[JBoss JIRA] (WFLY-9610) Start of a BatchJob is called, but BatchJob is seems no started. Absent entries in DB tables step_execution, job_execution
by Serg Pol (JIRA)
[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFLY-9610?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.... ]
Serg Pol edited comment on WFLY-9610 at 1/10/18 8:56 AM:
---------------------------------------------------------
jobOperator.stop(executionId) has set BatchJobs in status STOPPING from status STARTING and after a thread became available has stopped them and set them in status STOPPED.
To my sorrow these BatchJobs were really started (from status STARTING) before they were stopped!
I thought that they will not be started/called at all in this case!
was (Author: serg_732173):
jobOperator.stop(executionId) has set BatchJobs in status STOPPING from status STARTING and after a thread became available has stopped them and set them status STOPPED.
To my sorrow these BatchJobs were really started (from status STARTING) before they were stopped!
I thought that they will not be started/called at all in this case!
> Start of a BatchJob is called, but BatchJob is seems no started. Absent entries in DB tables step_execution, job_execution
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: WFLY-9610
> URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFLY-9610
> Project: WildFly
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: Batch
> Affects Versions: 9.0.1.Final
> Environment: Cluster, standalone-full-ha
> Reporter: Serg Pol
> Assignee: Cheng Fang
>
> Start of a BatchJob is called and record/entry is absent sometimes in DB table "step_execution" as well as Endtime and Exitstatus in the table job_execution (there is just info about start of BatchJob).
> There are no any error nessages.
> BatchJob is not started in this case according Log.
> Any idea? Thanks
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.5.0#75005)
8 years, 3 months
[JBoss JIRA] (WFLY-9610) Start of a BatchJob is called, but BatchJob is seems no started. Absent entries in DB tables step_execution, job_execution
by Serg Pol (JIRA)
[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFLY-9610?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.... ]
Serg Pol commented on WFLY-9610:
--------------------------------
jobOperator.stop(executionId) has set BatchJobs in status STOPPING from status STARTING and after a thread became available has stopped them and set them status STOPPED.
To my sorrow these BatchJobs were really started (from status STARTING) before they were stopped!
I thought that they will not be started/called at all in this case!
> Start of a BatchJob is called, but BatchJob is seems no started. Absent entries in DB tables step_execution, job_execution
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: WFLY-9610
> URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFLY-9610
> Project: WildFly
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: Batch
> Affects Versions: 9.0.1.Final
> Environment: Cluster, standalone-full-ha
> Reporter: Serg Pol
> Assignee: Cheng Fang
>
> Start of a BatchJob is called and record/entry is absent sometimes in DB table "step_execution" as well as Endtime and Exitstatus in the table job_execution (there is just info about start of BatchJob).
> There are no any error nessages.
> BatchJob is not started in this case according Log.
> Any idea? Thanks
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.5.0#75005)
8 years, 3 months
[JBoss JIRA] (WFLY-9559) JMXPropertyEditorsTestCase should use 1 deployment not 40
by Yeray Borges (JIRA)
[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFLY-9559?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.... ]
Yeray Borges reassigned WFLY-9559:
----------------------------------
Assignee: Yeray Borges
> JMXPropertyEditorsTestCase should use 1 deployment not 40
> ---------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: WFLY-9559
> URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFLY-9559
> Project: WildFly
> Issue Type: Task
> Components: JMX, Test Suite
> Reporter: Brian Stansberry
> Assignee: Yeray Borges
> Priority: Minor
>
> JMXPropertyEditorsTestCase does 40 different deployment operations, with each identical except for changing a deployment descriptor to configure xml for 1 mbean attribute. Then the test checks that value.
> Do 1 deployment with 40 config items and then check them all. Eliminate 78 management ops (39 pairs of deploy/undeploy.)
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.5.0#75005)
8 years, 3 months
[JBoss JIRA] (ELY-1485) HTTP DIGEST requires cnonce to be base64
by Jan Kalina (JIRA)
Jan Kalina created ELY-1485:
-------------------------------
Summary: HTTP DIGEST requires cnonce to be base64
Key: ELY-1485
URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/ELY-1485
Project: WildFly Elytron
Issue Type: Bug
Components: HTTP
Affects Versions: 1.2.0.Beta11
Reporter: Jan Kalina
Assignee: Jan Kalina
NonceManager of HTTP DIGEST mechanism requires nonce to base64 encoded value, otherwise it fails on DecodeException.
In RFC there is no requirement for client to use base64 value as cnonce. There is only recommendation for server nonce:
{panel}
nonce
A server-specified data string which MUST be different each time a
digest-challenge is sent as part of initial authentication. It is
*recommended* that this string be base64 or hexadecimal data.
{panel}
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.5.0#75005)
8 years, 3 months
[JBoss JIRA] (WFLY-9542) Iron JAC Amar is being told to create more KeyConnectionAssociation under CachedConnectionManagerImpl then actual JTA transactions open (Reproducible with NESTED EJB calls)
by Nuno Godinho de Matos (JIRA)
[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFLY-9542?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.... ]
Nuno Godinho de Matos commented on WFLY-9542:
---------------------------------------------
Hi,
Is there an IRON jac Amar expert that could give some feedback on this issue?
My impression is that the right fix for this problem would be that somehow that Cached Connection manager, before creating a New Stack() it would to have context of the Transaction Id for which the new stack of connections being created is, and compare it to the transaction id associated to the already existing stack.
If the transaction ID is the same (e.g one EJB calling another EJB that has TransactionAttribute=Supports), then there is no need to create a new Stack at all. The JTA transaction context is still the same.
If the pop of a stack is being triggered, the cachec connection manager would have to, somehow, know what the JTA transaction ID context to which it is going back into is.
if the JTA Transaction ID continues to be the same, then there is no need to pop the stack.
If the JTA Transaction ID context change,s then the POP can go through.
Otherwise, perhaps what could be done as well is , just working on the POP stack logic.
The POP stack logic could take its list of connections about to disappear and keep it an local variable.
After the POP is done, it culd compare the JTA transction id of the current stack that remains open to that that it just popped.
If the transaction ids are exactly the same, it should not discar those connections but registered them on the active stack.
Something of the sort.
If think the second solution, I might be able to implement it on my own --- once I have time to dedicate to wildfly.
The first solution, I think I would need an expert on this to give me proper guidance.
Kindest regards,
And many thanks for all the help.
> Iron JAC Amar is being told to create more KeyConnectionAssociation under CachedConnectionManagerImpl then actual JTA transactions open (Reproducible with NESTED EJB calls)
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: WFLY-9542
> URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFLY-9542
> Project: WildFly
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: EJB
> Affects Versions: 10.1.0.Final
> Reporter: Nuno Godinho de Matos
> Labels: Arjuna, IronJacamar, JTA
>
> I have been trying to understand for what reason we sometimes are seing the exception:
> {panel}
> IJ000311: Throwable from unregister connection: java.lang.IllegalStateException: IJ000152: Trying to return an unknown connection: org.jboss.jca.adapters.jdbc.jdk7.WrappedConnectionJDK7@2021ff6.
> {panel}
> I have now created a sample application that allows the exception to be reproduced:
> https://github.com/99sono/wildlfly-ironjacamar-unregisterconnection/
> To summarize:
> If we start a JTA transaction T1 by invoking an @EJB with TransacitonAttirbute RequiresNew.
> And then this EJB calls a second EJB with TransacitonAttirbute Supports.
> Then we will have the problem that if the First JDBC access is done on the nested EJB, the connection handed over to the JPA layer (eclipselink) will be popped out of the
> org.jboss.jca.core.connectionmanager.ccm.CachedConnectionManagerImpl.currentObjects
> As soon as we come out of the Nested EJB call.
> I do not know how serious this is.
> If somehow the popped out connection continues in fact locked to the ongoing JTA transaction or if might be going back to the connection pool and potentially be up for grabs.
