[JBoss JIRA] (WFLY-7074) Unable to add cached-connection-manager after removing it once
by Martin Simka (JIRA)
Martin Simka created WFLY-7074:
----------------------------------
Summary: Unable to add cached-connection-manager after removing it once
Key: WFLY-7074
URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFLY-7074
Project: WildFly
Issue Type: Bug
Components: JCA
Affects Versions: 8.0.0.Beta1
Reporter: Martin Simka
{{<cached-connection-manager>}} is enabled in jca subsystem by default:
{code:xml}
<subsystem xmlns="urn:jboss:domain:jca:1.1">
...
<cached-connection-manager />
</subsystem>
{code}
However, it is unable to re-enable {{<cached-connection-manager>}} once it is disabled. CLI command fails to add it due to duplicate resource.
{code}
[standalone@localhost:9990 /] /subsystem=jca/cached-connection-manager=cached-connection-manager:remove
{
"outcome" => "success",
"response-headers" => {
"operation-requires-reload" => true,
"process-state" => "reload-required"
}
}
[standalone@localhost:9990 /] :reload
{
"outcome" => "success",
"result" => undefined
}
[standalone@localhost:9990 /] /subsystem=jca/cached-connection-manager=cached-connection-manager:add
{
"outcome" => "failed",
"failure-description" => "JBAS014803: Duplicate resource [
(\"subsystem\" => \"jca\"),
(\"cached-connection-manager\" => \"cached-connection-manager\")
]",
"rolled-back" => true
}
{code}
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.11#64026)
9 years, 10 months
- 1
- 0
[JBoss JIRA] (DROOLS-1008) KieServer to update container for SNAPSHOT kjar
by Mario Fusco (JIRA)
[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/DROOLS-1008?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugi... ]
Mario Fusco resolved DROOLS-1008.
---------------------------------
Resolution: Cannot Reproduce Bug
As I wrote in my last comment I'm not able to reproduce this issue. In case this is still a problem also on latest drools version feel free to reopen this ticket providing a complete reproducer (maybe setting up your environment in a docker image?)
> KieServer to update container for SNAPSHOT kjar
> -----------------------------------------------
>
> Key: DROOLS-1008
> URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/DROOLS-1008
> Project: Drools
> Issue Type: Feature Request
> Components: kie server
> Affects Versions: 6.2.0.Final, 6.3.0.Final
> Reporter: Andrew Collins
> Assignee: Mario Fusco
> Attachments: snapshot_kjar_reproducer.patch
>
>
> General:
> When a kjar has a snapshot version, kie-server will not react to new snapshot versions deployed to a remote artifact repository. The remote artifact repository is only queried the first time after JVM startup, regardless of settings.xml snapshot updatePolicy setting. Retrieving a new snapshot version is only possible through use of KieScanner.scanNow() or recycling the JVM, which will both fetch the new artifact from the remote repository and reload the kmodule in the KieServer JVM.
> Steps to reproduce:
> * KieServer and Business Central deployed to separate JVMs, pointing to independent maven repositories. Snapshot updatePolicy should be "always" in KieServer settings.xml.
> * Deploy new kjar snapshot from Business Central to remote artifactory. (unique version "1")
> * Start KieServer (verify new snapshot version is pulled from remote)
> * Deploy new kjar snapnshot. (unique version "2")
> Expected behavior:
> * Creating a new container, or invoking updateReleaseId() on existing container will pull latest snapshot from remote artifactory.
> Actual Behavior
> * Creating a new container, or invoking updateReleaseId() on existing container, does not query remote artifactory for latest snapshots.
> Workaround:
> * Forcing a KieScanner.scanNow() will fetch new snapshot from remote artifactory.
> * Or, restarting KieScanner JVM will fetch new snapshot from remote artifactory.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.11#64026)
9 years, 10 months
- 1
- 0
[JBoss JIRA] (WFLY-7029) RemoteFailoverTestCast#testGracefulShutdownConcurrentFailover fails with "ISPN000324: remote-failover-test.jar is in 'STOPPING' state and this is an invocation not belonging to an on-going transaction, so it does not accept new invocations."
by Radoslav Husar (JIRA)
[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFLY-7029?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.... ]
Radoslav Husar updated WFLY-7029:
---------------------------------
Labels: clean_shutdown (was: )
> RemoteFailoverTestCast#testGracefulShutdownConcurrentFailover fails with "ISPN000324: remote-failover-test.jar is in 'STOPPING' state and this is an invocation not belonging to an on-going transaction, so it does not accept new invocations."
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: WFLY-7029
> URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFLY-7029
> Project: WildFly
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: Clustering
> Affects Versions: 10.1.0.Final
> Reporter: Radoslav Husar
> Assignee: Richard Achmatowicz
> Labels: clean_shutdown
>
> https://ci.wildfly.org/viewLog.html?buildId=24851&tab=buildResultsDiv&bui...
> {noformat}
> 04:31:43,323 INFO [org.jboss.as.test.clustering.NodeUtil] (main) Stopping container=container-0, timeout=15
> 04:31:43,324 INFO [org.jboss.as.arquillian.container.controller.ClientWildFlyContainerController] (main) Manual stopping of a server instance with timeout=15
> &#27;[0m04:31:43,338 INFO [org.jboss.as.server] (management-handler-thread - 4) WFLYSRV0211: Suspending server with 15000 ms timeout.
> &#27;[0m04:31:43,343 INFO [org.jboss.ejb.client.remoting.NoSuchEJBExceptionResponseHandler] (Remoting "config-based-ejb-client-endpoint" task-10) Retrying invocation which failed on node node-0 with exception:: javax.ejb.NoSuchEJBException: No such EJB[appname=,modulename=remote-failover-test,distinctname=,beanname=SlowToDestroyStatefulIncrementorBean,viewclassname=org.jboss.as.test.clustering.cluster.ejb.remote.bean.Incrementor]
> at org.jboss.ejb.client.remoting.NoSuchEJBExceptionResponseHandler.processMessage(NoSuchEJBExceptionResponseHandler.java:64)
> at org.jboss.ejb.client.remoting.ChannelAssociation.processResponse(ChannelAssociation.java:386)
> at org.jboss.ejb.client.remoting.ChannelAssociation$ResponseReceiver.handleMessage(ChannelAssociation.java:498)
> at org.jboss.remoting3.remote.RemoteConnectionChannel$5.run(RemoteConnectionChannel.java:456)
> at org.jboss.remoting3.EndpointImpl$TrackingExecutor$1.run(EndpointImpl.java:731)
> at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1142)
> at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:617)
> at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:745)
> &#27;[0m04:31:43,345 INFO [org.jboss.as.server] (Management Triggered Shutdown) WFLYSRV0241: Shutting down in response to management operation 'shutdown'
> &#27;[0m&#27;[0m04:31:43,430 INFO [org.wildfly.extension.undertow] (MSC service thread 1-2) WFLYUT0019: Host default-host stopping
> &#27;[0m&#27;[0m04:31:43,436 INFO [org.jboss.modcluster] (ServerService Thread Pool -- 29) MODCLUSTER000002: Initiating mod_cluster shutdown
> &#27;[0m&#27;[0m04:31:43,445 INFO [org.wildfly.extension.messaging-activemq] (ServerService Thread Pool -- 74) WFLYMSGAMQ0006: Unbound messaging object to jndi name java:/ConnectionFactory
> &#27;[0m&#27;[0m04:31:43,459 INFO [org.infinispan.remoting.transport.jgroups.JGroupsTransport] (MSC service thread 1-2) ISPN000080: Disconnecting JGroups channel hibernate
> &#27;[0m&#27;[0m04:31:43,459 INFO [org.infinispan.remoting.transport.jgroups.JGroupsTransport] (MSC service thread 1-2) ISPN000082: Stopping the RpcDispatcher for channel hibernate
> &#27;[0m&#27;[0m04:31:43,463 INFO [org.infinispan.remoting.transport.jgroups.JGroupsTransport] (MSC service thread 1-5) ISPN000080: Disconnecting JGroups channel server
> &#27;[0m&#27;[0m04:31:43,464 INFO [org.infinispan.remoting.transport.jgroups.JGroupsTransport] (MSC service thread 1-5) ISPN000082: Stopping the RpcDispatcher for channel server
> &#27;[0m&#27;[0m04:31:43,471 INFO [org.infinispan.eviction.impl.PassivationManagerImpl] (ServerService Thread Pool -- 29) ISPN000029: Passivating all entries to disk
> &#27;[0m&#27;[0m04:31:43,472 INFO [org.infinispan.eviction.impl.PassivationManagerImpl] (ServerService Thread Pool -- 29) ISPN000030: Passivated 2 entries in 0 milliseconds
> &#27;[0m&#27;[0m04:31:43,501 INFO [org.infinispan.remoting.transport.jgroups.JGroupsTransport] (MSC service thread 1-4) ISPN000080: Disconnecting JGroups channel web
> &#27;[0m&#27;[0m04:31:43,501 INFO [org.infinispan.remoting.transport.jgroups.JGroupsTransport] (MSC service thread 1-4) ISPN000082: Stopping the RpcDispatcher for channel web
> &#27;[0m&#27;[0m04:31:43,502 INFO [org.jboss.as.clustering.infinispan] (ServerService Thread Pool -- 29) WFLYCLINF0003: Stopped remote-failover-test.jar cache from ejb container
> &#27;[0m&#27;[0m04:31:43,505 INFO [org.infinispan.remoting.transport.jgroups.JGroupsTransport] (MSC service thread 1-1) ISPN000080: Disconnecting JGroups channel testDbPersistence
> &#27;[0m&#27;[0m04:31:43,505 INFO [org.infinispan.remoting.transport.jgroups.JGroupsTransport] (MSC service thread 1-1) ISPN000082: Stopping the RpcDispatcher for channel testDbPersistence
> &#27;[0m&#27;[33m04:31:43,502 WARN [org.infinispan.remoting.inboundhandler.NonTotalOrderTxPerCacheInboundInvocationHandler] (thread-11,ee,node-0) ISPN000071: Caught exception when handling command LockControlCommand{cache=remote-failover-test.jar, keys=[UnknownSessionID [6951504948515351686656515249505365655750686851525048706670486766]], flags=[FORCE_WRITE_LOCK], unlock=false, gtx=GlobalTransaction:<node-1>:48:remote}: org.infinispan.IllegalLifecycleStateException: ISPN000324: remote-failover-test.jar is in 'STOPPING' state and this is an invocation not belonging to an on-going transaction, so it does not accept new invocations. Either restart it or recreate the cache container.
