[JBoss JIRA] (DROOLS-1410) Add pause/restart features to drools workbench rules
by angelo difino (JIRA)
angelo difino created DROOLS-1410:
-------------------------------------
Summary: Add pause/restart features to drools workbench rules
Key: DROOLS-1410
URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/DROOLS-1410
Project: Drools
Issue Type: Feature Request
Components: core engine, tools
Affects Versions: 6.5.0.Final
Reporter: angelo difino
Assignee: Mario Fusco
Priority: Minor
It should be nice to have a features in the Drools Workbench to signal a Rule for PAUSE/RESTART, so it can be possible to temporarly remove or insert again the Rule in the overall reasoning.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.2.3#72005)
9 years, 5 months
[JBoss JIRA] (WFLY-3316) Multi threaded ejb invocations via remote-naming produce EJBCLIENT000025 if the Context is closed
by RH Bugzilla Integration (JIRA)
[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFLY-3316?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.... ]
RH Bugzilla Integration commented on WFLY-3316:
-----------------------------------------------
Petr Penicka <ppenicka(a)redhat.com> changed the Status of [bug 1094380|https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1094380] from VERIFIED to CLOSED
> Multi threaded ejb invocations via remote-naming produce EJBCLIENT000025 if the Context is closed
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: WFLY-3316
> URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFLY-3316
> Project: WildFly
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: EJB
> Affects Versions: 8.0.0.Final
> Reporter: Wolf-Dieter Fink
> Assignee: Enrique González Martínez
> Labels: ejb, naming, remote-clients, remote-ejb-connection
> Attachments: reproducer.zip
>
>
> If a client run multi threads and each Thread use it's own InitialContext the behaviour is unexpected.
> The behaviour is as followed:
> if each invocation create it's own IC and lookup the EJB there is sometimes a EJBCLIENT000025 because one of the one thread has closed the IC until another thread try to invoke an EJB.
> If the IC is reused the failure might happen only if the first Thread has finished the invocations and close the IC during other Threads are still running.
> It looks that the underlying remote connection will be closed if the first IC is closed without respect that there are different IC's created and still in use.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.2.3#72005)
9 years, 5 months
[JBoss JIRA] (WFLY-29) An ear file with modules in subfolders can not deploy under AS 7.0
by RH Bugzilla Integration (JIRA)
[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFLY-29?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.sy... ]
RH Bugzilla Integration commented on WFLY-29:
---------------------------------------------
Petr Penicka <ppenicka(a)redhat.com> changed the Status of [bug 1206635|https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1206635] from VERIFIED to CLOSED
> An ear file with modules in subfolders can not deploy under AS 7.0
> ------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: WFLY-29
> URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFLY-29
> Project: WildFly
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: EE
> Reporter: Adrian Zuo
> Assignee: Stuart Douglas
> Fix For: 8.1.0.CR2, 8.1.0.Final
>
> Attachments: migrate.ear, migrate.ear
>
>
> I have an ear file names migrate.ear which contains one ejb jar (ejb.jar) and one war file (war.war), if I put the ejb jar to a ejb folder and war file to war folder, the ear can not be depoyed.
> If I move the ejb jar and war file out, it can be deployed.
> Below structuer can be deployed:
> ejb.jar
> lib/
> lib/util-1.0-SNAPSHOT.jar
> lib/version.jar
> META-INF/
> META-INF/application.xml
> META-INF/MANIFEST.MF
> war.war
>
> Below structure can not be deployed:
> ejb/
> ejb/ejb.jar
> lib/
> lib/util-1.0-SNAPSHOT.jar
> lib/version.jar
> META-INF/
> META-INF/application.xml
> META-INF/MANIFEST.MF
> war/
> war/war.war
> Below is the error:
> http://community.jboss.org/message/630869#630869
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.2.3#72005)
9 years, 5 months
[JBoss JIRA] (WFLY-3947) Incorrect EJB Calendar Based Timeouts
by RH Bugzilla Integration (JIRA)
[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFLY-3947?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.... ]
RH Bugzilla Integration commented on WFLY-3947:
-----------------------------------------------
Petr Penicka <ppenicka(a)redhat.com> changed the Status of [bug 1213875|https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1213875] from VERIFIED to CLOSED
> Incorrect EJB Calendar Based Timeouts
> --------------------------------------
>
> Key: WFLY-3947
> URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFLY-3947
> Project: WildFly
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: EJB
> Reporter: Eduardo Martins
> Assignee: Eduardo Martins
> Fix For: 9.0.0.Beta1
>
>
> EJB3 CalendarBasedTimeout computes incorrects timeouts due to bad Calendar time fields manipulation, specially on DST.
