[JBoss JIRA] (DROOLS-1770) More FEEL runtime cycle detection tests
by Kris Verlaenen (JIRA)
[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/DROOLS-1770?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugi... ]
Kris Verlaenen updated DROOLS-1770:
-----------------------------------
Sprint: 2017 Week 40-41-42, 2017 Week 43-44, 2017 Week 45-46, 2017 Week 47-48, 2017 Week 49-50, 2017 Week 51-52, 2018 Week 01-02, 2018 Week 03-04 (was: 2017 Week 40-41-42, 2017 Week 43-44, 2017 Week 45-46, 2017 Week 47-48, 2017 Week 49-50, 2017 Week 51-52, 2018 Week 01-02)
> More FEEL runtime cycle detection tests
> ---------------------------------------
>
> Key: DROOLS-1770
> URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/DROOLS-1770
> Project: Drools
> Issue Type: Enhancement
> Components: dmn engine
> Affects Versions: 7.4.1.Final
> Reporter: Fedor Gavrilov
> Assignee: Fedor Gavrilov
> Priority: Minor
>
> Runtime cycle detecton lacks tests for false positive, such as deadly diamond topology:
> A depends on B and C
> B and C depend on D
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.5.0#75005)
8 years, 3 months
[JBoss JIRA] (DROOLS-2109) [XLS Decision Table] New Asset Dialogue misses descriptions
by Kris Verlaenen (JIRA)
[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/DROOLS-2109?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugi... ]
Kris Verlaenen updated DROOLS-2109:
-----------------------------------
Sprint: 2017 Week 43-44, 2017 Week 45-46, 2017 Week 47-48, 2017 Week 49-50, 2017 Week 51-52, 2018 Week 01-02, 2018 Week 03-04 (was: 2017 Week 43-44, 2017 Week 45-46, 2017 Week 47-48, 2017 Week 49-50, 2017 Week 51-52, 2018 Week 01-02)
> [XLS Decision Table] New Asset Dialogue misses descriptions
> -----------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: DROOLS-2109
> URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/DROOLS-2109
> Project: Drools
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: XLS Decision Table Editor
> Affects Versions: 7.5.0.Final
> Reporter: Jozef Marko
> Assignee: Jozef Marko
> Attachments: Screenshot from 2017-11-03 10-20-21.png
>
>
> The attached dialogue shows missing descriptions for table format and file selector.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.5.0#75005)
8 years, 3 months
[JBoss JIRA] (DROOLS-1795) [Guided Decision Table] Invalid error message when renaming bound variable name in conditional BRL column.
by Kris Verlaenen (JIRA)
[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/DROOLS-1795?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugi... ]
Kris Verlaenen updated DROOLS-1795:
-----------------------------------
Sprint: 2017 Week 38-39, 2017 Week 40-41-42, 2017 Week 43-44, 2017 Week 45-46, 2017 Week 47-48, 2017 Week 49-50, 2017 Week 51-52, 2018 Week 01-02, 2018 Week 03-04 (was: 2017 Week 38-39, 2017 Week 40-41-42, 2017 Week 43-44, 2017 Week 45-46, 2017 Week 47-48, 2017 Week 49-50, 2017 Week 51-52, 2018 Week 01-02)
> [Guided Decision Table] Invalid error message when renaming bound variable name in conditional BRL column.
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: DROOLS-1795
> URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/DROOLS-1795
> Project: Drools
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: Guided Decision Table Editor
> Affects Versions: 7.0.0.Final
> Reporter: Mark Coble
> Assignee: Mark Coble
> Priority: Minor
> Fix For: 7.0.0.Final
>
> Attachments: guvnor-3507.png
>
>
> If a condition BRL column is added to a DT with bound variables that are used in an action column and that variable name is subsequently changed, the attached error message occurs when updating the action column with the new variable name. In the attached message the original variable name is 'app'. Hitting 'ok' returns you to the DT which has actually refactored the DT with the new variable name and validation is successful.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.5.0#75005)
8 years, 3 months
[JBoss JIRA] (DROOLS-1825) [Guided Decision Table] Ability to change HIT policy in a decision table anytime
by Kris Verlaenen (JIRA)
[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/DROOLS-1825?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugi... ]
Kris Verlaenen updated DROOLS-1825:
-----------------------------------
Sprint: 2017 Week 45-46, 2017 Week 47-48, 2017 Week 49-50, 2017 Week 51-52, 2018 Week 01-02, 2018 Week 03-04 (was: 2017 Week 45-46, 2017 Week 47-48, 2017 Week 49-50, 2017 Week 51-52, 2018 Week 01-02)
> [Guided Decision Table] Ability to change HIT policy in a decision table anytime
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: DROOLS-1825
> URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/DROOLS-1825
> Project: Drools
> Issue Type: Enhancement
> Components: Guided Decision Table Editor
> Affects Versions: 7.1.0.Beta2
> Reporter: Ivo Bek
> Assignee: Toni Rikkola
> Priority: Critical
> Labels: UX
> Attachments: DROOLS-1825 (Parent Rule).png, DecisionTable1.png, DecisionTable2.png, GDTAnalysis(a)2x.png, GDTColumns(a)2x.png
>
> Original Estimate: 1 week
> Remaining Estimate: 1 week
>
> Today, it's possible to set 1 of 5 HIT policies when we create a new guided decision table. However, the user might not know which HIT policy he/she should use at this early beginning. Therefore, it should be possible to set the policy to None when we create a new guided decision table and set the HIT policy later after we add columns and rows, fill in some data and see and decide based on the created table how the rules should behave using the HIT policy.
