[JBoss JIRA] (WFCORE-1560) Cli calls leak resources in Host Controller when repeatedly calling jboss-cli.sh
by Kabir Khan (JIRA)
[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFCORE-1560?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugi... ]
Kabir Khan updated WFCORE-1560:
-------------------------------
Fix Version/s: 3.0.0.Beta7
(was: 3.0.0.Beta6)
> Cli calls leak resources in Host Controller when repeatedly calling jboss-cli.sh
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: WFCORE-1560
> URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFCORE-1560
> Project: WildFly Core
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: Domain Management
> Affects Versions: 2.0.8.Final
> Environment: OS: CentOS 7.2
> Java HotSpot(TM) 64-Bit Server VM (build 25.77-b03, mixed mode)
> Wildfly-10.0.0-Final
> Reporter: Michael Noack
> Assignee: Brian Stansberry
> Priority: Critical
> Fix For: 3.0.0.Beta7
>
> Attachments: JVM-DC.png, console-dc.log, host-controller.log, process-controller.log
>
>
> When executing management commands using jboss-cli.sh against the domain controller of a cluster repeatedly the host controller uses up more and more memory in oldgen. After several thousands of runs of jboss-cli the host controller eventually becomes unresponsive (see attached picture for memory consumption, dc became entirely unresponsive at roughly 6:30am):
> [root@dc broken]# /opt/wildfly-10.0.0.Final-DC/bin/./jboss-cli.sh --connect --user="username" --password="password" --command=":read-children-names(child-type=host)"
> Failed to connect to the controller: The controller is not available at xx.xx.xx.xx:9993: java.net.ConnectException: WFLYPRT0023: Could not connect to https-remoting://xx.xx.xx.xx:9993. The connection timed out: WFLYPRT0023: Could not connect to https-remoting://xx.xx.xx.xx:9993. The connection timed out
> I discovered the issue when testing whether https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFCORE-974 was actually resolved in wildfly-10.0.0.Final as advertised. I can confirm that the issue is different, since no OOM-Exceptions are thrown. However the DC still becomes useless, since it won't accept any connections anymore. -I will check whether the work-around from WFCORE-974 applies to this issue as well.- However the work-around from WFCORE-974 doesn't fix this issue.
> Please note that the attached logs are UTC, while the monitoring is UTC+2. Also the collection values are misleading since I haven't adapted my monitoring to the new output of jstat in JDK8. PU and PC are thus MU and MC.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.2.3#72005)
9 years, 2 months
[JBoss JIRA] (WFCORE-1649) RBAC constraint config modifications will fail in a mixed domain if the modified constraint is not present in the legacy slave
by Kabir Khan (JIRA)
[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFCORE-1649?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugi... ]
Kabir Khan updated WFCORE-1649:
-------------------------------
Fix Version/s: 3.0.0.Beta7
(was: 3.0.0.Beta6)
> RBAC constraint config modifications will fail in a mixed domain if the modified constraint is not present in the legacy slave
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: WFCORE-1649
> URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFCORE-1649
> Project: WildFly Core
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: Domain Management
> Reporter: Brian Stansberry
> Assignee: Brian Stansberry
> Priority: Critical
> Fix For: 3.0.0.Beta7
>
>
> The management model for RBAC constraints is maintained using synthetic resources, with resources only existing for those items (SensitivityClassification and ApplicationClassification) that are registered in the current process. Operations that touch classifications unknown to that process will fail due to missing resource problems.
> This is a big problem in the following scenarios:
> 1) Mixed domain, where legacy slaves do not know about newly introduced classifications.
> 2) Slimming scenarios where slaves are ignoring unrelated parts of the domain wide config and also don't have some extension installed, resulting in classifications registered by those extensions not being present.
> A partial workaround to 1) is for the kernel to register transformers for newly introduced classifications (e.g. SERVER_SSL added in EAP 6.4.7 and EAP 7). But:
> -- that doesn't help with problem 2)
> -- only the kernel can register kernel transformers, so if extensions add new classifications there is no way for them to register the transformer.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.2.3#72005)
9 years, 2 months
[JBoss JIRA] (WFCORE-1351) FilePermission for XNIO and Marshalling modules are required for Remoting to run with security manager
by Kabir Khan (JIRA)
[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFCORE-1351?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugi... ]
Kabir Khan updated WFCORE-1351:
-------------------------------
Fix Version/s: 3.0.0.Beta7
(was: 3.0.0.Beta6)
> FilePermission for XNIO and Marshalling modules are required for Remoting to run with security manager
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: WFCORE-1351
> URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFCORE-1351
> Project: WildFly Core
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: Remoting, Security
> Reporter: Ondrej Kotek
> Assignee: David Lloyd
> Priority: Critical
> Fix For: 3.0.0.Beta7
>
> Attachments: 1-no-createEndpoint-permission.stacktrace, 2-no-createXnioWorker-permission.stacktrace, 3-no-addConnectionProvider-permission.stacktrace, 4-no-accessDeclaredMembers-permission.stractrace, 5-no-suppressAccessChecks-permission.stracktrace
>
>
> # Running _NestedRemoteContextTestCase_ (from WildFly _testsuite/integration/basic_) with security manager, like
> {noformat}
> ./integration-tests.sh -Dts.basic -Dts.noSmoke -Dtest=NestedRemoteContextTestCase -Dsecurity.manager
> {noformat}
> results in exception:
> {noformat}
> java.io.IOException: java.lang.IllegalArgumentException: XNIO001001: No XNIO provider found
> {noformat}
> To make it work, permissions like following need to be added to _permissions.xml_ of _ejb.ear_:
> {noformat}
> new FilePermission("/home/okotek/git/wildfly/dist/target/wildfly-10.0.0.CR5-SNAPSHOT/modules/system/layers/base/org/jboss/xnio/nio/main/*", "read"),
> new FilePermission("/home/okotek/git/wildfly/dist/target/wildfly-10.0.0.CR5-SNAPSHOT/modules/system/layers/base/org/jboss/marshalling/river/main/*", "read"),
> new RemotingPermission("createEndpoint"),
> new RuntimePermission("createXnioWorker"),
> new RemotingPermission("addConnectionProvider"),
> new RuntimePermission("modifyThread"),
> new RuntimePermission("accessDeclaredMembers"),
> new ReflectPermission("suppressAccessChecks")
> {noformat}
> which is very confusing.
