[JBoss JIRA] (JGRP-2301) UFC: add back to configs even if TCP is transport
by Bela Ban (Jira)
Bela Ban created JGRP-2301:
------------------------------
Summary: UFC: add back to configs even if TCP is transport
Key: JGRP-2301
URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JGRP-2301
Project: JGroups
Issue Type: Enhancement
Reporter: Bela Ban
Assignee: Bela Ban
Fix For: 4.0.16
Currently, none of the TCP-based stacks have UFC in them. This is bad, as async messages can overwhelm the receiver. Point in case is cross-site replication: the bridge using TCP replicates updates to the other site masters quickly, but the updates are only passed to the thread pool for processing, exhausting memory over time.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v7.12.1#712002)
7 years, 9 months
[JBoss JIRA] (WFLY-11178) WSTrustTestCase failing on IBM
by Jan Blizňák (Jira)
[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFLY-11178?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin... ]
Jan Blizňák commented on WFLY-11178:
------------------------------------
At the moment, I don't know how to obtain info about class init order.
No, the linked picketlink code is the only place where this property is manipulated with. It is executed in both cases - IBM and OpenJDK before the attempt to call SchemaFactory.newInstance().
Is there an easy way how to list currently loaded modules, for given deployment?
I am trying to prepare reduced reproducer that would show the issue too.
> WSTrustTestCase failing on IBM
> ------------------------------
>
> Key: WFLY-11178
> URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFLY-11178
> Project: WildFly
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: Web Services
> Affects Versions: 14.0.0.Final
> Reporter: Jan Blizňák
> Assignee: Alessio Soldano
> Priority: Major
> Attachments: log.txt
>
>
> As discovered during investigation in WFLY-10336, we are now getting test failures in WSTrustTestCase when IBM JDK is used. The relevant part of the exception is:
> {code:java}
> Caused by: java.lang.IllegalArgumentException: Provider org.apache.xerces.jaxp.validation.XMLSchemaFactory not found
> at javax.xml.validation.SchemaFactory.newInstance(Unknown Source)
> at org.opensaml.core.xml.config.XMLConfigurator.<init>(XMLConfigurator.java:94)
> at org.apache.wss4j.common.saml.OpenSAMLBootstrap.bootstrap(OpenSAMLBootstrap.java:85)
> at org.apache.wss4j.common.saml.OpenSAMLUtil.initSamlEngine(OpenSAMLUtil.java:91)
> at org.apache.wss4j.common.saml.OpenSAMLUtil.initSamlEngine(OpenSAMLUtil.java:75)
> at org.apache.wss4j.common.saml.SamlAssertionWrapper.<init>(SamlAssertionWrapper.java:184)
> at org.apache.cxf.sts.token.provider.SAMLTokenProvider.createSamlToken(SAMLTokenProvider.java:308)
> at org.apache.cxf.sts.token.provider.SAMLTokenProvider.createToken(SAMLTokenProvider.java:120)
> ... 102 more
> {code}
> It turned out the issue is in wildfly for some time, the breaking change was identified as https://github.com/wildfly/wildfly-core/pull/3201/
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v7.12.1#712002)
7 years, 9 months
[JBoss JIRA] (DROOLS-3133) Add support for EXPECTED conditions on new object
by Klara Kufova (Jira)
[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/DROOLS-3133?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugi... ]
Klara Kufova updated DROOLS-3133:
---------------------------------
Story Points: 5
> Add support for EXPECTED conditions on new object
> -------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: DROOLS-3133
> URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/DROOLS-3133
> Project: Drools
> Issue Type: Story
> Components: Scenario Simulation and Testing
> Reporter: Daniele Zonca
> Assignee: Daniele Zonca
> Priority: Major
>
> As user I want to define in the EXPECTED section conditions on instances that are generated during rule execution and not only on object defined in the GIVEN section.
> In other words I want to define I expect that during rule execution it will be generated an instance of a specific type and that satisfy some conditions
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v7.12.1#712002)
7 years, 9 months