January 2018 - jboss-jira - Jboss List Archives

[JBoss JIRA] (WFCORE-2497) Convert *-authentication-factory resources to be child resources of security-domain

by Brian Stansberry (JIRA)

[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFCORE-2497?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugi... ] Brian Stansberry updated WFCORE-2497: ------------------------------------- Fix Version/s: 4.0.0.Alpha7 (was: 4.0.0.Alpha6) > Convert *-authentication-factory resources to be child resources of security-domain > ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: WFCORE-2497 > URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFCORE-2497 > Project: WildFly Core > Issue Type: Task > Components: Security > Reporter: Darran Lofthouse > Fix For: 4.0.0.Alpha7 > > > This is a good example of where child resources work. > The authentication factory resources have a mandatory dependency on a single security domain. > The configuration within the factory is related to it's security domain. > There is only a single resource that can provide security domains. > The behaviour of the parent is unaffected by the existence or configuration of the child. > The parent and child manage their own services independently with the child's service depending on the parent's service. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.5.0#75005)

8 years, 3 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss JIRA] (WFCORE-2365) Review custom-modifiable-realm resource in Elytron subsystem

by Brian Stansberry (JIRA)

[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFCORE-2365?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugi... ] Brian Stansberry updated WFCORE-2365: ------------------------------------- Fix Version/s: 4.0.0.Alpha7 (was: 4.0.0.Alpha6) > Review custom-modifiable-realm resource in Elytron subsystem > ------------------------------------------------------------ > > Key: WFCORE-2365 > URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFCORE-2365 > Project: WildFly Core > Issue Type: Bug > Components: Security > Reporter: Ondrej Lukas > Fix For: 4.0.0.Alpha7 > > > See description of JBEAP-6100 for more details. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.5.0#75005)

8 years, 3 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss JIRA] (WFCORE-2349) Add RemoteManagementPermission and RemoteJMXPermission checks for remote clients.

by Brian Stansberry (JIRA)

[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFCORE-2349?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugi... ] Brian Stansberry updated WFCORE-2349: ------------------------------------- Fix Version/s: 4.0.0.Alpha7 (was: 4.0.0.Alpha6) > Add RemoteManagementPermission and RemoteJMXPermission checks for remote clients. > --------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: WFCORE-2349 > URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFCORE-2349 > Project: WildFly Core > Issue Type: Enhancement > Components: Domain Management, Security > Reporter: Darran Lofthouse > Fix For: 4.0.0.Alpha7 > > > Other services such as EJB and transactions have a Remote*Permission to verify the remote client has the required permission to use that service - this should be repeated for the management related services to control what a remote client can and can not connect to. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.5.0#75005)

8 years, 3 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss JIRA] (WFCORE-2336) Remove ModelController.createClient

by Brian Stansberry (JIRA)

[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFCORE-2336?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugi... ] Brian Stansberry updated WFCORE-2336: ------------------------------------- Fix Version/s: 4.0.0.Alpha7 (was: 4.0.0.Alpha6) > Remove ModelController.createClient > ----------------------------------- > > Key: WFCORE-2336 > URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFCORE-2336 > Project: WildFly Core > Issue Type: Task > Components: Domain Management > Reporter: Brian Stansberry > Fix For: 4.0.0.Alpha7 > > > Follow up on WFCORE-1507 by removing ModelController.createClient and any use of it. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.5.0#75005)

8 years, 3 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss JIRA] (WFCORE-1960) Get rid of attributes of type LIST of PROPERTY; use OBJECT of STRING

by Brian Stansberry (JIRA)

[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFCORE-1960?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugi... ] Brian Stansberry updated WFCORE-1960: ------------------------------------- Fix Version/s: 4.0.0.Alpha7 (was: 4.0.0.Alpha6) > Get rid of attributes of type LIST of PROPERTY; use OBJECT of STRING > -------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: WFCORE-1960 > URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFCORE-1960 > Project: WildFly Core > Issue Type: Bug > Components: Domain Management > Reporter: Brian Stansberry > Assignee: Ken Wills > Fix For: 4.0.0.Alpha7 > > Attachments: rrd.txt > > > A read-resource-description output of a standalone-full-ha.xml server (see attached) shows a couple attributes that are of type LIST, value-type PROPERTY. (Just text search for PROPERTY.) We should convert those to OBJECT, value-type STRING. Both represent a resource address. An object of string is equivalent to a LinkedHashMap<String, String>, with ordering based on insertion. So such a description is fine for a path address attribute. > I'd like to get rid of the notion of PROPERTY in our spec definition of how to describe attributes, parameters and value-types (https://docs.jboss.org/author/display/WFLY/Description+of+the+Management+...) so removing the only usage of it will help. > We should still accept PROPERTY as inputs when we can do conversion to the defined type. This is all about tightening up the spec to remove the not-really-necessary PROPERTY concept. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.5.0#75005)

8 years, 3 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss JIRA] (WFCORE-1944) Convert domain-management tests to reference Elytron SecurityRealm and remove old CallbackHandler code.

by Brian Stansberry (JIRA)