> Thus, it should be possible to change HIT policy in a decision table anytime.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.5.0#75005)
8 years, 3 months
[JBoss JIRA] (DROOLS-1609) Augment FEEL AST node at compilation with return type
by Kris Verlaenen (JIRA)
[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/DROOLS-1609?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugi... ]
Kris Verlaenen updated DROOLS-1609:
-----------------------------------
Sprint: 2017 Week 24-25, 2017 Week 26-27, 2017 Week 28-29, 2017 Week 30-31, 2017 Week 32-33, 2017 Week 34-35, 2017 Week 36-37, 2017 Week 38-39, 2017 Week 40-41-42, 2017 Week 43-44, 2017 Week 45-46, 2017 Week 47-48, 2017 Week 49-50, 2017 Week 51-52, 2018 Week 01-02, 2018 Week 03-04 (was: 2017 Week 24-25, 2017 Week 26-27, 2017 Week 28-29, 2017 Week 30-31, 2017 Week 32-33, 2017 Week 34-35, 2017 Week 36-37, 2017 Week 38-39, 2017 Week 40-41-42, 2017 Week 43-44, 2017 Week 45-46, 2017 Week 47-48, 2017 Week 49-50, 2017 Week 51-52, 2018 Week 01-02)
> Augment FEEL AST node at compilation with return type
> -----------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: DROOLS-1609
> URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/DROOLS-1609
> Project: Drools
> Issue Type: Enhancement
> Components: dmn engine
> Reporter: Matteo Mortari
> Assignee: Matteo Mortari
> Priority: Minor
>
> This is needed so to be able to determine the result of a boxed function at compile time, in turn to be able at compile time to determine a valid compilation without error of a BKM for instance.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.5.0#75005)
8 years, 3 months
[JBoss JIRA] (DROOLS-1959) [DMN Editor] Extend marshaller support for Expressions
by Kris Verlaenen (JIRA)
[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/DROOLS-1959?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugi... ]
Kris Verlaenen updated DROOLS-1959:
-----------------------------------
Sprint: 2017 Week 34-35, 2017 Week 36-37, 2017 Week 38-39, 2017 Week 40-41-42, 2017 Week 43-44, 2017 Week 45-46, 2017 Week 47-48, 2017 Week 49-50, 2017 Week 51-52, 2018 Week 01-02, 2018 Week 03-04 (was: 2017 Week 34-35, 2017 Week 36-37, 2017 Week 38-39, 2017 Week 40-41-42, 2017 Week 43-44, 2017 Week 45-46, 2017 Week 47-48, 2017 Week 49-50, 2017 Week 51-52, 2018 Week 01-02)
> [DMN Editor] Extend marshaller support for Expressions
> ------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: DROOLS-1959
> URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/DROOLS-1959
> Project: Drools
> Issue Type: Task
> Components: DMN Editor
> Reporter: Matteo Mortari
> Assignee: Matteo Mortari
>
> When UI support for DMN Expression is available, the marshaller shall be extended to support marshalling between DMN xml and the stunner representation of the expression.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.5.0#75005)
8 years, 3 months
[JBoss JIRA] (DROOLS-1701) FEEL code generation and compilation
by Kris Verlaenen (JIRA)
[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/DROOLS-1701?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugi... ]
Kris Verlaenen updated DROOLS-1701:
-----------------------------------
Sprint: 2017 Week 36-37, 2017 Week 38-39, 2017 Week 40-41-42, 2017 Week 43-44, 2017 Week 45-46, 2017 Week 47-48, 2017 Week 49-50, 2017 Week 51-52, 2018 Week 01-02, 2018 Week 03-04 (was: 2017 Week 36-37, 2017 Week 38-39, 2017 Week 40-41-42, 2017 Week 43-44, 2017 Week 45-46, 2017 Week 47-48, 2017 Week 49-50, 2017 Week 51-52, 2018 Week 01-02)
> FEEL code generation and compilation
> ------------------------------------
>
> Key: DROOLS-1701
> URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/DROOLS-1701
> Project: Drools
> Issue Type: Task
> Components: dmn engine
> Reporter: Matteo Mortari
> Assignee: Matteo Mortari
>
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.5.0#75005)
8 years, 3 months
[JBoss JIRA] (DROOLS-1946) DMN Editor
by Kris Verlaenen (JIRA)
[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/DROOLS-1946?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugi... ]
Kris Verlaenen updated DROOLS-1946:
-----------------------------------
