December 2017 - jboss-jira - Jboss List Archives

[JBoss JIRA] (WFCORE-3107) Allow slave hosts to ignore missing RBAC config resources

by Brian Stansberry (JIRA)

[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFCORE-3107?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugi... ] Brian Stansberry updated WFCORE-3107: ------------------------------------- Fix Version/s: 4.0.0.Alpha6 (was: 4.0.0.Alpha5) > Allow slave hosts to ignore missing RBAC config resources > --------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: WFCORE-3107 > URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFCORE-3107 > Project: WildFly Core > Issue Type: Sub-task > Components: Domain Management > Reporter: Brian Stansberry > Assignee: Brian Stansberry > Fix For: 4.0.0.Alpha6 > > > Part of parent issue whereby slaves can ignore missing RBAC constraint resources for write requests coming from the DC. > If the DC sent the request, then the address is ok overall. So if it's missing on the slave that means the slave doesn't have that constraint registered and doesn't need to handle the op. > This fix could possibly be backported to the 2.1.x and to EAP 6.4.x in lieu of adding transformers as part of the parent issue. In the case of 2.1.x it also allows slaves to ignore the related extension even if the code for it is present (which is only a minor benefit.) -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.5.0#75005)

8 years, 4 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss JIRA] (WFCORE-3073) Handle Shutdown via TERM gracefully

by Brian Stansberry (JIRA)

[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFCORE-3073?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugi... ] Brian Stansberry updated WFCORE-3073: ------------------------------------- Fix Version/s: 4.0.0.Alpha6 (was: 4.0.0.Alpha5) > Handle Shutdown via TERM gracefully > ----------------------------------- > > Key: WFCORE-3073 > URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFCORE-3073 > Project: WildFly Core > Issue Type: Feature Request > Components: Domain Management > Reporter: Ben Parees > Assignee: Brian Stansberry > Fix For: 4.0.0.Alpha6 > > > The wildfly server currently -terminates immediately- performs a standard (non-graceful) shutdown in response to a TERM signal. To achieve a -clean- graceful shutdown requires invoking the CLI tooling. This is particularly problematic in container environments like kubernetes where the container process (wildfly in this case) is going to get a TERM signal when the container needs to be moved. > While it's possible to wrapper the process and handle the TERM and then invoke the CLI, it would be preferable for the server process itself to cleanly handle a TERM signal by waiting for in-flight requests to complete (w/ some grace period of course). > Having this as configurable behavior would be good if there are backwards compatibility concerns about introducing this behavior change. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.5.0#75005)

8 years, 4 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss JIRA] (WFCORE-3019) The bin/product.conf and the org.jboss.as.product:wildfly-core module should come in via an FP

by Brian Stansberry (JIRA)

[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFCORE-3019?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugi... ] Brian Stansberry updated WFCORE-3019: ------------------------------------- Fix Version/s: 4.0.0.Alpha6 (was: 4.0.0.Alpha5) > The bin/product.conf and the org.jboss.as.product:wildfly-core module should come in via an FP > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: WFCORE-3019 > URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFCORE-3019 > Project: WildFly Core > Issue Type: Task > Components: Server > Reporter: Brian Stansberry > Assignee: James Perkins > Fix For: 4.0.0.Alpha6 > > > For WFLY-4692 we moved the "product" stuff out of core-feature-pack and into dist. But this means it doesn't end up in the skinny dist produced by the "build" module. Plus it makes the "dist" a kind of FP of its own. > The stuff in dist/src/distribution should be its own FP. That one *perhaps* depends on core-feature-pack. Then build and dist use the new FP in addition to or instead of core-feature-pack. > So, core-feature-pack is independently usable, in other dists, but our offiical build/dist, which has our official product module, picks up the new FP. > Whether the new "product" FP depends on core-feature-pack depends on how we want to use it; i.e. can this bin/product.conf and module be used in some other flavor of dist. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.5.0#75005)

8 years, 4 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss JIRA] (WFCORE-2857) Usage of wildfly.sasl.local-user.default-user in core configuration files

by Brian Stansberry (JIRA)

[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFCORE-2857?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugi... ] Brian Stansberry updated WFCORE-2857: ------------------------------------- Fix Version/s: 4.0.0.Alpha6 (was: 4.0.0.Alpha5) > Usage of wildfly.sasl.local-user.default-user in core configuration files > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: WFCORE-2857 > URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFCORE-2857 > Project: WildFly Core > Issue Type: Task > Components: Domain Management, Test Suite > Reporter: Ken Wills > Assignee: Ken Wills > Fix For: 4.0.0.Alpha6 > > > The property wildfly.sasl.local-user.default-user is present in some, commented out on other, and absent from some default configuation files in core. (the default host-slave.xml for example has it, but it appears to have no effect if removed). There is uneven usage of it throughout the testsuite config files. > We should review and make the usage (or non-usage) consistent. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.5.0#75005)

8 years, 4 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss JIRA] (WFCORE-3382) Further Enhance Elytron Permission Configuration

by Brian Stansberry (JIRA)

[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFCORE-3382?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugi... ] Brian Stansberry updated WFCORE-3382: ------------------------------------- Fix Version/s: 4.0.0.Alpha6 (was: 4.0.0.Alpha5) > Further Enhance Elytron Permission Configuration > ------------------------------------------------ > > Key: WFCORE-3382 > URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFCORE-3382 > Project: WildFly Core > Issue Type: Feature Request > Components: Security > Reporter: Darran Lofthouse > Fix For: 4.0.0.Alpha6 > > > This has currently been simplified to a single resource for the out of the box configuration, however this brings issues as now permissions are duplicated so modifications need to be replicated instead of to a single location. > Finding a way for the default required permissions to be defined in one location could help eliminate the duplication. > We could also consider going one step further and subsystems register the default permissions that should be granted. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.5.0#75005)

