[JBoss JIRA] (JGRP-1876) MERGE3 : Strange number and content of subgroups
by Karim AMMOUS (JIRA)
[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JGRP-1876?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.... ]
Karim AMMOUS commented on JGRP-1876:
------------------------------------
Please delete the oldest "JGRP-1876-1.pdf" file.
> MERGE3 : Strange number and content of subgroups
> ------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: JGRP-1876
> URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JGRP-1876
> Project: JGroups
> Issue Type: Bug
> Affects Versions: 3.4.2
> Reporter: Karim AMMOUS
> Assignee: Bela Ban
> Fix For: 3.5.1, 3.6, 3.6.2
>
> Attachments: 4Subgroups.zip, ChannelCreator.java, DkeJgrpAddress.java, JGRP-1876-1.pdf, JGRP-1876-1.pdf, karim-logs-files.zip, MergeTest4.java, MergeViewWith210Subgroups.log, SplitMergeTest.java, views.txt
>
>
> Using JGroups 3.4.2, a split occurred and a merge was processed successfully but number of subgroups is wrong (210 instead of 2).
> The final mergeView is correct and contains 210 members.
> Here is an extract of subviews:
> {code}
> INFO | Incoming-18,cluster,term-ETJ101697729-31726:host:192.168.56.6:1:CL(GROUP01)[F] | [MyMembershipListener.java:126] | (middleware) | MergeView view ID = [serv-ZM2BU35940-58033:vt-14:192.168.55.55:1:CL(GROUP01)[F]|172]
> 210 subgroups
> [....
> [term-ETJ100691812-36873:host:192.168.56.16:1:CL(GROUP01)[F]|170] (1) [term-ETJ104215245-11092:host:192.168.56.72:1:CL(GROUP01)[F]]
> [term-ETJ100691812-36873:host:192.168.56.16:1:CL(GROUP01)[F]|170] (1) [serv-ZM2BU38960-6907:asb:192.168.55.52:1:CL(GROUP01)[F]]
> [term-ETJ101697729-31726:host:192.168.56.6:1:CL(GROUP01)[F]|171] (1) [term-ETJ101697729-31726:host:192.168.56.6:1:CL(GROUP01)[F]]
> [term-ETJ100691812-36873:host:192.168.56.16:1:CL(GROUP01)[F]|170] (1) [serv-ZM2BU47533-55240:vt-14:192.168.55.57:1:CL(GROUP01)[F]]
> [term-ETJ100691812-36873:host:192.168.56.16:1:CL(GROUP01)[F]|170] (1) [serv-ZM2BU35943-49435:asb:192.168.55.51:1:CL(GROUP01)[F]]
> ....]
> {code}
> II wasn't able to reproduce that with a simple program. But I observed that merge was preceded by an ifdown/ifup on host 192.168.56.6. That member lost all others members, but it still present in their view.
> Example:
> {code}
> {A, B, C} => {A, B, C} and {C} => {A, B, C}
> {code}
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.11#6341)
11 years, 5 months
[JBoss JIRA] (JGRP-1876) MERGE3 : Strange number and content of subgroups
by Karim AMMOUS (JIRA)
[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JGRP-1876?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.... ]
Karim AMMOUS updated JGRP-1876:
-------------------------------
Attachment: JGRP-1876-1.pdf
> MERGE3 : Strange number and content of subgroups
> ------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: JGRP-1876
> URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JGRP-1876
> Project: JGroups
> Issue Type: Bug
> Affects Versions: 3.4.2
> Reporter: Karim AMMOUS
> Assignee: Bela Ban
> Fix For: 3.5.1, 3.6, 3.6.2
>
> Attachments: 4Subgroups.zip, ChannelCreator.java, DkeJgrpAddress.java, JGRP-1876-1.pdf, JGRP-1876-1.pdf, karim-logs-files.zip, MergeTest4.java, MergeViewWith210Subgroups.log, SplitMergeTest.java, views.txt
>
>
> Using JGroups 3.4.2, a split occurred and a merge was processed successfully but number of subgroups is wrong (210 instead of 2).
