[JBoss JIRA] (DROOLS-2268) Add more fine-grained control on all assets
by Michael Anstis (JIRA)
[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/DROOLS-2268?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugi... ]
Michael Anstis commented on DROOLS-2268:
----------------------------------------
[~rbourner] Ah, my mistake, you're after permissions per file.
[~porcelli] Thoughts?
> Add more fine-grained control on all assets
> -------------------------------------------
>
> Key: DROOLS-2268
> URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/DROOLS-2268
> Project: Drools
> Issue Type: Enhancement
> Components: Artifact Repository
> Affects Versions: 6.5.0.Final
> Reporter: Richard Bourner
> Assignee: Michael Anstis
> Priority: Minor
>
> Currently, permissions within Business Central are only at projects level.
> It would be interesting to be able to enable permissions at a more fine-grained level.
> For instance, in a single project of one repository, having some people with read-only access on some assets, and other people have read/write access to the same assets.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.5.0#75005)
8 years, 3 months
[JBoss JIRA] (DROOLS-2268) Add more fine-grained control on all assets
by Richard Bourner (JIRA)
[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/DROOLS-2268?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugi... ]
Richard Bourner commented on DROOLS-2268:
-----------------------------------------
My understanding is that you can indeed assign permissions to roles/groups (using the kie-cli with V6 or the UI in V7) but only at project level, not at rules (or other assets) level.
> Add more fine-grained control on all assets
> -------------------------------------------
>
> Key: DROOLS-2268
> URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/DROOLS-2268
> Project: Drools
> Issue Type: Enhancement
> Components: Artifact Repository
> Affects Versions: 6.5.0.Final
> Reporter: Richard Bourner
> Assignee: Michael Anstis
> Priority: Minor
>
> Currently, permissions within Business Central are only at projects level.
> It would be interesting to be able to enable permissions at a more fine-grained level.
> For instance, in a single project of one repository, having some people with read-only access on some assets, and other people have read/write access to the same assets.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.5.0#75005)
8 years, 3 months
[JBoss JIRA] (DROOLS-2268) Add more fine-grained control on all assets
by Michael Anstis (JIRA)
[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/DROOLS-2268?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugi... ]
Michael Anstis commented on DROOLS-2268:
----------------------------------------
[~rbourner] I thought you could also assign permissions to roles/groups (of Users)?
[~davidredhat] This is true is it not?
> Add more fine-grained control on all assets
> -------------------------------------------
>
> Key: DROOLS-2268
> URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/DROOLS-2268
> Project: Drools
> Issue Type: Enhancement
> Components: Artifact Repository
> Affects Versions: 6.5.0.Final
> Reporter: Richard Bourner
> Assignee: Michael Anstis
> Priority: Minor
>
> Currently, permissions within Business Central are only at projects level.
> It would be interesting to be able to enable permissions at a more fine-grained level.
> For instance, in a single project of one repository, having some people with read-only access on some assets, and other people have read/write access to the same assets.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.5.0#75005)
8 years, 3 months
[JBoss JIRA] (DROOLS-2268) Add more fine-grained control on all assets
by Richard Bourner (JIRA)
Richard Bourner created DROOLS-2268:
---------------------------------------
Summary: Add more fine-grained control on all assets
Key: DROOLS-2268
URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/DROOLS-2268
Project: Drools
Issue Type: Enhancement
Components: Artifact Repository
Affects Versions: 6.5.0.Final
Reporter: Richard Bourner
Assignee: Michael Anstis
Priority: Minor
Currently, permissions within Business Central are only at projects level.
It would be interesting to be able to enable permissions at a more fine-grained level.
For instance, in a single project of one repository, having some people with read-only access on some assets, and other people have read/write access to the same assets.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.5.0#75005)
8 years, 3 months
[JBoss JIRA] (DROOLS-2267) Scope of enumeration
by Richard Bourner (JIRA)
Richard Bourner created DROOLS-2267:
---------------------------------------
Summary: Scope of enumeration
Key: DROOLS-2267
URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/DROOLS-2267
Project: Drools
Issue Type: Enhancement
Components: decision tables, Enumerations Editor
Affects Versions: 6.5.0.Final
Environment: Business Central / BRMS 6
Reporter: Richard Bourner
Assignee: Mario Fusco
Priority: Minor
Currently the scope of an enumeration file is per package. It would be nice to expand the scope in order to avoir duplicating all enumerations in each package of one project.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.5.0#75005)
8 years, 3 months
[JBoss JIRA] (WFBUILD-33) Support non-jar artifacts properly
by Peter Palaga (JIRA)
[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFBUILD-33?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin... ]
Peter Palaga commented on WFBUILD-33:
-------------------------------------
Work in progress https://github.com/ppalaga/wildfly-build-tools/commits/WFBUILD-33
> Support non-jar artifacts properly
> ----------------------------------
>
> Key: WFBUILD-33
> URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFBUILD-33
> Project: WildFly Build Tools
> Issue Type: Bug
> Reporter: Peter Palaga
> Assignee: Peter Palaga
>
> The immediate impetus for reporting this is the fact that after upgrading from 1.1.6.Final to 1.2.6.Final our
> {code}
> <copy-artifact artifact="io.hawt:hawtio-wildfly" to-location="standalone/deployments/"/>
> {code}
> stopped working for the FP plugin. Changing it to
> {code}<copy-artifact artifact="io.hawt:hawtio-wildfly:war" to-location="standalone/deployments/"/>{code}
> by adding :war made the FP plugin happy, but it made the provisioning plugin fail with an NPE.
> It looks like the code parsing and the rendering the groupId:artifactId:type:classifier:version strings is scattered over several methods whose behavior is not 100% consistent.
> The current objective is:
> (1) Write a few integration tests to pin the behavior before the change, identifying the broken cases
> (2) Write the actual fix in such a way that the plugins stay as backwards compatible as possible.
> I have a fix that works for me, I just need to ensure, my changes keep the plugins backwards compatible.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.5.0#75005)
8 years, 3 months