> at org.infinispan.transaction.impl.TransactionTable.getOrCreateRemoteTransaction(TransactionTable.java:364)
> at org.infinispan.transaction.impl.TransactionTable.getOrCreateRemoteTransaction(TransactionTable.java:354)
> at org.infinispan.commands.control.LockControlCommand.createContext(LockControlCommand.java:138)
> at org.infinispan.commands.control.LockControlCommand.createContext(LockControlCommand.java:38)
> at org.infinispan.remoting.inboundhandler.action.PendingTxAction.createContext(PendingTxAction.java:107)
> at org.infinispan.remoting.inboundhandler.action.PendingTxAction.init(PendingTxAction.java:57)
> at org.infinispan.remoting.inboundhandler.action.BaseLockingAction.check(BaseLockingAction.java:38)
> at org.infinispan.remoting.inboundhandler.action.DefaultReadyAction.isReady(DefaultReadyAction.java:42)
> at org.infinispan.remoting.inboundhandler.action.DefaultReadyAction.isReady(DefaultReadyAction.java:45)
> at org.infinispan.remoting.inboundhandler.NonTotalOrderTxPerCacheInboundInvocationHandler$1.isReady(NonTotalOrderTxPerCacheInboundInvocationHandler.java:124)
> at org.infinispan.util.concurrent.BlockingTaskAwareExecutorServiceImpl.execute(BlockingTaskAwareExecutorServiceImpl.java:51)
> at org.infinispan.executors.LazyInitializingBlockingTaskAwareExecutorService.execute(LazyInitializingBlockingTaskAwareExecutorService.java:46)
> at org.infinispan.remoting.inboundhandler.BasePerCacheInboundInvocationHandler.handleRunnable(BasePerCacheInboundInvocationHandler.java:130)
> at org.infinispan.remoting.inboundhandler.NonTotalOrderTxPerCacheInboundInvocationHandler.handle(NonTotalOrderTxPerCacheInboundInvocationHandler.java:99)
> at org.infinispan.remoting.inboundhandler.GlobalInboundInvocationHandler.handleCacheRpcCommand(GlobalInboundInvocationHandler.java:126)
> at org.infinispan.remoting.inboundhandler.GlobalInboundInvocationHandler.handleFromCluster(GlobalInboundInvocationHandler.java:75)
> at org.infinispan.remoting.transport.jgroups.CommandAwareRpcDispatcher.executeCommandFromLocalCluster(CommandAwareRpcDispatcher.java:205)
> at org.infinispan.remoting.transport.jgroups.CommandAwareRpcDispatcher.handle(CommandAwareRpcDispatcher.java:175)
> at org.jgroups.blocks.RequestCorrelator.handleRequest(RequestCorrelator.java:455)
> at org.jgroups.blocks.RequestCorrelator.dispatch(RequestCorrelator.java:406)
> at org.jgroups.blocks.RequestCorrelator.receiveMessage(RequestCorrelator.java:357)
> at org.jgroups.blocks.RequestCorrelator.receive(RequestCorrelator.java:245)
> at org.jgroups.blocks.MessageDispatcher$ProtocolAdapter.up(MessageDispatcher.java:664)
> at org.jgroups.JChannel.up(JChannel.java:738)
> at org.jgroups.fork.ForkProtocolStack.up(ForkProtocolStack.java:120)
> at org.jgroups.stack.Protocol.up(Protocol.java:380)
> at org.jgroups.protocols.FORK.up(FORK.java:114)
> at org.jgroups.protocols.FRAG2.up(FRAG2.java:165)
> at org.jgroups.protocols.FlowControl.up(FlowControl.java:390)
> at org.jgroups.protocols.pbcast.GMS.up(GMS.java:1040)
> at org.jgroups.protocols.pbcast.STABLE.up(STABLE.java:234)
> at org.jgroups.protocols.UNICAST3.deliverMessage(UNICAST3.java:1070)
> at org.jgroups.protocols.UNICAST3.handleDataReceived(UNICAST3.java:785)
> at org.jgroups.protocols.UNICAST3.up(UNICAST3.java:426)
> at org.jgroups.protocols.pbcast.NAKACK2.up(NAKACK2.java:649)
> at org.jgroups.protocols.VERIFY_SUSPECT.up(VERIFY_SUSPECT.java:155)
> at org.jgroups.protocols.FD.up(FD.java:260)
> at org.jgroups.protocols.FD_SOCK.up(FD_SOCK.java:310)
> at org.jgroups.protocols.MERGE3.up(MERGE3.java:285)
> at org.jgroups.protocols.Discovery.up(Discovery.java:296)
> at org.jgroups.protocols.MPING.up(MPING.java:178)
> at org.jgroups.protocols.TP.passMessageUp(TP.java:1601)
> at org.jgroups.protocols.TP$SingleMessageHandler.run(TP.java:1817)
> at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1142)
> at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:617)
> at org.jboss.as.clustering.jgroups.ClassLoaderThreadFactory.lambda$newThread$0(ClassLoaderThreadFactory.java:52)
> at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:745)
> &#27;[0m&#27;[0m04:31:43,517 INFO [org.wildfly.extension.messaging-activemq] (MSC service thread 1-2) WFLYMSGAMQ0006: Unbound messaging object to jndi name java:jboss/DefaultJMSConnectionFactory
> &#27;[0m&#27;[0m04:31:43,517 INFO [org.jboss.as.connector.subsystems.datasources] (MSC service thread 1-2) WFLYJCA0010: Unbound data source [java:jboss/datasources/ExampleDS]
> &#27;[0m&#27;[0m04:31:43,518 INFO [org.jboss.as.connector.deployment] (MSC service thread 1-4) WFLYJCA0011: Unbound JCA ConnectionFactory [java:/JmsXA]
> &#27;[0m&#27;[0m04:31:43,535 INFO [org.jboss.as.connector.deployers.jdbc] (MSC service thread 1-8) WFLYJCA0019: Stopped Driver service with driver-name = h2
> &#27;[0m&#27;[0m04:31:43,547 INFO [org.jboss.as.clustering.infinispan] (ServerService Thread Pool -- 2) WFLYCLINF0003: Stopped client-mappings cache from ejb container
> &#27;[0m04:31:43,565 INFO [org.jboss.ejb.client.remoting] (Remoting "config-based-ejb-client-endpoint" task-14) EJBCLIENT000016: Channel Channel ID b007a55b (outbound) of Remoting connection 017c35ab to /0:0:0:0:0:0:0:1:8080 of endpoint "config-based-ejb-client-endpoint" <1c33eee> can no longer process messages
> &#27;[0m04:31:43,576 INFO [org.infinispan.remoting.transport.jgroups.JGroupsTransport] (MSC service thread 1-3) ISPN000080: Disconnecting JGroups channel ejb
> &#27;[0m&#27;[0m04:31:43,576 INFO [org.infinispan.remoting.transport.jgroups.JGroupsTransport] (MSC service thread 1-3) ISPN000082: Stopping the RpcDispatcher for channel ejb
> &#27;[0m&#27;[0m04:31:43,575 INFO [org.apache.activemq.artemis.ra] (ServerService Thread Pool -- 35) AMQ151003: resource adaptor stopped
> &#27;[0m&#27;[0m04:31:43,591 INFO [org.wildfly.extension.undertow] (MSC service thread 1-6) WFLYUT0008: Undertow AJP listener ajp suspending
> &#27;[0m&#27;[0m04:31:43,591 INFO [org.wildfly.extension.undertow] (MSC service thread 1-6) WFLYUT0007: Undertow AJP listener ajp stopped, was bound to [::1]:8009
> &#27;[0m&#27;[0m04:31:43,592 INFO [org.wildfly.extension.undertow] (MSC service thread 1-6) WFLYUT0008: Undertow HTTPS listener https suspending
> &#27;[0m&#27;[0m04:31:43,592 INFO [org.wildfly.extension.undertow] (MSC service thread 1-6) WFLYUT0007: Undertow HTTPS listener https stopped, was bound to [::1]:8443
> &#27;[0m&#27;[31m04:31:43,585 ERROR [org.infinispan.interceptors.InvocationContextInterceptor] (default task-11) ISPN000136: Error executing command GetKeyValueCommand, writing keys []: org.infinispan.remoting.RemoteException: ISPN000217: Received exception from node-0, see cause for remote stack trace
> at org.infinispan.remoting.transport.AbstractTransport.checkResponse(AbstractTransport.java:44)
> at org.infinispan.remoting.transport.jgroups.JGroupsTransport.checkRsp(JGroupsTransport.java:795)
> at org.infinispan.remoting.transport.jgroups.JGroupsTransport.lambda$invokeRemotelyAsync$1(JGroupsTransport.java:642)
> at java.util.concurrent.CompletableFuture.uniApply(CompletableFuture.java:602)
> at java.util.concurrent.CompletableFuture$UniApply.tryFire(CompletableFuture.java:577)
> at java.util.concurrent.CompletableFuture.postComplete(CompletableFuture.java:474)
> at java.util.concurrent.CompletableFuture.complete(CompletableFuture.java:1962)
> at org.infinispan.remoting.transport.jgroups.RspListFuture.futureDone(RspListFuture.java:31)
> at org.jgroups.blocks.Request.checkCompletion(Request.java:152)
> at org.jgroups.blocks.GroupRequest.receiveResponse(GroupRequest.java:116)
> at org.jgroups.blocks.RequestCorrelator.dispatch(RequestCorrelator.java:427)
> at org.jgroups.blocks.RequestCorrelator.receiveMessage(RequestCorrelator.java:357)
> at org.jgroups.blocks.RequestCorrelator.receive(RequestCorrelator.java:245)
> at org.jgroups.blocks.MessageDispatcher$ProtocolAdapter.up(MessageDispatcher.java:664)
> at org.jgroups.JChannel.up(JChannel.java:738)
> at org.jgroups.fork.ForkProtocolStack.up(ForkProtocolStack.java:120)
> at org.jgroups.stack.Protocol.up(Protocol.java:380)
> at org.jgroups.protocols.FORK.up(FORK.java:114)
> at org.jgroups.protocols.FRAG2.up(FRAG2.java:165)
> at org.jgroups.protocols.FlowControl.up(FlowControl.java:390)
> at org.jgroups.protocols.pbcast.GMS.up(GMS.java:1040)
> at org.jgroups.protocols.pbcast.STABLE.up(STABLE.java:234)
> at org.jgroups.protocols.UNICAST3.deliverMessage(UNICAST3.java:1070)
> at org.jgroups.protocols.UNICAST3.handleDataReceived(UNICAST3.java:785)
> at org.jgroups.protocols.UNICAST3.up(UNICAST3.java:426)
> at org.jgroups.protocols.pbcast.NAKACK2.up(NAKACK2.java:649)
> at org.jgroups.protocols.VERIFY_SUSPECT.up(VERIFY_SUSPECT.java:155)
> at org.jgroups.protocols.FD.up(FD.java:260)
> at org.jgroups.protocols.FD_SOCK.up(FD_SOCK.java:310)
> at org.jgroups.protocols.MERGE3.up(MERGE3.java:285)
> at org.jgroups.protocols.Discovery.up(Discovery.java:296)
> at org.jgroups.protocols.MPING.up(MPING.java:178)
> at org.jgroups.protocols.TP.passMessageUp(TP.java:1601)
> at org.jgroups.protocols.TP$SingleMessageHandler.run(TP.java:1817)
> at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1142)
> at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:617)
> at org.jboss.as.clustering.jgroups.ClassLoaderThreadFactory.lambda$newThread$0(ClassLoaderThreadFactory.java:52)
> at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:745)
> Caused by: org.infinispan.commons.CacheException: Problems invoking command.
