May 2016 - jboss-jira - Jboss List Archives

[JBoss JIRA] (WFLY-6619) Documentation about dynamic modules

by Jens Piegsa (JIRA)

Jens Piegsa created WFLY-6619: --------------------------------- Summary: Documentation about dynamic modules Key: WFLY-6619 URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFLY-6619 Project: WildFly Issue Type: Enhancement Reporter: Jens Piegsa Assignee: Jason Greene Please add some information about dynamic modules to the WildFly documentation: [https://access.redhat.com/documentation/en-US/JBoss_Enterprise_Applicatio...] -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.4.11#64026)

9 years, 11 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss JIRA] (DROOLS-1174) Bug of score corruption in dinner party examples uncovered by fix for PLANNER-488

by Jiri Locker (JIRA)

[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/DROOLS-1174?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugi... ] Jiri Locker commented on DROOLS-1174: ------------------------------------- Done (see sub-task for details). Let me know if additional cooperation is needed. > Bug of score corruption in dinner party examples uncovered by fix for PLANNER-488 > --------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: DROOLS-1174 > URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/DROOLS-1174 > Project: Drools > Issue Type: Bug > Components: core engine > Reporter: Geoffrey De Smet > Assignee: Mario Fusco > Priority: Critical > > to reproduce run DinnerPartySolveAllTurtleTest with VM option -DrunTurtleTests=true in optaplanner-examples. > {code} > 2016-05-12 16:06:02,121 [main] INFO Opened: data/dinnerparty/unsolved/wedding01.xml > 2016-05-12 16:06:02,226 [main] TRACE Model annotations parsed for Solution DinnerParty: > 2016-05-12 16:06:02,226 [main] TRACE Entity SeatDesignation: > 2016-05-12 16:06:02,226 [main] TRACE Variable seat (genuine) > 2016-05-12 16:06:03,436 [main] INFO Solving started: time spent (137), best score (144uninitialized/-14400), environment mode (NON_INTRUSIVE_FULL_ASSERT), random (JDK with seed 0). > 2016-05-12 16:06:03,913 [main] DEBUG Custom step (0), time spent (615), score (-2890), new best score (-2890). > 2016-05-12 16:06:03,913 [main] INFO Custom phase (0) ended: step total (1), time spent (615), best score (-2890), score calculation speed (11050/sec). > 2016-05-12 16:06:03,937 [main] TRACE Created cachedMoveList: size (10368), moveSelector (Shuffling(Filtering(SwapMoveSelector(FromSolutionEntitySelector(SeatDesignation), FromSolutionEntitySelector(SeatDesignation))))). > 2016-05-12 16:06:03,941 [main] TRACE Shuffled cachedMoveList with size (10368) in moveSelector(Shuffling(Filtering(SwapMoveSelector(FromSolutionEntitySelector(SeatDesignation), FromSolutionEntitySelector(SeatDesignation))))). > 2016-05-12 16:06:03,950 [main] TRACE Move index (0), score (-2890), accepted (true), move (Grayson {1.4} <-> Oliver {0.4}). > 2016-05-12 16:06:03,957 [main] TRACE Move index (1), score (-2890), accepted (true), move (James {10.4} <-> Cameron {10.10}). > java.lang.IllegalStateException: Score corruption: the workingScore (-3190) is not the uncorruptedScore (-3090) after completedAction (Eliana {8.9} <-> Allison {9.3}): > The corrupted scoreDirector has 1 ConstraintMatch(s) which are in excess (and should not be there): > org.optaplanner.examples.dinnerparty.solver/twoSameJobTypePerTable/level0/[8, SOCIALITE]=-100 > The corrupted scoreDirector has no ConstraintMatch(s) which are missing. > Check your score constraints. > at org.optaplanner.core.impl.score.director.AbstractScoreDirector.assertWorkingScoreFromScratch(AbstractScoreDirector.java:418) > at org.optaplanner.core.impl.solver.scope.DefaultSolverScope.assertWorkingScoreFromScratch(DefaultSolverScope.java:118) > at org.optaplanner.core.impl.phase.scope.AbstractPhaseScope.assertWorkingScoreFromScratch(AbstractPhaseScope.java:156) > at org.optaplanner.core.impl.localsearch.decider.LocalSearchDecider.processMove(LocalSearchDecider.java:167) > at org.optaplanner.core.impl.localsearch.decider.LocalSearchDecider.doMove(LocalSearchDecider.java:153) > at org.optaplanner.core.impl.localsearch.decider.LocalSearchDecider.decideNextStep(LocalSearchDecider.java:125) > at org.optaplanner.core.impl.localsearch.DefaultLocalSearchPhase.solve(DefaultLocalSearchPhase.java:63) > at org.optaplanner.core.impl.solver.DefaultSolver.runPhases(DefaultSolver.java:229) > at org.optaplanner.core.impl.solver.DefaultSolver.solve(DefaultSolver.java:191) > at org.optaplanner.examples.common.app.SolveAllTurtleTest.buildAndSolve(SolveAllTurtleTest.java:75) > at org.optaplanner.examples.common.app.SolveAllTurtleTest.runFastAndFullAssert(SolveAllTurtleTest.java:55) > at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method) > at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:62) > at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43) > at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:498) > at org.junit.runners.model.FrameworkMethod$1.runReflectiveCall(FrameworkMethod.java:50) > at org.junit.internal.runners.model.ReflectiveCallable.run(ReflectiveCallable.java:12) > at org.junit.runners.model.FrameworkMethod.invokeExplosively(FrameworkMethod.java:47) > at org.junit.internal.runners.statements.InvokeMethod.evaluate(InvokeMethod.java:17) > at org.junit.internal.runners.statements.RunBefores.evaluate(RunBefores.java:26) > at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.runLeaf(ParentRunner.java:325) > at org.junit.runners.BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.runChild(BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.java:78) > at org.junit.runners.BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.runChild(BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.java:57) > at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$3.run(ParentRunner.java:290) > at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$1.schedule(ParentRunner.java:71) > at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.runChildren(ParentRunner.java:288) > at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.access$000(ParentRunner.java:58) > at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$2.evaluate(ParentRunner.java:268) > at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.run(ParentRunner.java:363) > at org.junit.runners.Suite.runChild(Suite.java:128) > at org.junit.runners.Suite.runChild(Suite.java:27) > at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$3.run(ParentRunner.java:290) > at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$1.schedule(ParentRunner.java:71) > at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.runChildren(ParentRunner.java:288) > at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.access$000(ParentRunner.java:58) > at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$2.evaluate(ParentRunner.java:268) > at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.run(ParentRunner.java:363) > at org.junit.runner.JUnitCore.run(JUnitCore.java:137) > at com.intellij.junit4.JUnit4IdeaTestRunner.startRunnerWithArgs(JUnit4IdeaTestRunner.java:119) > at com.intellij.junit4.JUnit4IdeaTestRunner.startRunnerWithArgs(JUnit4IdeaTestRunner.java:42) > at com.intellij.rt.execution.junit.JUnitStarter.prepareStreamsAndStart(JUnitStarter.java:234) > at com.intellij.rt.execution.junit.JUnitStarter.main(JUnitStarter.java:74) > at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method) > at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:62) > at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43) > at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:498) > at com.intellij.rt.execution.application.AppMain.main(AppMain.java:144) > {code} > I enabled trace logging above, it happens in the 3th move of the first step. > It seems like this rule is responsible: > {code} > // 1 democrat and 1 republican = 2 politians at each table but NOT two of the same kind > // 2 doctors at each table but NOT two of the same kind > // 2 coaches at each table but NOT two of the same kind > // 2 programmers at each table but NOT two of the same kind > // 2 socialites at each table > // 2 teachers at each table > rule "twoSameJobTypePerTable" > when > $jobType : JobType() > $table : Table() > not ( > SeatDesignation(guestJobType == $jobType, seatTable == $table, $leftId : id, $firstJob : guestJob) > and SeatDesignation(guestJobType == $jobType, seatTable == $table, id > $leftId, > differentKindIfNeeded($firstJob)) > ) > then > scoreHolder.addConstraintMatch(kcontext, -100); > end > {code} -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.4.11#64026)

