[JBoss JIRA] (DROOLS-3283) Incorrect V&V results when operator is filled in the row (as opposed to column definition)
by Toni Rikkola (Jira)
[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/DROOLS-3283?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugi... ]
Toni Rikkola updated DROOLS-3283:
---------------------------------
Sprint: 2018 Week 45-47
> Incorrect V&V results when operator is filled in the row (as opposed to column definition)
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: DROOLS-3283
> URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/DROOLS-3283
> Project: Drools
> Issue Type: Bug
> Reporter: Toni Rikkola
> Assignee: Toni Rikkola
> Priority: Major
> Labels: support
>
> Imagine data model Person with attribute age.
> If you create decision table and add two columns:
> - both are defined against "age" attribute
> - none of them have operator defined
> then you add one row, and you fill in the operator and the value directly inside the row.
> For example:
> >= 20
> <= 30
> The generated DRL looks like this:
> {code:java}
> package org;
> //from row number: 1
> rule "Row 1 AnotherTest"
> dialect "mvel"
> when
> p : Person( age >= 20 , age <= 30 )
> then
> p.setAgeGroup( "whatever" );
> end
> {code}
> The V&V will report this as conflicting row:
> !6iOx.png|thumbnail!
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v7.12.1#712002)
7 years, 6 months
[JBoss JIRA] (WFCORE-4204) Add Phase priorities for MicroProfile DUPs
by Jeff Mesnil (Jira)
[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFCORE-4204?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugi... ]
Jeff Mesnil updated WFCORE-4204:
--------------------------------
Summary: Add Phase priorities for MicroProfile DUPs (was: Add Phase priorities for MicroProfile DUP)
> Add Phase priorities for MicroProfile DUPs
> ------------------------------------------
>
> Key: WFCORE-4204
> URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFCORE-4204
> Project: WildFly Core
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: Deployment Scanner
> Reporter: Jeff Mesnil
> Assignee: ehsavoie Hugonnet
> Priority: Major
>
> New MicroProfile extensions were added late in the WildFly 14 release cycles and they did not properly define their priorities in org.jboss.as.server.deployment.Phase.
> It introduce 5 new priorities:
> {code}
> public static final int DEPENDENCIES_MICROPROFILE_CONFIG = 0x1850;
> public static final int DEPENDENCIES_MICROPROFILE_METRICS = 0x1860;
> public static final int DEPENDENCIES_MICROPROFILE_HEALTH = 0x1870;
> public static final int DEPENDENCIES_MICROPROFILE_OPENTRACING = 0x1880;
> public static final int POST_MODULE_MICROPROFILE_CONFIG = 0x3750;
> public static final int POST_MODULE_MICROPROFILE_METRICS = 0x3760;
> public static final int POST_MODULE_MICROPROFILE_HEALTH = 0x3770;
> public static final int POST_MODULE_MICROPROFILE_OPENTRACING = 0x3780;
> {code}
> Note that the metrics priorities correspond to a new extension (tracked by WFLY-10712) that's not in WildFly yet (but will be before 15.0 is released)
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v7.12.1#712002)
7 years, 6 months
[JBoss JIRA] (WFCORE-4204) Add Phase priorities for MicroProfile DUP
by Jeff Mesnil (Jira)
Jeff Mesnil created WFCORE-4204:
-----------------------------------
Summary: Add Phase priorities for MicroProfile DUP
Key: WFCORE-4204
URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFCORE-4204
Project: WildFly Core
Issue Type: Bug
Components: Deployment Scanner
Reporter: Jeff Mesnil
Assignee: ehsavoie Hugonnet
New MicroProfile extensions were added late in the WildFly 14 release cycles and they did not properly define their priorities in org.jboss.as.server.deployment.Phase.
It introduce 5 new priorities:
{code}
public static final int DEPENDENCIES_MICROPROFILE_CONFIG = 0x1850;
public static final int DEPENDENCIES_MICROPROFILE_METRICS = 0x1860;
public static final int DEPENDENCIES_MICROPROFILE_HEALTH = 0x1870;
public static final int DEPENDENCIES_MICROPROFILE_OPENTRACING = 0x1880;
public static final int POST_MODULE_MICROPROFILE_CONFIG = 0x3750;
public static final int POST_MODULE_MICROPROFILE_METRICS = 0x3760;
public static final int POST_MODULE_MICROPROFILE_HEALTH = 0x3770;
public static final int POST_MODULE_MICROPROFILE_OPENTRACING = 0x3780;
{code}
Note that the metrics priorities correspond to a new extension (tracked by WFLY-10712) that's not in WildFly yet (but will be before 15.0 is released)
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v7.12.1#712002)
7 years, 6 months
[JBoss JIRA] (DROOLS-3162) Resolve Table (grid) width for Scenario
by Daniele Zonca (Jira)
[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/DROOLS-3162?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugi... ]
Daniele Zonca reassigned DROOLS-3162:
-------------------------------------
Assignee: Daniele Zonca (was: Gabriele Cardosi)
> Resolve Table (grid) width for Scenario
> ---------------------------------------
>
> Key: DROOLS-3162
> URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/DROOLS-3162
> Project: Drools
> Issue Type: Sub-task
> Components: Scenario Simulation and Testing
> Reporter: Liz Clayton
> Assignee: Daniele Zonca
> Priority: Major
> Labels: UX-CSS
>
> Table does not extend to the full width of the canvas area, which in the default view creates a gap between the table and the right panel. This could affect usability as the visual association and proximity between the selected cell and the input area (in the right panel) is reduced.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v7.12.1#712002)
7 years, 6 months
[JBoss JIRA] (ELY-1663) BC FIPS, Management Interface, ELY04001: No algorithm found matching TLS/SSL protocol selection criteria
by Martin Choma (Jira)
[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/ELY-1663?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.s... ]
Martin Choma commented on ELY-1663:
-----------------------------------
I can confirm with the fix I dont see tests failing anymore.
