[JBoss JIRA] (WFCORE-2687) Expose the current step operation's name and parameters via the OperationContext
by Brian Stansberry (JIRA)
[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFCORE-2687?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugi... ]
Brian Stansberry updated WFCORE-2687:
-------------------------------------
Fix Version/s: 4.0.0.Alpha3
(was: 4.0.0.Alpha2)
> Expose the current step operation's name and parameters via the OperationContext
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: WFCORE-2687
> URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFCORE-2687
> Project: WildFly Core
> Issue Type: Enhancement
> Components: Domain Management
> Reporter: Brian Stansberry
> Assignee: Brian Stansberry
> Fix For: 4.0.0.Alpha3
>
>
> Remove the need to pass the 'operation' ModelNode to a method for it to be able to learn about the currently effective operation.
> OperationContext already exposes getCurrentAddress(). Add getCurrentOperationName() and getCurrentOperationParameter(String name).
> The latter returns null if !operation.has(name) otherwise it returns whatever the node was. Or perhaps return undefined with an overloaded variant with a boolean param that lets the caller turn on getting null.
> The getCurrentOperationParameter should reject 'name', 'address', 'operation-headers' etc as legal param names; only expose true parameters.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.5.0#75005)
8 years, 6 months
[JBoss JIRA] (WFCORE-2497) Convert *-authentication-factory resources to be child resources of security-domain
by Brian Stansberry (JIRA)
[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFCORE-2497?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugi... ]
Brian Stansberry updated WFCORE-2497:
-------------------------------------
Fix Version/s: 4.0.0.Alpha3
(was: 4.0.0.Alpha2)
> Convert *-authentication-factory resources to be child resources of security-domain
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: WFCORE-2497
> URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFCORE-2497
> Project: WildFly Core
> Issue Type: Task
> Components: Security
> Reporter: Darran Lofthouse
> Fix For: 4.0.0.Alpha3
>
>
> This is a good example of where child resources work.
> The authentication factory resources have a mandatory dependency on a single security domain.
> The configuration within the factory is related to it's security domain.
> There is only a single resource that can provide security domains.
> The behaviour of the parent is unaffected by the existence or configuration of the child.
> The parent and child manage their own services independently with the child's service depending on the parent's service.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.5.0#75005)
8 years, 6 months
[JBoss JIRA] (WFCORE-3181) Review CustomCredentialSecurityFactoryTestCase
by Brian Stansberry (JIRA)
[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFCORE-3181?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugi... ]
Brian Stansberry updated WFCORE-3181:
-------------------------------------
Fix Version/s: 4.0.0.Alpha3
(was: 4.0.0.Alpha2)
> Review CustomCredentialSecurityFactoryTestCase
> ----------------------------------------------
>
> Key: WFCORE-3181
> URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFCORE-3181
> Project: WildFly Core
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: Security, Test Suite
> Reporter: Darran Lofthouse
> Fix For: 4.0.0.Alpha3
>
>
> The test case CustomCredentialSecurityFactoryTestCase appears to be testing that the 'code does what it does' rather than testing the 'code is doing what it should'.
> The test is testing a custom credential security factory can be called but the test is using HTTP Basic authentication and relying on SPNEGO authentication being triggered as this is the only mechanism that currently uses this factory.
> Should a minor change be required to the SPNEGO authentication mechanism which affects when this credential factory is called this test case could subsequently fail.
> If possible it would be better to convert this test to be a SPNEGO test and then test the behaviour of the credential security factory affects the mechanism as expected.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.5.0#75005)
8 years, 6 months
[JBoss JIRA] (WFCORE-3167) option to filter out aged out patches from the patching history
by Brian Stansberry (JIRA)
[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFCORE-3167?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugi... ]
Brian Stansberry updated WFCORE-3167:
-------------------------------------
Fix Version/s: 4.0.0.Alpha3
(was: 4.0.0.Alpha2)
> option to filter out aged out patches from the patching history
> ---------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: WFCORE-3167
> URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFCORE-3167
> Project: WildFly Core
> Issue Type: Feature Request
> Components: CLI, Patching
> Affects Versions: 3.0.0.Beta30
> Reporter: Alexey Loubyansky
> Assignee: Alexey Loubyansky
> Fix For: 4.0.0.Alpha3
>
>
> show-history management operation (and patch history cli command) returns all the patches that have been applied to the installation even if some of them have been aged out by executing ageout-history management operation.
> In some cases it would be useful to filter out the aged out patches from the result, leaving only the patches that can actually be rolled back by a user.
> That could be achieved by adding an optional boolean parameter exclude-agedout (with default value false to preserve the current behavior) to show-history operation.
