[JBoss JIRA] (WFLY-3909) Upgrade PicketBox
by David Lloyd (JIRA)
David Lloyd created WFLY-3909:
---------------------------------
Summary: Upgrade PicketBox
Key: WFLY-3909
URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFLY-3909
Project: WildFly
Issue Type: Component Upgrade
Components: Security
Reporter: David Lloyd
Assignee: Darran Lofthouse
Fix For: 9.0.0.CR1
Upgrade PicketBox to a version which resolves SECURITY-861.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.1#6329)
11 years, 9 months
[JBoss JIRA] (JGRP-1840) Provide docker image for JGroups
by Arne Osthues (JIRA)
[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JGRP-1840?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.... ]
Arne Osthues commented on JGRP-1840:
------------------------------------
My experience with docker and jgroups so far.
Running multiple containers on one host works well since all containers can connect to each other through their default interface. For discovery using a gossip router is one solution that works.
If the containers run on different hosts it gets more complicated. By default each container can only be reached by its host and other containers.
The general ideas to get it working are:
* Add an extra software network layer to put the containers into the same network. There are several tools that try to support this approach. i.E. [weave|https://github.com/zettio/weave] , [pipework|https://github.com/jpetazzo/pipework] and [libswarm|https://github.com/docker/libswarm].
* Trying to put the load on jgroups. The different hosts can be treated like different networks separated by a firewall. Using a TUNNEL can be a solution.
I haven't found the perfect way yet. I am still trying to avoid the need for the extra software network since this it makes it more complicated to automate starting containers with tools like vagrant or fig.
> Provide docker image for JGroups
> --------------------------------
>
> Key: JGRP-1840
> URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JGRP-1840
> Project: JGroups
> Issue Type: Task
> Reporter: Bela Ban
> Assignee: Bela Ban
> Priority: Optional
> Fix For: 3.6
>
>
> Provide a docker image for one or more JGroups demos. People could run multiple instances and see a cluster. Candidates for demos:
> * Draw (can we set DISPLAY to be the user's desktop?)
> * Topology
> * Some replicated map (ReplCache)
> * Chat
> [1] https://gist.github.com/goldmann/d38589ad919343ba30dd
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.1#6329)
11 years, 9 months
[JBoss JIRA] (WFLY-3908) Upgrade Weld
by David Lloyd (JIRA)
David Lloyd created WFLY-3908:
---------------------------------
Summary: Upgrade Weld
Key: WFLY-3908
URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFLY-3908
Project: WildFly
Issue Type: Component Upgrade
Components: CDI / Weld
Reporter: David Lloyd
Assignee: Stuart Douglas
Priority: Critical
Fix For: 9.0.0.CR1
Upgrade to a version of Weld which includes WELD-1751.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.1#6329)
11 years, 9 months
[JBoss JIRA] (WFLY-950) RESTEasy: Empty cfg. param javax.ws.rs.Application produces exception
by RH Bugzilla Integration (JIRA)
[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFLY-950?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.s... ]
RH Bugzilla Integration commented on WFLY-950:
----------------------------------------------
Weinan Li <weli(a)redhat.com> changed the Status of [bug 899666|https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=899666] from ASSIGNED to MODIFIED
> RESTEasy: Empty cfg. param javax.ws.rs.Application produces exception
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: WFLY-950
> URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFLY-950
> Project: WildFly
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: REST
> Reporter: Pavel Janousek
> Assignee: Weinan Li
>
> RESTEasy can be configured through several configuration options in WAR application deployment file WEB-INF/web.xml. The major one (also portable defined by JAX-RS standard) is _javax.ws.rs.Application_. When I set this parameter to empty content present behavior is raising exception "java.lang.StringIndexOutOfBoundsException: String index out of range: 0", it is not so good.
> I think, this is hard miss-configuration error and deployment description as this one should be rejected and a such application should not be deployed at all with appropriate error message, but not only by messed exception.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.1#6329)
11 years, 9 months
[JBoss JIRA] (JASSIST-234) Support for Javaflow bytecode pattern
by Shigeru Chiba (JIRA)
[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JASSIST-234?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugi... ]
Shigeru Chiba resolved JASSIST-234.
-----------------------------------
Fix Version/s: 3.19.0-GA
Resolution: Done
The patch has been merged.
> Support for Javaflow bytecode pattern
> -------------------------------------
>
> Key: JASSIST-234
> URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JASSIST-234
> Project: Javassist
> Issue Type: Patch
> Affects Versions: 3.18.2-GA
> Reporter: Shigeru Chiba
> Assignee: Shigeru Chiba
> Fix For: 3.19.0-GA
>
>
> The Apache Javaflow project instruments class files to provide its Continuation capability. One of the bytecode patterns it generates to handle Category 2 parameters is:
> NEW
> DUP
> DUP2_X2
> POP2
> Unfortunately, when Javassist sees this pattern when moving instructions, it recognizes the NEW DUP and removes it in order to do the move. However, this leaves the DUP2_X2 POP2 abandoned which leads to stack corruption and javassist throwing an exception due to a negative stack height.
> Given this involves Category 2 operands, there is not much short of a complete rearchitecting that can be done in Javaflow to accommodate the existing Javassist patterns for NEW. Therefore, I ask the the above bytecode pattern be added to the javassist.expr.NewExpr.canReplace() method. I will submit a patch with the proposed change.
> Originally reported by Baron Roberts at:
> https://github.com/jboss-javassist/javassist/pull/21
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.1#6329)
11 years, 9 months