Sprint: 2017 Week 24-25, 2017 Week 26-27, 2017 Week 28-29, 2017 Week 30-31, 2017 Week 32-33, 2017 Week 34-35, 2017 Week 36-37, 2017 Week 38-39, 2017 Week 40-41-42, 2017 Week 43-44, 2017 Week 45-46, 2017 Week 47-48, 2017 Week 49-50, 2017 Week 51-52, 2018 Week 01-02, 2018 Week 03-04 (was: 2017 Week 24-25, 2017 Week 26-27, 2017 Week 28-29, 2017 Week 30-31, 2017 Week 32-33, 2017 Week 34-35, 2017 Week 36-37, 2017 Week 38-39, 2017 Week 40-41-42, 2017 Week 43-44, 2017 Week 45-46, 2017 Week 47-48, 2017 Week 49-50, 2017 Week 51-52, 2018 Week 01-02)
> DMN Editor
> ----------
>
> Key: DROOLS-1946
> URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/DROOLS-1946
> Project: Drools
> Issue Type: Feature Request
> Components: DMN Editor
> Reporter: Michael Anstis
> Assignee: Michael Anstis
> Labels: UX
> Fix For: 7.6.0.Final
>
>
> Place holder for all DMN Editor related activities
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.5.0#75005)
8 years, 3 months
[JBoss JIRA] (ELY-1475) Empty username for FormAuthenticationMechanism causes IllegalArgumentException
by Ilia Vassilev (JIRA)
[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/ELY-1475?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.s... ]
Ilia Vassilev reassigned ELY-1475:
----------------------------------
Assignee: Ilia Vassilev (was: Romain Pelisse)
> Empty username for FormAuthenticationMechanism causes IllegalArgumentException
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: ELY-1475
> URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/ELY-1475
> Project: WildFly Elytron
> Issue Type: Bug
> Affects Versions: 1.2.0.Beta11
> Reporter: Ondrej Lukas
> Assignee: Ilia Vassilev
> Fix For: 1.2.0.Beta12
>
>
> In case when empty username is passed to FormAuthenticationMechanism.attemptAuthentication then IllegalArgumentException is thrown from constructor of NameCallback. This happens in cases when form is sent with empty value for j_username.
> See exception:
> {code}
> ERROR [io.undertow.request] (default task-18) UT005023: Exception handling request to /depForm/j_security_check: java.lang.IllegalArgumentException
> at javax.security.auth.callback.NameCallback.<init>(NameCallback.java:90)
> at org.wildfly.security.http.impl.UsernamePasswordAuthenticationMechanism.authenticate(UsernamePasswordAuthenticationMechanism.java:60)
> at org.wildfly.security.http.impl.FormAuthenticationMechanism.attemptAuthentication(FormAuthenticationMechanism.java:172)
> at org.wildfly.security.http.impl.FormAuthenticationMechanism.evaluateRequest(FormAuthenticationMechanism.java:106)
> at org.wildfly.security.http.util.SetMechanismInformationMechanismFactory$1.evaluateRequest(SetMechanismInformationMechanismFactory.java:114)
> at org.wildfly.security.http.util.SecurityIdentityServerMechanismFactory$1.evaluateRequest(SecurityIdentityServerMechanismFactory.java:77)
> at org.wildfly.security.http.HttpAuthenticator$AuthenticationExchange.authenticate(HttpAuthenticator.java:115)
> at org.wildfly.security.http.HttpAuthenticator$AuthenticationExchange.access$100(HttpAuthenticator.java:94)
> at org.wildfly.security.http.HttpAuthenticator.authenticate(HttpAuthenticator.java:78)
> at org.wildfly.elytron.web.undertow.server.SecurityContextImpl.authenticate(SecurityContextImpl.java:100)
> at io.undertow.servlet.handlers.security.ServletAuthenticationCallHandler.handleRequest(ServletAuthenticationCallHandler.java:55)
> at io.undertow.server.handlers.DisableCacheHandler.handleRequest(DisableCacheHandler.java:33)
> at io.undertow.server.handlers.PredicateHandler.handleRequest(PredicateHandler.java:43)
> at io.undertow.security.handlers.AuthenticationConstraintHandler.handleRequest(AuthenticationConstraintHandler.java:53)
> at io.undertow.security.handlers.AbstractConfidentialityHandler.handleRequest(AbstractConfidentialityHandler.java:46)
> at io.undertow.servlet.handlers.security.ServletConfidentialityConstraintHandler.handleRequest(ServletConfidentialityConstraintHandler.java:64)
> at io.undertow.servlet.handlers.security.ServletSecurityConstraintHandler.handleRequest(ServletSecurityConstraintHandler.java:59)
