December 2016 - jboss-jira - Jboss List Archives

[JBoss JIRA] (DROOLS-607) Match.getObjects() should reflect the patterns' order

by Michael Biarnes Kiefer (JIRA)

[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/DROOLS-607?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin... ] Michael Biarnes Kiefer updated DROOLS-607: ------------------------------------------ Fix Version/s: 7.0.0.Beta5 (was: 7.0.0.Beta4) > Match.getObjects() should reflect the patterns' order > ----------------------------------------------------- > > Key: DROOLS-607 > URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/DROOLS-607 > Project: Drools > Issue Type: Enhancement > Affects Versions: 5.5.0.Final, 5.6.0.Final, 6.0.0.Final, 6.1.0.Final > Reporter: Davide Sottara > Assignee: Mark Proctor > Priority: Minor > Fix For: 7.0.0.Beta5 > > > if Match.getObjects() is called on a rule with LHS A() B() C(), > the resulting list will have the matching objects in reversed order > - that is, [c, b, a] - making it more difficult to analyze it. > The object's position in the list should reflect the LHS. > The order should be preserved even when subnetworks are present. > For example, A() not B() C() should then result in the list [a, *, c ] -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.2.3#72005)

9 years, 5 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss JIRA] (DROOLS-542) Expose more Commands through the KieCommands API

by Michael Biarnes Kiefer (JIRA)

[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/DROOLS-542?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin... ] Michael Biarnes Kiefer updated DROOLS-542: ------------------------------------------ Fix Version/s: 7.0.0.Beta5 (was: 7.0.0.Beta4) > Expose more Commands through the KieCommands API > ------------------------------------------------ > > Key: DROOLS-542 > URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/DROOLS-542 > Project: Drools > Issue Type: Feature Request > Affects Versions: 6.1.0.CR1 > Reporter: Davide Sottara > Assignee: Davide Sottara > Fix For: 7.0.0.Beta5 > > > Not all Commands are exposed by the KieCommands API interface -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.2.3#72005)

9 years, 5 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss JIRA] (DROOLS-470) Decision Table (XLS) should support fixed conditions, such as SeatDesignation(isNeighborOf($guest))

by Michael Biarnes Kiefer (JIRA)

[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/DROOLS-470?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin... ] Michael Biarnes Kiefer updated DROOLS-470: ------------------------------------------ Fix Version/s: 7.0.0.Beta5 (was: 7.0.0.Beta4) > Decision Table (XLS) should support fixed conditions, such as SeatDesignation(isNeighborOf($guest)) > --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: DROOLS-470 > URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/DROOLS-470 > Project: Drools > Issue Type: Enhancement > Components: decision tables > Affects Versions: 6.1.0.Beta2 > Reporter: Geoffrey De Smet > Assignee: Michael Anstis > Labels: optaplanner-request-for-drools > Fix For: 7.0.0.Beta5 > > > This DT should work: > ||CONDITION||CONDITION||ACTION| > |$guest : SeatDesignation()|$neighbor : SeatDesignation(isNeighborOf($guest))|| > |guestName == "$param"|guestName == "$param"|doSomething();| > It crashes because of the "SeatDesignation(isNeighborOf($guest))". Only empty parenthesis are allowed. > Failing workaround 1: This workaround (as specified by the docs), does NOT work well, because it adds the same condition (isNeighborOf($guest)) multiple times in the same rule: > ||CONDITION||CONDITION||CONDITION||ACTION| > |$guest : SeatDesignation()|$neighbor : SeatDesignation()||| > |guestName == "$param"|isNeighborOf($guest), guestName == "$param"|isNeighborOf($guest), guestAge == "$param"|doSomething();| > Failing workaround 2: Adding an extra, hidden column with that condition does not work when new rows are added because condition columns with an empty cell are ignored. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.2.3#72005)

9 years, 5 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss JIRA] (DROOLS-453) Allow KieSession globals configurable via kmodule.xml

by Michael Biarnes Kiefer (JIRA)

