[JBoss JIRA] (WFLY-11118) inter-app can't be deployed
by Jean-Francois Denise (Jira)
Jean-Francois Denise created WFLY-11118:
-------------------------------------------
Summary: inter-app can't be deployed
Key: WFLY-11118
URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFLY-11118
Project: WildFly
Issue Type: Bug
Components: Quickstarts
Reporter: Jean-Francois Denise
Assignee: Eduardo Martins
When deploying we have un-resolved dependency.
16:45:57,040 INFO [org.jboss.weld.Version] (MSC service thread 1-5) WELD-000900: 3.0.5 (Final)
16:45:57,454 ERROR [org.jboss.as.controller.management-operation] (management-handler-thread - 1) WFLYCTL0013: Operation ("add") failed - address: ([("deployment" => "inter-app-appA.war")]) - failure description: {
"WFLYCTL0412: Required services that are not installed:" => ["jboss.naming.context.java.global.inter-app-appB.\"BarImpl!org.jboss.as.quickstarts.interapp.shared.Bar\""],
"WFLYCTL0180: Services with missing/unavailable dependencies" => ["jboss.naming.context.java.module.inter-app-appA.inter-app-appA.env.\"org.jboss.as.quickstarts.interapp.appA.Imports\".bar is missing [jboss.naming.context.java.global.inter-app-appB.\"BarImpl!org.jboss.as.quickstarts.interapp.shared.Bar\"]"]
}
16:45:57,457 ERROR [org.jboss.as.server] (management-handler-thread - 1) WFLYSRV0021: Deploy of deployment "inter-app-appA.war" was rolled back with the following failure message:
{
"WFLYCTL0412: Required services that are not installed:" => ["jboss.naming.context.java.global.inter-app-appB.\"BarImpl!org.jboss.as.quickstarts.interapp.shared.Bar\""],
"WFLYCTL0180: Services with missing/unavailable dependencies" => ["jboss.naming.context.java.module.inter-app-appA.inter-app-appA.env.\"org.jboss.as.quickstarts.interapp.appA.Imports\".bar is missing [jboss.naming.context.java.global.inter-app-appB.\"BarImpl!org.jboss.as.quickstarts.interapp.shared.Bar\"]"]
}
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v7.12.1#712002)
7 years, 7 months
[JBoss JIRA] (WFLY-11062) Missing "Multi-Release: true" in MANIFEST for multirelease jar infinispan-commons-9.3.3.Final-redhat-00001.jar
by Rostislav Svoboda (Jira)
[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFLY-11062?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin... ]
Rostislav Svoboda commented on WFLY-11062:
------------------------------------------
When and how will be this fixed for WildFly ?
Remember this is tracker for WF, not ISPN. I think this should be kept open.
> Missing "Multi-Release: true" in MANIFEST for multirelease jar infinispan-commons-9.3.3.Final-redhat-00001.jar
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: WFLY-11062
> URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFLY-11062
> Project: WildFly
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: Clustering
> Affects Versions: 14.0.1.Final
> Reporter: tommaso borgato
> Priority: Major
>
> Project {{org.infinispan:infinispan-commons:9.3.3.Final}} contains classes specific for JDK-10.
> In the {{pom.xml}} file there is a {{jdk10-compile}} profile for the multi-release compilation.
> The MANIFEST in jar {{infinispan-commons-9.3.3.Final-redhat-00001.jar}} shipped with {{jboss-eap-7.2.0.CD14.CR1.zip}} does not contain line {{Multi-Release: true}}.
