[JBoss JIRA] (WFCORE-1275) CLI resolve-parameter-values set to true does not recognise vaulted strings
by Lin Gao (JIRA)
Lin Gao created WFCORE-1275:
-------------------------------
Summary: CLI resolve-parameter-values set to true does not recognise vaulted strings
Key: WFCORE-1275
URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFCORE-1275
Project: WildFly Core
Issue Type: Bug
Components: CLI
Affects Versions: 2.0.5.Final
Reporter: Lin Gao
Assignee: Lin Gao
When enabling
<resolve-parameter-values>true</resolve-parameter-values>
in "bin\jboss-cli.xml"
vaulted string will get misinterpreted.
Example, if a command has "${VAULT::tom::tom::1}" then
the parser sees this as ${name:defaultValue} with
name="VAULT"
defaultValue=":tom::tom::1"
Escaping the $ sign in various ways did not help. The only way is to switch <resolve-parameter-values> back to false.
Ideally, the parser should recognize vaulted string and pass then in unchanged.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.11#64026)
10 years, 3 months
[JBoss JIRA] (WFCORE-1274) CLI resolve-parameter-values set to true does not recognise vaulted strings
by Lin Gao (JIRA)
Lin Gao created WFCORE-1274:
-------------------------------
Summary: CLI resolve-parameter-values set to true does not recognise vaulted strings
Key: WFCORE-1274
URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFCORE-1274
Project: WildFly Core
Issue Type: Bug
Components: CLI
Affects Versions: 2.0.5.Final
Reporter: Lin Gao
Assignee: Lin Gao
When enabling
<resolve-parameter-values>true</resolve-parameter-values>
in "bin\jboss-cli.xml"
vaulted string will get misinterpreted.
Example, if a command has "${VAULT::tom::tom::1}" then
the parser sees this as ${name:defaultValue} with
name="VAULT"
defaultValue=":tom::tom::1"
Escaping the $ sign in various ways did not help. The only way is to switch <resolve-parameter-values> back to false.
Ideally, the parser should recognize vaulted string and pass then in unchanged.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.11#64026)
10 years, 3 months
[JBoss JIRA] (WFLY-5822) Clustering performance regression in ejbremote-dist-sync scenario
by Richard Achmatowicz (JIRA)
[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFLY-5822?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.... ]
Richard Achmatowicz edited comment on WFLY-5822 at 1/6/16 7:59 PM:
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Some statistics on session creation calls, method invocation calls and the resulting gets/puts during such calls (totals over running the test for a few iterations):
EAP 7.0.0.DR9:
||operation||perf18||perf19||perf20||perf21||
|SessionCreation|98|99|103|100|
|MethodInvocation|35854|35871|36046|36037|
|Get|179368|179454|180333|180205|
|Put|808|808|558|393|
EAP 6.4.0:
||operation||perf18||perf19||perf20||perf21||
|SessionCreation|22|22|36|29|
|MethodInvocation|4299|6954|4738|6614|
|Get|8598|13911|9478|13253|
|Put|9473 |11742|12512|11598|
For every method invocation:
EAP 7.0.0 has 5 gets
EAP 6.4.0 has 2 gets
was (Author: rachmato):
Some statistics on session creation calls, method invocation calls and the resulting gets/puts during such calls (totals over running the test for a few iterations):
EAP 7.0.0.DR9:
||operation||perf18||perf19||perf20||perf21||
|SessionCreation|98|99|103|100|
|MethodInvocation|35854|35871|36046|36037|
|Get|179368|179454|180333|180205|
|Put|808|808|558|393|
EAP 6.4.0:
||operation||perf18||perf19||perf20||perf21||
|SessionCreation|22|22|36|29|
|MethodInvocation|4299|6954|4738|6614|
|Get|8598|13911|9478|13253|
|Put|9473 |11742|12512|11598|
> Clustering performance regression in ejbremote-dist-sync scenario
> ------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: WFLY-5822
> URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFLY-5822
> Project: WildFly
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: Clustering, EJB
> Affects Versions: 10.0.0.CR5
> Reporter: Michal Vinkler
> Assignee: Richard Achmatowicz
> Priority: Critical
>
> Compared to EAP 6, all SYNC scenarios have the same/better performance except of this one, wonder why?
> Compare these results:
> stress-ejbremote-dist-sync
> 7.0.0.ER2: [throughput|http://jenkins.mw.lab.eng.bos.redhat.com/hudson/job/eap-7x-str...]
> 6.4.0.GA: [throughput|http://jenkins.mw.lab.eng.bos.redhat.com/hudson/job/eap-6x-str...]
> ---------------------------------------
> Just for comparison: ejbremote REPL_SYNC scenario *performs well* on the other hand:
> stress-ejbremote-repl-sync
> 7.0.0.ER2: [throughput|http://jenkins.mw.lab.eng.bos.redhat.com/hudson/job/eap-7x-str...]
> 6.4.0.GA: [throughput|http://jenkins.mw.lab.eng.bos.redhat.com/hudson/job/eap-6x-str...]
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.11#64026)
10 years, 3 months