> The final mergeView is correct and contains 210 members.
> Here is an extract of subviews:
> {code}
> INFO | Incoming-18,cluster,term-ETJ101697729-31726:host:192.168.56.6:1:CL(GROUP01)[F] | [MyMembershipListener.java:126] | (middleware) | MergeView view ID = [serv-ZM2BU35940-58033:vt-14:192.168.55.55:1:CL(GROUP01)[F]|172]
> 210 subgroups
> [....
> [term-ETJ100691812-36873:host:192.168.56.16:1:CL(GROUP01)[F]|170] (1) [term-ETJ104215245-11092:host:192.168.56.72:1:CL(GROUP01)[F]]
> [term-ETJ100691812-36873:host:192.168.56.16:1:CL(GROUP01)[F]|170] (1) [serv-ZM2BU38960-6907:asb:192.168.55.52:1:CL(GROUP01)[F]]
> [term-ETJ101697729-31726:host:192.168.56.6:1:CL(GROUP01)[F]|171] (1) [term-ETJ101697729-31726:host:192.168.56.6:1:CL(GROUP01)[F]]
> [term-ETJ100691812-36873:host:192.168.56.16:1:CL(GROUP01)[F]|170] (1) [serv-ZM2BU47533-55240:vt-14:192.168.55.57:1:CL(GROUP01)[F]]
> [term-ETJ100691812-36873:host:192.168.56.16:1:CL(GROUP01)[F]|170] (1) [serv-ZM2BU35943-49435:asb:192.168.55.51:1:CL(GROUP01)[F]]
> ....]
> {code}
> II wasn't able to reproduce that with a simple program. But I observed that merge was preceded by an ifdown/ifup on host 192.168.56.6. That member lost all others members, but it still present in their view.
> Example:
> {code}
> {A, B, C} => {A, B, C} and {C} => {A, B, C}
> {code}
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.11#6341)
11 years, 5 months
[JBoss JIRA] (JGRP-1876) MERGE3 : Strange number and content of subgroups
by Karim AMMOUS (JIRA)
[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JGRP-1876?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.... ]
Karim AMMOUS edited comment on JGRP-1876 at 1/19/15 5:42 AM:
-------------------------------------------------------------
Sequence diagram "JGRP-1876-1.pdf" enclosed
He is a configuration excerpt to explain timers
{noformat}
<MERGE3 min_interval="20000" max_interval="30000"
<FD_ALL interval="10000" timeout="35000" timeout_check_interval="3000"/>
<VERIFY_SUSPECT timeout="2000" num_msgs="1"/>
<pbcast.GMS view_bundling="true" max_bundling_time="11000"/>
MergeInfoSender interval=[min_interval, max_interval * 1.5]=[20, 45]
ViewConsistencyChecking interval= max_interval * 1.6 = 48s
{noformat}
was (Author: ammous):
Sequence diagram
He is a configuration excerpt to explain timers
{noformat}
<MERGE3 min_interval="20000" max_interval="30000"
<FD_ALL interval="10000" timeout="35000" timeout_check_interval="3000"/>
<VERIFY_SUSPECT timeout="2000" num_msgs="1"/>
<pbcast.GMS view_bundling="true" max_bundling_time="11000"/>
MergeInfoSender interval=[min_interval, max_interval * 1.5]=[20, 45]
ViewConsistencyChecking interval= max_interval * 1.6 = 48s
{noformat}
> MERGE3 : Strange number and content of subgroups
> ------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: JGRP-1876
> URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JGRP-1876
> Project: JGroups
> Issue Type: Bug
> Affects Versions: 3.4.2
> Reporter: Karim AMMOUS
> Assignee: Bela Ban
> Fix For: 3.5.1, 3.6, 3.6.2
>
> Attachments: 4Subgroups.zip, ChannelCreator.java, DkeJgrpAddress.java, JGRP-1876-1.pdf, karim-logs-files.zip, MergeTest4.java, MergeViewWith210Subgroups.log, SplitMergeTest.java, views.txt
>
>
> Using JGroups 3.4.2, a split occurred and a merge was processed successfully but number of subgroups is wrong (210 instead of 2).