> at org.infinispan.remoting.inboundhandler.BasePerCacheInboundInvocationHandler.exceptionHandlingCommand(BasePerCacheInboundInvocationHandler.java:106)
> at org.infinispan.remoting.inboundhandler.NonTotalOrderTxPerCacheInboundInvocationHandler.handle(NonTotalOrderTxPerCacheInboundInvocationHandler.java:101)
> at org.infinispan.remoting.inboundhandler.GlobalInboundInvocationHandler.handleCacheRpcCommand(GlobalInboundInvocationHandler.java:126)
> at org.infinispan.remoting.inboundhandler.GlobalInboundInvocationHandler.handleFromCluster(GlobalInboundInvocationHandler.java:75)
> at org.infinispan.remoting.transport.jgroups.CommandAwareRpcDispatcher.executeCommandFromLocalCluster(CommandAwareRpcDispatcher.java:205)
> at org.infinispan.remoting.transport.jgroups.CommandAwareRpcDispatcher.handle(CommandAwareRpcDispatcher.java:175)
> at org.jgroups.blocks.RequestCorrelator.handleRequest(RequestCorrelator.java:455)
> at org.jgroups.blocks.RequestCorrelator.dispatch(RequestCorrelator.java:406)
> ... 27 more
> Caused by: org.infinispan.IllegalLifecycleStateException: ISPN000324: remote-failover-test.jar is in 'STOPPING' state and this is an invocation not belonging to an on-going transaction, so it does not accept new invocations. Either restart it or recreate the cache container.
> at org.infinispan.transaction.impl.TransactionTable.getOrCreateRemoteTransaction(TransactionTable.java:364)
> at org.infinispan.transaction.impl.TransactionTable.getOrCreateRemoteTransaction(TransactionTable.java:354)
> at org.infinispan.commands.control.LockControlCommand.createContext(LockControlCommand.java:138)
> at org.infinispan.commands.control.LockControlCommand.createContext(LockControlCommand.java:38)
> at org.infinispan.remoting.inboundhandler.action.PendingTxAction.createContext(PendingTxAction.java:107)
> at org.infinispan.remoting.inboundhandler.action.PendingTxAction.init(PendingTxAction.java:57)
> at org.infinispan.remoting.inboundhandler.action.BaseLockingAction.check(BaseLockingAction.java:38)
> at org.infinispan.remoting.inboundhandler.action.DefaultReadyAction.isReady(DefaultReadyAction.java:42)
> at org.infinispan.remoting.inboundhandler.action.DefaultReadyAction.isReady(DefaultReadyAction.java:45)
> at org.infinispan.remoting.inboundhandler.NonTotalOrderTxPerCacheInboundInvocationHandler$1.isReady(NonTotalOrderTxPerCacheInboundInvocationHandler.java:124)
> at org.infinispan.util.concurrent.BlockingTaskAwareExecutorServiceImpl.execute(BlockingTaskAwareExecutorServiceImpl.java:51)
> at org.infinispan.executors.LazyInitializingBlockingTaskAwareExecutorService.execute(LazyInitializingBlockingTaskAwareExecutorService.java:46)
> at org.infinispan.remoting.inboundhandler.BasePerCacheInboundInvocationHandler.handleRunnable(BasePerCacheInboundInvocationHandler.java:130)
> at org.infinispan.remoting.inboundhandler.NonTotalOrderTxPerCacheInboundInvocationHandler.handle(NonTotalOrderTxPerCacheInboundInvocationHandler.java:99)
> ... 33 more
> &#27;[0m&#27;[31m04:31:43,588 ERROR [org.jboss.as.ejb3.invocation] (default task-11) WFLYEJB0034: EJB Invocation failed on component SlowToDestroyStatefulIncrementorBean for method public abstract org.jboss.as.test.clustering.cluster.ejb.remote.bean.Result org.jboss.as.test.clustering.cluster.ejb.remote.bean.Incrementor.increment(): javax.ejb.EJBException: org.infinispan.remoting.RemoteException: ISPN000217: Received exception from node-0, see cause for remote stack trace
> at org.jboss.as.ejb3.tx.CMTTxInterceptor.handleExceptionInOurTx(CMTTxInterceptor.java:187)
> at org.jboss.as.ejb3.tx.CMTTxInterceptor.invokeInOurTx(CMTTxInterceptor.java:277)
> at org.jboss.as.ejb3.tx.CMTTxInterceptor.required(CMTTxInterceptor.java:327)
> at org.jboss.as.ejb3.tx.CMTTxInterceptor.processInvocation(CMTTxInterceptor.java:239)
> at org.jboss.invocation.InterceptorContext.proceed(InterceptorContext.java:340)
> at org.jboss.as.ejb3.remote.EJBRemoteTransactionPropagatingInterceptor.processInvocation(EJBRemoteTransactionPropagatingInterceptor.java:79)
> at org.jboss.invocation.InterceptorContext.proceed(InterceptorContext.java:340)
> at org.jboss.as.ejb3.component.interceptors.CurrentInvocationContextInterceptor.processInvocation(CurrentInvocationContextInterceptor.java:41)
> at org.jboss.invocation.InterceptorContext.proceed(InterceptorContext.java:340)
> at org.jboss.as.ejb3.component.invocationmetrics.WaitTimeInterceptor.processInvocation(WaitTimeInterceptor.java:47)
> at org.jboss.invocation.InterceptorContext.proceed(InterceptorContext.java:340)
> at org.jboss.as.ejb3.security.SecurityContextInterceptor.processInvocation(SecurityContextInterceptor.java:100)
> at org.jboss.invocation.InterceptorContext.proceed(InterceptorContext.java:340)
> at org.jboss.as.ejb3.deployment.processors.StartupAwaitInterceptor.processInvocation(StartupAwaitInterceptor.java:22)
> at org.jboss.invocation.InterceptorContext.proceed(InterceptorContext.java:340)
> at org.jboss.as.ejb3.component.interceptors.ShutDownInterceptorFactory$1.processInvocation(ShutDownInterceptorFactory.java:64)
> at org.jboss.invocation.InterceptorContext.proceed(InterceptorContext.java:340)
> at org.jboss.as.ejb3.deployment.processors.EjbSuspendInterceptor.processInvocation(EjbSuspendInterceptor.java:53)
> at org.jboss.invocation.InterceptorContext.proceed(InterceptorContext.java:340)
> at org.jboss.as.ejb3.component.interceptors.LoggingInterceptor.processInvocation(LoggingInterceptor.java:67)
> at org.jboss.invocation.InterceptorContext.proceed(InterceptorContext.java:340)
> at org.jboss.as.ee.component.NamespaceContextInterceptor.processInvocation(NamespaceContextInterceptor.java:50)
> at org.jboss.invocation.InterceptorContext.proceed(InterceptorContext.java:340)
> at org.jboss.as.ejb3.component.interceptors.AdditionalSetupInterceptor.processInvocation(AdditionalSetupInterceptor.java:54)
> at org.jboss.invocation.InterceptorContext.proceed(InterceptorContext.java:340)
> at org.jboss.invocation.ContextClassLoaderInterceptor.processInvocation(ContextClassLoaderInterceptor.java:64)
> at org.jboss.invocation.InterceptorContext.proceed(InterceptorContext.java:340)
> at org.jboss.invocation.InterceptorContext.run(InterceptorContext.java:356)
> at org.wildfly.security.manager.WildFlySecurityManager.doChecked(WildFlySecurityManager.java:636)
> at org.jboss.invocation.AccessCheckingInterceptor.processInvocation(AccessCheckingInterceptor.java:61)
> at org.jboss.invocation.InterceptorContext.proceed(InterceptorContext.java:340)
> at org.jboss.invocation.InterceptorContext.run(InterceptorContext.java:356)
> at org.jboss.invocation.PrivilegedWithCombinerInterceptor.processInvocation(PrivilegedWithCombinerInterceptor.java:80)
> at org.jboss.invocation.InterceptorContext.proceed(InterceptorContext.java:340)
> at org.jboss.invocation.ChainedInterceptor.processInvocation(ChainedInterceptor.java:61)
> at org.jboss.as.ee.component.ViewService$View.invoke(ViewService.java:198)
> at org.jboss.as.ejb3.remote.protocol.versionone.MethodInvocationMessageHandler.invokeMethod(MethodInvocationMessageHandler.java:328)
> at org.jboss.as.ejb3.remote.protocol.versionone.MethodInvocationMessageHandler.access$100(MethodInvocationMessageHandler.java:67)
> at org.jboss.as.ejb3.remote.protocol.versionone.MethodInvocationMessageHandler$1.run(MethodInvocationMessageHandler.java:201)
> at org.jboss.as.ejb3.remote.protocol.versionone.MethodInvocationMessageHandler.processMessage(MethodInvocationMessageHandler.java:263)
> at org.jboss.as.ejb3.remote.protocol.versionone.VersionOneProtocolChannelReceiver.processMessage(VersionOneProtocolChannelReceiver.java:213)
> at org.jboss.as.ejb3.remote.protocol.versiontwo.VersionTwoProtocolChannelReceiver.processMessage(VersionTwoProtocolChannelReceiver.java:76)
> at org.jboss.as.ejb3.remote.protocol.versionone.VersionOneProtocolChannelReceiver.handleMessage(VersionOneProtocolChannelReceiver.java:159)
> at org.jboss.remoting3.remote.RemoteConnectionChannel$5.run(RemoteConnectionChannel.java:456)
> at org.jboss.remoting3.EndpointImpl$TrackingExecutor$1.run(EndpointImpl.java:731)
> at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1142)
> at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:617)
> at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:745)
> Caused by: org.infinispan.remoting.RemoteException: ISPN000217: Received exception from node-0, see cause for remote stack trace
> at org.infinispan.remoting.transport.AbstractTransport.checkResponse(AbstractTransport.java:44)
> at org.infinispan.remoting.transport.jgroups.JGroupsTransport.checkRsp(JGroupsTransport.java:795)
> at org.infinispan.remoting.transport.jgroups.JGroupsTransport.lambda$invokeRemotelyAsync$1(JGroupsTransport.java:642)
> at java.util.concurrent.CompletableFuture.uniApply(CompletableFuture.java:602)
> at java.util.concurrent.CompletableFuture$UniApply.tryFire(CompletableFuture.java:577)
> at java.util.concurrent.CompletableFuture.postComplete(CompletableFuture.java:474)
> at java.util.concurrent.CompletableFuture.complete(CompletableFuture.java:1962)
> at org.infinispan.remoting.transport.jgroups.RspListFuture.futureDone(RspListFuture.java:31)
> at org.jgroups.blocks.Request.checkCompletion(Request.java:152)
> at org.jgroups.blocks.GroupRequest.receiveResponse(GroupRequest.java:116)
> at org.jgroups.blocks.RequestCorrelator.dispatch(RequestCorrelator.java:427)
> at org.jgroups.blocks.RequestCorrelator.receiveMessage(RequestCorrelator.java:357)
> at org.jgroups.blocks.RequestCorrelator.receive(RequestCorrelator.java:245)
> at org.jgroups.blocks.MessageDispatcher$ProtocolAdapter.up(MessageDispatcher.java:664)
> at org.jgroups.JChannel.up(JChannel.java:738)
> at org.jgroups.fork.ForkProtocolStack.up(ForkProtocolStack.java:120)
> at org.jgroups.stack.Protocol.up(Protocol.java:380)
> at org.jgroups.protocols.FORK.up(FORK.java:114)
> at org.jgroups.protocols.FRAG2.up(FRAG2.java:165)
> at org.jgroups.protocols.FlowControl.up(FlowControl.java:390)
> at org.jgroups.protocols.pbcast.GMS.up(GMS.java:1040)
> at org.jgroups.protocols.pbcast.STABLE.up(STABLE.java:234)
> at org.jgroups.protocols.UNICAST3.deliverMessage(UNICAST3.java:1070)
> at org.jgroups.protocols.UNICAST3.handleDataReceived(UNICAST3.java:785)
> at org.jgroups.protocols.UNICAST3.up(UNICAST3.java:426)
> at org.jgroups.protocols.pbcast.NAKACK2.up(NAKACK2.java:649)
> at org.jgroups.protocols.VERIFY_SUSPECT.up(VERIFY_SUSPECT.java:155)
> at org.jgroups.protocols.FD.up(FD.java:260)
> at org.jgroups.protocols.FD_SOCK.up(FD_SOCK.java:310)
> at org.jgroups.protocols.MERGE3.up(MERGE3.java:285)
> at org.jgroups.protocols.Discovery.up(Discovery.java:296)
> at org.jgroups.protocols.MPING.up(MPING.java:178)
> at org.jgroups.protocols.TP.passMessageUp(TP.java:1601)
> at org.jgroups.protocols.TP$SingleMessageHandler.run(TP.java:1817)
> at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1142)
> at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:617)
> at org.jboss.as.clustering.jgroups.ClassLoaderThreadFactory.lambda$newThread$0(ClassLoaderThreadFactory.java:52)
> ... 1 more
> Caused by: org.infinispan.commons.CacheException: Problems invoking command.
