[JBoss JIRA] (WFCORE-25) Windows PowerShell scripts in bin
by Brian Stansberry (JIRA)
[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFCORE-25?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.... ]
Brian Stansberry moved WFLY-676 to WFCORE-25:
---------------------------------------------
Project: WildFly Core (was: WildFly)
Key: WFCORE-25 (was: WFLY-676)
Component/s: Scripts
(was: Scripts)
Fix Version/s: 1.0.0.Alpha4
(was: 9.0.0.CR1)
> Windows PowerShell scripts in bin
> ---------------------------------
>
> Key: WFCORE-25
> URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFCORE-25
> Project: WildFly Core
> Issue Type: Bug
> Security Level: Public(Everyone can see)
> Components: Scripts
> Reporter: Brian Stansberry
> Assignee: Tomaz Cerar
> Fix For: 1.0.0.Alpha4
>
>
> Add .psh scripts that match the functionality of our .sh scripts. Leave the .bat scripts in their current limited-functionality form for people still on XP, but use PowerShell as the recommended Windows scripting language.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.2.6#6264)
11 years, 9 months
[JBoss JIRA] (WFLY-3201) Channel end notification received, closing channel ... should be logged at debug
by Brian Stansberry (JIRA)
[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFLY-3201?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.... ]
Brian Stansberry commented on WFLY-3201:
----------------------------------------
Brad, please resolve this when WildFly includes the version of remote-naming with this fix. The pull requests have been merged into remote-naming.
> Channel end notification received, closing channel ... should be logged at debug
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: WFLY-3201
> URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFLY-3201
> Project: WildFly
> Issue Type: Bug
> Security Level: Public(Everyone can see)
> Components: Naming
> Reporter: Brad Maxwell
> Assignee: Brad Maxwell
>
> Remote naming is logging this at ERROR, though it seems normal and no adverse effects are apparent, we should log it at debug instead of error.
> ERROR Channel end notification received, closing channel Channel ID b8e969d6 (outbound) of Remoting connection 4970f4db to ...
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.2.6#6264)
11 years, 9 months
[JBoss JIRA] (WFLY-3673) EAR deployment overlay did not work if there is no related resource included in the ear
by Wolf-Dieter Fink (JIRA)
Wolf-Dieter Fink created WFLY-3673:
--------------------------------------
Summary: EAR deployment overlay did not work if there is no related resource included in the ear
Key: WFLY-3673
URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFLY-3673
Project: WildFly
Issue Type: Bug
Security Level: Public (Everyone can see)
Reporter: Wolf-Dieter Fink
Assignee: David Lloyd
It is possible to overlay WEB-inf/lib/xy.jar without having xy.jar included in the war file.
If an EAR file is used a module in the lib directory can not be added in the same way. But overlay is working if the lib/xy.jar is available.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.2.6#6264)
11 years, 9 months
[JBoss JIRA] (JBJCA-1199) Guard against ISE in TransactionSynchronizer
by Jesper Pedersen (JIRA)
Jesper Pedersen created JBJCA-1199:
--------------------------------------
Summary: Guard against ISE in TransactionSynchronizer
Key: JBJCA-1199
URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBJCA-1199
Project: IronJacamar
Issue Type: Bug
Security Level: Public (Everyone can see)
Components: Core
Affects Versions: 1.2.0.Beta3, 1.1.6.Final, 1.0.26.Final
Reporter: Jesper Pedersen
Assignee: Jesper Pedersen
Priority: Critical
Fix For: 1.0.27.Final, 1.1.7.Final, 1.2.0.Beta4
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.2.6#6264)
11 years, 9 months
[JBoss JIRA] (WFLY-3368) Reverse proxy configuration should use outbound-socket-binding
by Tomaz Cerar (JIRA)
[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFLY-3368?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.... ]
Tomaz Cerar commented on WFLY-3368:
-----------------------------------
@matt Would something like this cover your scenarios:
{code:xml}
<reverse-proxy name="reverse-proxy" connections-per-thread="30">
<host name="localhost" scheme="ajp" outbound-socket-binding-ref="ajp-remote" instance-id="myRoute"/>
</reverse-proxy>
{code}
and later in config you have
{code:xml}
<outbound-socket-binding name="ajp-remote">
<remote-destination host="localhost" port="8009"/>
</outbound-socket-binding>
{code}
> Reverse proxy configuration should use outbound-socket-binding
> --------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: WFLY-3368
> URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFLY-3368
> Project: WildFly
> Issue Type: Feature Request
> Security Level: Public(Everyone can see)
> Components: Web (Undertow)
> Affects Versions: 8.0.0.Final
> Reporter: Matt Wringe
> Assignee: Tomaz Cerar
> Fix For: 9.0.0.Beta1
>
>
> The reverse proxy configuration in standalone.xml requires a string value and will not accept variables like most of the other options.