> The final mergeView is correct and contains 210 members.
> Here is an extract of subviews:
> {code}
> INFO | Incoming-18,cluster,term-ETJ101697729-31726:host:192.168.56.6:1:CL(GROUP01)[F] | [MyMembershipListener.java:126] | (middleware) | MergeView view ID = [serv-ZM2BU35940-58033:vt-14:192.168.55.55:1:CL(GROUP01)[F]|172]
> 210 subgroups
> [....
> [term-ETJ100691812-36873:host:192.168.56.16:1:CL(GROUP01)[F]|170] (1) [term-ETJ104215245-11092:host:192.168.56.72:1:CL(GROUP01)[F]]
> [term-ETJ100691812-36873:host:192.168.56.16:1:CL(GROUP01)[F]|170] (1) [serv-ZM2BU38960-6907:asb:192.168.55.52:1:CL(GROUP01)[F]]
> [term-ETJ101697729-31726:host:192.168.56.6:1:CL(GROUP01)[F]|171] (1) [term-ETJ101697729-31726:host:192.168.56.6:1:CL(GROUP01)[F]]
> [term-ETJ100691812-36873:host:192.168.56.16:1:CL(GROUP01)[F]|170] (1) [serv-ZM2BU47533-55240:vt-14:192.168.55.57:1:CL(GROUP01)[F]]
> [term-ETJ100691812-36873:host:192.168.56.16:1:CL(GROUP01)[F]|170] (1) [serv-ZM2BU35943-49435:asb:192.168.55.51:1:CL(GROUP01)[F]]
> ....]
> {code}
> II wasn't able to reproduce that with a simple program. But I observed that merge was preceded by an ifdown/ifup on host 192.168.56.6. That member lost all others members, but it still present in their view.
> Example:
> {code}
> {A, B, C} => {A, B, C} and {C} => {A, B, C}
> {code}
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.11#6341)
11 years, 5 months
[JBoss JIRA] (JGRP-1876) MERGE3 : Strange number and content of subgroups
by Karim AMMOUS (JIRA)
[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JGRP-1876?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.... ]
Karim AMMOUS edited comment on JGRP-1876 at 1/19/15 5:41 AM:
-------------------------------------------------------------
Sequence diagram
He is a configuration excerpt to explain timers
{noformat}
<MERGE3 min_interval="20000" max_interval="30000"
<FD_ALL interval="10000" timeout="35000" timeout_check_interval="3000"/>
<VERIFY_SUSPECT timeout="2000" num_msgs="1"/>
<pbcast.GMS view_bundling="true" max_bundling_time="11000"/>
MergeInfoSender interval=[min_interval, max_interval * 1.5]=[20, 45]
ViewConsistencyChecking interval= max_interval * 1.6 = 48s
{noformat}
was (Author: ammous):
Sequence diagram
> MERGE3 : Strange number and content of subgroups
> ------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: JGRP-1876
> URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JGRP-1876
> Project: JGroups
> Issue Type: Bug
> Affects Versions: 3.4.2
> Reporter: Karim AMMOUS
> Assignee: Bela Ban
> Fix For: 3.5.1, 3.6, 3.6.2
>
> Attachments: 4Subgroups.zip, ChannelCreator.java, DkeJgrpAddress.java, JGRP-1876-1.pdf, karim-logs-files.zip, MergeTest4.java, MergeViewWith210Subgroups.log, SplitMergeTest.java, views.txt
>
>
> Using JGroups 3.4.2, a split occurred and a merge was processed successfully but number of subgroups is wrong (210 instead of 2).