> at io.undertow.security.handlers.AbstractSecurityContextAssociationHandler.handleRequest(AbstractSecurityContextAssociationHandler.java:43)
> at io.undertow.server.handlers.PredicateHandler.handleRequest(PredicateHandler.java:43)
> at org.wildfly.extension.undertow.security.jacc.JACCContextIdHandler.handleRequest(JACCContextIdHandler.java:61)
> at io.undertow.server.handlers.PredicateHandler.handleRequest(PredicateHandler.java:43)
> at org.wildfly.extension.undertow.deployment.GlobalRequestControllerHandler.handleRequest(GlobalRequestControllerHandler.java:68)
> at io.undertow.server.handlers.PredicateHandler.handleRequest(PredicateHandler.java:43)
> at io.undertow.servlet.handlers.ServletInitialHandler.handleFirstRequest(ServletInitialHandler.java:292)
> at io.undertow.servlet.handlers.ServletInitialHandler.access$100(ServletInitialHandler.java:81)
> at io.undertow.servlet.handlers.ServletInitialHandler$2.call(ServletInitialHandler.java:138)
> at io.undertow.servlet.handlers.ServletInitialHandler$2.call(ServletInitialHandler.java:135)
> at io.undertow.servlet.core.ServletRequestContextThreadSetupAction$1.call(ServletRequestContextThreadSetupAction.java:48)
> at io.undertow.servlet.core.ContextClassLoaderSetupAction$1.call(ContextClassLoaderSetupAction.java:43)
> at org.wildfly.extension.undertow.deployment.UndertowDeploymentInfoService$UndertowThreadSetupAction.lambda$create$0(UndertowDeploymentInfoService.java:1508)
> at org.wildfly.extension.undertow.deployment.UndertowDeploymentInfoService$UndertowThreadSetupAction.lambda$create$0(UndertowDeploymentInfoService.java:1508)
> at org.wildfly.extension.undertow.deployment.UndertowDeploymentInfoService$UndertowThreadSetupAction.lambda$create$0(UndertowDeploymentInfoService.java:1508)
> at org.wildfly.extension.undertow.deployment.UndertowDeploymentInfoService$UndertowThreadSetupAction.lambda$create$0(UndertowDeploymentInfoService.java:1508)
> at io.undertow.servlet.handlers.ServletInitialHandler.dispatchRequest(ServletInitialHandler.java:272)
> at io.undertow.servlet.handlers.ServletInitialHandler.access$000(ServletInitialHandler.java:81)
> at io.undertow.servlet.handlers.ServletInitialHandler$1.handleRequest(ServletInitialHandler.java:104)
> at io.undertow.server.Connectors.executeRootHandler(Connectors.java:326)
> at io.undertow.server.HttpServerExchange$1.run(HttpServerExchange.java:812)
> at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1149)
> at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:624)
> at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:748)
> {code}
> It seems that [1] should also check {{username.length() == 0}}.
> [1] https://github.com/wildfly-security/wildfly-elytron/blob/32ff7c17965b3eca...
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.5.0#75005)
8 years, 3 months
[JBoss JIRA] (WFLY-9122) Containers for distributed work manager tests always started in testsuite/integration/manualmode
by Yeray Borges (JIRA)
[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFLY-9122?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.... ]
Yeray Borges reassigned WFLY-9122:
----------------------------------
Assignee: Yeray Borges
> Containers for distributed work manager tests always started in testsuite/integration/manualmode
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: WFLY-9122
> URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFLY-9122
> Project: WildFly
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: Test Suite
> Reporter: Josef Cacek
> Assignee: Yeray Borges
>
> The Arquillian containers {{dwm-container-0}} and {{dwm-container-1}} are always started in the manualmode testsuite module.
> It can lead to port conflicts when another test wants to use its own server configuration with port offset 200 or 300. It also adds additional time to execute single test ({{mvn test -Dtest=MyTestCase}}), because these 2 containers has to be started first.
> The {{dwm-*}} containers are used by distributed work manager tests in package {{org.jboss.as.test.manualmode.jca.workmanager.distributed}}.
> CC [~rjanik]
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.5.0#75005)
8 years, 3 months