> Note this may be related to JBEAP-15502.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v7.12.1#712002)
7 years, 7 months
[JBoss JIRA] (WFLY-11117) Executing legacy operations in mod_cluster subsystem is not possible with configuration with just one proxy
by Jan Kašík (Jira)
Jan Kašík created WFLY-11117:
--------------------------------
Summary: Executing legacy operations in mod_cluster subsystem is not possible with configuration with just one proxy
Key: WFLY-11117
URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFLY-11117
Project: WildFly
Issue Type: Bug
Components: mod_cluster
Reporter: Jan Kašík
Assignee: Radoslav Husar
Running legacy operation ends up with an error:
{code}
[standalone@localhost:9990 /] /subsystem=modcluster/:disable
{
"outcome" => "failed",
"failure-description" => "WFLYMODCLS0022: Legacy operations cannot be used with multiple proxy configurations. Use non-deprecated operations at the correct proxy address.",
"rolled-back" => true
}
{code}
mod_cluster configuration:
{code}
[standalone@localhost:9990 /] /subsystem=modcluster/:read-resource
{
"outcome" => "success",
"result" => {
"mod-cluster-config" => {"configuration" => undefined},
"proxy" => {"default" => undefined}
}
}
{code}
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v7.12.1#712002)
7 years, 7 months
[JBoss JIRA] (DROOLS-2709) Revise and align visual presentation of tables (DMN, scenario, DT)
by Daniele Zonca (Jira)
[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/DROOLS-2709?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugi... ]
Daniele Zonca commented on DROOLS-2709:
---------------------------------------
[~uxdlc]
Yes I said that because style updates for DMN/Dtable and Scenario are not strictly related so we can update one by one.
If we update _behavioural_ requirements directly to the parent componet uberfire-wires-code-grids will be probably inherited by all of them at the same time (probably because if one of them has it own behaviour, it will be not changed)
For instance currently DMN looks better than Scenario
> Revise and align visual presentation of tables (DMN, scenario, DT)
> -------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: DROOLS-2709
> URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/DROOLS-2709
> Project: Drools
> Issue Type: Enhancement
> Components: DMN Editor, Scenario Simulation and Testing, Test Scenarios Editor
> Reporter: Liz Clayton
> Assignee: Michael Anstis
> Priority: Major
> Labels: UX, UXTeam, VisualDesign, drools-tools
>
> As a practitioner I need a clear and consistent presentation of table styles, so that I can learn the visual cues once for all tables in the application suite.
> When possible, iteratively update visual styles for tables using the following proposed options: https://redhat.invisionapp.com/share/RXLG7XB2TCW
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v7.12.1#712002)
7 years, 7 months
[JBoss JIRA] (WFLY-11116) Wildfly 12.0.0 Final Delay in Getting the Value Attributes of the Session Variables (Result in Null Pointer Exception)
by Ziad Saade (Jira)
[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFLY-11116?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin... ]
Ziad Saade updated WFLY-11116:
------------------------------
Security: (was: Red Hat Internal)
> Wildfly 12.0.0 Final Delay in Getting the Value Attributes of the Session Variables (Result in Null Pointer Exception)
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: WFLY-11116
> URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFLY-11116
> Project: WildFly
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: Application Client
> Affects Versions: 14.0.1.Final, 12.0.0.Final, 13.0.0.Final
> Reporter: Ziad Saade
> Assignee: Stuart Douglas
> Priority: Critical
>
> I have two Servlets Book and BookPreview the attribute is set in Book Servlet as follow:
>
> Book.java
> TestBean testBean=null;
> if(session.getAttribute("testBean")!=null)
> testBean = (TestBean)session.getAttribute("testBean");
> else{
> testBean=new TestBean();
> session.setAttribute("testBean",testBean);
> }
> testBean.setAmount("10");
>
> response.sendRedirect("BookPreview");
>
>
> The session attribute can be retrieved and the page is loaded normally and the Amount value is displayed however when submitting the form (Post Action in BookPreview.java) Null Pointer exception is generated.
>
> BookPreview.java
>
> TestBean testBean = (TestBean)session.getAttribute("testBean");
> String amount = testBean.getAmount; //Null pointer exception when submitting the form
>
> <form method="Post" action="BookPreview">
>
> </form>
>
> TestBean.java
>
> public class TestBean implements java.io.Serializable {
>
> private static final long serialVersionUID = 1L;
> private String amount;
>
> public String getAmount() {
> return amount;
> }
>
> public void setAmount(String amount) {
> this.amount = amount;
> }
> }
>
> Kindly advice how to fix the problem at the level of the server configuration.