> The final mergeView is correct and contains 210 members.
> Here is an extract of subviews:
> {code}
> INFO | Incoming-18,cluster,term-ETJ101697729-31726:host:192.168.56.6:1:CL(GROUP01)[F] | [MyMembershipListener.java:126] | (middleware) | MergeView view ID = [serv-ZM2BU35940-58033:vt-14:192.168.55.55:1:CL(GROUP01)[F]|172]
> 210 subgroups
> [....
> [term-ETJ100691812-36873:host:192.168.56.16:1:CL(GROUP01)[F]|170] (1) [term-ETJ104215245-11092:host:192.168.56.72:1:CL(GROUP01)[F]]
> [term-ETJ100691812-36873:host:192.168.56.16:1:CL(GROUP01)[F]|170] (1) [serv-ZM2BU38960-6907:asb:192.168.55.52:1:CL(GROUP01)[F]]
> [term-ETJ101697729-31726:host:192.168.56.6:1:CL(GROUP01)[F]|171] (1) [term-ETJ101697729-31726:host:192.168.56.6:1:CL(GROUP01)[F]]
> [term-ETJ100691812-36873:host:192.168.56.16:1:CL(GROUP01)[F]|170] (1) [serv-ZM2BU47533-55240:vt-14:192.168.55.57:1:CL(GROUP01)[F]]
> [term-ETJ100691812-36873:host:192.168.56.16:1:CL(GROUP01)[F]|170] (1) [serv-ZM2BU35943-49435:asb:192.168.55.51:1:CL(GROUP01)[F]]
> ....]
> {code}
> II wasn't able to reproduce that with a simple program. But I observed that merge was preceded by an ifdown/ifup on host 192.168.56.6. That member lost all others members, but it still present in their view.
> Example:
> {code}
> {A, B, C} => {A, B, C} and {C} => {A, B, C}
> {code}
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.11#6341)
11 years, 5 months
[JBoss JIRA] (JGRP-1876) MERGE3 : Strange number and content of subgroups
by Karim AMMOUS (JIRA)
[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JGRP-1876?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.... ]
Karim AMMOUS updated JGRP-1876:
-------------------------------
Attachment: JGRP-1876-1.pdf
Sequence diagram
> MERGE3 : Strange number and content of subgroups
> ------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: JGRP-1876
> URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JGRP-1876
> Project: JGroups
> Issue Type: Bug
> Affects Versions: 3.4.2
> Reporter: Karim AMMOUS
> Assignee: Bela Ban
> Fix For: 3.5.1, 3.6, 3.6.2
>
> Attachments: 4Subgroups.zip, ChannelCreator.java, DkeJgrpAddress.java, JGRP-1876-1.pdf, karim-logs-files.zip, MergeTest4.java, MergeViewWith210Subgroups.log, SplitMergeTest.java, views.txt
>
>
> Using JGroups 3.4.2, a split occurred and a merge was processed successfully but number of subgroups is wrong (210 instead of 2).
> The final mergeView is correct and contains 210 members.
> Here is an extract of subviews:
> {code}
> INFO | Incoming-18,cluster,term-ETJ101697729-31726:host:192.168.56.6:1:CL(GROUP01)[F] | [MyMembershipListener.java:126] | (middleware) | MergeView view ID = [serv-ZM2BU35940-58033:vt-14:192.168.55.55:1:CL(GROUP01)[F]|172]
> 210 subgroups
> [....
