[JBoss JIRA] (DROOLS-1094) OptaPlanner Kie server service: unable to retrieve best solution
by Geoffrey De Smet (JIRA)
[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/DROOLS-1094?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugi... ]
Geoffrey De Smet resolved DROOLS-1094.
--------------------------------------
Fix Version/s: 6.4.0.Final
7.0.0.Final
Resolution: Done
Fixed
> OptaPlanner Kie server service: unable to retrieve best solution
> ----------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: DROOLS-1094
> URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/DROOLS-1094
> Project: Drools
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: kie server
> Affects Versions: 6.4.0.CR1
> Environment: Kie server OptaPlanner service
> Reporter: Karel Suta
> Assignee: Geoffrey De Smet
> Labels: qe-recommend-fix-before-ga, reported-by-qe
> Fix For: 6.4.0.Final, 7.0.0.Final
>
>
> When I try to retrieve best solution from Solver in Kie server OptaPlanner extension, JAXB and XSTREAM works correctly but JSON doesn't. JSON marshalling isn't able to map planning variable in planning entity.
> It can be simulated using cloudbalance problem which is part of Kie server OptaPlanner integration tests. See test method testGetBestSolution in OptaplannerIntegrationTest.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.11#64026)
10 years, 1 month
[JBoss JIRA] (WFLY-6420) 30secs delay on consumer.receive() in spite of shorter timeout
by Jeff Mesnil (JIRA)
[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFLY-6420?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.... ]
Jeff Mesnil updated WFLY-6420:
------------------------------
Attachment: artemis-hornetq-client.tgz
Updated example working with WildFly 10.1.0.Final-SNAPSHOT
> 30secs delay on consumer.receive() in spite of shorter timeout
> --------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: WFLY-6420
> URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFLY-6420
> Project: WildFly
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: JMS
> Affects Versions: 10.0.0.Final
> Reporter: Tomohisa igarashi
> Assignee: Jeff Mesnil
> Fix For: 10.1.0.Final
>
> Attachments: artemis-hornetq-client.tgz, artemis-hornetq-client.tgz
>
>
> consumer.receive() is blocked 30secs even if shorter timeout is specified. Attached a maven project including testcases.
> The ArtemisStandaloneTest do same against embedded server, but this in contrast works fine. So the issue seems to happen only on WildFly via http upgrade connection.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.11#64026)
10 years, 1 month
[JBoss JIRA] (WFLY-6420) 30secs delay on consumer.receive() in spite of shorter timeout
by Jeff Mesnil (JIRA)
[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFLY-6420?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.... ]
Jeff Mesnil commented on WFLY-6420:
-----------------------------------
Your dependencies were not correct. You should use org.wildfly:wildfly-jms-client-bom to get the correct ones.
Please find attached your project with a correct POM (and updated code for JMS 2.0).
I've tested it against WildFly master and it works (even after restarting the server)
> 30secs delay on consumer.receive() in spite of shorter timeout
> --------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: WFLY-6420
> URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFLY-6420
> Project: WildFly
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: JMS
> Affects Versions: 10.0.0.Final
> Reporter: Tomohisa igarashi
> Assignee: Jeff Mesnil
> Fix For: 10.1.0.Final
>
> Attachments: artemis-hornetq-client.tgz
>
>
> consumer.receive() is blocked 30secs even if shorter timeout is specified. Attached a maven project including testcases.
> The ArtemisStandaloneTest do same against embedded server, but this in contrast works fine. So the issue seems to happen only on WildFly via http upgrade connection.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.11#64026)
10 years, 1 month
[JBoss JIRA] (WFLY-6420) 30secs delay on consumer.receive() in spite of shorter timeout
by Tomohisa igarashi (JIRA)
[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFLY-6420?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.... ]
Tomohisa igarashi commented on WFLY-6420:
-----------------------------------------
Ah thanks for catching it, but it still reproduces with specifying 1.1.0.wildfly-014 in the POM here.
> 30secs delay on consumer.receive() in spite of shorter timeout
> --------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: WFLY-6420
> URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFLY-6420
> Project: WildFly
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: JMS
> Affects Versions: 10.0.0.Final
> Reporter: Tomohisa igarashi
> Assignee: Jeff Mesnil
> Fix For: 10.1.0.Final
>
> Attachments: artemis-hornetq-client.tgz
>
>
> consumer.receive() is blocked 30secs even if shorter timeout is specified. Attached a maven project including testcases.
> The ArtemisStandaloneTest do same against embedded server, but this in contrast works fine. So the issue seems to happen only on WildFly via http upgrade connection.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.11#64026)
10 years, 1 month
[JBoss JIRA] (WFLY-6424) Update README-EJB-JMS.txt file in bin/client directory
by Jeff Mesnil (JIRA)
Jeff Mesnil created WFLY-6424:
---------------------------------
Summary: Update README-EJB-JMS.txt file in bin/client directory
Key: WFLY-6424
URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFLY-6424
Project: WildFly
Issue Type: Bug
Affects Versions: 10.0.0.Final
Reporter: Jeff Mesnil
Assignee: Jason Greene
Priority: Minor
The file reference the BOMs org.jboss.as:jboss-as-ejb-client-bom and org.jboss.as:jboss-as-jms-client-bom which have been moved to the org.wildfly namespace
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.11#64026)
10 years, 1 month
[JBoss JIRA] (WFLY-6420) 30secs delay on consumer.receive() in spite of shorter timeout
by Jeff Mesnil (JIRA)
[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFLY-6420?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.... ]
Jeff Mesnil commented on WFLY-6420:
-----------------------------------
I see that in your example you are using Artemis 1.2.0. WildFly is using Artemis 1.1.0.wildlfy-014 and I'm not sure how it is compatible with 1.2.0.
We recommend to use the BOM that contains sanctioned version for JMS client: org.wildfly:wildfly-jms-client-bom
> 30secs delay on consumer.receive() in spite of shorter timeout
> --------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: WFLY-6420
> URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFLY-6420
> Project: WildFly
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: JMS
> Affects Versions: 10.0.0.Final
> Reporter: Tomohisa igarashi
> Assignee: Jeff Mesnil
> Fix For: 10.1.0.Final
>
> Attachments: artemis-hornetq-client.tgz
>
>
> consumer.receive() is blocked 30secs even if shorter timeout is specified. Attached a maven project including testcases.
> The ArtemisStandaloneTest do same against embedded server, but this in contrast works fine. So the issue seems to happen only on WildFly via http upgrade connection.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.11#64026)
10 years, 1 month
[JBoss JIRA] (JGRP-2033) Replace Java serialization with JGroups marshalling
by Bela Ban (JIRA)
[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JGRP-2033?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.... ]
Bela Ban commented on JGRP-2033:
--------------------------------
Marshaller now only marshals _arguments_ to RPC calls and _return values_, not {{MethodCalls}}. In addition, there's an {{estimatedSize()}} call which is called before serialization to compute a size for the output stream that prevents resizing of its underlying buffer.
> Replace Java serialization with JGroups marshalling
> ---------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: JGRP-2033
> URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JGRP-2033
> Project: JGroups
> Issue Type: Task
> Reporter: Bela Ban
> Assignee: Bela Ban
> Fix For: 3.6.9, 4.0
>
>
> In some cases, even JGroups internal code still uses Java serialization. Replace this with marshalling (using {{Streamable}}). Analysis of all occurrences of {{Util.objectFromXXX()}} calls.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.11#64026)
10 years, 1 month