> This I do not know how... I lack the knowledge to say how crucial it is to have a good synchrinization between the connections being managed under the:
> org.jboss.jca.core.connectionmanager.ccm.CachedConnectionManagerImpl
> And the JPA layer.
> But intuitively, I would say: quite important.
> So whenever a Stack gets popped with connections being managed, I would intuitively say: one of the parties has done something wrong. Either:
> (a) ARJUNA is asking JAC AMAR to open stacks when the JTA transaction is the same and it shouldn't, or
> (b) It does not really matter that the conneciton is popped out - somehow JAC AMAR still knows that the connection it popped out is still bound to the JTA transaction and the problem is logically strange but of low impact...
> What appears to be true, is that eclipselink is doing something logicla, in the sense that it is only asking for the conneciton to be closed/unregistered at the end of the JTA transaction.
> NOTE:
> In fact the error that we see when we get the stack trace, could also happen and no stack trance be logged by jac AMAR.
> This is the scenario when JAC leaves the unregister conneciton via:
> org.jboss.jca.core.connectionmanager.ccm.CachedConnectionManagerImpl would be going out via the:
> {panel}
> CopyOnWriteArrayList<ConnectionRecord> conns = cmToConnectionsMap.get(cm);
> // Can happen if connections are "passed" between contexts
> if (conns == null)
> return;
> {panel}
> But in my oppinion this exit path deserves the exact same stack trace.
> The sample application is to be found here:
> https://github.com/99sono/wildlfly-ironjacamar-unregisterconnection/
> This sample application is not as simple to deploy because one needs to hava a data source configured.
> In any case the sample application has in src/test/resources my standalone.xml.
> It should be realtively easy to fix the JDBC drivers configured in the atnadlone.xml.
> And it should be relatively simple to fix the persistence.xml to search for eclipselink in the appropriate moduel.
> I will no copy paste bellow the LOG of the exception of the sample application.
> {panel}
> 2017-11-09 10:20:00,918 INFO [startupconnectionproblem.observer.EventObserverNestedJtaTransactionEjb] (ServerService Thread Pool -- 73)
> --------------------------------------
> -- STARTING TransactionImple < ac, BasicAction: 0:ffffac140c58:634ef22a:5a041dbd:15 status: ActionStatus.RUNNING >: observing the CDI event StartupEventToTryToReproduceIJ000311Issue
> --------------------------------------
> 2017-11-09 10:20:00,919 INFO [startupconnectionproblem.observer.EventObserverNestedJtaTransactionEjb] (ServerService Thread Pool -- 73) Doing a fetch ALL query. just to bind the connection manager to the KEY of stack level 1.
> 2017-11-09 10:20:01,033 FINE [org.eclipse.persistence.internal.databaseaccess.DatabaseAccessor] (ServerService Thread Pool -- 73) Eclipselink connected (jndiName: java:/jdbc/SAMPLE_DS)- obtaining connection: org.jboss.jca.adapters.jdbc.jdk7.WrappedConnectionJDK7@1d5b3a43. Eclipselink Server session is: ServerSession(
> DatabaseAccessor(connected)
> PostgreSQLPlatform)
> 2017-11-09 10:20:01,057 FINE [org.eclipse.persistence.internal.databaseaccess.DatabaseAccessor] (ServerService Thread Pool -- 73) EclipseLink - Closing connection: org.jboss.jca.adapters.jdbc.jdk7.WrappedConnectionJDK7@1d5b3a43
> 2017-11-09 10:20:01,063 INFO [startupconnectionproblem.observer.EventObserverNestedJtaTransactionEjb] (ServerService Thread Pool -- 73) At this point the org.jboss.jca.core.connectionmanager.ccm.CachedConnectionManagerImpl will have registered on stack1 the connection used by eclipselink, and unregistered as well.
> However, this temporary register/de-register is sufficient to add to the current key.getCMToConnectionsMap() and entry for the JDBC connection manger.
> This is fundamental, because without this step the exception that we will later see would be hidden away - even though the logical problem would be there no exception would be logged. By taking this magical step here, we have ensured that we will be able to reproduce the excpetion later.
> To summarize what has happend so far.
> 1. We have forced eclipselink to register and unregister a connection due to are fetch id query
> 2. The JTA transaction ID TransactionImple < ac, BasicAction: 0:ffffac140c58:634ef22a:5a041dbd:15 status: ActionStatus.RUNNING > continues healthy and running without any problem 3. Meanwhile internally, our CachedConnectionManagerImpl, for this thread, has a single task of keys in its currentObjects field
> 4. The leading key on this stack does not hold any connectionrecords (eclipselink returned the connecton to the pool) but it does have a KEY for the JDBC connection manager 5. Point 4 is the magical step to allow us to see the stack trace but not the core of the issue - just the core of seing the stack trace
> 2017-11-09 10:20:01,066 INFO [startupconnectionproblem.observer.EventObserverNestedJtaTransactionEjb] (ServerService Thread Pool -- 73) START: executoreSynchronousSameJta
> 2017-11-09 10:20:01,066 INFO [startupconnectionproblem.observer.EventObserverNestedJtaTransactionEjb] (ServerService Thread Pool -- 73) Right now we are within the same JTA transaction. But on a NESTED EJB call.
> What technically has happened at this point is that IRON JAC AMAR now has a second stack (keyAssociation)
> in the currentObjects. We add in stacks each time we go through an EJB evne if we keep the JTA transaction
> and this is the BUG. But we will see more about this later.
>
> 2017-11-09 10:20:01,066 INFO [startupconnectionproblem.observer.EventObserverNestedJtaTransactionEjb] (ServerService Thread Pool -- 73) STARTING 3: observing the CDI event StartupEventToTryToReproduceIJ000311Issue - The current transaction id is: TransactionImple < ac, BasicAction: 0:ffffac140c58:634ef22a:5a041dbd:15 status: ActionStatus.RUNNING >
> 2017-11-09 10:20:01,066 INFO [startupconnectionproblem.observer.EventObserverNestedJtaTransactionEjb] (ServerService Thread Pool -- 73) Going to create 50 entities on the database
> 2017-11-09 10:20:01,067 FINE [org.eclipse.persistence.internal.databaseaccess.DatabaseAccessor] (ServerService Thread Pool -- 73) Eclipselink connected (jndiName: jdbc/SAMPLE_NON_JTA_DS)- obtaining connection: org.jboss.jca.adapters.jdbc.jdk7.WrappedConnectionJDK7@4be2573e. Eclipselink Server session is: ClientSession({})
> 2017-11-09 10:20:01,073 FINE [org.eclipse.persistence.internal.databaseaccess.DatabaseAccessor] (ServerService Thread Pool -- 73) EclipseLink - Closing connection: org.jboss.jca.adapters.jdbc.jdk7.WrappedConnectionJDK7@4be2573e
> 2017-11-09 10:20:01,078 INFO [startupconnectionproblem.observer.EventObserverNestedJtaTransactionEjb] (ServerService Thread Pool -- 73) 50 entities should have been created:
> 2017-11-09 10:20:01,078 INFO [startupconnectionproblem.observer.EventObserverNestedJtaTransactionEjb] (ServerService Thread Pool -- 73) Now we want to flush - we want to force eclipselink to have to acquire the java:/jdbc/SAMPLE_DS and not be allowed to close the connection yet.
> 2017-11-09 10:20:01,085 FINE [org.eclipse.persistence.internal.databaseaccess.DatabaseAccessor] (ServerService Thread Pool -- 73) Eclipselink connected (jndiName: java:/jdbc/SAMPLE_DS)- obtaining connection: org.jboss.jca.adapters.jdbc.jdk7.WrappedConnectionJDK7@2021ff6. Eclipselink Server session is: ClientSession({default=DatabaseAccessor(connected)})
> 2017-11-09 10:20:01,101 INFO [startupconnectionproblem.observer.EventObserverNestedJtaTransactionEjb] (ServerService Thread Pool -- 73) The flush has been done. We expec that the log now shows us that java:/jdbc/SAMPLE_DS connection was acquired but not yet closed by eclipselink.