[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFCORE-1944?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugi... ] Brian Stansberry updated WFCORE-1944: ------------------------------------- Fix Version/s: 4.0.0.Alpha7 (was: 4.0.0.Alpha6) > Convert domain-management tests to reference Elytron SecurityRealm and remove old CallbackHandler code. > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: WFCORE-1944 > URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFCORE-1944 > Project: WildFly Core > Issue Type: Task > Components: Domain Management, Security > Reporter: Darran Lofthouse > Fix For: 4.0.0.Alpha7 > > > The important pieces of code within the legacy security realms are being wrapped using Elytron components, items like the legacy CallbackHandlers can be removed but existing tests need porting to call Elytron APIs. > The legacy tests do need to be retained as they offer a good level of regression testing for the legacy realms. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.5.0#75005)

8 years, 3 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss JIRA] (WFCORE-1649) RBAC constraint config modifications will fail in a mixed domain if the modified constraint is not present in the legacy slave

by Brian Stansberry (JIRA)

[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFCORE-1649?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugi... ] Brian Stansberry updated WFCORE-1649: ------------------------------------- Fix Version/s: 4.0.0.Alpha7 (was: 4.0.0.Alpha6) > RBAC constraint config modifications will fail in a mixed domain if the modified constraint is not present in the legacy slave > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > Key: WFCORE-1649 > URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFCORE-1649 > Project: WildFly Core > Issue Type: Bug > Components: Domain Management > Reporter: Brian Stansberry > Assignee: Brian Stansberry > Priority: Critical > Labels: domain-mode > Fix For: 4.0.0.Alpha7 > > > The management model for RBAC constraints is maintained using synthetic resources, with resources only existing for those items (SensitivityClassification and ApplicationClassification) that are registered in the current process. Operations that touch classifications unknown to that process will fail due to missing resource problems. > This is a big problem in the following scenarios: > 1) Mixed domain, where legacy slaves do not know about newly introduced classifications. > 2) Slimming scenarios where slaves are ignoring unrelated parts of the domain wide config and also don't have some extension installed, resulting in classifications registered by those extensions not being present. > A partial workaround to 1) is for the kernel to register transformers for newly introduced classifications (e.g. SERVER_SSL added in EAP 6.4.7 and EAP 7). But: > -- that doesn't help with problem 2) > -- only the kernel can register kernel transformers, so if extensions add new classifications there is no way for them to register the transformer. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.5.0#75005)

8 years, 3 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss JIRA] (WFCORE-1489) Expose (un)registerNotificationHandler() on OperationContext

by Brian Stansberry (JIRA)

[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFCORE-1489?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugi... ] Brian Stansberry updated WFCORE-1489: ------------------------------------- Fix Version/s: 4.0.0.Alpha7 (was: 4.0.0.Alpha6) > Expose (un)registerNotificationHandler() on OperationContext > ------------------------------------------------------------ > > Key: WFCORE-1489 > URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFCORE-1489 > Project: WildFly Core > Issue Type: Enhancement > Components: Domain Management > Reporter: Kabir Khan > Assignee: Jeff Mesnil > Fix For: 4.0.0.Alpha7 > > > Currently the only way to (un)register notifications is via the NotificationHandlerRegistration exposed by ModelController.getNotificationRegistry(). It would be nice to not have to install a service whose only purpose is to get hold of the ModelController from OSH's. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.5.0#75005)

8 years, 3 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss JIRA] (WFCORE-3255) Complex type AttributeDefinition variants don't handle ParameterCorrector properly

by Brian Stansberry (JIRA)

[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFCORE-3255?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugi... ] Brian Stansberry updated WFCORE-3255: ------------------------------------- Fix Version/s: 4.0.0.Alpha7 (was: 4.0.0.Alpha6) > Complex type AttributeDefinition variants don't handle ParameterCorrector properly > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: WFCORE-3255 > URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFCORE-3255 > Project: WildFly Core > Issue Type: Bug > Components: Domain Management > Affects Versions: 3.0.1.Final > Reporter: Brian Stansberry > Assignee: Brian Stansberry > Fix For: 4.0.0.Alpha7 > > > If a field in a complex attribute (i.e. one that uses Object...AttributeDefinition) has a ParameterCorrector configured, that corrector never gets called. That's because only a corrector on the top level attribute gets called. > These classes should automatically use an internal corrector that first calls any corrector configured for fields, and then, if one is present, calls any top level corrector. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.5.0#75005)

8 years, 3 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss JIRA] (WFCORE-3181) Review CustomCredentialSecurityFactoryTestCase

by Brian Stansberry (JIRA)

[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFCORE-3181?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugi... ] Brian Stansberry updated WFCORE-3181: ------------------------------------- Fix Version/s: 4.0.0.Alpha7 (was: 4.0.0.Alpha6) > Review CustomCredentialSecurityFactoryTestCase > ---------------------------------------------- > > Key: WFCORE-3181 > URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFCORE-3181 > Project: WildFly Core > Issue Type: Bug > Components: Security, Test Suite > Reporter: Darran Lofthouse > Fix For: 4.0.0.Alpha7 > > > The test case CustomCredentialSecurityFactoryTestCase appears to be testing that the 'code does what it does' rather than testing the 'code is doing what it should'. > The test is testing a custom credential security factory can be called but the test is using HTTP Basic authentication and relying on SPNEGO authentication being triggered as this is the only mechanism that currently uses this factory. > Should a minor change be required to the SPNEGO authentication mechanism which affects when this credential factory is called this test case could subsequently fail. > If possible it would be better to convert this test to be a SPNEGO test and then test the behaviour of the credential security factory affects the mechanism as expected. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.5.0#75005)

8 years, 3 months

1
0
0 / 0

2026

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

jboss-jira January 2018