January 2017 - jboss-jira - Jboss List Archives

[JBoss JIRA] (WFCORE-363) ManagementResourceRegistration.getOverrideModel never returns null

by Kabir Khan (JIRA)

[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFCORE-363?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin... ] Kabir Khan updated WFCORE-363: ------------------------------ Fix Version/s: 3.0.0.Alpha18 (was: 3.0.0.Alpha17) > ManagementResourceRegistration.getOverrideModel never returns null > ------------------------------------------------------------------ > > Key: WFCORE-363 > URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFCORE-363 > Project: WildFly Core > Issue Type: Bug > Components: Domain Management > Reporter: Brian Stansberry > Fix For: 3.0.0.Alpha18 > > > ManagementResourceRegistration.getOverrideModel ends up returning the wildcard registration if there is no override registration. This isn't correct. > The fix isn't trivial because fixing it results in nasty failures in the smoke tests. From looking at the uses of this method (which all involve a null check) I assume there are some bugs in the code that calls this method that get exposed once it does what it should. > This bug is the cause of the initial failure of my WFLY-2880 fix. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.2.3#72005)

9 years, 3 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss JIRA] (WFCORE-13) End users can call non-published management API operations

by Kabir Khan (JIRA)

[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFCORE-13?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.... ] Kabir Khan updated WFCORE-13: ----------------------------- Fix Version/s: 3.0.0.Alpha18 (was: 3.0.0.Alpha17) > End users can call non-published management API operations > ---------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: WFCORE-13 > URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFCORE-13 > Project: WildFly Core > Issue Type: Bug > Components: Domain Management > Reporter: Ladislav Thon > Labels: EAP > Fix For: 3.0.0.Alpha18 > > > It's not possible to call "non-published" operations (those that are not visible in the resource tree, e.g. {{describe}}) via JMX, while it's entirely possible to call them via CLI (e.g. {{/subsystem=security:describe}}) and other management interfaces. > The problem lies in the fact that {{ModelControllerMBeanHelper.invoke}} method checks {{if (!accessControl.isExecutableOperation(operationName))}} and the {{isExecutableOperation}} method assumes that the operation will be visible in the resource tree. In fact, there is a comment stating _should not happen_, but now we know that it indeed _can_ happen. > What's more, it gives a misleading error message. The {{isExecutableOperation}} returns {{false}} for unknown operations, which results in {{Not authorized to invoke operation}} message. Which is wrong in two different ways simultaneously: 1. the problem isn't authorization, but the fact that the operation can't be found; 2. the user (e.g. in the {{SuperUser}} role) _is_ authorized. > I'm considering this low priority, because 1. JMX is likely to be very rarely used to access the management interface, 2. hiding information isn't nearly as important as leaking them, 3. non-published operations aren't nearly as important as the published ones. It's worth a JIRA nevertheless. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.2.3#72005)

9 years, 3 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss JIRA] (WFCORE-1282) Unable to create HTTPS connection using *ECDH_RSA* cipher suites / kECDHr cipher string

by Kabir Khan (JIRA)

[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFCORE-1282?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugi... ] Kabir Khan updated WFCORE-1282: ------------------------------- Fix Version/s: 3.0.0.Alpha18 (was: 3.0.0.Alpha17) > Unable to create HTTPS connection using *ECDH_RSA* cipher suites / kECDHr cipher string > --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: WFCORE-1282 > URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFCORE-1282 > Project: WildFly Core > Issue Type: Bug > Components: Security > Affects Versions: 1.0.2.Final > Environment: Oracle Java > Reporter: Martin Choma > Assignee: Darran Lofthouse > Priority: Critical > Fix For: 3.0.0.Alpha18 > > Attachments: client_debug_eap6.log, client_debug_eap7.log, server-cert-key-ec.jks, server_debug_eap6.log, server_debug_eap7.log > > > User using these cipher suites / cipher name in EAP6 won't be able to use it in EAP7. > Setting as critical as these cipher suites, are considered for strong and widely used in my opinion. > In server log, error "no cipher suites in common" can be seen using -Djavax.net.debug=all. > Note, that analogous configuration in EAP6 works fine. > Issue can be seen on Oracle Java only, as on OpenJDK / IBM these suites are not provided by method getDefaultCipherSuites(). > Also is it possible to log "no cipher suites in common" and similar tls handshake errors without -Djavax.net.debug for better troubleshooting? -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.2.3#72005)

9 years, 3 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss JIRA] (WFCORE-1145) Review of HostController / Application Server Remoting connections

by Kabir Khan (JIRA)