> 2017-11-09 10:20:01,101 INFO [startupconnectionproblem.observer.EventObserverNestedJtaTransactionEjb] (ServerService Thread Pool -- 73) ENDING TransactionImple < ac, BasicAction: 0:ffffac140c58:634ef22a:5a041dbd:15 status: ActionStatus.RUNNING >: finishing to observer. The current transaction id is: {}
> 2017-11-09 10:20:01,101 INFO [startupconnectionproblem.observer.EventObserverNestedJtaTransactionEjb] (ServerService Thread Pool -- 73) OK. Now we are about to leave our nested EJB call. What is happening now is very important.
> 1. We will leave a nested EJB call but not the JTA transaction 2. Wildfly will go to the cachedConnectonManagerImpl and tell it to pop a stack (BUG) 3. The stack that goes away is actually holding the JDBC connection thta has been given to ECLIPSELINK and thta eclipselink will later try to close 4. When we leave this call we go back to STACK 1, where no connections are being managed
> 2017-11-09 10:20:01,102 INFO [startupconnectionproblem.observer.EventObserverNestedJtaTransactionEjb] (ServerService Thread Pool -- 73) FINISH: executoreSynchronousSameJta:
>
> 2017-11-09 10:20:01,102 WARN [startupconnectionproblem.observer.EventObserverNestedJtaTransactionEjb] (ServerService Thread Pool -- 73) NOW we are out of our nested EJB call. We are bout to leave the main EJB transaction call.
> In short we are about to reproduce the stack trace.
> What will now happen is the following.
> 1. Wildfly will tell eclipselink that the transaction is at an end and it should commit if it can
> 2. Eclipselink does its job of committing the changes and takes the JTA connection it was given and tries to close it
> 3. IRON JAC AMAR will log the stack trace we wanted to reproduce saying it has not idea what connection we are trying to return to the pool.
> 4. The reason the CachedConnectionManagerImpl does not know about the connection is because it was managed under STACK 2 but was popped out of existence after the nested transaction
> 5. Now it is very important to keep in mind that even if we were not seing the stack trace the error would be there (the moment we popped a key stack that had still connections) 6. Keep in mind that if we were to modify the source code and disable our reproduceBugService.fetchAlIds() call we would see no stack trace but the same issue would be present.7. The difference that doing the reproduceBugService.fetchAlIds() does is whether or not CachedConnectionManagerImpl during unregister connection leaves via the if conns == null return null or if goes further into the if (!ignoreConnections)
> 8. OK - Now that we understand what is happening behind the scenes we can let eclipselink try to close the JDBC connection at the end of the JTA transaction
>
> 2017-11-09 10:20:01,106 FINE [org.eclipse.persistence.internal.databaseaccess.DatabaseAccessor] (ServerService Thread Pool -- 73) EclipseLink - Closing connection: org.jboss.jca.adapters.jdbc.jdk7.WrappedConnectionJDK7@2021ff6
> 2017-11-09 10:20:01,107 INFO [org.jboss.jca.core.connectionmanager.listener.TxConnectionListener] (ServerService Thread Pool -- 73) IJ000311: Throwable from unregister connection: java.lang.IllegalStateException: IJ000152: Trying to return an unknown connection: org.jboss.jca.adapters.jdbc.jdk7.WrappedConnectionJDK7@2021ff6
> at org.jboss.jca.core.connectionmanager.ccm.CachedConnectionManagerImpl.unregisterConnection(CachedConnectionManagerImpl.java:408)
> at org.jboss.jca.core.connectionmanager.listener.TxConnectionListener.connectionClosed(TxConnectionListener.java:645)
> at org.jboss.jca.adapters.jdbc.BaseWrapperManagedConnection.returnHandle(BaseWrapperManagedConnection.java:596)
> at org.jboss.jca.adapters.jdbc.BaseWrapperManagedConnection.closeHandle(BaseWrapperManagedConnection.java:541)
> at org.jboss.jca.adapters.jdbc.WrappedConnection.returnConnection(WrappedConnection.java:298)
> at org.jboss.jca.adapters.jdbc.WrappedConnection.close(WrappedConnection.java:256)
> at org.eclipse.persistence.internal.databaseaccess.DatabaseAccessor.closeDatasourceConnection(DatabaseAccessor.java:522)
> at org.eclipse.persistence.internal.databaseaccess.DatasourceAccessor.closeConnection(DatasourceAccessor.java:537)
> at org.eclipse.persistence.internal.databaseaccess.DatabaseAccessor.closeConnection(DatabaseAccessor.java:545)
> at org.eclipse.persistence.internal.databaseaccess.DatasourceAccessor.closeJTSConnection(DatasourceAccessor.java:188)
> at org.eclipse.persistence.sessions.server.ClientSession.releaseJTSConnection(ClientSession.java:171)
> at org.eclipse.persistence.transaction.AbstractSynchronizationListener.beforeCompletion(AbstractSynchronizationListener.java:175)
> at org.eclipse.persistence.transaction.JTASynchronizationListener.beforeCompletion(JTASynchronizationListener.java:68)
> at org.jboss.as.txn.service.internal.tsr.JCAOrderedLastSynchronizationList.beforeCompletion(JCAOrderedLastSynchronizationList.java:116)
> at com.arjuna.ats.internal.jta.resources.arjunacore.SynchronizationImple.beforeCompletion(SynchronizationImple.java:76)
> at com.arjuna.ats.arjuna.coordinator.TwoPhaseCoordinator.beforeCompletion(TwoPhaseCoordinator.java:368)
> at com.arjuna.ats.arjuna.coordinator.TwoPhaseCoordinator.end(TwoPhaseCoordinator.java:91)
> at com.arjuna.ats.arjuna.AtomicAction.commit(AtomicAction.java:162)
> at com.arjuna.ats.internal.jta.transaction.arjunacore.TransactionImple.commitAndDisassociate(TransactionImple.java:1200)
> at com.arjuna.ats.internal.jta.transaction.arjunacore.BaseTransaction.commit(BaseTransaction.java:126)
> at com.arjuna.ats.jbossatx.BaseTransactionManagerDelegate.commit(BaseTransactionManagerDelegate.java:89)
> at org.jboss.as.ejb3.tx.CMTTxInterceptor.endTransaction(CMTTxInterceptor.java:91)
> at org.jboss.as.ejb3.tx.CMTTxInterceptor.invokeInOurTx(CMTTxInterceptor.java:279)
> at org.jboss.as.ejb3.tx.CMTTxInterceptor.requiresNew(CMTTxInterceptor.java:349)
> at org.jboss.as.ejb3.tx.CMTTxInterceptor.processInvocation(CMTTxInterceptor.java:241)
> at org.jboss.invocation.InterceptorContext.proceed(InterceptorContext.java:340)
> at org.jboss.as.ejb3.component.interceptors.CurrentInvocationContextInterceptor.processInvocation(CurrentInvocationContextInterceptor.java:41)
> at org.jboss.invocation.InterceptorContext.proceed(InterceptorContext.java:340)
> at org.jboss.as.ejb3.component.invocationmetrics.WaitTimeInterceptor.processInvocation(WaitTimeInterceptor.java:47)
> at org.jboss.invocation.InterceptorContext.proceed(InterceptorContext.java:340)
> at org.jboss.as.ejb3.security.SecurityContextInterceptor.processInvocation(SecurityContextInterceptor.java:100)
> at org.jboss.invocation.InterceptorContext.proceed(InterceptorContext.java:340)
> at org.jboss.as.ejb3.deployment.processors.StartupAwaitInterceptor.processInvocation(StartupAwaitInterceptor.java:22)
> at org.jboss.invocation.InterceptorContext.proceed(InterceptorContext.java:340)
> at org.jboss.invocation.InterceptorContext$Invocation.proceed(InterceptorContext.java:437)
> at org.jboss.as.ejb3.concurrency.ContainerManagedConcurrencyInterceptor.processInvocation(ContainerManagedConcurrencyInterceptor.java:110)
> at org.jboss.invocation.InterceptorContext.proceed(InterceptorContext.java:340)
> at org.jboss.as.ejb3.component.interceptors.ShutDownInterceptorFactory$1.processInvocation(ShutDownInterceptorFactory.java:64)
> at org.jboss.invocation.InterceptorContext.proceed(InterceptorContext.java:340)
> at org.jboss.as.ejb3.component.interceptors.LoggingInterceptor.processInvocation(LoggingInterceptor.java:67)
> at org.jboss.invocation.InterceptorContext.proceed(InterceptorContext.java:340)