> The high level CLI command patch history could include an equivalent --exclude-agedout argument.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.5.0#75005)
8 years, 6 months
[JBoss JIRA] (WFCORE-3107) Allow slave hosts to ignore missing RBAC config resources
by Brian Stansberry (JIRA)
[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFCORE-3107?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugi... ]
Brian Stansberry updated WFCORE-3107:
-------------------------------------
Fix Version/s: 4.0.0.Alpha3
(was: 4.0.0.Alpha2)
> Allow slave hosts to ignore missing RBAC config resources
> ---------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: WFCORE-3107
> URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFCORE-3107
> Project: WildFly Core
> Issue Type: Sub-task
> Components: Domain Management
> Reporter: Brian Stansberry
> Assignee: Brian Stansberry
> Fix For: 4.0.0.Alpha3
>
>
> Part of parent issue whereby slaves can ignore missing RBAC constraint resources for write requests coming from the DC.
> If the DC sent the request, then the address is ok overall. So if it's missing on the slave that means the slave doesn't have that constraint registered and doesn't need to handle the op.
> This fix could possibly be backported to the 2.1.x and to EAP 6.4.x in lieu of adding transformers as part of the parent issue. In the case of 2.1.x it also allows slaves to ignore the related extension even if the code for it is present (which is only a minor benefit.)
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.5.0#75005)
8 years, 6 months
[JBoss JIRA] (WFCORE-3073) Handle TERM gracefully
by Brian Stansberry (JIRA)
[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFCORE-3073?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugi... ]
Brian Stansberry updated WFCORE-3073:
-------------------------------------
Fix Version/s: 4.0.0.Alpha3
(was: 4.0.0.Alpha2)
> Handle TERM gracefully
> ----------------------
>
> Key: WFCORE-3073
> URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFCORE-3073
> Project: WildFly Core
> Issue Type: Feature Request
> Components: Domain Management
> Reporter: Ben Parees
> Assignee: Brian Stansberry
> Fix For: 4.0.0.Alpha3
>
>
> The wildfly server currently terminates immediately in response to a TERM signal. To achieve a clean shutdown requires invoking the CLI tooling. This is particularly problematic in container environments like kubernetes where the container process (wildfly in this case) is going to get a TERM signal when the container needs to be moved.
> While it's possible to wrapper the process and handle the TERM and then invoke the CLI, it would be preferable for the server process itself to cleanly handle a TERM signal by waiting for in-flight requests to complete (w/ some grace period of course).
> Having this as configurable behavior would be good if there are backwards compatibility concerns about introducing this behavior change.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.5.0#75005)
8 years, 6 months
[JBoss JIRA] (WFCORE-3019) The bin/product.conf and the org.jboss.as.product:wildfly-core module should come in via an FP
by Brian Stansberry (JIRA)
[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFCORE-3019?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugi... ]
Brian Stansberry updated WFCORE-3019:
-------------------------------------
Fix Version/s: 4.0.0.Alpha3
(was: 4.0.0.Alpha2)
> The bin/product.conf and the org.jboss.as.product:wildfly-core module should come in via an FP
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: WFCORE-3019
> URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFCORE-3019
> Project: WildFly Core
> Issue Type: Task
> Components: Server
> Reporter: Brian Stansberry
> Fix For: 4.0.0.Alpha3
>
>
> For WFLY-4692 we moved the "product" stuff out of core-feature-pack and into dist. But this means it doesn't end up in the skinny dist produced by the "build" module. Plus it makes the "dist" a kind of FP of its own.
> The stuff in dist/src/distribution should be its own FP. That one *perhaps* depends on core-feature-pack. Then build and dist use the new FP in addition to or instead of core-feature-pack.
> So, core-feature-pack is independently usable, in other dists, but our offiical build/dist, which has our official product module, picks up the new FP.
> Whether the new "product" FP depends on core-feature-pack depends on how we want to use it; i.e. can this bin/product.conf and module be used in some other flavor of dist.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.5.0#75005)
8 years, 6 months
[JBoss JIRA] (WFCORE-2857) Usage of wildfly.sasl.local-user.default-user in core configuration files
by Brian Stansberry (JIRA)
[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFCORE-2857?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugi... ]
Brian Stansberry updated WFCORE-2857:
-------------------------------------
Fix Version/s: 4.0.0.Alpha3
(was: 4.0.0.Alpha2)
> Usage of wildfly.sasl.local-user.default-user in core configuration files
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: WFCORE-2857
> URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFCORE-2857
> Project: WildFly Core
> Issue Type: Task
> Components: Domain Management, Test Suite
> Reporter: Ken Wills
> Assignee: Ken Wills
> Fix For: 4.0.0.Alpha3
>
>
> The property wildfly.sasl.local-user.default-user is present in some, commented out on other, and absent from some default configuation files in core. (the default host-slave.xml for example has it, but it appears to have no effect if removed). There is uneven usage of it throughout the testsuite config files.
> We should review and make the usage (or non-usage) consistent.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.5.0#75005)
8 years, 6 months