[JBoss JIRA] (ELY-1162) WildFly Elytron Tool, add prompt when --secret is missing for Mask command.
by Hynek Švábek (JIRA)
Hynek Švábek created ELY-1162:
---------------------------------
Summary: WildFly Elytron Tool, add prompt when --secret is missing for Mask command.
Key: ELY-1162
URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/ELY-1162
Project: WildFly Elytron
Issue Type: Bug
Reporter: Hynek Švábek
Assignee: Darran Lofthouse
Priority: Critical
Add prompt when --secret is missing for Mask command.
Use case:
User have automation script using wildfly elytron tool and user don't want to have secret value stored in file.
User don't want secret value to be stored in shell history after execution.
User don't want secret value to be listed in ps -aux output.
There have to be possibility to omit --secret. When omitting --secret attribute user interaction prompt should follow with possibility to input secret value.
*How to reproduce*
{code}
java -jar .wildfly-elytron-tool.jar mask -i 240 -s 12345678
{code}
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.2.3#72005)
9 years, 1 month
[JBoss JIRA] (WFLY-8793) Change attributes of services in EJB3 subsystem to be allow runtime modifications
by Michal Jurc (JIRA)
[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFLY-8793?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.... ]
Michal Jurc moved JBEAP-10956 to WFLY-8793:
-------------------------------------------
Project: WildFly (was: JBoss Enterprise Application Platform)
Key: WFLY-8793 (was: JBEAP-10956)
Workflow: GIT Pull Request workflow (was: CDW with loose statuses v1)
Component/s: EJB
(was: EJB)
Affects Version/s: (was: 7.1.0.DR18)
> Change attributes of services in EJB3 subsystem to be allow runtime modifications
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: WFLY-8793
> URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFLY-8793
> Project: WildFly
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: EJB
> Reporter: Michal Jurc
> Assignee: David Lloyd
> Priority: Critical
>
> Currently, almost all of the attributes of services in {{/subsystem=ejb3}} have {{"restart-required" => "all-services"}}. This should be changed to allow these attributes to be modifiable in runtime where possible.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.2.3#72005)
9 years, 1 month
[JBoss JIRA] (LOGMGR-157) Provide faster alternative to SimpleDataFormat
by Koen Janssens (JIRA)
[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/LOGMGR-157?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin... ]
Koen Janssens updated LOGMGR-157:
---------------------------------
Attachment: DateFormatPerformance.java
> Provide faster alternative to SimpleDataFormat
> ----------------------------------------------
>
> Key: LOGMGR-157
> URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/LOGMGR-157
> Project: JBoss Log Manager
> Issue Type: Enhancement
> Components: core
> Affects Versions: 2.0.6.Final
> Reporter: Koen Janssens
> Attachments: DateFormatPerformance.java
>
>
> Whenever a data or timestamp is included in the logging pattern, SimpleDataFormat is used for formatting. Even with one instance per thread, it is still a heavy beast.
> Other logging libraries (like the 15 year old log4j) have 'fast tracks' for known formats such as ISO 8601. These implementations are faster and generate less memory garbage.
> During profiling, i discovered that simpledateformat is doing a lot of stuff while printing a date:
> at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:748)
> at org.jboss.logmanager.handlers.AsyncHandler$AsyncTask.run(AsyncHandler.java:196)
> at org.jboss.logmanager.ExtHandler.publish(ExtHandler.java:76)
> at org.jboss.logmanager.handlers.WriterHandler.doPublish(WriterHandler.java:46)
> at org.jboss.logmanager.ExtFormatter.format(ExtFormatter.java:32)
> at org.jboss.logmanager.formatters.MultistepFormatter.format(MultistepFormatter.java:83)
> at org.jboss.logmanager.formatters.Formatters$JustifyingFormatStep.render(Formatters.java:224)
> at org.jboss.logmanager.formatters.Formatters$5.renderRaw(Formatters.java:389)
> at java.text.DateFormat.format(DateFormat.java:345)
> at java.text.SimpleDateFormat.format(SimpleDateFormat.java:936)
> at java.text.SimpleDateFormat.format(SimpleDateFormat.java:966)
> at java.text.SimpleDateFormat.subFormat(SimpleDateFormat.java:1125)
> at java.util.Calendar.getDisplayName(Calendar.java:2110)
> at java.text.DateFormatSymbols.getInstance(DateFormatSymbols.java:340)
> at java.text.DateFormatSymbols.getProviderInstance(DateFormatSymbols.java:364)
> at sun.util.locale.provider.DateFormatSymbolsProviderImpl.getInstance(DateFormatSymbolsProviderImpl.java:85)
> at java.text.DateFormatSymbols.<init>(DateFormatSymbols.java:145)
> at java.text.DateFormatSymbols.initializeData(DateFormatSymbols.java:710)
> at sun.util.resources.LocaleData.getDateFormatData(LocaleData.java:127)
> at sun.util.resources.LocaleData.getBundle(LocaleData.java:163)
> at java.security.AccessController.doPrivileged(Native Method)
> at sun.util.resources.LocaleData$1.run(LocaleData.java:163)
> at sun.util.resources.LocaleData$1.run(LocaleData.java:167)
> at java.util.ResourceBundle.getBundle(ResourceBundle.java:890)
> at java.util.ResourceBundle.getBundleImpl(ResourceBundle.java:1348)
> at java.util.ResourceBundle.checkList(ResourceBundle.java:1400)
> at java.util.Collections$UnmodifiableCollection.isEmpty(Collections.java:1031)
> at java.util.AbstractCollection.isEmpty(AbstractCollection.java:86)
> I have attached a small comparision between simpledateformat performance and log4j ISO formatting performance. It roughly a factor 10 'faster'
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.2.3#72005)
9 years, 1 month
[JBoss JIRA] (DROOLS-1565) Implement a KieScanner listener
by Matteo Mortari (JIRA)
[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/DROOLS-1565?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugi... ]
Matteo Mortari commented on DROOLS-1565:
----------------------------------------
[~tkobayashi] for my understanding, I am proceeding with the assumption it is okay to return the "collect" of messages from the both phases in one shot, and notify the listener with the overall result. Also because if first phase ("build") contains any error, won't proceed to the second phase.("updateDependencyToVersion"). I just prefer to verify this, if there's a use case to receive them separately, kindly let me know. Thank you.
> Implement a KieScanner listener
> -------------------------------
>
> Key: DROOLS-1565
> URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/DROOLS-1565
> Project: Drools
> Issue Type: Enhancement
> Components: core engine
> Reporter: Mario Fusco
> Assignee: Matteo Mortari
>
> Allow to register a listener on the KieScanner to be notified when a kjar is successfully updated and when the incremental compilation fails.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.2.3#72005)
9 years, 1 month