> at org.jboss.as.ee.component.NamespaceContextInterceptor.processInvocation(NamespaceContextInterceptor.java:50)
> at org.jboss.invocation.InterceptorContext.proceed(InterceptorContext.java:340)
> at org.jboss.as.ejb3.component.interceptors.AdditionalSetupInterceptor.processInvocation(AdditionalSetupInterceptor.java:54)
> at org.jboss.invocation.InterceptorContext.proceed(InterceptorContext.java:340)
> at org.jboss.invocation.ContextClassLoaderInterceptor.processInvocation(ContextClassLoaderInterceptor.java:64)
> at org.jboss.invocation.InterceptorContext.proceed(InterceptorContext.java:340)
> at org.jboss.invocation.InterceptorContext.run(InterceptorContext.java:356)
> at org.wildfly.security.manager.WildFlySecurityManager.doChecked(WildFlySecurityManager.java:636)
> at org.jboss.invocation.AccessCheckingInterceptor.processInvocation(AccessCheckingInterceptor.java:61)
> at org.jboss.invocation.InterceptorContext.proceed(InterceptorContext.java:340)
> at org.jboss.invocation.InterceptorContext.run(InterceptorContext.java:356)
> at org.jboss.invocation.PrivilegedWithCombinerInterceptor.processInvocation(PrivilegedWithCombinerInterceptor.java:80)
> at org.jboss.invocation.InterceptorContext.proceed(InterceptorContext.java:340)
> at org.jboss.invocation.ChainedInterceptor.processInvocation(ChainedInterceptor.java:61)
> at org.jboss.as.ee.component.ViewService$View.invoke(ViewService.java:198)
> at org.jboss.as.ee.component.ViewDescription$1.processInvocation(ViewDescription.java:185)
> at org.jboss.invocation.InterceptorContext.proceed(InterceptorContext.java:340)
> at org.jboss.invocation.ChainedInterceptor.processInvocation(ChainedInterceptor.java:61)
> at org.jboss.as.ee.component.ProxyInvocationHandler.invoke(ProxyInvocationHandler.java:73)
> at startupconnectionproblem.observer.EventObserverNestedJtaTransactionEjb$$$view9.observeStartupEventToTryToReproduceIJ000311Issue(Unknown Source)
> at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
> at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:62)
> at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43)
> at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:498)
> at org.jboss.weld.util.reflection.Reflections.invokeAndUnwrap(Reflections.java:433)
> at org.jboss.weld.bean.proxy.EnterpriseBeanProxyMethodHandler.invoke(EnterpriseBeanProxyMethodHandler.java:128)
> at org.jboss.weld.bean.proxy.EnterpriseTargetBeanInstance.invoke(EnterpriseTargetBeanInstance.java:56)
> at org.jboss.weld.bean.proxy.ProxyMethodHandler.invoke(ProxyMethodHandler.java:100)
> at startupconnectionproblem.observer.EventObserverNestedJtaTransactionEjb$Proxy$_$$_Weld$EnterpriseProxy$.observeStartupEventToTryToReproduceIJ000311Issue(Unknown Source)
> at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
> at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:62)
> at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43)
> at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:498)
> at org.jboss.weld.injection.StaticMethodInjectionPoint.invoke(StaticMethodInjectionPoint.java:88)
> at org.jboss.weld.injection.StaticMethodInjectionPoint.invoke(StaticMethodInjectionPoint.java:78)
> at org.jboss.weld.injection.MethodInvocationStrategy$SimpleMethodInvocationStrategy.invoke(MethodInvocationStrategy.java:129)
> at org.jboss.weld.event.ObserverMethodImpl.sendEvent(ObserverMethodImpl.java:313)
> at org.jboss.weld.event.ObserverMethodImpl.sendEvent(ObserverMethodImpl.java:291)
> at org.jboss.weld.event.ObserverMethodImpl.notify(ObserverMethodImpl.java:269)
> at org.jboss.weld.event.ObserverNotifier.notifySyncObservers(ObserverNotifier.java:302)
> at org.jboss.weld.event.ObserverNotifier.notify(ObserverNotifier.java:291)
> at org.jboss.weld.event.EventImpl.fire(EventImpl.java:89)
> at startupconnectionproblem.event.FireStartupEventsServiceImpl.fireStartupCDIEvents(FireStartupEventsServiceImpl.java:41)
> at startupconnectionproblem.event.FireStartupEventsServiceImpl$Proxy$_$$_WeldClientProxy.fireStartupCDIEvents(Unknown Source)
> at startupconnectionproblem.event.StartupSingletonLocalEjb.postConstrcut(StartupSingletonLocalEjb.java:38)
> at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
> at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:62)
> at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43)
> at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:498)
> at org.jboss.as.ee.component.ManagedReferenceLifecycleMethodInterceptor.processInvocation(ManagedReferenceLifecycleMethodInterceptor.java:96)
> at org.jboss.invocation.InterceptorContext.proceed(InterceptorContext.java:340)
> at org.jboss.as.weld.ejb.Jsr299BindingsInterceptor.doLifecycleInterception(Jsr299BindingsInterceptor.java:114)
> at org.jboss.as.weld.ejb.Jsr299BindingsInterceptor.processInvocation(Jsr299BindingsInterceptor.java:103)
> at org.jboss.invocation.InterceptorContext.proceed(InterceptorContext.java:340)
> at org.jboss.invocation.InterceptorContext$Invocation.proceed(InterceptorContext.java:437)
> at org.jboss.weld.ejb.AbstractEJBRequestScopeActivationInterceptor.aroundInvoke(AbstractEJBRequestScopeActivationInterceptor.java:73)
> at org.jboss.as.weld.ejb.EjbRequestScopeActivationInterceptor.processInvocation(EjbRequestScopeActivationInterceptor.java:83)
> at org.jboss.invocation.InterceptorContext.proceed(InterceptorContext.java:340)
> at org.jboss.as.weld.injection.WeldInjectionInterceptor.processInvocation(WeldInjectionInterceptor.java:53)
> at org.jboss.invocation.InterceptorContext.proceed(InterceptorContext.java:340)
> at org.jboss.as.ee.component.AroundConstructInterceptorFactory$1.processInvocation(AroundConstructInterceptorFactory.java:28)
> at org.jboss.invocation.InterceptorContext.proceed(InterceptorContext.java:340)
> at org.jboss.as.weld.injection.WeldInterceptorInjectionInterceptor.processInvocation(WeldInterceptorInjectionInterceptor.java:56)
> at org.jboss.invocation.InterceptorContext.proceed(InterceptorContext.java:340)
> at org.jboss.as.weld.ejb.Jsr299BindingsCreateInterceptor.processInvocation(Jsr299BindingsCreateInterceptor.java:100)
> at org.jboss.invocation.InterceptorContext.proceed(InterceptorContext.java:340)
> at org.jboss.as.ee.component.NamespaceContextInterceptor.processInvocation(NamespaceContextInterceptor.java:50)
> at org.jboss.invocation.InterceptorContext.proceed(InterceptorContext.java:340)
> at org.jboss.as.ejb3.tx.CMTTxInterceptor.invokeInNoTx(CMTTxInterceptor.java:263)
> at org.jboss.as.ejb3.tx.LifecycleCMTTxInterceptor.notSupported(LifecycleCMTTxInterceptor.java:87)
> at org.jboss.as.ejb3.tx.LifecycleCMTTxInterceptor.processInvocation(LifecycleCMTTxInterceptor.java:64)
> at org.jboss.invocation.InterceptorContext.proceed(InterceptorContext.java:340)
> at org.jboss.as.weld.injection.WeldInjectionContextInterceptor.processInvocation(WeldInjectionContextInterceptor.java:43)
> at org.jboss.invocation.InterceptorContext.proceed(InterceptorContext.java:340)
> at org.jboss.as.ejb3.component.interceptors.CurrentInvocationContextInterceptor.processInvocation(CurrentInvocationContextInterceptor.java:41)
> at org.jboss.invocation.InterceptorContext.proceed(InterceptorContext.java:340)
> at org.jboss.as.ee.concurrent.ConcurrentContextInterceptor.processInvocation(ConcurrentContextInterceptor.java:45)
> at org.jboss.invocation.InterceptorContext.proceed(InterceptorContext.java:340)
> at org.jboss.invocation.ContextClassLoaderInterceptor.processInvocation(ContextClassLoaderInterceptor.java:64)
> at org.jboss.invocation.InterceptorContext.proceed(InterceptorContext.java:340)
> at org.jboss.as.ejb3.component.singleton.StartupCountDownInterceptor.processInvocation(StartupCountDownInterceptor.java:25)