9 years, 11 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss JIRA] (DROOLS-1179) Provide an isolated reproducer for DROOLS-1174

by Jiri Locker (JIRA)

[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/DROOLS-1179?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugi... ] Jiri Locker resolved DROOLS-1179. --------------------------------- Resolution: Done Isolated reproducer available at https://github.com/yurloc/optaplanner/commits/drools-1179. Solver work reduced to 2 moves in the first step of LS. The first move is successful and the second one fails with corrupted score: {noformat} 2016-05-17 11:36:23,934 [main] INFO Solving started: time spent (79), best score (-1600), environment mode (NON_INTRUSIVE_FULL_ASSERT), random (JDK with seed 0). 2016-05-17 11:36:23,938 [main] TRACE Created cachedMoveList: size (25), moveSelector (Shuffling(Filtering(SwapMoveSelector(FromSolutionEntitySelector(SeatDesignation), FromSolutionEntitySelector(SeatDesignation))))). 2016-05-17 11:36:23,938 [main] TRACE Shuffled cachedMoveList with size (25) in moveSelector(Shuffling(Filtering(SwapMoveSelector(FromSolutionEntitySelector(SeatDesignation), FromSolutionEntitySelector(SeatDesignation))))). 2016-05-17 11:36:23,952 [main] TRACE Move index (18), score (-1600), accepted (true), move (Aaliyah {2.7} <-> Aubrey {2.5}). Exception in thread "main" java.lang.IllegalStateException: Score corruption: the workingScore (-1700) is not the uncorruptedScore (-1600) after completedAction (Kaylee {1.7} <-> Avery {0.7}): The corrupted scoreDirector has 1 ConstraintMatch(s) which are in excess (and should not be there): org.optaplanner.examples.dinnerparty.solver/twoSameJobTypePerTable/level0/[1, DOCTOR]=-100 The corrupted scoreDirector has no ConstraintMatch(s) which are missing. Check your score constraints. {noformat} There is only a single rule in dinnerPartyScoreRules.drl and the initialized solution has been reduced to 5 entities and 8 facts. > Provide an isolated reproducer for DROOLS-1174 > ---------------------------------------------- > > Key: DROOLS-1179 > URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/DROOLS-1179 > Project: Drools > Issue Type: Sub-task > Components: core engine > Reporter: Jiri Locker > Assignee: Jiri Locker > -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.4.11#64026)