> [term-ETJ100691812-36873:host:192.168.56.16:1:CL(GROUP01)[F]|170] (1) [term-ETJ104215245-11092:host:192.168.56.72:1:CL(GROUP01)[F]]
> [term-ETJ100691812-36873:host:192.168.56.16:1:CL(GROUP01)[F]|170] (1) [serv-ZM2BU38960-6907:asb:192.168.55.52:1:CL(GROUP01)[F]]
> [term-ETJ101697729-31726:host:192.168.56.6:1:CL(GROUP01)[F]|171] (1) [term-ETJ101697729-31726:host:192.168.56.6:1:CL(GROUP01)[F]]
> [term-ETJ100691812-36873:host:192.168.56.16:1:CL(GROUP01)[F]|170] (1) [serv-ZM2BU47533-55240:vt-14:192.168.55.57:1:CL(GROUP01)[F]]
> [term-ETJ100691812-36873:host:192.168.56.16:1:CL(GROUP01)[F]|170] (1) [serv-ZM2BU35943-49435:asb:192.168.55.51:1:CL(GROUP01)[F]]
> ....]
> {code}
> II wasn't able to reproduce that with a simple program. But I observed that merge was preceded by an ifdown/ifup on host 192.168.56.6. That member lost all others members, but it still present in their view.
> Example:
> {code}
> {A, B, C} => {A, B, C} and {C} => {A, B, C}
> {code}
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.11#6341)
11 years, 5 months
[JBoss JIRA] (WFLY-3266) Exception are hidden by retry and end in a EJBCLIENT000032 Exception - the underlying client or server side cause is swallowed
by Panagiotis Sotiropoulos (JIRA)
[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFLY-3266?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.... ]
Panagiotis Sotiropoulos reassigned WFLY-3266:
---------------------------------------------
Assignee: Panagiotis Sotiropoulos (was: David Lloyd)
Fix Version/s: 9.0.0.CR1
Resolution: Done
Updating to resolved since https://github.com/jbossas/jboss-ejb-client/pull/73 was merged.
> Exception are hidden by retry and end in a EJBCLIENT000032 Exception - the underlying client or server side cause is swallowed
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: WFLY-3266
> URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFLY-3266
> Project: WildFly
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: EJB
> Affects Versions: 8.0.0.Final
> Reporter: Wolf-Dieter Fink
> Assignee: Panagiotis Sotiropoulos
> Priority: Critical
> Fix For: 9.0.0.CR1
>
>
> In case of large parameter input for EJB invocations the ejb-client throw the Exception below.
> The underlying OutOfMemory is complete hidden, neither in the server.log nor in the ejb-client with TRACE a hint will be found.
> java.lang.IllegalStateException: EJBCLIENT000032: Cannot retry a request which hasn't previously been completed
> at org.jboss.ejb.client.EJBClientInvocationContext.retryRequest(EJBClientInvocationContext.java:200)
> at org.jboss.ejb.client.EJBInvocationHandler.sendRequestWithPossibleRetries(EJBInvocationHandler.java:256)
> at org.jboss.ejb.client.EJBInvocationHandler.sendRequestWithPossibleRetries(EJBInvocationHandler.java:265)
> at org.jboss.ejb.client.EJBInvocationHandler.doInvoke(EJBInvocationHandler.java:198)
> at org.jboss.ejb.client.EJBInvocationHandler.doInvoke(EJBInvocationHandler.java:181)
> at org.jboss.ejb.client.EJBInvocationHandler.invoke(EJBInvocationHandler.java:144)
> at com.sun.proxy.$Proxy6.uploadData(Unknown Source)
> at de.info.biene.konsens.TestServiceWithAPITest.testUploadData(TestServiceWithAPITest.java:81)
> at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
> at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:57)
> at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43)
> at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:606)
> at org.junit.runners.model.FrameworkMethod$1.runReflectiveCall(FrameworkMethod.java:47)
> at org.junit.internal.runners.model.ReflectiveCallable.run(ReflectiveCallable.java:12)
> at org.junit.runners.model.FrameworkMethod.invokeExplosively(FrameworkMethod.java:44)
> at org.junit.internal.runners.statements.InvokeMethod.evaluate(InvokeMethod.java:17)
> at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.runLeaf(ParentRunner.java:271)
> at org.junit.runners.BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.runChild(BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.java:70)
> at org.junit.runners.BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.runChild(BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.java:50)
> at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$3.run(ParentRunner.java:238)
> at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$1.schedule(ParentRunner.java:63)
> at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.runChildren(ParentRunner.java:236)
> at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.access$000(ParentRunner.java:53)