[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFCORE-1145?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugi... ] Kabir Khan updated WFCORE-1145: ------------------------------- Fix Version/s: 3.0.0.Alpha18 (was: 3.0.0.Alpha17) > Review of HostController / Application Server Remoting connections > ------------------------------------------------------------------ > > Key: WFCORE-1145 > URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFCORE-1145 > Project: WildFly Core > Issue Type: Task > Components: Domain Management > Reporter: Darran Lofthouse > Assignee: Darran Lofthouse > Labels: affects_elytron > Fix For: 3.0.0.Alpha18 > > > Where an application server connects back to it's host controller in domain mode it used the same Remoting connector exposed possibly for native domain management access. > The problem with this is that as soon as any security restrictions are placed on the connector exposed by the host controller then the application servers require something to work with this - this is even though we are only ever talking about loopback communication between two process on the same machine. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.2.3#72005)

9 years, 3 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss JIRA] (WFCORE-1059) RestartParentResourceAdd/RemoveHandler should handle capability registration

by Kabir Khan (JIRA)

[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFCORE-1059?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugi... ] Kabir Khan updated WFCORE-1059: ------------------------------- Fix Version/s: 3.0.0.Alpha18 (was: 3.0.0.Alpha17) > RestartParentResourceAdd/RemoveHandler should handle capability registration > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: WFCORE-1059 > URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFCORE-1059 > Project: WildFly Core > Issue Type: Bug > Components: Domain Management > Affects Versions: 2.0.0.CR6 > Reporter: Paul Ferraro > Assignee: Tomaz Cerar > Fix For: 3.0.0.Alpha18 > > > RestartParentResourceAddHandler and RestartParentResourceRemoveHandler do not extend the respective AbstractAddStepHandler and AbstractRemoveStepHandler base classes, and thus does not handle capability [un]registration. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.2.3#72005)

9 years, 3 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss JIRA] (WFCORE-1533) Integrate Management Access Control permission assignment with Elytron

by Kabir Khan (JIRA)

[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFCORE-1533?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugi... ] Kabir Khan updated WFCORE-1533: ------------------------------- Fix Version/s: 3.0.0.Alpha18 (was: 3.0.0.Alpha17) > Integrate Management Access Control permission assignment with Elytron > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: WFCORE-1533 > URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFCORE-1533 > Project: WildFly Core > Issue Type: Feature Request > Components: Domain Management, Security > Reporter: Darran Lofthouse > Assignee: Darran Lofthouse > Labels: affects_elytron > Fix For: 3.0.0.Alpha18 > > > A big portion of management role based access control is taking the assigned roles and then mapping these to the permissions for that role. > Elytron provides a new PermissionMapper interface that takes a SecurityIdentity and the roles mapped for that identity and returns a PermissionVerifier which can be as simple as a wrapper around a PermissionCollection. > This will also be a good opportunity to start to move the role mapping out of the core management model to Elytron. > After that Elytron allows for custom PermissionMapper implementations to be provided and associated with the domain using capabilities and requirements so we arrive at a point where provided the permission checks performed by management are generic enough custom PermissionMapper / PermissionVerifier implementations can be added that may or may not be role based. > _Note: As with everything we are doing old and new need to be supported in parallel for a while although this may be achieved by providing default Elytron implementations that are wrappers around the old._ -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.2.3#72005)

9 years, 3 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss JIRA] (WFCORE-1438) Elytron integration with logging subsystem

by Kabir Khan (JIRA)

[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFCORE-1438?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugi... ] Kabir Khan updated WFCORE-1438: ------------------------------- Fix Version/s: 3.0.0.Alpha18 (was: 3.0.0.Alpha17) > Elytron integration with logging subsystem > ------------------------------------------ > > Key: WFCORE-1438 > URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFCORE-1438 > Project: WildFly Core > Issue Type: Feature Request > Components: Logging > Reporter: Darran Lofthouse > Assignee: Darran Lofthouse > Fix For: 3.0.0.Alpha18 > > > This is primarily an investigation task to start with, Logging can use syslog, Syslog access can be protected with TLS, Elytron is providing unified SSL configuration - do we need to bring these together. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.2.3#72005)

9 years, 3 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss JIRA] (WFCORE-1351) FilePermission for XNIO and Marshalling modules are required for Remoting to run with security manager

by Kabir Khan (JIRA)