> Why do I need add seemingly unrelated permissions, like _FilePermission_ for XNIO and marshalling or _RuntimePermission_ for createXnioWorker? Such behavior should be fixed or properly documented.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.2.3#72005)
9 years, 2 months
[JBoss JIRA] (WFCORE-1960) Get rid of attributes of type LIST of PROPERTY; use OBJECT of STRING
by Kabir Khan (JIRA)
[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFCORE-1960?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugi... ]
Kabir Khan updated WFCORE-1960:
-------------------------------
Fix Version/s: 3.0.0.Beta7
(was: 3.0.0.Beta6)
> Get rid of attributes of type LIST of PROPERTY; use OBJECT of STRING
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: WFCORE-1960
> URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFCORE-1960
> Project: WildFly Core
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: Domain Management
> Reporter: Brian Stansberry
> Assignee: Ken Wills
> Fix For: 3.0.0.Beta7
>
> Attachments: rrd.txt
>
>
> A read-resource-description output of a standalone-full-ha.xml server (see attached) shows a couple attributes that are of type LIST, value-type PROPERTY. (Just text search for PROPERTY.) We should convert those to OBJECT, value-type STRING. Both represent a resource address. An object of string is equivalent to a LinkedHashMap<String, String>, with ordering based on insertion. So such a description is fine for a path address attribute.
> I'd like to get rid of the notion of PROPERTY in our spec definition of how to describe attributes, parameters and value-types (https://docs.jboss.org/author/display/WFLY/Description+of+the+Management+...) so removing the only usage of it will help.
> We should still accept PROPERTY as inputs when we can do conversion to the defined type. This is all about tightening up the spec to remove the not-really-necessary PROPERTY concept.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.2.3#72005)
9 years, 2 months
[JBoss JIRA] (WFCORE-1802) Integrate OpenSSL Provider registration with Elytron
by Kabir Khan (JIRA)
[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFCORE-1802?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugi... ]
Kabir Khan updated WFCORE-1802:
-------------------------------
Fix Version/s: 3.0.0.Beta7
(was: 3.0.0.Beta6)
> Integrate OpenSSL Provider registration with Elytron
> ----------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: WFCORE-1802
> URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFCORE-1802
> Project: WildFly Core
> Issue Type: Task
> Components: Security
> Reporter: Stuart Douglas
> Assignee: Darran Lofthouse
> Priority: Blocker
> Fix For: 3.0.0.Beta7
>
>
> We need to remove the following block from SecurityRealmResourceDefinition: -
> {code}
> static {
> //register the Openssl Provider, if possible
> //not really sure if this is the best place for it
> try {
> OpenSSLProvider.register();
> DomainManagementLogger.ROOT_LOGGER.registeredOpenSSLProvider();
> } catch (Throwable t){
> DomainManagementLogger.ROOT_LOGGER.debugf(t, "Failed to register OpenSSL provider");
> }
> }
> {code}
> Registration will then be possible within the Elytron subsystem configuration.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.2.3#72005)
9 years, 2 months
[JBoss JIRA] (WFCORE-1958) Clean up testsuite Elytron registration
by Kabir Khan (JIRA)
[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFCORE-1958?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugi... ]
Kabir Khan updated WFCORE-1958:
-------------------------------
Fix Version/s: 3.0.0.Beta7
(was: 3.0.0.Beta6)
> Clean up testsuite Elytron registration
> ---------------------------------------
>
> Key: WFCORE-1958
> URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFCORE-1958
> Project: WildFly Core
> Issue Type: Task
> Components: Test Suite
> Reporter: Darran Lofthouse
> Assignee: Darran Lofthouse
> Priority: Blocker
> Fix For: 3.0.0.Beta7
>
>
> In a couple of places we have artificially registered the WildFly Elytron Security provider, we need to address this so tests can automatically have it available to them..
> Also re-enable the following test case: -
> * org.jboss.as.test.integration.domain.suites.FullRbacProviderRunAsTestSuite
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.2.3#72005)
9 years, 2 months