[JBoss JIRA] (AS7-2936) Canot remove security login moddule
by Heiko Braun (Created) (JIRA)
Canot remove security login moddule
-----------------------------------
Key: AS7-2936
URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/AS7-2936
Project: Application Server 7
Issue Type: Bug
Components: Domain Management, Security
Reporter: Heiko Braun
Assignee: Brian Stansberry
Fix For: 7.1.0.CR1
Due to some weird DMR constraints I cannot clear the list of security domain modules:
{noformat}
[INFO] save:{
[INFO] "operation" => "write-attribute",
[INFO] "address" => [
[INFO] ("subsystem" => "security"),
[INFO] ("security-domain" => "other"),
[INFO] ("authentication" => "classic")
[INFO] ],
[INFO] "name" => "login-modules",
[INFO] "value" => []
[INFO] }
[ERROR] 2011-12-07 09:21:57,097 [ERROR] On Wed Dec 07 09:21:57 CET 2011, MessageCenter received Failed to: write-attribute login-modules: other
[ERROR] 2011-12-07 09:21:57,101 [ERROR] Message{conciseMessage='Failed to: write-attribute login-modules: other', detailedMessage='JBAS014706: [0] is an invalid size for parameter value. A minimum length of [1] is required', fired=Wed Dec 07 09:21:57 CET 2011, severity=Error, options=[]}
{noformat}
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: https://issues.jboss.org/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
14 years, 4 months
[JBoss JIRA] (AS7-3881) HornetQ configurations for broadcast and discovery groups do not use socket bindings
by Shelly McGowan (JIRA)
Shelly McGowan created AS7-3881:
-----------------------------------
Summary: HornetQ configurations for broadcast and discovery groups do not use socket bindings
Key: AS7-3881
URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/AS7-3881
Project: Application Server 7
Issue Type: Bug
Reporter: Shelly McGowan
Assignee: Brian Stansberry
Fix For: 7.1.1.Final
HornetQ configurations for broadcast and discovery groups do not use socket bindings. Every configurations values related to ports or addresses should use socket bindings. For example see configurations for JGrpups, ...
standalone/configuration/standalone-full-ha.xml
HornetQ
{code}
<broadcast-groups>
<broadcast-group name="bg-group1">
<group-address>231.7.7.7</group-address>
<group-port>9876</group-port>
<broadcast-period>5000</broadcast-period>
<connector-ref>netty</connector-ref>
</broadcast-group>
</broadcast-groups>
<discovery-groups>
<discovery-group name="dg-group1">
<group-address>231.7.7.7</group-address>
<group-port>9876</group-port>
<refresh-timeout>10000</refresh-timeout>
</discovery-group>
</discovery-groups>
....
{code}
{code}
<socket-binding-group name="standard-sockets" default-interface="public" port-offset="${jboss.socket.binding.port-offset:0}">
...
<socket-binding name="jgroups-diagnostics" port="0" multicast-address="224.0.75.75" multicast-port="7500"/>
<socket-binding name="jgroups-mping" port="0" multicast-address="${jboss.default.multicast.address:230.0.0.4}" multicast-port="45700"/>
...
{code}
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: https://issues.jboss.org/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
14 years, 4 months
[JBoss JIRA] (AS7-3801) Deleting content in "data/content" breaks JBoss startup
by Wolfgang Knauf (JIRA)
Wolfgang Knauf created AS7-3801:
-----------------------------------
Summary: Deleting content in "data/content" breaks JBoss startup
Key: AS7-3801
URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/AS7-3801
Project: Application Server 7
Issue Type: Bug
Components: Server
Affects Versions: 7.1.0.CR1b
Environment: Happens at least with the snapshot of 2012-02-07
Reporter: Wolfgang Knauf
Assignee: Jason Greene
Priority: Minor
Attachments: boot.log
I deployed an app by JSR88 (full sample + deployer attached to AS7-3474 ).
Then I started some vandalism and deleted the directory "standalone\data\content\91\107bf1efaf37237132c7e7ec9b02ec178f4bfe", where the deployed app was found.
This prevented JBoss from starting. Attached is the boot.log. Though it tells that the server was started, it seems to have skipped all modules.
This error message was found:
21:14:48,203 ERROR [org.jboss.as.controller.management-operation] Operation ("add") failed - address: ([("deployment" => "file:/C:/DOCUME~1/Knuffi/LOCALS~1/Temp/___Stateless.ear")]) - failure description: "JBAS015812: No deployment content with hash 91107bf1efaf37237132c7e7ec9b02ec178f4bfe is available in the deployment content repository."
I would expect that it skips the missing deployment, but continues with the rest of the startup process.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: https://issues.jboss.org/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
14 years, 4 months
[JBoss JIRA] (AS7-2673) CLI shutdown * operation (kills domain controller first, beheads host controllers)
by mark yarborough (Created) (JIRA)
CLI shutdown * operation (kills domain controller first, beheads host controllers)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Key: AS7-2673
URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/AS7-2673
Project: Application Server 7
Issue Type: Bug
Components: CLI
Affects Versions: 7.1.0.Alpha1
Reporter: mark yarborough
Assignee: Alexey Loubyansky
Priority: Trivial
>From the CLI with a domain controller and two host controllers running, using wildcard command intended to shut down everything:
[domain@localhost:9999 host] cd ..
