February 2017 - jboss-jira - Jboss List Archives

[JBoss JIRA] (WFCORE-459) Account for attribute groups in CLI behavior

by Kabir Khan (JIRA)

[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFCORE-459?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin... ] Kabir Khan updated WFCORE-459: ------------------------------ Fix Version/s: 3.0.0.Beta7 (was: 3.0.0.Beta6) > Account for attribute groups in CLI behavior > -------------------------------------------- > > Key: WFCORE-459 > URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFCORE-459 > Project: WildFly Core > Issue Type: Feature Request > Components: CLI > Reporter: Brian Stansberry > Assignee: Jean-Francois Denise > Fix For: 3.0.0.Beta7 > > > See http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/wildfly-dev/2014-December/003414.html > This JIRA is for reflecting the attribute group notion in CLI behavior. > I think this is just reflecting it in the output of the "ls -l" command, although there may be other places I'm not thinking of. For "ls -l" simplest is just to add a GROUP column to the right, and then sort the attributes by group and then by name, but perhaps something else is better. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.2.3#72005)

9 years, 1 month

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss JIRA] (WFCORE-396) Look into whether READ_ONLY but not RUNTIME_ONLY domain server ops should be visible to users

by Kabir Khan (JIRA)

[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFCORE-396?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin... ] Kabir Khan updated WFCORE-396: ------------------------------ Fix Version/s: 3.0.0.Beta7 (was: 3.0.0.Beta6) > Look into whether READ_ONLY but not RUNTIME_ONLY domain server ops should be visible to users > --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: WFCORE-396 > URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFCORE-396 > Project: WildFly Core > Issue Type: Enhancement > Components: Domain Management > Reporter: Brian Stansberry > Assignee: Ken Wills > Fix For: 3.0.0.Beta7 > > > Ops registered on a domain server without the RUNTIME_ONLY flag are hidden from users (e.g. in read-operation-names results etc) in order to not delude users into thinking they can do something like :write-attribute directly on a server (instead of modifying host or domain config elements.) > But shouldn't a READ_ONLY flag be sufficient as well? An op that only reads config should be valid. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.2.3#72005)

9 years, 1 month

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss JIRA] (WFCORE-266) Deprecate the ParameterValidator constructor variants that accept allowNull and allowExpressions params

by Kabir Khan (JIRA)

[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFCORE-266?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin... ] Kabir Khan updated WFCORE-266: ------------------------------ Fix Version/s: 3.0.0.Beta7 (was: 3.0.0.Beta6) > Deprecate the ParameterValidator constructor variants that accept allowNull and allowExpressions params > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: WFCORE-266 > URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFCORE-266 > Project: WildFly Core > Issue Type: Task > Components: Domain Management > Reporter: Brian Stansberry > Fix For: 3.0.0.Beta7 > > > Most of the ParameterValidator implementations that get passed to AttributeDefinition accept params to control whether null and expressions are allowed. These are now redundant, as AttributeDefinition wraps the provided validator with NillableOrExpressionParameterValidator, and it handles that aspect of validation based on the settings of the AD. > So we should deprecate these constructor variants to let people know they aren't needed. Ideally shift the code as well. > CRITICAL: before doing this, make sure the AttributeDefinition variants that support complex types properly wrap any validators that are configured for *element* validation. A quick look shows that ListAttributeDefinition.Builder and MapAttributeDefinition.Builder do. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.2.3#72005)

9 years, 1 month

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss JIRA] (WFCORE-107) Update whoami operation to return authentication mechanism where verbose=true

by Kabir Khan (JIRA)

[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFCORE-107?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin... ] Kabir Khan updated WFCORE-107: ------------------------------ Fix Version/s: 3.0.0.Beta7 (was: 3.0.0.Beta6) > Update whoami operation to return authentication mechanism where verbose=true > ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: WFCORE-107 > URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFCORE-107 > Project: WildFly Core > Issue Type: Feature Request > Components: Domain Management > Reporter: Darran Lofthouse > Assignee: Darran Lofthouse > Fix For: 3.0.0.Beta7 > > > The admin console currently contains a "logout" handler that follows a round of HTTP message exchanges to trick the web browser into forgetting the credentials it has cached. > This only makes sense where the browser has cached a credential - if we return the authentication mechanism then the console can make a better decision regarding displaying the logout link or could change the implementation so display a message to the user explaining why logout does not make sense. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.2.3#72005)

9 years, 1 month

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss JIRA] (WFCORE-13) End users can call non-published management API operations

by Kabir Khan (JIRA)