> at org.jboss.invocation.InterceptorContext.proceed(InterceptorContext.java:340)
> at org.jboss.invocation.InterceptorContext.run(InterceptorContext.java:356)
> at org.jboss.invocation.PrivilegedWithCombinerInterceptor.processInvocation(PrivilegedWithCombinerInterceptor.java:80)
> at org.jboss.invocation.InterceptorContext.proceed(InterceptorContext.java:340)
> at org.jboss.invocation.ChainedInterceptor.processInvocation(ChainedInterceptor.java:61)
> at org.jboss.as.ee.component.BasicComponent.constructComponentInstance(BasicComponent.java:161)
> at org.jboss.as.ee.component.BasicComponent.constructComponentInstance(BasicComponent.java:134)
> at org.jboss.as.ee.component.BasicComponent.createInstance(BasicComponent.java:88)
> at org.jboss.as.ejb3.component.singleton.SingletonComponent.getComponentInstance(SingletonComponent.java:124)
> at org.jboss.as.ejb3.component.singleton.SingletonComponent.start(SingletonComponent.java:138)
> at org.jboss.as.ee.component.ComponentStartService$1.run(ComponentStartService.java:54)
> at java.util.concurrent.Executors$RunnableAdapter.call(Executors.java:511)
> at java.util.concurrent.FutureTask.run(FutureTask.java:266)
> at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1149)
> at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:624)
> at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:748)
> at org.jboss.threads.JBossThread.run(JBossThread.java:320)
> 2017-11-09 10:20:01,114 INFO [startupconnectionproblem.event.FireStartupEventsServiceImpl] (ServerService Thread Pool -- 73) FIINSH: StartupEventToTryToReproduceIJ000311Issue
> 2017-11-09 10:20:01,114 INFO [startupconnectionproblem.event.StartupSingletonLocalEjb] (ServerService Thread Pool -- 73) ENDING 1: Post construct of startup bean singleton ending
> 2017-11-09 10:20:01,240 INFO [javax.enterprise.resource.webcontainer.jsf.config] (ServerService Thread Pool -- 73) Initializing Mojarra 2.2.13.SP1 20160303-1204 for context '/app'
> 2017-11-09 10:20:02,098 INFO [org.primefaces.webapp.PostConstructA
> {panel}
> Thanks for considering this issue.
> I do not know how much impact this issue can actually have.
> We have many hundred different types of JTA business transactions, and we see this sample application happening on system tests and stress tests relatively often.
> Now that I have better understand of the issue, I can in some cases rework the code to dodge this problem to avoid nested calls of EJBS on the same transaciton - but this will not always be possible.
> And I would be quite afraid of this issue, if means that our connectons still in the hands of ElcipseLInk are going back to the pool.
> This would explain some strange errors we have had only on stress test application, that we do not see when using a different app server.
> I must say it was extremelly difficult to be able to make the stack trace reproducible.
> There are many tricky points to be able to lead the code to go precisely through the code path that leads to the excpetion.
> But it is relatively trivial to make the code leave through the "silent bug iron jac amar code path".
> Many thanks for all the help on this.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.5.0#75005)
8 years, 3 months
[JBoss JIRA] (DROOLS-2230) Deadlock related to org.kie.workbench.common.services.backend.builder.core.LRUProjectDependenciesClassLoaderCache
by Michael Anstis (JIRA)
[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/DROOLS-2230?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugi... ]
Michael Anstis moved RHDM-261 to DROOLS-2230:
---------------------------------------------
Project: Drools (was: Red Hat Decision Manager)
Key: DROOLS-2230 (was: RHDM-261)
Workflow: GIT Pull Request workflow (was: CDW with docs v1)
Docs QE Status: NEW
Component/s: build
(was: Business Central)
Affects Build: (was: DR1)
Affects Version/s: 7.5.0.Final
(was: 7.0.0.GA)
QE Status: NEW
Fix Version/s: (was: 7.0.0.GA)
> Deadlock related to org.kie.workbench.common.services.backend.builder.core.LRUProjectDependenciesClassLoaderCache
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: DROOLS-2230
> URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/DROOLS-2230
> Project: Drools
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: build
> Affects Versions: 7.5.0.Final
> Environment: EAP 7.1
> Reporter: Michael Anstis
> Assignee: Michael Anstis
> Priority: Blocker
> Labels: reported-by-qe
>
> We have encountered a deadlock in business-central prohibiting EAP from stopping:
> Found one Java-level deadlock:
> =============================
> "Thread-848":
> waiting to lock monitor 0x00007f3f8008f788 (object 0x000000008f743730, a org.kie.workbench.common.services.backend.builder.core.LRUProjectDependenciesClassLoaderCache$Proxy$_$$_WeldClientProxy),
> which is held by "Thread-377"
> "Thread-377":
> waiting to lock monitor 0x00007f3f80092228 (object 0x000000009579fac0, a org.drools.compiler.kie.builder.impl.KieFileSystemImpl),
> which is held by "Thread-520"
> "Thread-520":
> waiting to lock monitor 0x00007f3f8008f788 (object 0x000000008f743730, a org.kie.workbench.common.services.backend.builder.core.LRUProjectDependenciesClassLoaderCache$Proxy$_$$_WeldClientProxy),
> which is held by "Thread-377"
> Please have a look at the full jstack output in the attachment.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.5.0#75005)
8 years, 3 months
[JBoss JIRA] (DROOLS-2230) Deadlock related to org.kie.workbench.common.services.backend.builder.core.LRUProjectDependenciesClassLoaderCache
by Michael Anstis (JIRA)
[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/DROOLS-2230?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugi... ]
Michael Anstis updated DROOLS-2230:
-----------------------------------
Sprint: 2018 Week 01-02
> Deadlock related to org.kie.workbench.common.services.backend.builder.core.LRUProjectDependenciesClassLoaderCache
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: DROOLS-2230
> URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/DROOLS-2230
> Project: Drools
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: build
> Affects Versions: 7.5.0.Final
> Environment: EAP 7.1
> Reporter: Michael Anstis
> Assignee: Michael Anstis
> Priority: Blocker
> Labels: reported-by-qe
>
> We have encountered a deadlock in business-central prohibiting EAP from stopping:
> Found one Java-level deadlock:
> =============================
> "Thread-848":
> waiting to lock monitor 0x00007f3f8008f788 (object 0x000000008f743730, a org.kie.workbench.common.services.backend.builder.core.LRUProjectDependenciesClassLoaderCache$Proxy$_$$_WeldClientProxy),
> which is held by "Thread-377"
> "Thread-377":
> waiting to lock monitor 0x00007f3f80092228 (object 0x000000009579fac0, a org.drools.compiler.kie.builder.impl.KieFileSystemImpl),
> which is held by "Thread-520"
> "Thread-520":
> waiting to lock monitor 0x00007f3f8008f788 (object 0x000000008f743730, a org.kie.workbench.common.services.backend.builder.core.LRUProjectDependenciesClassLoaderCache$Proxy$_$$_WeldClientProxy),
> which is held by "Thread-377"
> Please have a look at the full jstack output in the attachment.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.5.0#75005)
8 years, 3 months
[JBoss JIRA] (DROOLS-2194) ClassCastException after kiescanner scanNow() method
by Mario Fusco (JIRA)
[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/DROOLS-2194?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugi... ]
Mario Fusco commented on DROOLS-2194:
-------------------------------------
[~tirelli] I confirm this is bug. For now I created a more isolated reproducer, I'm still investigating the problem.