> BC FIPS, Management Interface, ELY04001: No algorithm found matching TLS/SSL protocol selection criteria
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: ELY-1663
> URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/ELY-1663
> Project: WildFly Elytron
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: SSL
> Affects Versions: 1.6.0.Final
> Reporter: Martin Choma
> Assignee: Farah Juma
> Priority: Blocker
>
> Rarely 1:30 it happens there occures error accessing http management interface secured with TLS with BC FIPS
> {code}
> Operation {"operation" => "add","address" => [("subsystem" => "elytron"),("server-ssl-context" => "test-server-ssl-context")],"key-manager" => "key-manager-name_test-server-ssl-context","cipher-suite-filter" => "TLS_DHE_DSS_WITH_3DES_EDE_CBC_SHA,TLS_DHE_DSS_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA,TLS_DHE_DSS_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256,TLS_DHE_DSS_WITH_AES_256_CBC_SHA,TLS_DHE_DSS_WITH_AES_256_CBC_SHA256,TLS_ECDHE_ECDSA_WITH_3DES_EDE_CBC_SHA,TLS_ECDHE_ECDSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA,TLS_ECDHE_ECDSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256,TLS_ECDHE_ECDSA_WITH_AES_256_CBC_SHA,TLS_ECDHE_ECDSA_WITH_AES_256_CBC_SHA384,TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_3DES_EDE_CBC_SHA,TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA,TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256,TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_CBC_SHA,TLS_RSA_WITH_3DES_EDE_CBC_SHA,TLS_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA,TLS_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256,TLS_RSA_WITH_AES_256_CBC_SHA,TLS_RSA_WITH_AES_256_CBC_SHA256","trust-manager" => "trust-manager-name_test-server-ssl-context","protocols" => ["TLSv1.2"],"need-client-auth" => true} failed: {"outcome" => "failed","failure-description" => {"WFLYCTL0080: Failed services" => {"org.wildfly.security.ssl-context.test-server-ssl-context" => "java.security.NoSuchAlgorithmException: ELY04001: No algorithm found matching TLS/SSL protocol selection criteria
> Caused by: java.security.NoSuchAlgorithmException: ELY04001: No algorithm found matching TLS/SSL protocol selection criteria"}},"rolled-back" => true}
> ERROR [org.jboss.msc.service.fail] (MSC service thread 1-2) MSC000001: Failed to start service org.wildfly.security.ssl-context.test-server-ssl-context: org.jboss.msc.service.StartException in service org.wildfly.security.ssl-context.test-server-ssl-context: java.security.NoSuchAlgorithmException: ELY04001: No algorithm found matching TLS/SSL protocol selection criteria
> at org.wildfly.extension.elytron.SSLDefinitions$6.lambda$getValueSupplier$1(SSLDefinitions.java:982)
> at org.wildfly.extension.elytron.TrivialService.start(TrivialService.java:53)
> at org.jboss.msc.service.ServiceControllerImpl$StartTask.startService(ServiceControllerImpl.java:1736)
> at org.jboss.msc.service.ServiceControllerImpl$StartTask.execute(ServiceControllerImpl.java:1698)
> at org.jboss.msc.service.ServiceControllerImpl$ControllerTask.run(ServiceControllerImpl.java:1556)
> at org.jboss.threads.ContextClassLoaderSavingRunnable.run(ContextClassLoaderSavingRunnable.java:35)
> at org.jboss.threads.EnhancedQueueExecutor.safeRun(EnhancedQueueExecutor.java:1985)
> at org.jboss.threads.EnhancedQueueExecutor$ThreadBody.doRunTask(EnhancedQueueExecutor.java:1487)
> at org.jboss.threads.EnhancedQueueExecutor$ThreadBody.run(EnhancedQueueExecutor.java:1378)
> at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:748)
> Caused by: java.security.NoSuchAlgorithmException: ELY04001: No algorithm found matching TLS/SSL protocol selection criteria
> at org.wildfly.security.ssl.SSLUtils.lambda$createSslContextFactory$1(SSLUtils.java:130)
> at org.wildfly.security.ssl.SSLContextBuilder.lambda$build$0(SSLContextBuilder.java:340)
> at org.wildfly.security.OneTimeSecurityFactory.create(OneTimeSecurityFactory.java:53)
> at org.wildfly.extension.elytron.SSLDefinitions$6.lambda$getValueSupplier$1(SSLDefinitions.java:980)
> ... 9 more
> {code}
> Some facts
> * It happens only on management interface BC FIPS TLS tests
> * It does not occur on Undertow secured with BC FIPS
> * Previously there was issue with similar error but that happened everywhere https://issues.jboss.org/browse/ELY-1618
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v7.12.1#712002)
7 years, 6 months