> at org.infinispan.remoting.inboundhandler.BasePerCacheInboundInvocationHandler.exceptionHandlingCommand(BasePerCacheInboundInvocationHandler.java:106)
> at org.infinispan.remoting.inboundhandler.NonTotalOrderTxPerCacheInboundInvocationHandler.handle(NonTotalOrderTxPerCacheInboundInvocationHandler.java:101)
> at org.infinispan.remoting.inboundhandler.GlobalInboundInvocationHandler.handleCacheRpcCommand(GlobalInboundInvocationHandler.java:126)
> at org.infinispan.remoting.inboundhandler.GlobalInboundInvocationHandler.handleFromCluster(GlobalInboundInvocationHandler.java:75)
> at org.infinispan.remoting.transport.jgroups.CommandAwareRpcDispatcher.executeCommandFromLocalCluster(CommandAwareRpcDispatcher.java:205)
> at org.infinispan.remoting.transport.jgroups.CommandAwareRpcDispatcher.handle(CommandAwareRpcDispatcher.java:175)
> at org.jgroups.blocks.RequestCorrelator.handleRequest(RequestCorrelator.java:455)
> at org.jgroups.blocks.RequestCorrelator.dispatch(RequestCorrelator.java:406)
> ... 27 more
> Caused by: org.infinispan.IllegalLifecycleStateException: ISPN000324: remote-failover-test.jar is in 'STOPPING' state and this is an invocation not belonging to an on-going transaction, so it does not accept new invocations. Either restart it or recreate the cache container.
> at org.infinispan.transaction.impl.TransactionTable.getOrCreateRemoteTransaction(TransactionTable.java:364)
> at org.infinispan.transaction.impl.TransactionTable.getOrCreateRemoteTransaction(TransactionTable.java:354)
> at org.infinispan.commands.control.LockControlCommand.createContext(LockControlCommand.java:138)
> at org.infinispan.commands.control.LockControlCommand.createContext(LockControlCommand.java:38)
> at org.infinispan.remoting.inboundhandler.action.PendingTxAction.createContext(PendingTxAction.java:107)
> at org.infinispan.remoting.inboundhandler.action.PendingTxAction.init(PendingTxAction.java:57)
> at org.infinispan.remoting.inboundhandler.action.BaseLockingAction.check(BaseLockingAction.java:38)
> at org.infinispan.remoting.inboundhandler.action.DefaultReadyAction.isReady(DefaultReadyAction.java:42)
> at org.infinispan.remoting.inboundhandler.action.DefaultReadyAction.isReady(DefaultReadyAction.java:45)
> at org.infinispan.remoting.inboundhandler.NonTotalOrderTxPerCacheInboundInvocationHandler$1.isReady(NonTotalOrderTxPerCacheInboundInvocationHandler.java:124)
> at org.infinispan.util.concurrent.BlockingTaskAwareExecutorServiceImpl.execute(BlockingTaskAwareExecutorServiceImpl.java:51)
> at org.infinispan.executors.LazyInitializingBlockingTaskAwareExecutorService.execute(LazyInitializingBlockingTaskAwareExecutorService.java:46)
> at org.infinispan.remoting.inboundhandler.BasePerCacheInboundInvocationHandler.handleRunnable(BasePerCacheInboundInvocationHandler.java:130)
> at org.infinispan.remoting.inboundhandler.NonTotalOrderTxPerCacheInboundInvocationHandler.handle(NonTotalOrderTxPerCacheInboundInvocationHandler.java:99)
> ... 33 more
> {noformat}
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.11#64026)
9 years, 10 months
- 1
- 0
[JBoss JIRA] (DROOLS-1008) KieServer to update container for SNAPSHOT kjar
by Mario Fusco (JIRA)
[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/DROOLS-1008?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugi... ]
Mario Fusco commented on DROOLS-1008:
-------------------------------------
I'm still investigating this purely on the kie-ci side. I already had a few tests using snapshots. Moreover in one of them I tried to replace
{code:java}
scanner.scanNow();
{code}
with
{code:java}
kieContainer.updateToVersion( releaseId );
{code}
here https://github.com/droolsjbpm/drools/blob/master/kie-ci/src/test/java/org... but still the test works as expected.
[~acollins] I'm assuming that when you wrote updateReleaseId() you actually meant updateToVersion( releaseId ). if this is the case I'm still unable to reproduce this problem, at least as a unit test inside kie-ci. I'll now try to set up an environment as similar as possible to the one you described and check if can I reproduce this issue in that way.
> KieServer to update container for SNAPSHOT kjar
> -----------------------------------------------
>
> Key: DROOLS-1008
> URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/DROOLS-1008
> Project: Drools
> Issue Type: Feature Request
> Components: kie server
> Affects Versions: 6.2.0.Final, 6.3.0.Final
> Reporter: Andrew Collins
> Assignee: Mario Fusco
> Attachments: snapshot_kjar_reproducer.patch
>
>
> General:
> When a kjar has a snapshot version, kie-server will not react to new snapshot versions deployed to a remote artifact repository. The remote artifact repository is only queried the first time after JVM startup, regardless of settings.xml snapshot updatePolicy setting. Retrieving a new snapshot version is only possible through use of KieScanner.scanNow() or recycling the JVM, which will both fetch the new artifact from the remote repository and reload the kmodule in the KieServer JVM.
> Steps to reproduce:
> * KieServer and Business Central deployed to separate JVMs, pointing to independent maven repositories. Snapshot updatePolicy should be "always" in KieServer settings.xml.
> * Deploy new kjar snapshot from Business Central to remote artifactory. (unique version "1")
> * Start KieServer (verify new snapshot version is pulled from remote)
> * Deploy new kjar snapnshot. (unique version "2")
> Expected behavior:
> * Creating a new container, or invoking updateReleaseId() on existing container will pull latest snapshot from remote artifactory.
> Actual Behavior
> * Creating a new container, or invoking updateReleaseId() on existing container, does not query remote artifactory for latest snapshots.
> Workaround:
> * Forcing a KieScanner.scanNow() will fetch new snapshot from remote artifactory.
> * Or, restarting KieScanner JVM will fetch new snapshot from remote artifactory.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.11#64026)
9 years, 10 months
- 1
- 0
[JBoss JIRA] (WFLY-7073) elytron key/trust-managers incosistency between dmr and xsd
by Darran Lofthouse (JIRA)
[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFLY-7073?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.... ]
Darran Lofthouse commented on WFLY-7073:
----------------------------------------
[~honza889] Passing this one your way as it is a subsystem issue, however we may want to pick up the work to redesign the provider-loader resource first as the final design for that resource(s) may influence how we really want to reference it.
> elytron key/trust-managers incosistency between dmr and xsd
> -----------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: WFLY-7073
> URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFLY-7073
> Project: WildFly
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: Security
> Reporter: Martin Choma
> Assignee: Jan Kalina
>
> For key/trust-managers in dmr model, there is "provider-loader" attribute [1], however xsd defines provider attribute [2] for key/trust-managers.
> Probably if user could define both provider and provider-loader, that would be the best.
> [1]
> {noformat}
> [standalone@localhost:9990 /] /subsystem=elytron/key-managers=server2:add(
> algorithm key-store password provider-loader
> {noformat}
> [2]
> https://github.com/wildfly-security/elytron-subsystem/blob/master/src/mai...
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.11#64026)
9 years, 10 months
- 1
- 0
[JBoss JIRA] (WFLY-7073) elytron key/trust-managers incosistency between dmr and xsd
by Darran Lofthouse (JIRA)
[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFLY-7073?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.... ]
Darran Lofthouse reassigned WFLY-7073:
--------------------------------------
Assignee: Jan Kalina (was: Darran Lofthouse)
> elytron key/trust-managers incosistency between dmr and xsd
> -----------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: WFLY-7073
> URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFLY-7073
> Project: WildFly
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: Security
> Reporter: Martin Choma
> Assignee: Jan Kalina
>
> For key/trust-managers in dmr model, there is "provider-loader" attribute [1], however xsd defines provider attribute [2] for key/trust-managers.
> Probably if user could define both provider and provider-loader, that would be the best.
> [1]
> {noformat}
> [standalone@localhost:9990 /] /subsystem=elytron/key-managers=server2:add(
> algorithm key-store password provider-loader
> {noformat}
> [2]
> https://github.com/wildfly-security/elytron-subsystem/blob/master/src/mai...
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.11#64026)
9 years, 10 months
- 1
- 0
[JBoss JIRA] (WFLY-7073) elytron key/trust-managers incosistency between dmr and xsd
by Martin Choma (JIRA)
[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFLY-7073?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.... ]
Martin Choma moved JBEAP-5928 to WFLY-7073:
-------------------------------------------
Project: WildFly (was: JBoss Enterprise Application Platform)
Key: WFLY-7073 (was: JBEAP-5928)
Workflow: GIT Pull Request workflow (was: CDW with loose statuses v1)
Component/s: Security
(was: Security)
Affects Version/s: (was: 7.1.0.DR4)
> elytron key/trust-managers incosistency between dmr and xsd
> -----------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: WFLY-7073
> URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFLY-7073
> Project: WildFly
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: Security
> Reporter: Martin Choma
> Assignee: Darran Lofthouse
>
> For key/trust-managers in dmr model, there is "provider-loader" attribute [1], however xsd defines provider attribute [2] for key/trust-managers.
> Probably if user could define both provider and provider-loader, that would be the best.
> [1]
> {noformat}
> [standalone@localhost:9990 /] /subsystem=elytron/key-managers=server2:add(
> algorithm key-store password provider-loader
> {noformat}
> [2]
> https://github.com/wildfly-security/elytron-subsystem/blob/master/src/mai...