9 years, 11 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss JIRA] (WFCORE-1481) list-add operation doesn't work on login-modules attribute

by Tomas Hofman (JIRA)

[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFCORE-1481?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugi... ] Tomas Hofman updated WFCORE-1481: --------------------------------- Story Points: 55 > list-add operation doesn't work on login-modules attribute > ---------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: WFCORE-1481 > URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFCORE-1481 > Project: WildFly Core > Issue Type: Bug > Components: Domain Management > Affects Versions: 2.1.0.Final > Reporter: Bartosz Spyrko-Śmietanko > Assignee: Tomas Hofman > > Executing list-add operation on login-modules results in the modules being replaced instead of appending new module. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.4.11#64026)

9 years, 11 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss JIRA] (WFLY-6618) Upgrade to WildFly Core 2.1.3

by Tomas Hofman (JIRA)

[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFLY-6618?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.... ] Tomas Hofman updated WFLY-6618: ------------------------------- Labels: 7.z.GA (was: ) > Upgrade to WildFly Core 2.1.3 > ----------------------------- > > Key: WFLY-6618 > URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFLY-6618 > Project: WildFly > Issue Type: Component Upgrade > Reporter: Tomas Hofman > Assignee: Tomas Hofman > -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.4.11#64026)

9 years, 11 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss JIRA] (WFLY-6618) Upgrade to WildFly Core 2.1.3

by Tomas Hofman (JIRA)

[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFLY-6618?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.... ] Tomas Hofman updated WFLY-6618: ------------------------------- Labels: (was: 7.z.GA) > Upgrade to WildFly Core 2.1.3 > ----------------------------- > > Key: WFLY-6618 > URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFLY-6618 > Project: WildFly > Issue Type: Component Upgrade > Reporter: Tomas Hofman > Assignee: Tomas Hofman > -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.4.11#64026)

9 years, 11 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss JIRA] (WFLY-6618) Upgrade to WildFly Core 2.1.3

by Tomas Hofman (JIRA)

[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFLY-6618?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.... ] Tomas Hofman updated WFLY-6618: ------------------------------- Fix Version/s: (was: 9.0.1.Final) > Upgrade to WildFly Core 2.1.3 > ----------------------------- > > Key: WFLY-6618 > URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFLY-6618 > Project: WildFly > Issue Type: Component Upgrade > Reporter: Tomas Hofman > Assignee: Tomas Hofman > -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.4.11#64026)

9 years, 11 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss JIRA] (WFLY-6618) Upgrade to WildFly Core 2.1.3

by Tomas Hofman (JIRA)

[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFLY-6618?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.... ] Tomas Hofman updated WFLY-6618: ------------------------------- Component/s: (was: Web (Undertow)) > Upgrade to WildFly Core 2.1.3 > ----------------------------- > > Key: WFLY-6618 > URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFLY-6618 > Project: WildFly > Issue Type: Component Upgrade > Reporter: Tomas Hofman > Assignee: Tomas Hofman > Fix For: 9.0.1.Final > > -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.4.11#64026)

9 years, 11 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss JIRA] (WFLY-6618) Upgrade to WildFly Core 2.1.3

by Tomas Hofman (JIRA)

[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFLY-6618?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.... ] Tomas Hofman reassigned WFLY-6618: ---------------------------------- Assignee: Tomas Hofman (was: Jason Greene) > Upgrade to WildFly Core 2.1.3 > ----------------------------- > > Key: WFLY-6618 > URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFLY-6618 > Project: WildFly > Issue Type: Component Upgrade > Components: Web (Undertow) > Reporter: Tomas Hofman > Assignee: Tomas Hofman > Fix For: 9.0.1.Final > > -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.4.11#64026)

9 years, 11 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss JIRA] (WFLY-6618) Upgrade to WildFly Core 2.1.3

by Tomas Hofman (JIRA)

Tomas Hofman created WFLY-6618: ---------------------------------- Summary: Upgrade to WildFly Core 2.1.3 Key: WFLY-6618 URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFLY-6618 Project: WildFly Issue Type: Component Upgrade Components: Web (Undertow) Reporter: Tomas Hofman Assignee: Jason Greene Fix For: 9.0.1.Final -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.4.11#64026)

9 years, 11 months

1
0
0 / 0

2026

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

jboss-jira May 2016