[JBoss JIRA] (WFCORE-1983) Root cause of failing parsing should be used as failure description
by ehsavoie Hugonnet (JIRA)
[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFCORE-1983?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugi... ]
ehsavoie Hugonnet reassigned WFCORE-1983:
-----------------------------------------
Assignee: ehsavoie Hugonnet (was: Brian Stansberry)
> Root cause of failing parsing should be used as failure description
> -------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: WFCORE-1983
> URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFCORE-1983
> Project: WildFly Core
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: Domain Management
> Reporter: Jean-Francois Denise
> Assignee: ehsavoie Hugonnet
>
> It happens that the CLI does a custom parsing of the value in case ModelNode.fromString fails (whatever the exception).
> The issue is that the custom parsing doesn't follow the ModelNode parsing syntax and parse everything as String. So the resulting ModelNode that is serialised and sent to the server has been transformed.
> I am surprised that we don't have more of such failures. For example, when numbers are located inside custom complex structure such as: {mynumber=9999} that will be sent as an OBJECT containing a STRING although the valid DMR syntax {"my number"=>999} would be sent as an OBJECT containing an INT.
> Some server side subsystems are smart enough to call into asXXX methods and not check the type?
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.2.3#72005)
9 years, 4 months
[JBoss JIRA] (ELY-298) load-from/uri keystore xsd/parser mismatch
by Darran Lofthouse (JIRA)
[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/ELY-298?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.sy... ]
Darran Lofthouse updated ELY-298:
---------------------------------
Fix Version/s: 1.1.0.Beta19
(was: 1.1.0.Beta18)
> load-from/uri keystore xsd/parser mismatch
> ------------------------------------------
>
> Key: ELY-298
> URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/ELY-298
> Project: WildFly Elytron
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: Authentication Client
> Reporter: Kabir Khan
> Assignee: Darran Lofthouse
> Fix For: 1.1.0.Beta19
>
>
> The xsd has
> {code}
> <xsd:complexType name="key-store-type">
> <xsd:sequence minOccurs="1" maxOccurs="1">
> <!-- Access source type -->
> <xsd:choice minOccurs="1" maxOccurs="1">
> <xsd:element name="file" type="name-type" minOccurs="1" maxOccurs="1"/>
> <xsd:element name="load-from" type="uri-type" minOccurs="1" maxOccurs="1"/>
> <xsd:element name="resource" type="name-type" minOccurs="1" maxOccurs="1"/>
> {code}
> The parser seems to look for 'uri' rather than 'load-from'
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.2.3#72005)
9 years, 4 months
[JBoss JIRA] (ELY-524) RealmIdentity data caching support in the LDAP realm
by Darran Lofthouse (JIRA)
[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/ELY-524?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.sy... ]
Darran Lofthouse updated ELY-524:
---------------------------------
Fix Version/s: 1.1.0.Beta19
(was: 1.1.0.Beta18)
> RealmIdentity data caching support in the LDAP realm
> ----------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: ELY-524
> URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/ELY-524
> Project: WildFly Elytron
> Issue Type: Feature Request
> Components: Realms
> Reporter: David Lloyd
> Assignee: Pedro Igor
> Priority: Critical
> Fix For: 1.1.0.Beta19
>
>
> The LDAP realm should use a caching strategy to avoid excessive database load in the presence of per-request authentication traffic.
> The realm implementation could maintain a synchronized LRU cache of one-time-initialize references to a cached DirContext or Attributes or binding or some combination of these. Because the cache is synchronized, the one-time-initialize object would be added under the lock and then the lock released before the object is populated and returned as a cached credential, allowing atomic action with a minimum of contention.
> For each cached entity, a NamingListener could be established which would invalidate (or possibly update) the cached value as the database changes.
> Alternatively, a NamingListener could be established for all identities, and each update would invalidate or update any cached values corresponding to the DN or resolved name.
> This is a complex design topic so discussion is welcome.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.2.3#72005)
9 years, 4 months