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.11#64026)
9 years, 10 months
- 1
- 0
[JBoss JIRA] (WFLY-7029) RemoteFailoverTestCast#testGracefulShutdownConcurrentFailover fails with "ISPN000324: remote-failover-test.jar is in 'STOPPING' state and this is an invocation not belonging to an on-going transaction, so it does not accept new invocations."
by Dan Berindei (JIRA)
[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFLY-7029?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.... ]
Dan Berindei commented on WFLY-7029:
------------------------------------
The remote node is supposed to catch {{IllegalLifecycleStateException}} and replace the exception with a {{CacheNotFoundResponse}} (ISPN-5539).
However, this time the exception happens in {{BlockingRunnable.isReady()}}, outside of {{BaseBlockingRunnable.run()}}, so the {{IllegalLifecycleStateException}} is never caught and is sent directly to the originator. I've created ISPN-7008 to track this.
> RemoteFailoverTestCast#testGracefulShutdownConcurrentFailover fails with "ISPN000324: remote-failover-test.jar is in 'STOPPING' state and this is an invocation not belonging to an on-going transaction, so it does not accept new invocations."
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: WFLY-7029
> URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFLY-7029
> Project: WildFly
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: Clustering
> Affects Versions: 10.1.0.Final
> Reporter: Radoslav Husar
> Assignee: Richard Achmatowicz
>
> https://ci.wildfly.org/viewLog.html?buildId=24851&tab=buildResultsDiv&bui...
> {noformat}
> 04:31:43,323 INFO [org.jboss.as.test.clustering.NodeUtil] (main) Stopping container=container-0, timeout=15
> 04:31:43,324 INFO [org.jboss.as.arquillian.container.controller.ClientWildFlyContainerController] (main) Manual stopping of a server instance with timeout=15
> &#27;[0m04:31:43,338 INFO [org.jboss.as.server] (management-handler-thread - 4) WFLYSRV0211: Suspending server with 15000 ms timeout.
> &#27;[0m04:31:43,343 INFO [org.jboss.ejb.client.remoting.NoSuchEJBExceptionResponseHandler] (Remoting "config-based-ejb-client-endpoint" task-10) Retrying invocation which failed on node node-0 with exception:: javax.ejb.NoSuchEJBException: No such EJB[appname=,modulename=remote-failover-test,distinctname=,beanname=SlowToDestroyStatefulIncrementorBean,viewclassname=org.jboss.as.test.clustering.cluster.ejb.remote.bean.Incrementor]
> at org.jboss.ejb.client.remoting.NoSuchEJBExceptionResponseHandler.processMessage(NoSuchEJBExceptionResponseHandler.java:64)
> at org.jboss.ejb.client.remoting.ChannelAssociation.processResponse(ChannelAssociation.java:386)
> at org.jboss.ejb.client.remoting.ChannelAssociation$ResponseReceiver.handleMessage(ChannelAssociation.java:498)
> at org.jboss.remoting3.remote.RemoteConnectionChannel$5.run(RemoteConnectionChannel.java:456)
> at org.jboss.remoting3.EndpointImpl$TrackingExecutor$1.run(EndpointImpl.java:731)
> at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1142)
> at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:617)
> at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:745)
> &#27;[0m04:31:43,345 INFO [org.jboss.as.server] (Management Triggered Shutdown) WFLYSRV0241: Shutting down in response to management operation 'shutdown'
> &#27;[0m&#27;[0m04:31:43,430 INFO [org.wildfly.extension.undertow] (MSC service thread 1-2) WFLYUT0019: Host default-host stopping
> &#27;[0m&#27;[0m04:31:43,436 INFO [org.jboss.modcluster] (ServerService Thread Pool -- 29) MODCLUSTER000002: Initiating mod_cluster shutdown
> &#27;[0m&#27;[0m04:31:43,445 INFO [org.wildfly.extension.messaging-activemq] (ServerService Thread Pool -- 74) WFLYMSGAMQ0006: Unbound messaging object to jndi name java:/ConnectionFactory
> &#27;[0m&#27;[0m04:31:43,459 INFO [org.infinispan.remoting.transport.jgroups.JGroupsTransport] (MSC service thread 1-2) ISPN000080: Disconnecting JGroups channel hibernate
> &#27;[0m&#27;[0m04:31:43,459 INFO [org.infinispan.remoting.transport.jgroups.JGroupsTransport] (MSC service thread 1-2) ISPN000082: Stopping the RpcDispatcher for channel hibernate
> &#27;[0m&#27;[0m04:31:43,463 INFO [org.infinispan.remoting.transport.jgroups.JGroupsTransport] (MSC service thread 1-5) ISPN000080: Disconnecting JGroups channel server
> &#27;[0m&#27;[0m04:31:43,464 INFO [org.infinispan.remoting.transport.jgroups.JGroupsTransport] (MSC service thread 1-5) ISPN000082: Stopping the RpcDispatcher for channel server
> &#27;[0m&#27;[0m04:31:43,471 INFO [org.infinispan.eviction.impl.PassivationManagerImpl] (ServerService Thread Pool -- 29) ISPN000029: Passivating all entries to disk
> &#27;[0m&#27;[0m04:31:43,472 INFO [org.infinispan.eviction.impl.PassivationManagerImpl] (ServerService Thread Pool -- 29) ISPN000030: Passivated 2 entries in 0 milliseconds
> &#27;[0m&#27;[0m04:31:43,501 INFO [org.infinispan.remoting.transport.jgroups.JGroupsTransport] (MSC service thread 1-4) ISPN000080: Disconnecting JGroups channel web
> &#27;[0m&#27;[0m04:31:43,501 INFO [org.infinispan.remoting.transport.jgroups.JGroupsTransport] (MSC service thread 1-4) ISPN000082: Stopping the RpcDispatcher for channel web
> &#27;[0m&#27;[0m04:31:43,502 INFO [org.jboss.as.clustering.infinispan] (ServerService Thread Pool -- 29) WFLYCLINF0003: Stopped remote-failover-test.jar cache from ejb container
> &#27;[0m&#27;[0m04:31:43,505 INFO [org.infinispan.remoting.transport.jgroups.JGroupsTransport] (MSC service thread 1-1) ISPN000080: Disconnecting JGroups channel testDbPersistence
> &#27;[0m&#27;[0m04:31:43,505 INFO [org.infinispan.remoting.transport.jgroups.JGroupsTransport] (MSC service thread 1-1) ISPN000082: Stopping the RpcDispatcher for channel testDbPersistence
> &#27;[0m&#27;[33m04:31:43,502 WARN [org.infinispan.remoting.inboundhandler.NonTotalOrderTxPerCacheInboundInvocationHandler] (thread-11,ee,node-0) ISPN000071: Caught exception when handling command LockControlCommand{cache=remote-failover-test.jar, keys=[UnknownSessionID [6951504948515351686656515249505365655750686851525048706670486766]], flags=[FORCE_WRITE_LOCK], unlock=false, gtx=GlobalTransaction:<node-1>:48:remote}: org.infinispan.IllegalLifecycleStateException: ISPN000324: remote-failover-test.jar is in 'STOPPING' state and this is an invocation not belonging to an on-going transaction, so it does not accept new invocations. Either restart it or recreate the cache container.
> at org.infinispan.transaction.impl.TransactionTable.getOrCreateRemoteTransaction(TransactionTable.java:364)
> at org.infinispan.transaction.impl.TransactionTable.getOrCreateRemoteTransaction(TransactionTable.java:354)
> at org.infinispan.commands.control.LockControlCommand.createContext(LockControlCommand.java:138)
> at org.infinispan.commands.control.LockControlCommand.createContext(LockControlCommand.java:38)
> at org.infinispan.remoting.inboundhandler.action.PendingTxAction.createContext(PendingTxAction.java:107)
> at org.infinispan.remoting.inboundhandler.action.PendingTxAction.init(PendingTxAction.java:57)
> at org.infinispan.remoting.inboundhandler.action.BaseLockingAction.check(BaseLockingAction.java:38)
> at org.infinispan.remoting.inboundhandler.action.DefaultReadyAction.isReady(DefaultReadyAction.java:42)
> at org.infinispan.remoting.inboundhandler.action.DefaultReadyAction.isReady(DefaultReadyAction.java:45)
> at org.infinispan.remoting.inboundhandler.NonTotalOrderTxPerCacheInboundInvocationHandler$1.isReady(NonTotalOrderTxPerCacheInboundInvocationHandler.java:124)
> at org.infinispan.util.concurrent.BlockingTaskAwareExecutorServiceImpl.execute(BlockingTaskAwareExecutorServiceImpl.java:51)
> at org.infinispan.executors.LazyInitializingBlockingTaskAwareExecutorService.execute(LazyInitializingBlockingTaskAwareExecutorService.java:46)
> at org.infinispan.remoting.inboundhandler.BasePerCacheInboundInvocationHandler.handleRunnable(BasePerCacheInboundInvocationHandler.java:130)
> at org.infinispan.remoting.inboundhandler.NonTotalOrderTxPerCacheInboundInvocationHandler.handle(NonTotalOrderTxPerCacheInboundInvocationHandler.java:99)
> at org.infinispan.remoting.inboundhandler.GlobalInboundInvocationHandler.handleCacheRpcCommand(GlobalInboundInvocationHandler.java:126)
> at org.infinispan.remoting.inboundhandler.GlobalInboundInvocationHandler.handleFromCluster(GlobalInboundInvocationHandler.java:75)
> at org.infinispan.remoting.transport.jgroups.CommandAwareRpcDispatcher.executeCommandFromLocalCluster(CommandAwareRpcDispatcher.java:205)
> at org.infinispan.remoting.transport.jgroups.CommandAwareRpcDispatcher.handle(CommandAwareRpcDispatcher.java:175)