[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFCORE-1351?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugi... ] Kabir Khan updated WFCORE-1351: ------------------------------- Fix Version/s: 3.0.0.Alpha18 (was: 3.0.0.Alpha17) > FilePermission for XNIO and Marshalling modules are required for Remoting to run with security manager > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > Key: WFCORE-1351 > URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFCORE-1351 > Project: WildFly Core > Issue Type: Bug > Components: Remoting, Security > Reporter: Ondrej Kotek > Assignee: David Lloyd > Priority: Critical > Fix For: 3.0.0.Alpha18 > > Attachments: 1-no-createEndpoint-permission.stacktrace, 2-no-createXnioWorker-permission.stacktrace, 3-no-addConnectionProvider-permission.stacktrace, 4-no-accessDeclaredMembers-permission.stractrace, 5-no-suppressAccessChecks-permission.stracktrace > > > # Running _NestedRemoteContextTestCase_ (from WildFly _testsuite/integration/basic_) with security manager, like > {noformat} > ./integration-tests.sh -Dts.basic -Dts.noSmoke -Dtest=NestedRemoteContextTestCase -Dsecurity.manager > {noformat} > results in exception: > {noformat} > java.io.IOException: java.lang.IllegalArgumentException: XNIO001001: No XNIO provider found > {noformat} > To make it work, permissions like following need to be added to _permissions.xml_ of _ejb.ear_: > {noformat} > new FilePermission("/home/okotek/git/wildfly/dist/target/wildfly-10.0.0.CR5-SNAPSHOT/modules/system/layers/base/org/jboss/xnio/nio/main/*", "read"), > new FilePermission("/home/okotek/git/wildfly/dist/target/wildfly-10.0.0.CR5-SNAPSHOT/modules/system/layers/base/org/jboss/marshalling/river/main/*", "read"), > new RemotingPermission("createEndpoint"), > new RuntimePermission("createXnioWorker"), > new RemotingPermission("addConnectionProvider"), > new RuntimePermission("modifyThread"), > new RuntimePermission("accessDeclaredMembers"), > new ReflectPermission("suppressAccessChecks") > {noformat} > which is very confusing. > Why do I need add seemingly unrelated permissions, like _FilePermission_ for XNIO and marshalling or _RuntimePermission_ for createXnioWorker? Such behavior should be fixed or properly documented. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.2.3#72005)

9 years, 3 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss JIRA] (WFCORE-1897) Follow up WFCORE-296 once migrated to Remoting 5

by Kabir Khan (JIRA)

[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFCORE-1897?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugi... ] Kabir Khan updated WFCORE-1897: ------------------------------- Fix Version/s: 3.0.0.Alpha18 (was: 3.0.0.Alpha17) > Follow up WFCORE-296 once migrated to Remoting 5 > ------------------------------------------------ > > Key: WFCORE-1897 > URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFCORE-1897 > Project: WildFly Core > Issue Type: Task > Components: Remoting > Reporter: Darran Lofthouse > Assignee: Darran Lofthouse > Priority: Blocker > Fix For: 3.0.0.Alpha18 > > > WFCORE-296 adds support for the schemes remote:// remote_http:// and remote+https:// - once we switch to centralised Endpoints we need to ensure this new set is still supported along with the previous set. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.2.3#72005)

9 years, 3 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss JIRA] (WFCORE-1891) Split WildFly Elytron into two modules with a public / private split.

by Kabir Khan (JIRA)

[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFCORE-1891?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugi... ] Kabir Khan updated WFCORE-1891: ------------------------------- Fix Version/s: 3.0.0.Alpha18 (was: 3.0.0.Alpha17) > Split WildFly Elytron into two modules with a public / private split. > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: WFCORE-1891 > URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFCORE-1891 > Project: WildFly Core > Issue Type: Task > Components: Security > Reporter: Darran Lofthouse > Assignee: Darran Lofthouse > Priority: Critical > Fix For: 3.0.0.Alpha18 > > > The Elytron jar will be contained within a private module, possibly 'elytron-private' then a module 'elytron' will depend on this and make the public packages visible. > The following packages have been identified as being private: - > org.wildfly.security._private > org.wildfly.security.asn1 > org.wildfly.security.auth.realm > org.wildfly.security.auth.realm.* > org.wildfly.security.authz.jacc > org.wildfly.security.credential.store.impl > org.wildfly.security.security.digest > org.wildfly.security.http.impl > org.wildfly.security.security.keystore > org.wildfly.security.mechanism.oauth2 > org.wildfly.security.mechanism.scram > org.wildfly.security.password.impl > org.wildfly.security.password.util > org.wildfly.security.pem > org.wildfly.security.sasl > org.wildfly.security.sasl.* (Except util) > org.wildfly.security.util > org.wildfly.security.util_private > org.wildfly.security.x500 > org.wildfly.security.x500.cert -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.2.3#72005)

9 years, 3 months

1
0
0 / 0

2026

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

jboss-jira January 2017