> ClassCastException after kiescanner scanNow() method
> ----------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: DROOLS-2194
> URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/DROOLS-2194
> Project: Drools
> Issue Type: Bug
> Affects Versions: 7.5.0.Final
> Reporter: Pedro Almeida
> Assignee: Mario Fusco
> Attachments: DroolsDynamicReload.zip
>
>
> I need to add and remove rules in runtime, without losing facts.
> I'm achieving this by manipulating a kJar on my .m2 folder by adding and removing rules.
> The scanner is attached and the scanNow() method is invoked whenever a change occurs.
> But whenever I load a rule back (say on rule YYY), I get errors on (XXX), seems like it has to do with accumulates and can occur on various rules, something like:
> 18:13:15,354 SEVERE [org.rule.package.core.DroolsEJB] (default task-30) Error executing fireAllRules(): java.lang.ClassCastException: org.rule.package.Rule_XXX_$u40$Start$u41$1698483954$Accumulate0 cannot be cast to org.rule.package.Rule_XXX_$u40$Start$u41$1698483954$Accumulate0: java.lang.RuntimeException: java.lang.ClassCastException: org.rule.package.Rule_XXX_$u40$Start$u41$1698483954$Accumulate0 cannot be cast to org.rule.package.Rule_XXX_$u40$Start$u41$1698483954$Accumulate0
> at org.drools.core.rule.SingleAccumulate.accumulate(SingleAccumulate.java:106)
> at org.drools.core.phreak.PhreakAccumulateNode.addMatch(PhreakAccumulateNode.java:750)
> at org.drools.core.phreak.PhreakAccumulateNode.doRightInserts(PhreakAccumulateNode.java:230)
> at org.drools.core.phreak.PhreakAccumulateNode.doNode(PhreakAccumulateNode.java:85)
> at org.drools.core.phreak.RuleNetworkEvaluator.switchOnDoBetaNode(RuleNetworkEvaluator.java:567)
> at org.drools.core.phreak.RuleNetworkEvaluator.evalBetaNode(RuleNetworkEvaluator.java:538)
> at org.drools.core.phreak.RuleNetworkEvaluator.evalNode(RuleNetworkEvaluator.java:373)
> at org.drools.core.phreak.RuleNetworkEvaluator.innerEval(RuleNetworkEvaluator.java:333)
> at org.drools.core.phreak.RuleNetworkEvaluator.outerEval(RuleNetworkEvaluator.java:169)
> at org.drools.core.phreak.AddRemoveRule.forceFlushLeftTuple(AddRemoveRule.java:676)
> at org.drools.core.phreak.AddRemoveRule.flushLeftTupleIfNecessary(AddRemoveRule.java:636)
> at org.drools.core.phreak.AddRemoveRule.flushLeftTupleIfNecessary(AddRemoveRule.java:609)
> at org.drools.core.reteoo.BetaNode.assertObject(BetaNode.java:313)
> at org.drools.core.reteoo.CompositeObjectSinkAdapter.doPropagateAssertObject(CompositeObjectSinkAdapter.java:487)
> at org.drools.core.reteoo.CompositeObjectSinkAdapter.propagateAssertObject(CompositeObjectSinkAdapter.java:385)
> at org.drools.core.reteoo.AlphaNode.assertObject(AlphaNode.java:142)
> at org.drools.core.reteoo.SingleObjectSinkAdapter.propagateAssertObject(SingleObjectSinkAdapter.java:70)
> at org.drools.core.reteoo.AlphaNode.assertObject(AlphaNode.java:142)
> at org.drools.core.reteoo.SingleObjectSinkAdapter.propagateAssertObject(SingleObjectSinkAdapter.java:70)
> at org.drools.core.reteoo.AlphaNode.assertObject(AlphaNode.java:142)
> at org.drools.core.reteoo.CompositeObjectSinkAdapter.doPropagateAssertObject(CompositeObjectSinkAdapter.java:487)
> at org.drools.core.reteoo.CompositeObjectSinkAdapter.propagateAssertObject(CompositeObjectSinkAdapter.java:385)
> at org.drools.core.reteoo.CompositeObjectSinkAdapter.propagateAssertObject(CompositeObjectSinkAdapter.java:367)
> at org.drools.core.reteoo.ObjectTypeNode.propagateAssert(ObjectTypeNode.java:320)
> at org.drools.core.phreak.PropagationEntry$Insert.propagate(PropagationEntry.java:161)
> at org.drools.core.phreak.PropagationEntry$Insert.execute(PropagationEntry.java:166)
> at org.drools.core.phreak.SynchronizedPropagationList.flush(SynchronizedPropagationList.java:96)
> at org.drools.core.phreak.SynchronizedPropagationList.flush(SynchronizedPropagationList.java:91)
> at org.drools.core.common.DefaultAgenda.fireLoop(DefaultAgenda.java:1051)
> at org.drools.core.common.DefaultAgenda.internalFireAllRules(DefaultAgenda.java:1014)
> at org.drools.core.common.DefaultAgenda.fireAllRules(DefaultAgenda.java:1006)
> at org.drools.core.impl.StatefulKnowledgeSessionImpl.internalFireAllRules(StatefulKnowledgeSessionImpl.java:1320)
> at org.drools.core.impl.StatefulKnowledgeSessionImpl.fireAllRules(StatefulKnowledgeSessionImpl.java:1311)
> at org.drools.core.impl.StatefulKnowledgeSessionImpl.fireAllRules(StatefulKnowledgeSessionImpl.java:1295)
> at org.rule.package.core.DroolsEJB.fireAllRules(DroolsEJB.java:263)
> at org.rule.package.core.DroolsEJB.insertEvent(DroolsEJB.java:244)
> at sun.reflect.GeneratedMethodAccessor97.invoke(Unknown Source)
> at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43)
> at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:498)
> at org.jboss.as.ee.component.ManagedReferenceMethodInterceptor.processInvocation(ManagedReferenceMethodInterceptor.java:52)
> at org.jboss.invocation.InterceptorContext.proceed(InterceptorContext.java:340)
> at org.jboss.invocation.InterceptorContext$Invocation.proceed(InterceptorContext.java:437)
> at org.jboss.as.weld.ejb.Jsr299BindingsInterceptor.doMethodInterception(Jsr299BindingsInterceptor.java:82)
> at org.jboss.as.weld.ejb.Jsr299BindingsInterceptor.processInvocation(Jsr299BindingsInterceptor.java:93)
> at org.jboss.as.ee.component.interceptors.UserInterceptorFactory$1.processInvocation(UserInterceptorFactory.java:63)
> at org.jboss.invocation.InterceptorContext.proceed(InterceptorContext.java:340)
> at org.jboss.as.ejb3.component.invocationmetrics.ExecutionTimeInterceptor.processInvocation(ExecutionTimeInterceptor.java:43)
> at org.jboss.invocation.InterceptorContext.proceed(InterceptorContext.java:340)
> at org.jboss.invocation.InterceptorContext$Invocation.proceed(InterceptorContext.java:437)
> at org.jboss.weld.ejb.AbstractEJBRequestScopeActivationInterceptor.aroundInvoke(AbstractEJBRequestScopeActivationInterceptor.java:64)
> at org.jboss.as.weld.ejb.EjbRequestScopeActivationInterceptor.processInvocation(EjbRequestScopeActivationInterceptor.java:83)
> at org.jboss.invocation.InterceptorContext.proceed(InterceptorContext.java:340)
> at org.jboss.as.ee.concurrent.ConcurrentContextInterceptor.processInvocation(ConcurrentContextInterceptor.java:45)
> at org.jboss.invocation.InterceptorContext.proceed(InterceptorContext.java:340)
> at org.jboss.invocation.InitialInterceptor.processInvocation(InitialInterceptor.java:21)
> at org.jboss.invocation.InterceptorContext.proceed(InterceptorContext.java:340)