[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/DROOLS-453?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin... ] Michael Biarnes Kiefer updated DROOLS-453: ------------------------------------------ Fix Version/s: 7.0.0.Beta5 (was: 7.0.0.Beta4) > Allow KieSession globals configurable via kmodule.xml > ----------------------------------------------------- > > Key: DROOLS-453 > URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/DROOLS-453 > Project: Drools > Issue Type: Enhancement > Affects Versions: 6.0.0.Final > Reporter: Anton Giertli > Assignee: Mark Proctor > Fix For: 7.0.0.Beta5 > > > Looking at the current xsd of kmodule.xml > https://github.com/droolsjbpm/droolsjbpm-knowledge/blob/6.0.x/kie-api/src... > It is not possible to configure KieSession globals variables via kmodule.xml. > Given the fact it is already possible to configure almost every KieSession related features like listeners, handlers, loggers, globals, also session related, should be configurable through the kmodule.xml too. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.2.3#72005)

9 years, 5 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss JIRA] (DROOLS-817) Extremely poor performance of the topological sorting implementation for type declarations performs

by Michael Biarnes Kiefer (JIRA)

[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/DROOLS-817?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin... ] Michael Biarnes Kiefer updated DROOLS-817: ------------------------------------------ Fix Version/s: 7.0.0.Beta5 (was: 7.0.0.Beta4) > Extremely poor performance of the topological sorting implementation for type declarations performs > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: DROOLS-817 > URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/DROOLS-817 > Project: Drools > Issue Type: Enhancement > Components: core engine > Affects Versions: 6.0.0.Final, 6.0.1.Final, 6.1.0.Final, 6.2.0.Final, 6.3.0.Beta1 > Reporter: Davide Sottara > Assignee: Davide Sottara > Priority: Minor > Fix For: 7.0.0.Beta5 > > > The current implementation suffers from thrashing. > In case of large business object models (e.g. derived from an ontology), > the analysis at package build time may take orders of magnitude more > than necessary -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.2.3#72005)

9 years, 5 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss JIRA] (DROOLS-744) Rule Generation Feature Request

by Michael Biarnes Kiefer (JIRA)

[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/DROOLS-744?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin... ] Michael Biarnes Kiefer updated DROOLS-744: ------------------------------------------ Fix Version/s: 7.0.0.Beta5 (was: 7.0.0.Beta4) > Rule Generation Feature Request > ------------------------------- > > Key: DROOLS-744 > URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/DROOLS-744 > Project: Drools > Issue Type: Feature Request > Components: core engine, kie server > Affects Versions: 6.2.0.Final > Reporter: Justin Holmes > Assignee: Mario Fusco > Fix For: 7.0.0.Beta5 > > > As a developer using Drools, I want a rule generation java api that supports control logic in the rule templates (e.g. for loops, if/else) and integrates with the rule workbench in order to build highly dynamic business rules driven systems. > The initial thought process around implementation is to build two things 1) a simple way to author mvel templates in business central, the existing text editor could be used at first and 2) a simple embedded java api in it's own maven module which can checkout the git project that has the mvel template, apply a set of domain objects to the template, check in the resulting rule files to the local git repo and then push the changes back to business central. This allows us to leverage the power of the existing MVEL and JGit tech stack while pushing the complexity to a java api, where we are stronger than the workbench itself. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.2.3#72005)

9 years, 5 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss JIRA] (DROOLS-680) "contains" operator behaves inconsistently when used with Maps

by Michael Biarnes Kiefer (JIRA)

[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/DROOLS-680?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin... ] Michael Biarnes Kiefer updated DROOLS-680: ------------------------------------------ Fix Version/s: 7.0.0.Beta5 (was: 7.0.0.Beta4) > "contains" operator behaves inconsistently when used with Maps > -------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: DROOLS-680 > URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/DROOLS-680 > Project: Drools > Issue Type: Bug > Affects Versions: 5.6.0.Final, 6.0.1.Final, 6.1.0.Final, 6.2.0.CR4 > Reporter: Davide Sottara > Assignee: Mario Fusco > Fix For: 7.0.0.Beta5 > > > In a rule > {code} > Bean( map contains "x" ) // assuming "map" is a property of type Map > {code} > "contains" is arbitrarily interpreted as "containsKey" > The constrain will then fail after being jitted > The documentation explicitly states that "contains" applies to collections -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.2.3#72005)