> at org.jgroups.blocks.RequestCorrelator.handleRequest(RequestCorrelator.java:455)
> at org.jgroups.blocks.RequestCorrelator.dispatch(RequestCorrelator.java:406)
> at org.jgroups.blocks.RequestCorrelator.receiveMessage(RequestCorrelator.java:357)
> at org.jgroups.blocks.RequestCorrelator.receive(RequestCorrelator.java:245)
> at org.jgroups.blocks.MessageDispatcher$ProtocolAdapter.up(MessageDispatcher.java:664)
> at org.jgroups.JChannel.up(JChannel.java:738)
> at org.jgroups.fork.ForkProtocolStack.up(ForkProtocolStack.java:120)
> at org.jgroups.stack.Protocol.up(Protocol.java:380)
> at org.jgroups.protocols.FORK.up(FORK.java:114)
> at org.jgroups.protocols.FRAG2.up(FRAG2.java:165)
> at org.jgroups.protocols.FlowControl.up(FlowControl.java:390)
> at org.jgroups.protocols.pbcast.GMS.up(GMS.java:1040)
> at org.jgroups.protocols.pbcast.STABLE.up(STABLE.java:234)
> at org.jgroups.protocols.UNICAST3.deliverMessage(UNICAST3.java:1070)
> at org.jgroups.protocols.UNICAST3.handleDataReceived(UNICAST3.java:785)
> at org.jgroups.protocols.UNICAST3.up(UNICAST3.java:426)
> at org.jgroups.protocols.pbcast.NAKACK2.up(NAKACK2.java:649)
> at org.jgroups.protocols.VERIFY_SUSPECT.up(VERIFY_SUSPECT.java:155)
> at org.jgroups.protocols.FD.up(FD.java:260)
> at org.jgroups.protocols.FD_SOCK.up(FD_SOCK.java:310)
> at org.jgroups.protocols.MERGE3.up(MERGE3.java:285)
> at org.jgroups.protocols.Discovery.up(Discovery.java:296)
> at org.jgroups.protocols.MPING.up(MPING.java:178)
> at org.jgroups.protocols.TP.passMessageUp(TP.java:1601)
> at org.jgroups.protocols.TP$SingleMessageHandler.run(TP.java:1817)
> at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1142)
> at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:617)
> at org.jboss.as.clustering.jgroups.ClassLoaderThreadFactory.lambda$newThread$0(ClassLoaderThreadFactory.java:52)
> at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:745)
> &#27;[0m&#27;[0m04:31:43,517 INFO [org.wildfly.extension.messaging-activemq] (MSC service thread 1-2) WFLYMSGAMQ0006: Unbound messaging object to jndi name java:jboss/DefaultJMSConnectionFactory
> &#27;[0m&#27;[0m04:31:43,517 INFO [org.jboss.as.connector.subsystems.datasources] (MSC service thread 1-2) WFLYJCA0010: Unbound data source [java:jboss/datasources/ExampleDS]
> &#27;[0m&#27;[0m04:31:43,518 INFO [org.jboss.as.connector.deployment] (MSC service thread 1-4) WFLYJCA0011: Unbound JCA ConnectionFactory [java:/JmsXA]
> &#27;[0m&#27;[0m04:31:43,535 INFO [org.jboss.as.connector.deployers.jdbc] (MSC service thread 1-8) WFLYJCA0019: Stopped Driver service with driver-name = h2
> &#27;[0m&#27;[0m04:31:43,547 INFO [org.jboss.as.clustering.infinispan] (ServerService Thread Pool -- 2) WFLYCLINF0003: Stopped client-mappings cache from ejb container
> &#27;[0m04:31:43,565 INFO [org.jboss.ejb.client.remoting] (Remoting "config-based-ejb-client-endpoint" task-14) EJBCLIENT000016: Channel Channel ID b007a55b (outbound) of Remoting connection 017c35ab to /0:0:0:0:0:0:0:1:8080 of endpoint "config-based-ejb-client-endpoint" <1c33eee> can no longer process messages
> &#27;[0m04:31:43,576 INFO [org.infinispan.remoting.transport.jgroups.JGroupsTransport] (MSC service thread 1-3) ISPN000080: Disconnecting JGroups channel ejb
> &#27;[0m&#27;[0m04:31:43,576 INFO [org.infinispan.remoting.transport.jgroups.JGroupsTransport] (MSC service thread 1-3) ISPN000082: Stopping the RpcDispatcher for channel ejb
> &#27;[0m&#27;[0m04:31:43,575 INFO [org.apache.activemq.artemis.ra] (ServerService Thread Pool -- 35) AMQ151003: resource adaptor stopped
> &#27;[0m&#27;[0m04:31:43,591 INFO [org.wildfly.extension.undertow] (MSC service thread 1-6) WFLYUT0008: Undertow AJP listener ajp suspending
> &#27;[0m&#27;[0m04:31:43,591 INFO [org.wildfly.extension.undertow] (MSC service thread 1-6) WFLYUT0007: Undertow AJP listener ajp stopped, was bound to [::1]:8009
> &#27;[0m&#27;[0m04:31:43,592 INFO [org.wildfly.extension.undertow] (MSC service thread 1-6) WFLYUT0008: Undertow HTTPS listener https suspending
> &#27;[0m&#27;[0m04:31:43,592 INFO [org.wildfly.extension.undertow] (MSC service thread 1-6) WFLYUT0007: Undertow HTTPS listener https stopped, was bound to [::1]:8443
> &#27;[0m&#27;[31m04:31:43,585 ERROR [org.infinispan.interceptors.InvocationContextInterceptor] (default task-11) ISPN000136: Error executing command GetKeyValueCommand, writing keys []: org.infinispan.remoting.RemoteException: ISPN000217: Received exception from node-0, see cause for remote stack trace
> at org.infinispan.remoting.transport.AbstractTransport.checkResponse(AbstractTransport.java:44)
> at org.infinispan.remoting.transport.jgroups.JGroupsTransport.checkRsp(JGroupsTransport.java:795)
> at org.infinispan.remoting.transport.jgroups.JGroupsTransport.lambda$invokeRemotelyAsync$1(JGroupsTransport.java:642)
> at java.util.concurrent.CompletableFuture.uniApply(CompletableFuture.java:602)
> at java.util.concurrent.CompletableFuture$UniApply.tryFire(CompletableFuture.java:577)
> at java.util.concurrent.CompletableFuture.postComplete(CompletableFuture.java:474)
> at java.util.concurrent.CompletableFuture.complete(CompletableFuture.java:1962)
> at org.infinispan.remoting.transport.jgroups.RspListFuture.futureDone(RspListFuture.java:31)
> at org.jgroups.blocks.Request.checkCompletion(Request.java:152)
> at org.jgroups.blocks.GroupRequest.receiveResponse(GroupRequest.java:116)
> at org.jgroups.blocks.RequestCorrelator.dispatch(RequestCorrelator.java:427)
> at org.jgroups.blocks.RequestCorrelator.receiveMessage(RequestCorrelator.java:357)
> at org.jgroups.blocks.RequestCorrelator.receive(RequestCorrelator.java:245)
> at org.jgroups.blocks.MessageDispatcher$ProtocolAdapter.up(MessageDispatcher.java:664)
> at org.jgroups.JChannel.up(JChannel.java:738)
> at org.jgroups.fork.ForkProtocolStack.up(ForkProtocolStack.java:120)
> at org.jgroups.stack.Protocol.up(Protocol.java:380)
> at org.jgroups.protocols.FORK.up(FORK.java:114)
> at org.jgroups.protocols.FRAG2.up(FRAG2.java:165)
> at org.jgroups.protocols.FlowControl.up(FlowControl.java:390)
> at org.jgroups.protocols.pbcast.GMS.up(GMS.java:1040)
> at org.jgroups.protocols.pbcast.STABLE.up(STABLE.java:234)
> at org.jgroups.protocols.UNICAST3.deliverMessage(UNICAST3.java:1070)
> at org.jgroups.protocols.UNICAST3.handleDataReceived(UNICAST3.java:785)
> at org.jgroups.protocols.UNICAST3.up(UNICAST3.java:426)
> at org.jgroups.protocols.pbcast.NAKACK2.up(NAKACK2.java:649)
> at org.jgroups.protocols.VERIFY_SUSPECT.up(VERIFY_SUSPECT.java:155)
> at org.jgroups.protocols.FD.up(FD.java:260)
> at org.jgroups.protocols.FD_SOCK.up(FD_SOCK.java:310)
> at org.jgroups.protocols.MERGE3.up(MERGE3.java:285)
> at org.jgroups.protocols.Discovery.up(Discovery.java:296)
> at org.jgroups.protocols.MPING.up(MPING.java:178)
> at org.jgroups.protocols.TP.passMessageUp(TP.java:1601)
> at org.jgroups.protocols.TP$SingleMessageHandler.run(TP.java:1817)
> at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1142)
> at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:617)
> at org.jboss.as.clustering.jgroups.ClassLoaderThreadFactory.lambda$newThread$0(ClassLoaderThreadFactory.java:52)
> at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:745)
> Caused by: org.infinispan.commons.CacheException: Problems invoking command.
> at org.infinispan.remoting.inboundhandler.BasePerCacheInboundInvocationHandler.exceptionHandlingCommand(BasePerCacheInboundInvocationHandler.java:106)
> at org.infinispan.remoting.inboundhandler.NonTotalOrderTxPerCacheInboundInvocationHandler.handle(NonTotalOrderTxPerCacheInboundInvocationHandler.java:101)
> at org.infinispan.remoting.inboundhandler.GlobalInboundInvocationHandler.handleCacheRpcCommand(GlobalInboundInvocationHandler.java:126)
> at org.infinispan.remoting.inboundhandler.GlobalInboundInvocationHandler.handleFromCluster(GlobalInboundInvocationHandler.java:75)
> at org.infinispan.remoting.transport.jgroups.CommandAwareRpcDispatcher.executeCommandFromLocalCluster(CommandAwareRpcDispatcher.java:205)
> at org.infinispan.remoting.transport.jgroups.CommandAwareRpcDispatcher.handle(CommandAwareRpcDispatcher.java:175)
> at org.jgroups.blocks.RequestCorrelator.handleRequest(RequestCorrelator.java:455)
> at org.jgroups.blocks.RequestCorrelator.dispatch(RequestCorrelator.java:406)
> ... 27 more
> Caused by: org.infinispan.IllegalLifecycleStateException: ISPN000324: remote-failover-test.jar is in 'STOPPING' state and this is an invocation not belonging to an on-going transaction, so it does not accept new invocations. Either restart it or recreate the cache container.