> A couple of examples:
> 1) Timezone: "Europe/Lisbon"
> Schedule Expression: any day at 1h30m
> Start: 2013/03/31 03h30m
> First timeout currently is 2h30m
> 2) Timezone: "Australia/Lord_Howe"
> Schedule Expression: any day at 2h20m, 2h40m, 3h20m, 3h40m
> Start: 2013/10/06 02h41m
> First timeout currently is 3h50m
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.2.3#72005)
9 years, 5 months
[JBoss JIRA] (WFLY-4470) Duplicate message deliveries when start an MDB twice via CLI
by RH Bugzilla Integration (JIRA)
[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFLY-4470?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.... ]
RH Bugzilla Integration commented on WFLY-4470:
-----------------------------------------------
Petr Penicka <ppenicka(a)redhat.com> changed the Status of [bug 1159572|https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1159572] from VERIFIED to CLOSED
> Duplicate message deliveries when start an MDB twice via CLI
> -------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: WFLY-4470
> URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFLY-4470
> Project: WildFly
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: EJB, JMS
> Affects Versions: 9.0.0.Beta2
> Reporter: Chao Wang
> Assignee: Chao Wang
> Fix For: 9.0.0.CR1
>
>
> Description of problem:
> A singleton MDB delivers duplicate messages when start-delivery() is invoked twice while the message being delivered
> Steps to Reproduce:
> 1. Create a producer, which keeps sending messages for every second
> 2. Deploy a singleton consumer MDB
> 3. Invoke start-delivery() method on the MDB while the messages being delivered
> Actual results:
> MDB delivers duplicate messages
> Expected results:
> MDB needs to ignore start-delivery() call if the MDB has already been started.
> Additional info:
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.2.3#72005)
9 years, 5 months
[JBoss JIRA] (WFLY-3778) Tests in Manualmode test suite fail occasionally
by RH Bugzilla Integration (JIRA)
[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFLY-3778?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.... ]
RH Bugzilla Integration commented on WFLY-3778:
-----------------------------------------------
Petr Penicka <ppenicka(a)redhat.com> changed the Status of [bug 1105003|https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1105003] from VERIFIED to CLOSED
> Tests in Manualmode test suite fail occasionally
> ------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: WFLY-3778
> URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFLY-3778
> Project: WildFly
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: Remoting, Test Suite
> Affects Versions: 9.0.0.Alpha1
> Environment: Oracle Solaris SPARC 10, Oracle JDK 1.7.0_67.
> Reporter: Frank Langelage
> Assignee: David Lloyd
> Fix For: 10.0.0.CR4
>
> Attachments: TEST-org.jboss.as.test.manualmode.management.cli.VaultPasswordsInCLITestCase.xml, org.jboss.as.test.manualmode.management.cli.VaultPasswordsInCLITestCase-output.txt, org.jboss.as.test.manualmode.management.cli.VaultPasswordsInCLITestCase.txt
>
>
> I always see failures in one or few test of manualmode test suite on this platform. I not remember to have seen them on Windows 7.
> But I saw a very similar failure today on Linux first time for PR 6638.
> See https://github.com/wildfly/wildfly/pull/6638.
> Last failure on my machine:
> {noformat}
> Running org.jboss.as.test.manualmode.management.cli.VaultPasswordsInCLITestCase
> Tests run: 4, Failures: 1, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 72.186 sec <<< FAILURE! - in org.jboss.as.test.manualmode.management.cli.VaultPasswordsInCLITestCase
> testRightVaultPassword(org.jboss.as.test.manualmode.management.cli.VaultPasswordsInCLITestCase) Time elapsed: 6.23 sec <<< FAILURE!
> java.lang.AssertionError: Password should be right and authentication successful
> Expected: a string containing "\"outcome\" => \"success\""
> but: was "0: INFO [org.jboss.modules] JBoss Modules version 1.3.4.Final
> INFO [org.jboss.security] PBOX000361: Default Security Vault Implementation Initialized and Ready
> INFO [org.xnio] XNIO version 3.3.0.Beta1
> INFO [org.xnio.nio] XNIO NIO Implementation Version 3.3.0.Beta1
> INFO [org.jboss.remoting] JBoss Remoting version 4.0.3.Final
> "
> at org.hamcrest.MatcherAssert.assertThat(MatcherAssert.java:20)
> at org.junit.Assert.assertThat(Assert.java:865)
> at org.jboss.as.test.manualmode.management.cli.VaultPasswordsInCLITestCase.testRightVaultPassword(VaultPasswordsInCLITestCase.java:158)
> {noformat}
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.2.3#72005)
9 years, 5 months
[JBoss JIRA] (JGRP-2152) ASYM_ENCRYPT failure on Wildfly 10.1.0
by Bela Ban (JIRA)
[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JGRP-2152?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.... ]
Bela Ban commented on JGRP-2152:
--------------------------------
[~mwringe] [~rachmato] Can we close this issue?