8 years, 4 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss JIRA] (WFCORE-3360) Eliminate org.wildfly.extension.elytron.ProviderUtil

by Brian Stansberry (JIRA)

[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFCORE-3360?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugi... ] Brian Stansberry updated WFCORE-3360: ------------------------------------- Fix Version/s: 4.0.0.Alpha6 (was: 4.0.0.Alpha5) > Eliminate org.wildfly.extension.elytron.ProviderUtil > ---------------------------------------------------- > > Key: WFCORE-3360 > URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFCORE-3360 > Project: WildFly Core > Issue Type: Task > Components: Security > Reporter: Darran Lofthouse > Assignee: Darran Lofthouse > Fix For: 4.0.0.Alpha6 > > > WildFly Elytron contains a public utility class org.wildfly.security.util.ProviderUtil for the same purpose, we should use the code within WildFly Elytron and not custom code within the subsystem. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.5.0#75005)

8 years, 4 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss JIRA] (WFCORE-3255) Complex type AttributeDefinition variants don't handle ParameterCorrector properly

by Brian Stansberry (JIRA)

[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFCORE-3255?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugi... ] Brian Stansberry updated WFCORE-3255: ------------------------------------- Fix Version/s: 4.0.0.Alpha6 (was: 4.0.0.Alpha5) > Complex type AttributeDefinition variants don't handle ParameterCorrector properly > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: WFCORE-3255 > URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFCORE-3255 > Project: WildFly Core > Issue Type: Bug > Components: Domain Management > Affects Versions: 3.0.1.Final > Reporter: Brian Stansberry > Assignee: Brian Stansberry > Fix For: 4.0.0.Alpha6 > > > If a field in a complex attribute (i.e. one that uses Object...AttributeDefinition) has a ParameterCorrector configured, that corrector never gets called. That's because only a corrector on the top level attribute gets called. > These classes should automatically use an internal corrector that first calls any corrector configured for fields, and then, if one is present, calls any top level corrector. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.5.0#75005)

8 years, 4 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss JIRA] (WFCORE-3181) Review CustomCredentialSecurityFactoryTestCase

by Brian Stansberry (JIRA)

[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFCORE-3181?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugi... ] Brian Stansberry updated WFCORE-3181: ------------------------------------- Fix Version/s: 4.0.0.Alpha6 (was: 4.0.0.Alpha5) > Review CustomCredentialSecurityFactoryTestCase > ---------------------------------------------- > > Key: WFCORE-3181 > URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFCORE-3181 > Project: WildFly Core > Issue Type: Bug > Components: Security, Test Suite > Reporter: Darran Lofthouse > Fix For: 4.0.0.Alpha6 > > > The test case CustomCredentialSecurityFactoryTestCase appears to be testing that the 'code does what it does' rather than testing the 'code is doing what it should'. > The test is testing a custom credential security factory can be called but the test is using HTTP Basic authentication and relying on SPNEGO authentication being triggered as this is the only mechanism that currently uses this factory. > Should a minor change be required to the SPNEGO authentication mechanism which affects when this credential factory is called this test case could subsequently fail. > If possible it would be better to convert this test to be a SPNEGO test and then test the behaviour of the credential security factory affects the mechanism as expected. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.5.0#75005)

8 years, 4 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss JIRA] (WFCORE-3167) option to filter out aged out patches from the patching history

by Brian Stansberry (JIRA)

[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFCORE-3167?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugi... ] Brian Stansberry updated WFCORE-3167: ------------------------------------- Fix Version/s: 4.0.0.Alpha6 (was: 4.0.0.Alpha5) > option to filter out aged out patches from the patching history > --------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: WFCORE-3167 > URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFCORE-3167 > Project: WildFly Core > Issue Type: Feature Request > Components: CLI, Patching > Affects Versions: 3.0.0.Beta30 > Reporter: Alexey Loubyansky > Assignee: Alexey Loubyansky > Fix For: 4.0.0.Alpha6 > > > show-history management operation (and patch history cli command) returns all the patches that have been applied to the installation even if some of them have been aged out by executing ageout-history management operation. > In some cases it would be useful to filter out the aged out patches from the result, leaving only the patches that can actually be rolled back by a user. > That could be achieved by adding an optional boolean parameter exclude-agedout (with default value false to preserve the current behavior) to show-history operation. > The high level CLI command patch history could include an equivalent --exclude-agedout argument. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.5.0#75005)

8 years, 4 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss JIRA] (WFCORE-3457) Minimise Classes in the Elytron Subsystem

by Brian Stansberry (JIRA)

[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFCORE-3457?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugi... ] Brian Stansberry updated WFCORE-3457: ------------------------------------- Fix Version/s: 4.0.0.Alpha6 (was: 4.0.0.Alpha5) > Minimise Classes in the Elytron Subsystem > ----------------------------------------- > > Key: WFCORE-3457 > URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFCORE-3457 > Project: WildFly Core > Issue Type: Task > Components: Security > Reporter: Darran Lofthouse > Assignee: Darran Lofthouse > Fix For: 4.0.0.Alpha6 > > > We currently compile to 308 classes, as this subsystem is almost exclusively about management representation (Model and XML) rather than implementation all 308 of these classes will need to be loaded when the subsystem is installed. > By switching to builders where we can instead of anonymous inner classes and possibly using more common classes I believe a reasonable early target could be drop this to 200 to 250 classes so possibly up to a 33% saving. > Even without restructuring our resource registrations a lot of our classes exist just to logically group related resources rather than any other purpose. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.5.0#75005)

8 years, 4 months

1
0
0 / 0

2026

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

jboss-jira December 2017