[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFCORE-13?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.... ] Kabir Khan updated WFCORE-13: ----------------------------- Fix Version/s: 3.0.0.Beta7 (was: 3.0.0.Beta6) > End users can call non-published management API operations > ---------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: WFCORE-13 > URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFCORE-13 > Project: WildFly Core > Issue Type: Bug > Components: Domain Management > Reporter: Ladislav Thon > Labels: EAP > Fix For: 3.0.0.Beta7 > > > It's not possible to call "non-published" operations (those that are not visible in the resource tree, e.g. {{describe}}) via JMX, while it's entirely possible to call them via CLI (e.g. {{/subsystem=security:describe}}) and other management interfaces. > The problem lies in the fact that {{ModelControllerMBeanHelper.invoke}} method checks {{if (!accessControl.isExecutableOperation(operationName))}} and the {{isExecutableOperation}} method assumes that the operation will be visible in the resource tree. In fact, there is a comment stating _should not happen_, but now we know that it indeed _can_ happen. > What's more, it gives a misleading error message. The {{isExecutableOperation}} returns {{false}} for unknown operations, which results in {{Not authorized to invoke operation}} message. Which is wrong in two different ways simultaneously: 1. the problem isn't authorization, but the fact that the operation can't be found; 2. the user (e.g. in the {{SuperUser}} role) _is_ authorized. > I'm considering this low priority, because 1. JMX is likely to be very rarely used to access the management interface, 2. hiding information isn't nearly as important as leaking them, 3. non-published operations aren't nearly as important as the published ones. It's worth a JIRA nevertheless. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.2.3#72005)

9 years, 1 month

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss JIRA] (WFCORE-1059) RestartParentResourceAdd/RemoveHandler should handle capability registration

by Kabir Khan (JIRA)

[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFCORE-1059?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugi... ] Kabir Khan updated WFCORE-1059: ------------------------------- Fix Version/s: 3.0.0.Beta7 (was: 3.0.0.Beta6) > RestartParentResourceAdd/RemoveHandler should handle capability registration > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: WFCORE-1059 > URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFCORE-1059 > Project: WildFly Core > Issue Type: Bug > Components: Domain Management > Affects Versions: 2.0.0.CR6 > Reporter: Paul Ferraro > Assignee: Tomaz Cerar > Fix For: 3.0.0.Beta7 > > > RestartParentResourceAddHandler and RestartParentResourceRemoveHandler do not extend the respective AbstractAddStepHandler and AbstractRemoveStepHandler base classes, and thus does not handle capability [un]registration. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.2.3#72005)

9 years, 1 month

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss JIRA] (WFCORE-1145) Review of HostController / Application Server Remoting connections

by Kabir Khan (JIRA)

[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFCORE-1145?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugi... ] Kabir Khan updated WFCORE-1145: ------------------------------- Fix Version/s: 3.0.0.Beta7 (was: 3.0.0.Beta6) > Review of HostController / Application Server Remoting connections > ------------------------------------------------------------------ > > Key: WFCORE-1145 > URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFCORE-1145 > Project: WildFly Core > Issue Type: Task > Components: Domain Management > Reporter: Darran Lofthouse > Assignee: Darran Lofthouse > Labels: affects_elytron > Fix For: 3.0.0.Beta7 > > > Where an application server connects back to it's host controller in domain mode it used the same Remoting connector exposed possibly for native domain management access. > The problem with this is that as soon as any security restrictions are placed on the connector exposed by the host controller then the application servers require something to work with this - this is even though we are only ever talking about loopback communication between two process on the same machine. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.2.3#72005)

9 years, 1 month

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss JIRA] (WFCORE-644) jboss-cli needs to support using PKCS11 (including FIPS mode) keystores/truststores

by Kabir Khan (JIRA)