> for example, something like this should be valid, but its currently not:
> {code:xml}
> <handlers>
> <reverse-proxy name="reverse-proxy" connections-per-thread="30">
> <host name="${myURL}" instance-id="myRoute"/>
> </reverse-proxy>
> <handlers>
> {code}
> Here you need to specify the name as something like "http://127.5.183.1:8080"
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.2.6#6264)
11 years, 9 months
[JBoss JIRA] (JGRP-1863) Excessive dropped messages due to missing physical address
by Bela Ban (JIRA)
[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JGRP-1863?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.... ]
Bela Ban commented on JGRP-1863:
--------------------------------
Will test this in 3.6: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JGRP-1865
> Excessive dropped messages due to missing physical address
> ----------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: JGRP-1863
> URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JGRP-1863
> Project: JGroups
> Issue Type: Bug
> Security Level: Public(Everyone can see)
> Affects Versions: 3.5
> Reporter: Paul Ferraro
> Assignee: Bela Ban
> Priority: Blocker
> Fix For: 3.5
>
>
> When running the x-site replication tests (and only those tests - the others run fine) from the clustering testsuite in WildFly against JGroups 3.5, I encounter failures due to:
> {noformat}
> 12:15:48,537 WARN [org.infinispan.xsite.BackupSenderImpl] (default task-1) ISPN000202: Problems backing up data for cache dist to site SFO: org.infinispan.util.concurrent.TimeoutException: Timed out after 10 seconds waiting for a response from SFO (sync, timeout=10000)
> {noformat}
> The logs preceding this indicate the cause of the timeout:
> {noformat}
> 12:15:38,536 WARN [org.jgroups.protocols.UDP] (TransferQueueBundler,shared=udp) JGRP000032: null: no physical address for SiteMaster(NYC), dropping message
> 12:15:38,536 WARN [org.jgroups.protocols.UDP] (TransferQueueBundler,shared=udp) JGRP000032: null: no physical address for SiteMaster(SFO), dropping message
> 12:15:39,506 WARN [org.jgroups.protocols.UDP] (TransferQueueBundler,shared=udp) JGRP000032: null: no physical address for SiteMaster(SFO), dropping message
> 12:15:39,507 WARN [org.jgroups.protocols.UDP] (TransferQueueBundler,shared=udp) JGRP000032: null: no physical address for SiteMaster(NYC), dropping message
> {noformat}
> These messages repeat about 100 or so times over a period of 10 seconds.
> A little investigation reveals that the process for fetching physical addresses for a given logical destination address has changed. In 3.4, a given call to sendToSingleMember(...) would attempt to lookup the physical address by sending a Event.GET_PHYSICAL_ADDRESS up the stack and wait a predetermined period for a response. Any concurrent calls to sendToSingleMember(...) would also wait, but only one thread in a given time period would ever send the Event.GET_PHYSICAL_ADDRESS event up the stack.
> In 3.5 the process is different. In org.jgroups.protocols.TP, the FIND_MBRS event is used to lookup the phsyical addresses, instead of directly sending up a GET_PHYSICAL_ADDRESS event. However, looking at the implementation of the FIND_MBRS event handling within org.jgroups.protocols.Discovery, I see that this triggers a asynchronous GET_MBRS_REQ message. Since this message is sent asynchronously, this means that the response from the original FIND_MBRS event will most certainly be empty. Thus the thread that initiated the FIND_MBRS will most certainly log the PhysicalAddrMissing warning, as will any concurrent/subsequent calls to sendToSingleMember(...) for the same destination until that asynchronous processing completes. This is a departure from the logic in 3.4, where the thread initiating the physical address lookup would wait for some time for the address cache to be updated. I should think that the PhysicalAddrMissing warnings should stop once the original GET_MBRS_REQ message is handled, but that doesn't seem to be happening (hence the 100 or so sequential warning messages over a period of 10 seconds preceding the timeout log message from infinispan).
> Curiously, I see a org.jgroups.protocols.TP.setPingData(...) method, which seems to be responsible for populating the physical address cache from the FIND_MBRS event results from org.jgroups.protocols.Discovery - however, this method doesn't seem to be referenced anywhere. Might that be the source of the problem?
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.2.6#6264)
11 years, 9 months