[domain@localhost:9999 /] ls host
host2-9 host3 master
[domain@localhost:9999 /] ./host=*:shutdown
{"outcome" => "success"}
[domain@localhost:9999 /] ls
[domain@localhost:9999 /]
Success is reported, and we're no longer connected to a domain controller. A follow up check reveals that the domain controller (host=master) was shutdown, but the host controllers (host2-9 and host3) are still up and now searching for the missing domain controller:
<snippet from host3 console>
[Host Controller] 20:47:07,351 WARN [org.jboss.as.domain.controller] (Thread-14) Could not connect to remote domain controller 127.0.0.1:9999
[Host Controller] 20:47:22,357 WARN [org.jboss.as.domain.controller] (Thread-14) Could not connect to remote domain controller 127.0.0.1:9999
[Host Controller] 20:47:37,364 WARN [org.jboss.as.domain.controller] (Thread-14) Could not connect to remote domain controller 127.0.0.1:9999
[Host Controller] 20:47:52,370 WARN [org.jboss.as.domain.controller] (Thread-14) Could not connect to remote domain controller 127.0.0.1:9999
It appears that the DC was shutdown first, so no communication path the HCs, so they were not shutdown. Perhaps the wildcard should be disallowed for the shutdown operation, or intelligence added to shutdown the DC last... Just wanted to let you know.
Running something called jboss-as-7.1.0.Alpha2-SNAPSHOT downloaded by Rich Raposa for a GLS class around 10-Nov-2011. I chose "Affects Version" because that was the closest on the list...
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: https://issues.jboss.org/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
14 years, 4 months
[JBoss JIRA] Created: (AS7-1753) Intermittent failure in CompositeOperationHandlerUnitTestCase testRestartRequired
by Brian Stansberry (JIRA)
Intermittent failure in CompositeOperationHandlerUnitTestCase testRestartRequired
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Key: AS7-1753
URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/AS7-1753
Project: Application Server 7
Issue Type: Bug
Components: Domain Management
Reporter: Brian Stansberry
Assignee: Brian Stansberry
Fix For: 7.1.0.Alpha1
This pops up occasionally
<testcase time="0.203" classname="org.jboss.as.controller.CompositeOperationHandlerUnitTestCase" name="testRestartRequired">
<failure message="expected:<[restart-requir]ed> but was:<[undefin]ed>" type="org.junit.ComparisonFailure">org.junit.ComparisonFailure: expected:<[restart-requir]ed> but was:<[undefin]ed>
at org.junit.Assert.assertEquals(Assert.java:123)
at org.junit.Assert.assertEquals(Assert.java:145)
at org.jboss.as.controller.CompositeOperationHandlerUnitTestCase.testRestartRequired(CompositeOperationHandlerUnitTestCase.java:496)
at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:39)
at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:25)
at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:597)
at org.junit.runners.model.FrameworkMethod$1.runReflectiveCall(FrameworkMethod.java:44)
at org.junit.internal.runners.model.ReflectiveCallable.run(ReflectiveCallable.java:15)
at org.junit.runners.model.FrameworkMethod.invokeExplosively(FrameworkMethod.java:41)
at org.junit.internal.runners.statements.InvokeMethod.evaluate(InvokeMethod.java:20)
at org.junit.internal.runners.statements.RunBefores.evaluate(RunBefores.java:28)
at org.junit.internal.runners.statements.RunAfters.evaluate(RunAfters.java:31)
at org.junit.runners.BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.runNotIgnored(BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.java:79)
at org.junit.runners.BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.runChild(BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.java:71)
at org.junit.runners.BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.runChild(BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.java:49)
at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$3.run(ParentRunner.java:193)
at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$1.schedule(ParentRunner.java:52)
at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.runChildren(ParentRunner.java:191)
at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.access$000(ParentRunner.java:42)
at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$2.evaluate(ParentRunner.java:184)
at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.run(ParentRunner.java:236)
at org.apache.maven.surefire.junit4.JUnit4TestSet.execute(JUnit4TestSet.java:53)
at org.apache.maven.surefire.junit4.JUnit4Provider.executeTestSet(JUnit4Provider.java:123)
at org.apache.maven.surefire.junit4.JUnit4Provider.invoke(JUnit4Provider.java:104)
at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:39)
at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:25)
at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:597)
at org.apache.maven.surefire.util.ReflectionUtils.invokeMethodWithArray(ReflectionUtils.java:164)
at org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.ProviderFactory$ProviderProxy.invoke(ProviderFactory.java:110)
at org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.SurefireStarter.invokeProvider(SurefireStarter.java:172)
at org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.SurefireStarter.runSuitesInProcessWhenForked(SurefireStarter.java:104)
at org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.ForkedBooter.main(ForkedBooter.java:70)
</failure>
<system-out>========= New Test
{
"outcome" => "success",
"result" => {
"step-1" => {
"outcome" => "success",
"result" => 1,
"response-headers" => {
"runtime-update-skipped" => true,
"operation-requires-restart" => true
}
},
"step-2" => {
"outcome" => "success",
"result" => 2
}
}
}
======================
</system-out>
</testcase>
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
14 years, 4 months