> at org.infinispan.transaction.impl.TransactionTable.getOrCreateRemoteTransaction(TransactionTable.java:364)
> at org.infinispan.transaction.impl.TransactionTable.getOrCreateRemoteTransaction(TransactionTable.java:354)
> at org.infinispan.commands.control.LockControlCommand.createContext(LockControlCommand.java:138)
> at org.infinispan.commands.control.LockControlCommand.createContext(LockControlCommand.java:38)
> at org.infinispan.remoting.inboundhandler.action.PendingTxAction.createContext(PendingTxAction.java:107)
> at org.infinispan.remoting.inboundhandler.action.PendingTxAction.init(PendingTxAction.java:57)
> at org.infinispan.remoting.inboundhandler.action.BaseLockingAction.check(BaseLockingAction.java:38)
> at org.infinispan.remoting.inboundhandler.action.DefaultReadyAction.isReady(DefaultReadyAction.java:42)
> at org.infinispan.remoting.inboundhandler.action.DefaultReadyAction.isReady(DefaultReadyAction.java:45)
> at org.infinispan.remoting.inboundhandler.NonTotalOrderTxPerCacheInboundInvocationHandler$1.isReady(NonTotalOrderTxPerCacheInboundInvocationHandler.java:124)
> at org.infinispan.util.concurrent.BlockingTaskAwareExecutorServiceImpl.execute(BlockingTaskAwareExecutorServiceImpl.java:51)
> at org.infinispan.executors.LazyInitializingBlockingTaskAwareExecutorService.execute(LazyInitializingBlockingTaskAwareExecutorService.java:46)
> at org.infinispan.remoting.inboundhandler.BasePerCacheInboundInvocationHandler.handleRunnable(BasePerCacheInboundInvocationHandler.java:130)
> at org.infinispan.remoting.inboundhandler.NonTotalOrderTxPerCacheInboundInvocationHandler.handle(NonTotalOrderTxPerCacheInboundInvocationHandler.java:99)
> ... 33 more
> &#27;[0m&#27;[31m04:31:43,588 ERROR [org.jboss.as.ejb3.invocation] (default task-11) WFLYEJB0034: EJB Invocation failed on component SlowToDestroyStatefulIncrementorBean for method public abstract org.jboss.as.test.clustering.cluster.ejb.remote.bean.Result org.jboss.as.test.clustering.cluster.ejb.remote.bean.Incrementor.increment(): javax.ejb.EJBException: org.infinispan.remoting.RemoteException: ISPN000217: Received exception from node-0, see cause for remote stack trace
> at org.jboss.as.ejb3.tx.CMTTxInterceptor.handleExceptionInOurTx(CMTTxInterceptor.java:187)
> at org.jboss.as.ejb3.tx.CMTTxInterceptor.invokeInOurTx(CMTTxInterceptor.java:277)
> at org.jboss.as.ejb3.tx.CMTTxInterceptor.required(CMTTxInterceptor.java:327)
> at org.jboss.as.ejb3.tx.CMTTxInterceptor.processInvocation(CMTTxInterceptor.java:239)
> at org.jboss.invocation.InterceptorContext.proceed(InterceptorContext.java:340)
> at org.jboss.as.ejb3.remote.EJBRemoteTransactionPropagatingInterceptor.processInvocation(EJBRemoteTransactionPropagatingInterceptor.java:79)
> at org.jboss.invocation.InterceptorContext.proceed(InterceptorContext.java:340)
> at org.jboss.as.ejb3.component.interceptors.CurrentInvocationContextInterceptor.processInvocation(CurrentInvocationContextInterceptor.java:41)
> at org.jboss.invocation.InterceptorContext.proceed(InterceptorContext.java:340)
> at org.jboss.as.ejb3.component.invocationmetrics.WaitTimeInterceptor.processInvocation(WaitTimeInterceptor.java:47)
> at org.jboss.invocation.InterceptorContext.proceed(InterceptorContext.java:340)
> at org.jboss.as.ejb3.security.SecurityContextInterceptor.processInvocation(SecurityContextInterceptor.java:100)
> at org.jboss.invocation.InterceptorContext.proceed(InterceptorContext.java:340)
> at org.jboss.as.ejb3.deployment.processors.StartupAwaitInterceptor.processInvocation(StartupAwaitInterceptor.java:22)
> at org.jboss.invocation.InterceptorContext.proceed(InterceptorContext.java:340)
> at org.jboss.as.ejb3.component.interceptors.ShutDownInterceptorFactory$1.processInvocation(ShutDownInterceptorFactory.java:64)
> at org.jboss.invocation.InterceptorContext.proceed(InterceptorContext.java:340)
> at org.jboss.as.ejb3.deployment.processors.EjbSuspendInterceptor.processInvocation(EjbSuspendInterceptor.java:53)
> at org.jboss.invocation.InterceptorContext.proceed(InterceptorContext.java:340)
> at org.jboss.as.ejb3.component.interceptors.LoggingInterceptor.processInvocation(LoggingInterceptor.java:67)
> at org.jboss.invocation.InterceptorContext.proceed(InterceptorContext.java:340)
> at org.jboss.as.ee.component.NamespaceContextInterceptor.processInvocation(NamespaceContextInterceptor.java:50)
> at org.jboss.invocation.InterceptorContext.proceed(InterceptorContext.java:340)
> at org.jboss.as.ejb3.component.interceptors.AdditionalSetupInterceptor.processInvocation(AdditionalSetupInterceptor.java:54)
> at org.jboss.invocation.InterceptorContext.proceed(InterceptorContext.java:340)
> at org.jboss.invocation.ContextClassLoaderInterceptor.processInvocation(ContextClassLoaderInterceptor.java:64)
> at org.jboss.invocation.InterceptorContext.proceed(InterceptorContext.java:340)
> at org.jboss.invocation.InterceptorContext.run(InterceptorContext.java:356)
> at org.wildfly.security.manager.WildFlySecurityManager.doChecked(WildFlySecurityManager.java:636)
> at org.jboss.invocation.AccessCheckingInterceptor.processInvocation(AccessCheckingInterceptor.java:61)
> at org.jboss.invocation.InterceptorContext.proceed(InterceptorContext.java:340)
> at org.jboss.invocation.InterceptorContext.run(InterceptorContext.java:356)
> at org.jboss.invocation.PrivilegedWithCombinerInterceptor.processInvocation(PrivilegedWithCombinerInterceptor.java:80)
> at org.jboss.invocation.InterceptorContext.proceed(InterceptorContext.java:340)
> at org.jboss.invocation.ChainedInterceptor.processInvocation(ChainedInterceptor.java:61)
> at org.jboss.as.ee.component.ViewService$View.invoke(ViewService.java:198)
> at org.jboss.as.ejb3.remote.protocol.versionone.MethodInvocationMessageHandler.invokeMethod(MethodInvocationMessageHandler.java:328)
> at org.jboss.as.ejb3.remote.protocol.versionone.MethodInvocationMessageHandler.access$100(MethodInvocationMessageHandler.java:67)
> at org.jboss.as.ejb3.remote.protocol.versionone.MethodInvocationMessageHandler$1.run(MethodInvocationMessageHandler.java:201)
> at org.jboss.as.ejb3.remote.protocol.versionone.MethodInvocationMessageHandler.processMessage(MethodInvocationMessageHandler.java:263)
> at org.jboss.as.ejb3.remote.protocol.versionone.VersionOneProtocolChannelReceiver.processMessage(VersionOneProtocolChannelReceiver.java:213)
> at org.jboss.as.ejb3.remote.protocol.versiontwo.VersionTwoProtocolChannelReceiver.processMessage(VersionTwoProtocolChannelReceiver.java:76)
> at org.jboss.as.ejb3.remote.protocol.versionone.VersionOneProtocolChannelReceiver.handleMessage(VersionOneProtocolChannelReceiver.java:159)
> at org.jboss.remoting3.remote.RemoteConnectionChannel$5.run(RemoteConnectionChannel.java:456)
> at org.jboss.remoting3.EndpointImpl$TrackingExecutor$1.run(EndpointImpl.java:731)
> at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1142)
> at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:617)
> at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:745)
> Caused by: org.infinispan.remoting.RemoteException: ISPN000217: Received exception from node-0, see cause for remote stack trace
> at org.infinispan.remoting.transport.AbstractTransport.checkResponse(AbstractTransport.java:44)
> at org.infinispan.remoting.transport.jgroups.JGroupsTransport.checkRsp(JGroupsTransport.java:795)
> at org.infinispan.remoting.transport.jgroups.JGroupsTransport.lambda$invokeRemotelyAsync$1(JGroupsTransport.java:642)
> at java.util.concurrent.CompletableFuture.uniApply(CompletableFuture.java:602)
> at java.util.concurrent.CompletableFuture$UniApply.tryFire(CompletableFuture.java:577)
> at java.util.concurrent.CompletableFuture.postComplete(CompletableFuture.java:474)
> at java.util.concurrent.CompletableFuture.complete(CompletableFuture.java:1962)
> at org.infinispan.remoting.transport.jgroups.RspListFuture.futureDone(RspListFuture.java:31)
> at org.jgroups.blocks.Request.checkCompletion(Request.java:152)
> at org.jgroups.blocks.GroupRequest.receiveResponse(GroupRequest.java:116)
> at org.jgroups.blocks.RequestCorrelator.dispatch(RequestCorrelator.java:427)
> at org.jgroups.blocks.RequestCorrelator.receiveMessage(RequestCorrelator.java:357)
> at org.jgroups.blocks.RequestCorrelator.receive(RequestCorrelator.java:245)
> at org.jgroups.blocks.MessageDispatcher$ProtocolAdapter.up(MessageDispatcher.java:664)
> at org.jgroups.JChannel.up(JChannel.java:738)
> at org.jgroups.fork.ForkProtocolStack.up(ForkProtocolStack.java:120)
> at org.jgroups.stack.Protocol.up(Protocol.java:380)
> at org.jgroups.protocols.FORK.up(FORK.java:114)
> at org.jgroups.protocols.FRAG2.up(FRAG2.java:165)
> at org.jgroups.protocols.FlowControl.up(FlowControl.java:390)
> at org.jgroups.protocols.pbcast.GMS.up(GMS.java:1040)
> at org.jgroups.protocols.pbcast.STABLE.up(STABLE.java:234)
> at org.jgroups.protocols.UNICAST3.deliverMessage(UNICAST3.java:1070)
> at org.jgroups.protocols.UNICAST3.handleDataReceived(UNICAST3.java:785)
> at org.jgroups.protocols.UNICAST3.up(UNICAST3.java:426)
> at org.jgroups.protocols.pbcast.NAKACK2.up(NAKACK2.java:649)
> at org.jgroups.protocols.VERIFY_SUSPECT.up(VERIFY_SUSPECT.java:155)
> at org.jgroups.protocols.FD.up(FD.java:260)
> at org.jgroups.protocols.FD_SOCK.up(FD_SOCK.java:310)
> at org.jgroups.protocols.MERGE3.up(MERGE3.java:285)
> at org.jgroups.protocols.Discovery.up(Discovery.java:296)
> at org.jgroups.protocols.MPING.up(MPING.java:178)
> at org.jgroups.protocols.TP.passMessageUp(TP.java:1601)
> at org.jgroups.protocols.TP$SingleMessageHandler.run(TP.java:1817)
> at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1142)
> at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:617)
> at org.jboss.as.clustering.jgroups.ClassLoaderThreadFactory.lambda$newThread$0(ClassLoaderThreadFactory.java:52)
> ... 1 more
> Caused by: org.infinispan.commons.CacheException: Problems invoking command.
> at org.infinispan.remoting.inboundhandler.BasePerCacheInboundInvocationHandler.exceptionHandlingCommand(BasePerCacheInboundInvocationHandler.java:106)
> at org.infinispan.remoting.inboundhandler.NonTotalOrderTxPerCacheInboundInvocationHandler.handle(NonTotalOrderTxPerCacheInboundInvocationHandler.java:101)
> at org.infinispan.remoting.inboundhandler.GlobalInboundInvocationHandler.handleCacheRpcCommand(GlobalInboundInvocationHandler.java:126)
> at org.infinispan.remoting.inboundhandler.GlobalInboundInvocationHandler.handleFromCluster(GlobalInboundInvocationHandler.java:75)
> at org.infinispan.remoting.transport.jgroups.CommandAwareRpcDispatcher.executeCommandFromLocalCluster(CommandAwareRpcDispatcher.java:205)
> at org.infinispan.remoting.transport.jgroups.CommandAwareRpcDispatcher.handle(CommandAwareRpcDispatcher.java:175)
> at org.jgroups.blocks.RequestCorrelator.handleRequest(RequestCorrelator.java:455)
> at org.jgroups.blocks.RequestCorrelator.dispatch(RequestCorrelator.java:406)
> ... 27 more
> Caused by: org.infinispan.IllegalLifecycleStateException: ISPN000324: remote-failover-test.jar is in 'STOPPING' state and this is an invocation not belonging to an on-going transaction, so it does not accept new invocations. Either restart it or recreate the cache container.