> PS: I am not getting the exception when deploying the same application under other J EE application servers (Tomcat....)
>
> Thanks and Best Regards
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v7.12.1#712002)
7 years, 7 months
[JBoss JIRA] (WFLY-11115) bumpTimeout method usage in InMemorySessionManager
by Adam Krajcik (Jira)
[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFLY-11115?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin... ]
Adam Krajcik updated WFLY-11115:
--------------------------------
Component/s: Web (Undertow)
> bumpTimeout method usage in InMemorySessionManager
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: WFLY-11115
> URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFLY-11115
> Project: WildFly
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: Web (Undertow)
> Reporter: Adam Krajcik
> Assignee: Stuart Douglas
> Priority: Major
>
> Possible bug as mentioned in https://developer.jboss.org/thread/278634. As mentioned in the thread, use of bumpTimeout may cause a session that may never expire.
> From [~jstourac]:
> {quote}
> The list of methods where 'bumpTimeout' is actually used in [InMemorySessionManager|https://github.com/undertow-io/undertow/blob/maste...] to following: createSession(), setMaxInactiveInterval(), getAttribute(), getAttributeNames(), setAttribute(), removeAttribute(). From this list usage in following methods is suspicious: getAttribute(), getAttributeNames(), setAttribute(), removeAttribute().
> All occurrences were added by [this commit|https://github.com/undertow-io/undertow/commit/be768b6cb98c13f02df...] with initial session timeout implementation.
> The truth is the [Servlet 4.0, section 7.5|https://javaee.github.io/servlet-spec/downloads/servlet-4.0/servlet-4_0_FINAL.pdf] specification (Servlet 3.1 is almost identical) specifies that timeout depends on user activity only:
> "This means that the only mechanism that can be used to indicate when a client is no longer active is a time out period."
> {quote}
> Response from [~stuartdouglas] from mail:
> {quote}
> We could probably change that to just update the timeout in requestDone().
> {quote}
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v7.12.1#712002)
7 years, 7 months
[JBoss JIRA] (WFLY-11115) bumpTimeout method usage in InMemorySessionManager
by Adam Krajcik (Jira)
[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFLY-11115?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin... ]
Adam Krajcik moved UNDERTOW-1420 to WFLY-11115:
-----------------------------------------------
Project: WildFly (was: Undertow)
Key: WFLY-11115 (was: UNDERTOW-1420)
> bumpTimeout method usage in InMemorySessionManager
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: WFLY-11115
> URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFLY-11115
> Project: WildFly
> Issue Type: Bug
> Reporter: Adam Krajcik
> Assignee: Stuart Douglas
> Priority: Major
>
> Possible bug as mentioned in https://developer.jboss.org/thread/278634. As mentioned in the thread, use of bumpTimeout may cause a session that may never expire.
> From [~jstourac]:
> {quote}
> The list of methods where 'bumpTimeout' is actually used in [InMemorySessionManager|https://github.com/undertow-io/undertow/blob/maste...] to following: createSession(), setMaxInactiveInterval(), getAttribute(), getAttributeNames(), setAttribute(), removeAttribute(). From this list usage in following methods is suspicious: getAttribute(), getAttributeNames(), setAttribute(), removeAttribute().
> All occurrences were added by [this commit|https://github.com/undertow-io/undertow/commit/be768b6cb98c13f02df...] with initial session timeout implementation.
> The truth is the [Servlet 4.0, section 7.5|https://javaee.github.io/servlet-spec/downloads/servlet-4.0/servlet-4_0_FINAL.pdf] specification (Servlet 3.1 is almost identical) specifies that timeout depends on user activity only:
> "This means that the only mechanism that can be used to indicate when a client is no longer active is a time out period."
> {quote}
> Response from [~stuartdouglas] from mail:
> {quote}
> We could probably change that to just update the timeout in requestDone().
> {quote}
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v7.12.1#712002)
7 years, 7 months