9 years, 5 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss JIRA] (DROOLS-670) Generalize inline casts to work with traits

by Michael Biarnes Kiefer (JIRA)

[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/DROOLS-670?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin... ] Michael Biarnes Kiefer updated DROOLS-670: ------------------------------------------ Fix Version/s: 7.0.0.Beta5 (was: 7.0.0.Beta4) > Generalize inline casts to work with traits > ------------------------------------------- > > Key: DROOLS-670 > URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/DROOLS-670 > Project: Drools > Issue Type: Enhancement > Affects Versions: 6.2.0.CR3 > Reporter: Davide Sottara > Assignee: Davide Sottara > Fix For: 7.0.0.Beta5 > > > The following constraint > {code} > Person( this#Worker( wage > 1000 ) ) > {code} > is admissible when Worker is a subtype of Person. > It should also be possible to use "#" when Worker is a donned trait. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.2.3#72005)

9 years, 5 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss JIRA] (SECURITY-864) NameNotFoundException due to policyRegistration -- service jboss.naming.context.java.policyRegistration

by Martin Letenay (JIRA)

[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/SECURITY-864?page=com.atlassian.jira.plug... ] Martin Letenay commented on SECURITY-864: ----------------------------------------- We register it with plain {{new InitialContext().bind(policyRegistrationJndiName, policyRegistration);}} and never noticed any read-only JNDI tree problems. I've just tested it on Wildfly 10.0.0 and it went fine, JNDI tree accessible. Maybe some configuration setting ? > NameNotFoundException due to policyRegistration -- service jboss.naming.context.java.policyRegistration > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: SECURITY-864 > URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/SECURITY-864 > Project: PicketBox > Issue Type: Bug > Components: PicketBox > Reporter: Chao Wang > Assignee: Stefan Guilhen > > "NameNotFoundException due to policyRegistration -- service jboss.naming.context.java.policyRegistration" is recorded in server.log during quickstart example run by changing log level: > {noformat} > <logger category="org.jboss.as.security"> > <level name="TRACE"/> > </logger> > <logger category="org.jboss.security"> > <level name="TRACE"/> > </logger> > {noformat} > See detailed description in community discussion [#907134|https://developer.jboss.org/message/907134] > I choose Jira component picketbox since the exception is titled as "PBOX000293: Exception caught: javax.naming.NameNotFoundException" -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.2.3#72005)

9 years, 5 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss JIRA] (JBWEB-315) JBoss does not return exception with stack trace if the service address is not localhost or loopback ip

by Khoa Tran (JIRA)

Khoa Tran created JBWEB-315: ------------------------------- Summary: JBoss does not return exception with stack trace if the service address is not localhost or loopback ip Key: JBWEB-315 URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBWEB-315 Project: JBoss Web Issue Type: Bug Affects Versions: JBossWeb-7.0.1.GA Environment: Window OS: win 7 JDK version: 1.8.0_112 Reporter: Khoa Tran Assignee: Remy Maucherat Priority: Critical Attachments: Replication.docx, WebException.zip, standalone.xml For this JBOSS release 7.0.1.GA, exception return to client upon processing HTTP Request is not consistent. How the exception return surprisingly depends on the ipaddress (of the server). What I mean is: - Using 127.0.0.1 or localhost as part of address, exception is return fine, with proper stack trace - Using PC domain name, or lan ip adrress, the exception return is just "Internal Server Error", no stack trace - this look like JBoss error to me. Please view attach document for detail, also there is sample project and standalone xml included. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.2.3#72005)

9 years, 5 months

1
0
0 / 0

2026

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

jboss-jira December 2016