> at org.infinispan.transaction.impl.TransactionTable.getOrCreateRemoteTransaction(TransactionTable.java:364)
> at org.infinispan.transaction.impl.TransactionTable.getOrCreateRemoteTransaction(TransactionTable.java:354)
> at org.infinispan.commands.control.LockControlCommand.createContext(LockControlCommand.java:138)
> at org.infinispan.commands.control.LockControlCommand.createContext(LockControlCommand.java:38)
> at org.infinispan.remoting.inboundhandler.action.PendingTxAction.createContext(PendingTxAction.java:107)
> at org.infinispan.remoting.inboundhandler.action.PendingTxAction.init(PendingTxAction.java:57)
> at org.infinispan.remoting.inboundhandler.action.BaseLockingAction.check(BaseLockingAction.java:38)
> at org.infinispan.remoting.inboundhandler.action.DefaultReadyAction.isReady(DefaultReadyAction.java:42)
> at org.infinispan.remoting.inboundhandler.action.DefaultReadyAction.isReady(DefaultReadyAction.java:45)
> at org.infinispan.remoting.inboundhandler.NonTotalOrderTxPerCacheInboundInvocationHandler$1.isReady(NonTotalOrderTxPerCacheInboundInvocationHandler.java:124)
> at org.infinispan.util.concurrent.BlockingTaskAwareExecutorServiceImpl.execute(BlockingTaskAwareExecutorServiceImpl.java:51)
> at org.infinispan.executors.LazyInitializingBlockingTaskAwareExecutorService.execute(LazyInitializingBlockingTaskAwareExecutorService.java:46)
> at org.infinispan.remoting.inboundhandler.BasePerCacheInboundInvocationHandler.handleRunnable(BasePerCacheInboundInvocationHandler.java:130)
> at org.infinispan.remoting.inboundhandler.NonTotalOrderTxPerCacheInboundInvocationHandler.handle(NonTotalOrderTxPerCacheInboundInvocationHandler.java:99)
> ... 33 more
> {noformat}
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.11#64026)
9 years, 10 months
- 1
- 0
[JBoss JIRA] (DROOLS-1281) [GSS] (6..4.x) compilation of spreadsheet fails with specific condition
by Hiroko Miura (JIRA)
[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/DROOLS-1281?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugi... ]
Hiroko Miura deleted DROOLS-1281:
---------------------------------
> [GSS] (6..4.x) compilation of spreadsheet fails with specific condition
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: DROOLS-1281
> URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/DROOLS-1281
> Project: Drools
> Issue Type: Bug
> Reporter: Hiroko Miura
> Assignee: Mario Fusco
> Labels: support
>
> Platform JIRA for https://issues.jboss.org/browse/DROOLS-1279
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.11#64026)
9 years, 10 months
- 1
- 0
[JBoss JIRA] (WFCORE-1556) Poor handling of 'required', 'nillable' and 'alternatives' in AttributeDefinition
by Brian Stansberry (JIRA)
[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFCORE-1556?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugi... ]
Brian Stansberry updated WFCORE-1556:
-------------------------------------
Description:
The handling of the notions of 'required' and 'nillable' don't comply with the specs in https://docs.jboss.org/author/display/WFLY/Description+of+the+Management+..., particularly the "Description of an Attribute" part, where the 'required' and 'alternatives' fields are well described, with their relationship spelled out, while 'nillable' doesn't appear at all. Then in "Description of an Operation Parameter or Return Value" nillable is specified, although I think those descriptions could be tightened up in general.
The read-resource-description output for an attribute doesn't show "required" at all.
After a fair bit of thinking, I've finally recalled why the two separate notions of "required" and "nillable" exist in the first place.
The "required" and "alternatives" pieces go together. Is something required? And then if it is required, an alternative satisfies. So you can have two attributes/params, both required, but they are alternatives so one is defined and the other is not. And this is an ok thing.
And then 'nillable' comes in to help clients understand in a simple way whether they need to account for the possibility an undefined value. Basically:
nillable = !required || alternatives != null
Right now, nillable is implemented as
nillable = !required
There are a number of problems I see with AttributeDefinition:
1) We don't output the 'required' metadata unless it's an operation param being described. This is contrary to spec. However we shouldn't fix this unless we can have meaningful values for 'required', ones where the value can be true but the attribute/param can still have an undefined value, due to an alternative being present. If we can't fix that, there's no point outputting required as it's just redundant with what we output for 'nillable'.
2) We do output the 'nillable' metadata, even for attribute descriptions, where it isn't in the spec. But in this case I think we change the spec, as dropping nillable would be an incompatible change.
3) We don't properly validate the "required but has alternatives case." This can't be validated solely with ParameterValidator impls as those only see a single attribute value and don't have contextual information about other attributes/params. To get around this limitation, devs are saying that attributes with alternatives "allowNull" which is equivalent to saying they are not required. But they are required! So I think a fix for this will require AttributeDefinition itself to validate the overall resource model or operation object, and skip calling the ParameterValidator if the attribute/param is undefined and an alternative is defined.
4) AttributeDefinition and AbstractAttributeDefinitionBuilder unfortunately have a getter/setter/constructor param for property "allowNull" instead of a property named "required". This is unfortunate because "allowNull" intuitively maps to "nillable", but "required" is a much more useful thing to set. The value of "nillable" can be derived from a "required" setting and an "alternatives" setting, but the value of required cannot be so derived.
I think a fix for this would probably start from 4), deprecating setAllowNull, adding get/setRequired and changing the meaning of the AD(Builder) constructor param to "required". The effect of this would be that all current code setting "allowNull" would now be setting a new "required" field. This should be a non-breaking change as in current code that's the effect anyway.
Next would be to fix 3), by changing how AD validates.
Next would be to change the metadata we output, such that "required" is always present and the "nillable" value is !required || alternatives != null. And change the spec accordingly.
Last, in a separate task, would be to find attributes that were configuring "allowNull = true" solely to allow validation to pass when alternatives are present, and fix them to say "required=false".
was:
The handling of the notions of 'required' and 'nillable' don't comply with the specs in https://docs.jboss.org/author/display/WFLY10/Description+of+the+Managemen..., particularly the "Description of an Attribute" part, where the 'required' and 'alternatives' fields are well described, with their relationship spelled out, while 'nillable' doesn't appear at all. Then in "Description of an Operation Parameter or Return Value" nillable is specified, although I think those descriptions could be tightened up in general.
The read-resource-description output for an attribute doesn't show "required" at all.
After a fair bit of thinking, I've finally recalled why the two separate notions of "required" and "nillable" exist in the first place.
The "required" and "alternatives" pieces go together. Is something required? And then if it is required, an alternative satisfies. So you can have two attributes/params, both required, but they are alternatives so one is defined and the other is not. And this is an ok thing.
And then 'nillable' comes in to help clients understand in a simple way whether they need to account for the possibility an undefined value. Basically:
nillable = !required || alternatives != null
Right now, nillable is implemented as
nillable = !required
There are a number of problems I see with AttributeDefinition:
1) We don't output the 'required' metadata unless it's an operation param being described. This is contrary to spec. However we shouldn't fix this unless we can have meaningful values for 'required', ones where the value can be true but the attribute/param can still have an undefined value, due to an alternative being present. If we can't fix that, there's no point outputting required as it's just redundant with what we output for 'nillable'.
2) We do output the 'nillable' metadata, even for attribute descriptions, where it isn't in the spec. But in this case I think we change the spec, as dropping nillable would be an incompatible change.
3) We don't properly validate the "required but has alternatives case." This can't be validated solely with ParameterValidator impls as those only see a single attribute value and don't have contextual information about other attributes/params. To get around this limitation, devs are saying that attributes with alternatives "allowNull" which is equivalent to saying they are not required. But they are required! So I think a fix for this will require AttributeDefinition itself to validate the overall resource model or operation object, and skip calling the ParameterValidator if the attribute/param is undefined and an alternative is defined.
4) AttributeDefinition and AbstractAttributeDefinitionBuilder unfortunately have a getter/setter/constructor param for property "allowNull" instead of a property named "required". This is unfortunate because "allowNull" intuitively maps to "nillable", but "required" is a much more useful thing to set. The value of "nillable" can be derived from a "required" setting and an "alternatives" setting, but the value of required cannot be so derived.
I think a fix for this would probably start from 4), deprecating setAllowNull, adding get/setRequired and changing the meaning of the AD(Builder) constructor param to "required". The effect of this would be that all current code setting "allowNull" would now be setting a new "required" field. This should be a non-breaking change as in current code that's the effect anyway.
Next would be to fix 3), by changing how AD validates.
Next would be to change the metadata we output, such that "required" is always present and the "nillable" value is !required || alternatives != null. And change the spec accordingly.
Last, in a separate task, would be to find attributes that were configuring "allowNull = true" solely to allow validation to pass when alternatives are present, and fix them to say "required=false".
> Poor handling of 'required', 'nillable' and 'alternatives' in AttributeDefinition
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: WFCORE-1556
> URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFCORE-1556
> Project: WildFly Core
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: Domain Management
> Reporter: Brian Stansberry
> Assignee: Brian Stansberry
>
> The handling of the notions of 'required' and 'nillable' don't comply with the specs in https://docs.jboss.org/author/display/WFLY/Description+of+the+Management+..., particularly the "Description of an Attribute" part, where the 'required' and 'alternatives' fields are well described, with their relationship spelled out, while 'nillable' doesn't appear at all. Then in "Description of an Operation Parameter or Return Value" nillable is specified, although I think those descriptions could be tightened up in general.
> The read-resource-description output for an attribute doesn't show "required" at all.
> After a fair bit of thinking, I've finally recalled why the two separate notions of "required" and "nillable" exist in the first place.
> The "required" and "alternatives" pieces go together. Is something required? And then if it is required, an alternative satisfies. So you can have two attributes/params, both required, but they are alternatives so one is defined and the other is not. And this is an ok thing.
> And then 'nillable' comes in to help clients understand in a simple way whether they need to account for the possibility an undefined value. Basically:
> nillable = !required || alternatives != null
> Right now, nillable is implemented as
> nillable = !required
> There are a number of problems I see with AttributeDefinition:
> 1) We don't output the 'required' metadata unless it's an operation param being described. This is contrary to spec. However we shouldn't fix this unless we can have meaningful values for 'required', ones where the value can be true but the attribute/param can still have an undefined value, due to an alternative being present. If we can't fix that, there's no point outputting required as it's just redundant with what we output for 'nillable'.
> 2) We do output the 'nillable' metadata, even for attribute descriptions, where it isn't in the spec. But in this case I think we change the spec, as dropping nillable would be an incompatible change.
> 3) We don't properly validate the "required but has alternatives case." This can't be validated solely with ParameterValidator impls as those only see a single attribute value and don't have contextual information about other attributes/params. To get around this limitation, devs are saying that attributes with alternatives "allowNull" which is equivalent to saying they are not required. But they are required! So I think a fix for this will require AttributeDefinition itself to validate the overall resource model or operation object, and skip calling the ParameterValidator if the attribute/param is undefined and an alternative is defined.
> 4) AttributeDefinition and AbstractAttributeDefinitionBuilder unfortunately have a getter/setter/constructor param for property "allowNull" instead of a property named "required". This is unfortunate because "allowNull" intuitively maps to "nillable", but "required" is a much more useful thing to set. The value of "nillable" can be derived from a "required" setting and an "alternatives" setting, but the value of required cannot be so derived.
> I think a fix for this would probably start from 4), deprecating setAllowNull, adding get/setRequired and changing the meaning of the AD(Builder) constructor param to "required". The effect of this would be that all current code setting "allowNull" would now be setting a new "required" field. This should be a non-breaking change as in current code that's the effect anyway.
> Next would be to fix 3), by changing how AD validates.
> Next would be to change the metadata we output, such that "required" is always present and the "nillable" value is !required || alternatives != null. And change the spec accordingly.
> Last, in a separate task, would be to find attributes that were configuring "allowNull = true" solely to allow validation to pass when alternatives are present, and fix them to say "required=false".
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.11#64026)
9 years, 10 months
- 1
- 0