> at org.jboss.invocation.ChainedInterceptor.processInvocation(ChainedInterceptor.java:61)
> at org.jboss.as.ee.component.interceptors.ComponentDispatcherInterceptor.processInvocation(ComponentDispatcherInterceptor.java:52)
> at org.jboss.invocation.InterceptorContext.proceed(InterceptorContext.java:340)
> at org.jboss.as.ejb3.component.singleton.SingletonComponentInstanceAssociationInterceptor.processInvocation(SingletonComponentInstanceAssociationInterceptor.java:53)
> at org.jboss.invocation.InterceptorContext.proceed(InterceptorContext.java:340)
> at org.jboss.as.ejb3.tx.CMTTxInterceptor.invokeInCallerTx(CMTTxInterceptor.java:254)
> at org.jboss.as.ejb3.tx.CMTTxInterceptor.required(CMTTxInterceptor.java:329)
> at org.jboss.as.ejb3.tx.CMTTxInterceptor.processInvocation(CMTTxInterceptor.java:239)
> at org.jboss.invocation.InterceptorContext.proceed(InterceptorContext.java:340)
> at org.jboss.as.ejb3.component.interceptors.CurrentInvocationContextInterceptor.processInvocation(CurrentInvocationContextInterceptor.java:41)
> at org.jboss.invocation.InterceptorContext.proceed(InterceptorContext.java:340)
> at org.jboss.as.ejb3.component.invocationmetrics.WaitTimeInterceptor.processInvocation(WaitTimeInterceptor.java:43)
> at org.jboss.invocation.InterceptorContext.proceed(InterceptorContext.java:340)
> at org.jboss.as.ejb3.security.SecurityContextInterceptor.processInvocation(SecurityContextInterceptor.java:100)
> at org.jboss.invocation.InterceptorContext.proceed(InterceptorContext.java:340)
> at org.jboss.as.ejb3.deployment.processors.StartupAwaitInterceptor.processInvocation(StartupAwaitInterceptor.java:22)
> at org.jboss.invocation.InterceptorContext.proceed(InterceptorContext.java:340)
> at org.jboss.invocation.InterceptorContext$Invocation.proceed(InterceptorContext.java:437)
> at org.jboss.as.ejb3.concurrency.ContainerManagedConcurrencyInterceptor.processInvocation(ContainerManagedConcurrencyInterceptor.java:110)
> at org.jboss.invocation.InterceptorContext.proceed(InterceptorContext.java:340)
> at org.jboss.as.ejb3.component.interceptors.ShutDownInterceptorFactory$1.processInvocation(ShutDownInterceptorFactory.java:64)
> at org.jboss.invocation.InterceptorContext.proceed(InterceptorContext.java:340)
> at org.jboss.as.ejb3.component.interceptors.LoggingInterceptor.processInvocation(LoggingInterceptor.java:66)
> at org.jboss.invocation.InterceptorContext.proceed(InterceptorContext.java:340)
> at org.jboss.as.ee.component.NamespaceContextInterceptor.processInvocation(NamespaceContextInterceptor.java:50)
> at org.jboss.invocation.InterceptorContext.proceed(InterceptorContext.java:340)
> at org.jboss.as.ejb3.component.interceptors.AdditionalSetupInterceptor.processInvocation(AdditionalSetupInterceptor.java:54)
> at org.jboss.invocation.InterceptorContext.proceed(InterceptorContext.java:340)
> at org.jboss.invocation.ContextClassLoaderInterceptor.processInvocation(ContextClassLoaderInterceptor.java:64)
> at org.jboss.invocation.InterceptorContext.proceed(InterceptorContext.java:340)
> at org.jboss.invocation.InterceptorContext.run(InterceptorContext.java:356)
> at org.wildfly.security.manager.WildFlySecurityManager.doChecked(WildFlySecurityManager.java:636)
> at org.jboss.invocation.AccessCheckingInterceptor.processInvocation(AccessCheckingInterceptor.java:61)
> at org.jboss.invocation.InterceptorContext.proceed(InterceptorContext.java:340)
> at org.jboss.invocation.InterceptorContext.run(InterceptorContext.java:356)
> at org.jboss.invocation.PrivilegedWithCombinerInterceptor.processInvocation(PrivilegedWithCombinerInterceptor.java:80)
> at org.jboss.invocation.InterceptorContext.proceed(InterceptorContext.java:340)
> at org.jboss.invocation.ChainedInterceptor.processInvocation(ChainedInterceptor.java:61)
> at org.jboss.as.ee.component.ViewService$View.invoke(ViewService.java:198)
> at org.jboss.as.ee.component.ViewDescription$1.processInvocation(ViewDescription.java:185)
> at org.jboss.invocation.InterceptorContext.proceed(InterceptorContext.java:340)
> at org.jboss.invocation.ChainedInterceptor.processInvocation(ChainedInterceptor.java:61)
> at org.jboss.as.ee.component.ProxyInvocationHandler.invoke(ProxyInvocationHandler.java:73)
> at org.rule.package.core.DroolsEJB$$$view12.insertEvent(Unknown Source)
> at sun.reflect.GeneratedMethodAccessor97.invoke(Unknown Source)
> at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43)
> at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:498)
> at org.jboss.weld.util.reflection.Reflections.invokeAndUnwrap(Reflections.java:433)
> at org.jboss.weld.bean.proxy.EnterpriseBeanProxyMethodHandler.invoke(EnterpriseBeanProxyMethodHandler.java:128)
> at org.jboss.weld.bean.proxy.EnterpriseTargetBeanInstance.invoke(EnterpriseTargetBeanInstance.java:56)
> at org.jboss.weld.bean.proxy.ProxyMethodHandler.invoke(ProxyMethodHandler.java:100)
> at org.rule.package.core.DroolsEJB$Proxy$_$$_Weld$EnterpriseProxy$.insertEvent(Unknown Source)
> at org.rule.package.core.EventCorrelationServiceEJB.insertEvent(EventCorrelationServiceEJB.java:24)
> at sun.reflect.GeneratedMethodAccessor103.invoke(Unknown Source)
> at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43)
> at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:498)
> at org.jboss.as.ee.component.ManagedReferenceMethodInterceptor.processInvocation(ManagedReferenceMethodInterceptor.java:52)
> at org.jboss.invocation.InterceptorContext.proceed(InterceptorContext.java:340)
> at org.jboss.invocation.InterceptorContext$Invocation.proceed(InterceptorContext.java:437)
> at org.jboss.as.weld.ejb.Jsr299BindingsInterceptor.doMethodInterception(Jsr299BindingsInterceptor.java:82)
> at org.jboss.as.weld.ejb.Jsr299BindingsInterceptor.processInvocation(Jsr299BindingsInterceptor.java:93)
> at org.jboss.as.ee.component.interceptors.UserInterceptorFactory$1.processInvocation(UserInterceptorFactory.java:63)
> at org.jboss.invocation.InterceptorContext.proceed(InterceptorContext.java:340)
> at org.jboss.as.ejb3.component.invocationmetrics.ExecutionTimeInterceptor.processInvocation(ExecutionTimeInterceptor.java:43)
> at org.jboss.invocation.InterceptorContext.proceed(InterceptorContext.java:340)
> at org.jboss.as.jpa.interceptor.SBInvocationInterceptor.processInvocation(SBInvocationInterceptor.java:47)
> at org.jboss.invocation.InterceptorContext.proceed(InterceptorContext.java:340)
> at org.jboss.invocation.InterceptorContext$Invocation.proceed(InterceptorContext.java:437)