[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFCORE-644?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin... ] Kabir Khan updated WFCORE-644: ------------------------------ Fix Version/s: 3.0.0.Beta7 (was: 3.0.0.Beta6) > jboss-cli needs to support using PKCS11 (including FIPS mode) keystores/truststores > ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: WFCORE-644 > URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFCORE-644 > Project: WildFly Core > Issue Type: Bug > Components: CLI > Reporter: Derek Horton > Assignee: Darran Lofthouse > Priority: Critical > Fix For: 3.0.0.Beta7 > > > The cli's SSL configuration should be expanded to support using PKCS11 keystores/truststores. Currently it does not appear to be possible to configure the keystore/truststore type in the jboss-cli.xml file. > This is problematic when the JVM is running in FIPS mode. > The cli throws the following exception on startup: > $ ./bin/jboss-cli.sh > org.jboss.as.cli.CliInitializationException: java.security.KeyManagementException: FIPS mode: only SunJSSE TrustManagers may be used > at org.jboss.as.cli.impl.CommandContextImpl.initSSLContext(CommandContextImpl.java:541) > at org.jboss.as.cli.impl.CommandContextImpl.<init>(CommandContextImpl.java:291) > at org.jboss.as.cli.impl.CommandContextFactoryImpl.newCommandContext(CommandContextFactoryImpl.java:76) > at org.jboss.as.cli.impl.CliLauncher.initCommandContext(CliLauncher.java:294) > at org.jboss.as.cli.impl.CliLauncher.main(CliLauncher.java:277) > at org.jboss.as.cli.CommandLineMain.main(CommandLineMain.java:34) > at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method) > at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:57) > at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43) > at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:606) > at org.jboss.modules.Module.run(Module.java:312) > at org.jboss.modules.Main.main(Main.java:460) > Caused by: java.security.KeyManagementException: FIPS mode: only SunJSSE TrustManagers may be used > at sun.security.ssl.SSLContextImpl.chooseTrustManager(SSLContextImpl.java:126) > at sun.security.ssl.SSLContextImpl.engineInit(SSLContextImpl.java:89) > at javax.net.ssl.SSLContext.init(SSLContext.java:283) > at org.jboss.as.cli.impl.CommandContextImpl.initSSLContext(CommandContextImpl.java:537) > ... 11 more > It is possible to workaround the issue by setting the javax.net.ssl.keyStore / javax.net.ssl.trustStore system properties in the bin/jboss-cli.sh file: > JAVA_OPTS="$JAVA_OPTS -Djavax.net.ssl.trustStore=NONE -Djavax.net.ssl.trustStoreType=PKCS11" > JAVA_OPTS="$JAVA_OPTS -Djavax.net.ssl.keyStore=NONE -Djavax.net.ssl.keyStoreType=PKCS11 -Djavax.net.ssl.keyStorePassword=imapassword" -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.2.3#72005)

9 years, 1 month

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss JIRA] (WFCORE-887) "Deprecate" using an expression in model refs to interfaces

by Kabir Khan (JIRA)

[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFCORE-887?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin... ] Kabir Khan updated WFCORE-887: ------------------------------ Fix Version/s: 3.0.0.Beta7 (was: 3.0.0.Beta6) > "Deprecate" using an expression in model refs to interfaces > ----------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: WFCORE-887 > URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFCORE-887 > Project: WildFly Core > Issue Type: Task > Components: Domain Management > Reporter: Brian Stansberry > Fix For: 3.0.0.Beta7 > > > SocketBindingGroupResourceDefinition and OutboundSocketBindingResourceDefinition both have attributes that represent model refs to interface resources, but which also allow expressions. > Model references should not allow expressions. These were "grandfathered in" when the large scale expression support roll out happened for AS 7.2 / EAP 6.1. > There's no metadata facility to record that expression support is deprecated, but the add handler for these should log a WARN if they encounter an expression. Hopefully in EAP 8 we can then remove expression support. > We should look for other cases like this too, although those changes should be separate JIRAs. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.2.3#72005)

9 years, 1 month

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss JIRA] (WFCORE-1282) Unable to create HTTPS connection using *ECDH_RSA* cipher suites / kECDHr cipher string

by Kabir Khan (JIRA)

[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFCORE-1282?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugi... ] Kabir Khan updated WFCORE-1282: ------------------------------- Fix Version/s: 3.0.0.Beta7 (was: 3.0.0.Beta6) > Unable to create HTTPS connection using *ECDH_RSA* cipher suites / kECDHr cipher string > --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: WFCORE-1282 > URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFCORE-1282 > Project: WildFly Core > Issue Type: Bug > Components: Security > Affects Versions: 1.0.2.Final > Environment: Oracle Java > Reporter: Martin Choma > Assignee: Darran Lofthouse > Priority: Critical > Fix For: 3.0.0.Beta7 > > Attachments: client_debug_eap6.log, client_debug_eap7.log, server-cert-key-ec.jks, server_debug_eap6.log, server_debug_eap7.log > > > User using these cipher suites / cipher name in EAP6 won't be able to use it in EAP7. > Setting as critical as these cipher suites, are considered for strong and widely used in my opinion. > In server log, error "no cipher suites in common" can be seen using -Djavax.net.debug=all. > Note, that analogous configuration in EAP6 works fine. > Issue can be seen on Oracle Java only, as on OpenJDK / IBM these suites are not provided by method getDefaultCipherSuites(). > Also is it possible to log "no cipher suites in common" and similar tls handshake errors without -Djavax.net.debug for better troubleshooting? -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.2.3#72005)

9 years, 1 month

1
0
0 / 0

2026

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

jboss-jira February 2017