March 2018 - jboss-jira - Jboss List Archives

[JBoss JIRA] (DROOLS-1795) [Guided Decision Table] Invalid error message when renaming bound variable name in conditional BRL column.

by Kris Verlaenen (JIRA)

[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/DROOLS-1795?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugi... ] Kris Verlaenen updated DROOLS-1795: ----------------------------------- Sprint: 2017 Week 38-39, 2017 Week 40-41-42, 2017 Week 43-44, 2017 Week 45-46, 2017 Week 47-48, 2017 Week 49-50, 2017 Week 51-52, 2018 Week 01-02, 2018 Week 03-04, 2018 Week 05-06, 2018 Week 07-08, 2018 Week 09-10, 2018 Week 11-12 (was: 2017 Week 38-39, 2017 Week 40-41-42, 2017 Week 43-44, 2017 Week 45-46, 2017 Week 47-48, 2017 Week 49-50, 2017 Week 51-52, 2018 Week 01-02, 2018 Week 03-04, 2018 Week 05-06, 2018 Week 07-08, 2018 Week 09-10) > [Guided Decision Table] Invalid error message when renaming bound variable name in conditional BRL column. > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: DROOLS-1795 > URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/DROOLS-1795 > Project: Drools > Issue Type: Bug > Components: Guided Decision Table Editor > Affects Versions: 7.0.0.Final > Reporter: Mark Coble > Assignee: Mark Coble > Priority: Minor > Fix For: 7.0.0.Final > > Attachments: guvnor-3507.png > > > If a condition BRL column is added to a DT with bound variables that are used in an action column and that variable name is subsequently changed, the attached error message occurs when updating the action column with the new variable name. In the attached message the original variable name is 'app'. Hitting 'ok' returns you to the DT which has actually refactored the DT with the new variable name and validation is successful. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.5.0#75005)

8 years, 3 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss JIRA] (DROOLS-1825) [Guided Decision Table] Ability to change HIT policy in a decision table anytime

by Kris Verlaenen (JIRA)

[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/DROOLS-1825?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugi... ] Kris Verlaenen updated DROOLS-1825: ----------------------------------- Sprint: 2017 Week 45-46, 2017 Week 47-48, 2017 Week 49-50, 2017 Week 51-52, 2018 Week 01-02, 2018 Week 03-04, 2018 Week 05-06, 2018 Week 07-08, 2018 Week 09-10, 2018 Week 11-12 (was: 2017 Week 45-46, 2017 Week 47-48, 2017 Week 49-50, 2017 Week 51-52, 2018 Week 01-02, 2018 Week 03-04, 2018 Week 05-06, 2018 Week 07-08, 2018 Week 09-10) > [Guided Decision Table] Ability to change HIT policy in a decision table anytime > -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: DROOLS-1825 > URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/DROOLS-1825 > Project: Drools > Issue Type: Enhancement > Components: Guided Decision Table Editor > Affects Versions: 7.1.0.Beta2 > Reporter: Ivo Bek > Assignee: Toni Rikkola > Priority: Critical > Labels: UX, UXTeam > Attachments: DROOLS-1825 (Parent Rule).png, DecisionTable1.png, DecisionTable2.png, GDTAnalysis(a)2x.png, GDTColumns(a)2x.png > > Original Estimate: 1 week > Remaining Estimate: 1 week > > Today, it's possible to set 1 of 5 HIT policies when we create a new guided decision table. However, the user might not know which HIT policy he/she should use at this early beginning. Therefore, it should be possible to set the policy to None when we create a new guided decision table and set the HIT policy later after we add columns and rows, fill in some data and see and decide based on the created table how the rules should behave using the HIT policy. > Thus, it should be possible to change HIT policy in a decision table anytime. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.5.0#75005)

8 years, 3 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss JIRA] (DROOLS-1609) Augment FEEL AST node at compilation with return type

by Kris Verlaenen (JIRA)