> at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$2.evaluate(ParentRunner.java:229)
> at org.junit.internal.runners.statements.RunBefores.evaluate(RunBefores.java:26)
> at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.run(ParentRunner.java:309)
> at org.apache.maven.surefire.junit4.JUnit4Provider.execute(JUnit4Provider.java:252)
> at org.apache.maven.surefire.junit4.JUnit4Provider.executeTestSet(JUnit4Provider.java:141)
> at org.apache.maven.surefire.junit4.JUnit4Provider.invoke(JUnit4Provider.java:112)
> at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
> at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:57)
> at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43)
> at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:606)
> at org.apache.maven.surefire.util.ReflectionUtils.invokeMethodWithArray(ReflectionUtils.java:189)
> at org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.ProviderFactory$ProviderProxy.invoke(ProviderFactory.java:165)
> at org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.ProviderFactory.invokeProvider(ProviderFactory.java:85)
> at org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.ForkedBooter.runSuitesInProcess(ForkedBooter.java:115)
> at org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.ForkedBooter.main(ForkedBooter.java:75)
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.11#6341)
11 years, 5 months
[JBoss JIRA] (WFLY-3594) Wildfly showing the war file status as Failed after restart the server
by Bartosz Baranowski (JIRA)
[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFLY-3594?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.... ]
Bartosz Baranowski reassigned WFLY-3594:
----------------------------------------
Assignee: Bartosz Baranowski (was: Jason Greene)
> Wildfly showing the war file status as Failed after restart the server
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: WFLY-3594
> URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFLY-3594
> Project: WildFly
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: Server
> Affects Versions: 8.0.0.Final
> Environment: windows server 2003 32 bit O.S,Java 7,flex, Apache axis web services
> Reporter: shaik masthan
> Assignee: Bartosz Baranowski
> Priority: Minor
> Labels: restarting
> Original Estimate: 2 days
> Remaining Estimate: 2 days
>
> after successful deployment , war file status is deployed. When i restart the server , war files status is showing as failed. there were no errors in the logs and i am able to access the the application without any problems.
> After some time happen , again i restart the server this time war file status is deployed.
> intermittently i am viewing this weird behavior with war files w.r. t restarting the server.
> let me know any workaround or fix for this.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.11#6341)
11 years, 5 months
[JBoss JIRA] (WFLY-3594) Wildfly showing the war file status as Failed after restart the server
by Bartosz Baranowski (JIRA)
[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFLY-3594?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.... ]
Bartosz Baranowski commented on WFLY-3594:
------------------------------------------
Dialing back priority since this seems to have no impact on app availability.
Also, please provide reproducer and step by step instruction how to trigger this. Otherwise this issue cant be subject of investigation.
> Wildfly showing the war file status as Failed after restart the server
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: WFLY-3594
> URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFLY-3594
> Project: WildFly
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: Server
> Affects Versions: 8.0.0.Final
> Environment: windows server 2003 32 bit O.S,Java 7,flex, Apache axis web services
> Reporter: shaik masthan
> Assignee: Bartosz Baranowski
> Priority: Minor
> Labels: restarting
> Original Estimate: 2 days
> Remaining Estimate: 2 days
>
> after successful deployment , war file status is deployed. When i restart the server , war files status is showing as failed. there were no errors in the logs and i am able to access the the application without any problems.
> After some time happen , again i restart the server this time war file status is deployed.
> intermittently i am viewing this weird behavior with war files w.r. t restarting the server.
> let me know any workaround or fix for this.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.11#6341)
11 years, 5 months