[JBoss JIRA] (DROOLS-1562) NPE when creating KieModuleMetaData with wrong release id
by Maciej Swiderski (JIRA)
[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/DROOLS-1562?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugi... ]
Maciej Swiderski commented on DROOLS-1562:
------------------------------------------
[~mfusco] there seems to be two issues:
- one in KieModuleMetaData as illustrated in the attached stack trace
- another in updateToVersion method of KieContainerImpl that leads to following NPE:
{code}
java.lang.NullPointerException: null
at org.drools.compiler.kie.util.ChangeSetBuilder.build(ChangeSetBuilder.java:57) ~[drools-compiler-7.1.0-20170508.233901-66.jar:7.1.0-SNAPSHOT]
at org.drools.compiler.kie.builder.impl.KieContainerImpl.update(KieContainerImpl.java:236) ~[drools-compiler-7.1.0-20170508.233901-66.jar:7.1.0-SNAPSHOT]
at org.drools.compiler.kie.builder.impl.KieContainerImpl.updateToVersion(KieContainerImpl.java:202) ~[drools-compiler-7.1.0-20170508.233901-66.jar:7.1.0-SNAPSHOT]
{code}
> NPE when creating KieModuleMetaData with wrong release id
> ---------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: DROOLS-1562
> URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/DROOLS-1562
> Project: Drools
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: core engine
> Affects Versions: 7.0.0.CR3
> Reporter: Karel Suta
> Assignee: Mario Fusco
> Labels: reported-by-qe
> Attachments: stacktrace.txt
>
>
> If user tries to create new KieModuleMetaData using KieModuleMetaData.Factory.newKieModuleMetaData() with not existing release id then NPE is thrown, see stacktrace in attachment.
> This error can be simulated on Kie server. See PR with reproducer [1].
> [1] https://github.com/kiegroup/droolsjbpm-integration/pull/950
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.2.3#72005)
9 years, 2 months
[JBoss JIRA] (REMJMX-138) Allow a URI for the Elytron configuration to be passed to environment when establishing a connection
by James Perkins (JIRA)
[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/REMJMX-138?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin... ]
James Perkins updated REMJMX-138:
---------------------------------
Description:
Currently the current Elytron {{AuthenticationContext}} is captured when establishing a connection. It would be beneficial for clients to be able to pass a property, likely {{wildfly.config.url}} to be consistent with the system property, to the path of the configuration file and have the file parsed by Elytron. The {{AuthenticationContext}} parsed from the configuration file would be used instead of the currently captured one.
This is more of a nice to have for clients so they do not need to be aware of using Elytron directly.
was:
Currently the current Elytron {{AuthenticationContext}} is captured when establishing a connection. It would be beneficial for clients to be able to pass a property, likely {{wildfly.config.uri}} to be consistent with the system property, to the path of the configuration file and have the file parsed by Elytron. The {{AuthenticationContext}} parsed from the configuration file would be used instead of the currently captured one.
This is more of a nice to have for clients so they do not need to be aware of using Elytron directly.
> Allow a URI for the Elytron configuration to be passed to environment when establishing a connection
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: REMJMX-138
> URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/REMJMX-138
> Project: Remoting JMX
> Issue Type: Enhancement
> Reporter: James Perkins
> Assignee: James Perkins
> Priority: Minor
>
> Currently the current Elytron {{AuthenticationContext}} is captured when establishing a connection. It would be beneficial for clients to be able to pass a property, likely {{wildfly.config.url}} to be consistent with the system property, to the path of the configuration file and have the file parsed by Elytron. The {{AuthenticationContext}} parsed from the configuration file would be used instead of the currently captured one.
> This is more of a nice to have for clients so they do not need to be aware of using Elytron directly.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.2.3#72005)
9 years, 2 months
[JBoss JIRA] (REMJMX-138) Allow a URI for the Elytron configuration to be passed to environment when establishing a connection
by James Perkins (JIRA)
James Perkins created REMJMX-138:
------------------------------------
Summary: Allow a URI for the Elytron configuration to be passed to environment when establishing a connection
Key: REMJMX-138
URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/REMJMX-138
Project: Remoting JMX
Issue Type: Enhancement
Reporter: James Perkins
Assignee: James Perkins
Priority: Minor
Currently the current Elytron {{AuthenticationContext}} is captured when establishing a connection. It would be beneficial for clients to be able to pass a property, likely {{wildfly.config.uri}} to be consistent with the system property, to the path of the configuration file and have the file parsed by Elytron. The {{AuthenticationContext}} parsed from the configuration file would be used instead of the currently captured one.
This is more of a nice to have for clients so they do not need to be aware of using Elytron directly.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.2.3#72005)
9 years, 2 months
[JBoss JIRA] (ELY-1152) Rework security Provider behaviour
by Darran Lofthouse (JIRA)
[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/ELY-1152?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.s... ]
Darran Lofthouse updated ELY-1152:
----------------------------------
Fix Version/s: 1.1.0.Beta43
> Rework security Provider behaviour
> ----------------------------------
>
> Key: ELY-1152
> URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/ELY-1152
> Project: WildFly Elytron
> Issue Type: Task
> Components: Authentication Client
> Reporter: Darran Lofthouse
> Assignee: Darran Lofthouse
> Priority: Critical
> Fix For: 1.1.0.Beta43
>
>
> Everything that makes use of providers should be using a Supplier<Provider[]> which exists as a result of parsing the configuration.
> Our default behaviour should likely be a combination of globally defined providers, and service loader discovered providers. Config then is more likely to be about disabling one or both rather than enabling.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.2.3#72005)
9 years, 2 months