "FailTest" triggers a rule only 15 times when it should trigger it 16 times.
The same example with almost any change to the class model or to the order in loading the classes or the input data or the version of java it works.
The Class FailTest contains only a main method calling the main method of the Class HelloWorldExample. Running directly the main method in the class HelloWorldExample does work.
Any change fixes the problem in the example but it moves the error to other part. We have set a test testing more than 2000 million cases of rules/inputs and no matter how we write the rules or the code, we end up finding a case that fails, making the software not usable, as it is not predictable were it is going to fail.
The case has been uner study for more than a year and we have tried AIX, Linux and XP with DROOLS 5.1, 5.2, 5.3 and the trial of Enterprise edition. The example provided has only been tested to fail for DROOLS 5.3.0 final and Enterprise edition for SLES11 SP1 with the SUN virtual machine (not the IBM one) and for XP but there is no combination for which DROOLS work for the 2000 million cases.
The example provided is a 7kb example self-contained ( ftp://mpf:mpf@ftp.eumetsat.int/DROOLS_ERROR.zip )
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: https://issues.jboss.org/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
14 years, 4 months