> at org.jboss.weld.ejb.AbstractEJBRequestScopeActivationInterceptor.aroundInvoke(AbstractEJBRequestScopeActivationInterceptor.java:73)
> at org.jboss.as.weld.ejb.EjbRequestScopeActivationInterceptor.processInvocation(EjbRequestScopeActivationInterceptor.java:83)
> at org.jboss.invocation.InterceptorContext.proceed(InterceptorContext.java:340)
> at org.jboss.as.ee.concurrent.ConcurrentContextInterceptor.processInvocation(ConcurrentContextInterceptor.java:45)
> at org.jboss.invocation.InterceptorContext.proceed(InterceptorContext.java:340)
> at org.jboss.invocation.InitialInterceptor.processInvocation(InitialInterceptor.java:21)
> at org.jboss.invocation.InterceptorContext.proceed(InterceptorContext.java:340)
> at org.jboss.invocation.ChainedInterceptor.processInvocation(ChainedInterceptor.java:61)
> at org.jboss.as.ee.component.interceptors.ComponentDispatcherInterceptor.processInvocation(ComponentDispatcherInterceptor.java:52)
> at org.jboss.invocation.InterceptorContext.proceed(InterceptorContext.java:340)
> at org.jboss.as.ejb3.component.pool.PooledInstanceInterceptor.processInvocation(PooledInstanceInterceptor.java:51)
> at org.jboss.invocation.InterceptorContext.proceed(InterceptorContext.java:340)
> at org.jboss.as.ejb3.tx.CMTTxInterceptor.invokeInOurTx(CMTTxInterceptor.java:275)
> at org.jboss.as.ejb3.tx.CMTTxInterceptor.required(CMTTxInterceptor.java:327)
> at org.jboss.as.ejb3.tx.CMTTxInterceptor.processInvocation(CMTTxInterceptor.java:239)
> at org.jboss.invocation.InterceptorContext.proceed(InterceptorContext.java:340)
> at org.jboss.as.ejb3.remote.EJBRemoteTransactionPropagatingInterceptor.processInvocation(EJBRemoteTransactionPropagatingInterceptor.java:80)
> at org.jboss.invocation.InterceptorContext.proceed(InterceptorContext.java:340)
> at org.jboss.as.ejb3.component.interceptors.CurrentInvocationContextInterceptor.processInvocation(CurrentInvocationContextInterceptor.java:41)
> at org.jboss.invocation.InterceptorContext.proceed(InterceptorContext.java:340)
> at org.jboss.as.ejb3.component.invocationmetrics.WaitTimeInterceptor.processInvocation(WaitTimeInterceptor.java:43)
> at org.jboss.invocation.InterceptorContext.proceed(InterceptorContext.java:340)
> at org.jboss.as.ejb3.security.SecurityContextInterceptor.processInvocation(SecurityContextInterceptor.java:100)
> at org.jboss.invocation.InterceptorContext.proceed(InterceptorContext.java:340)
> at org.jboss.as.ejb3.deployment.processors.StartupAwaitInterceptor.processInvocation(StartupAwaitInterceptor.java:22)
> at org.jboss.invocation.InterceptorContext.proceed(InterceptorContext.java:340)
> at org.jboss.as.ejb3.component.interceptors.ShutDownInterceptorFactory$1.processInvocation(ShutDownInterceptorFactory.java:64)
> at org.jboss.invocation.InterceptorContext.proceed(InterceptorContext.java:340)
> at org.jboss.as.ejb3.deployment.processors.EjbSuspendInterceptor.processInvocation(EjbSuspendInterceptor.java:53)
> at org.jboss.invocation.InterceptorContext.proceed(InterceptorContext.java:340)
> at org.jboss.as.ejb3.component.interceptors.LoggingInterceptor.processInvocation(LoggingInterceptor.java:66)
> at org.jboss.invocation.InterceptorContext.proceed(InterceptorContext.java:340)
> at org.jboss.as.ee.component.NamespaceContextInterceptor.processInvocation(NamespaceContextInterceptor.java:50)
> at org.jboss.invocation.InterceptorContext.proceed(InterceptorContext.java:340)
> at org.jboss.as.ejb3.component.interceptors.AdditionalSetupInterceptor.processInvocation(AdditionalSetupInterceptor.java:54)
> at org.jboss.invocation.InterceptorContext.proceed(InterceptorContext.java:340)
> at org.jboss.invocation.ContextClassLoaderInterceptor.processInvocation(ContextClassLoaderInterceptor.java:64)
> at org.jboss.invocation.InterceptorContext.proceed(InterceptorContext.java:340)
> at org.jboss.invocation.InterceptorContext.run(InterceptorContext.java:356)
> at org.wildfly.security.manager.WildFlySecurityManager.doChecked(WildFlySecurityManager.java:636)
> at org.jboss.invocation.AccessCheckingInterceptor.processInvocation(AccessCheckingInterceptor.java:61)
> at org.jboss.invocation.InterceptorContext.proceed(InterceptorContext.java:340)
> at org.jboss.invocation.InterceptorContext.run(InterceptorContext.java:356)
> at org.jboss.invocation.PrivilegedWithCombinerInterceptor.processInvocation(PrivilegedWithCombinerInterceptor.java:80)
> at org.jboss.invocation.InterceptorContext.proceed(InterceptorContext.java:340)
> at org.jboss.invocation.ChainedInterceptor.processInvocation(ChainedInterceptor.java:61)
> at org.jboss.as.ee.component.ViewService$View.invoke(ViewService.java:198)
> at org.jboss.as.ejb3.remote.protocol.versionone.MethodInvocationMessageHandler.invokeMethod(MethodInvocationMessageHandler.java:327)
> at org.jboss.as.ejb3.remote.protocol.versionone.MethodInvocationMessageHandler.access$100(MethodInvocationMessageHandler.java:67)
> at org.jboss.as.ejb3.remote.protocol.versionone.MethodInvocationMessageHandler$1.run(MethodInvocationMessageHandler.java:200)
> at org.jboss.as.ejb3.remote.protocol.versionone.MethodInvocationMessageHandler.processMessage(MethodInvocationMessageHandler.java:262)
> at org.jboss.as.ejb3.remote.protocol.versionone.VersionOneProtocolChannelReceiver.processMessage(VersionOneProtocolChannelReceiver.java:213)
> at org.jboss.as.ejb3.remote.protocol.versiontwo.VersionTwoProtocolChannelReceiver.processMessage(VersionTwoProtocolChannelReceiver.java:76)
> at org.jboss.as.ejb3.remote.protocol.versionone.VersionOneProtocolChannelReceiver.handleMessage(VersionOneProtocolChannelReceiver.java:159)
> at org.jboss.remoting3.remote.RemoteConnectionChannel$5.run(RemoteConnectionChannel.java:456)
> at org.jboss.remoting3.EndpointImpl$TrackingExecutor$1.run(EndpointImpl.java:731)
> at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1142)
> at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:617)
> at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:745)
> Caused by: java.lang.ClassCastException: org.rule.package.Rule_XXX_$u40$Start$u41$1698483954$Accumulate0 cannot be cast to org.rule.package.Rule_XXX_$u40$Start$u41$1698483954$Accumulate0
> at org.rule.package.Rule_XXX_$u40$Start$u41$1698483954Accumulate0Invoker.accumulate(Rule_XXX_$u40$Start$u41$1698483954Accumulate0Invoker.java:46)
> at org.drools.core.rule.SingleAccumulate.accumulate(SingleAccumulate.java:98)
> ... 182 more
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.5.0#75005)
8 years, 3 months