> ASYM_ENCRYPT failure on Wildfly 10.1.0
> --------------------------------------
>
> Key: JGRP-2152
> URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JGRP-2152
> Project: JGroups
> Issue Type: Bug
> Affects Versions: 3.6.10
> Reporter: Matt Wringe
> Assignee: Bela Ban
> Fix For: 4.0, 3.6.13
>
> Attachments: hawkular-metrics-1.log, hawkular-metrics-2.log, org.jboss.as.test.clustering.cluster.cdi.CdiFailoverTestCase-SYNC-tcp-output-clean.txt, org.jboss.as.test.clustering.cluster.cdi.CdiFailoverTestCase-SYNC-tcp-output-clean2.txt, org.jboss.as.test.clustering.cluster.cdi.CdiFailoverTestCase-SYNC-tcp-output.txt, standalone.xml
>
>
> Using ASYM_ENCRYPT on Wildfly 10.1.0 seems to be broken.
> I am using the parameters for ASYM_ENCRYPT specified in http://www.jgroups.org/manual/index.html#Security
> Note: running with SYM_ENCRYPT doesn't cause any issues and it works fine with my setup. Its only ASYM_ENCRYPT which is currently failing.
> Note: running this on EAP fails in a similar manner.
> Eg:
> <protocol type="ASYM_ENCRYPT">
> <property name="encrypt_entire_message">true</property>
> <property name="sym_keylength">128</property>
> <property name="sym_algorithm">AES/ECB/PKCS5Padding</property>
> <property name="asym_keylength">512</property>
> <property name="asym_algorithm">RSA</property>
> </protocol>
> If I run a single instance, then I don't see any problems appear in the logs. Its when I start a second instance that I start to see errors about unrecognised ciphers and timeouts.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.2.3#72005)
9 years, 5 months
[JBoss JIRA] (WFLY-7894) logging statement to trace remoting heartbeat
by Peter Palaga (JIRA)
Peter Palaga created WFLY-7894:
----------------------------------
Summary: logging statement to trace remoting heartbeat
Key: WFLY-7894
URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFLY-7894
Project: WildFly
Issue Type: Enhancement
Components: EJB
Affects Versions: JBoss AS7 7.2.0.Final
Reporter: Peter Palaga
Assignee: Peter Palaga
Priority: Minor
you can set the heartbeat on a remoting connection by setting:
remote.connection.default.connect.options.org.jboss.remoting3.RemotingOptions.HEARTBEAT_INTERVAL
What is missing is the option to log on the client when the heartbeat message is fired.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.2.3#72005)
9 years, 5 months
[JBoss JIRA] (WFCORE-2201) Attempt to remove read-only /path=<x> logs exception to server.log
by Chao Wang (JIRA)
[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFCORE-2201?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugi... ]
Chao Wang commented on WFCORE-2201:
-----------------------------------
The exception we see in server.log is from PathManagerService.removePathEntry(), But PathRemoveHandler.execute() should verify it earlier.
However, Resource.Tools.readModel(context.readResource(PathAddress.EMPTY_ADDRESS)); ignores runtime-only resource with ALL_BUT_RUNTIME_AND_PROXIES_FILTER, it therefore returns a new empty ModelNode without any READ_ONLY set.
> Attempt to remove read-only /path=<x> logs exception to server.log
> ------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: WFCORE-2201
> URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFCORE-2201
> Project: WildFly Core
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: Domain Management
> Affects Versions: 3.0.0.Alpha19
> Reporter: Chao Wang
> Assignee: Chao Wang
> Priority: Minor
>
> When trying to remove read-only, preset paths, exception is logged in server log.
> I think this is not necessary and only the response on CLI or other side is sufficient: {code:java}
> [standalone@localhost:9990 /] /path=java.home:remove()
> {
> "outcome" => "failed",
> "failure-description" => "WFLYCTL0158: Operation handler failed: java.lang.IllegalArgumentException: WFLYCTL0257: Path entry is read-only: 'java.home'",
> "rolled-back" => true
> }
> {code}
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.2.3#72005)
9 years, 5 months