[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/DROOLS-1609?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugi... ] Kris Verlaenen updated DROOLS-1609: ----------------------------------- Sprint: 2017 Week 24-25, 2017 Week 26-27, 2017 Week 28-29, 2017 Week 30-31, 2017 Week 32-33, 2017 Week 34-35, 2017 Week 36-37, 2017 Week 38-39, 2017 Week 40-41-42, 2017 Week 43-44, 2017 Week 45-46, 2017 Week 47-48, 2017 Week 49-50, 2017 Week 51-52, 2018 Week 01-02, 2018 Week 03-04, 2018 Week 05-06, 2018 Week 07-08, 2018 Week 09-10, 2018 Week 11-12 (was: 2017 Week 24-25, 2017 Week 26-27, 2017 Week 28-29, 2017 Week 30-31, 2017 Week 32-33, 2017 Week 34-35, 2017 Week 36-37, 2017 Week 38-39, 2017 Week 40-41-42, 2017 Week 43-44, 2017 Week 45-46, 2017 Week 47-48, 2017 Week 49-50, 2017 Week 51-52, 2018 Week 01-02, 2018 Week 03-04, 2018 Week 05-06, 2018 Week 07-08, 2018 Week 09-10) > Augment FEEL AST node at compilation with return type > ----------------------------------------------------- > > Key: DROOLS-1609 > URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/DROOLS-1609 > Project: Drools > Issue Type: Enhancement > Components: dmn engine > Reporter: Matteo Mortari > Assignee: Matteo Mortari > Priority: Minor > > This is needed so to be able to determine the result of a boxed function at compile time, in turn to be able at compile time to determine a valid compilation without error of a BKM for instance. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.5.0#75005)

8 years, 3 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss JIRA] (DROOLS-1701) FEEL code generation and compilation

by Kris Verlaenen (JIRA)

[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/DROOLS-1701?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugi... ] Kris Verlaenen updated DROOLS-1701: ----------------------------------- Sprint: 2017 Week 36-37, 2017 Week 38-39, 2017 Week 40-41-42, 2017 Week 43-44, 2017 Week 45-46, 2017 Week 47-48, 2017 Week 49-50, 2017 Week 51-52, 2018 Week 01-02, 2018 Week 03-04, 2018 Week 05-06, 2018 Week 07-08, 2018 Week 09-10, 2018 Week 11-12 (was: 2017 Week 36-37, 2017 Week 38-39, 2017 Week 40-41-42, 2017 Week 43-44, 2017 Week 45-46, 2017 Week 47-48, 2017 Week 49-50, 2017 Week 51-52, 2018 Week 01-02, 2018 Week 03-04, 2018 Week 05-06, 2018 Week 07-08, 2018 Week 09-10) > FEEL code generation and compilation > ------------------------------------ > > Key: DROOLS-1701 > URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/DROOLS-1701 > Project: Drools > Issue Type: Task > Components: dmn engine > Reporter: Matteo Mortari > Assignee: Matteo Mortari > -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.5.0#75005)

8 years, 3 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss JIRA] (DROOLS-2255) [DMN designer] Node labels move between savings

by Kris Verlaenen (JIRA)

[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/DROOLS-2255?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugi... ] Kris Verlaenen updated DROOLS-2255: ----------------------------------- Sprint: 2018 Week 09-10, 2018 Week 11-12 (was: 2018 Week 09-10) > [DMN designer] Node labels move between savings > ----------------------------------------------- > > Key: DROOLS-2255 > URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/DROOLS-2255 > Project: Drools > Issue Type: Bug > Components: DMN Editor > Affects Versions: 7.6.0.Final > Reporter: Jozef Marko > Assignee: Wagner Scholl Lemos > Priority: Critical > Labels: Stunner > Attachments: after-save.png, before-save.png > > > The attachments shows DMN diagram before and after saving, it can be seen that node labels moved. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.5.0#75005)

8 years, 3 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss JIRA] (DROOLS-1946) DMN Editor

by Kris Verlaenen (JIRA)

[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/DROOLS-1946?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugi... ] Kris Verlaenen updated DROOLS-1946: ----------------------------------- Sprint: 2017 Week 24-25, 2017 Week 26-27, 2017 Week 28-29, 2017 Week 30-31, 2017 Week 32-33, 2017 Week 34-35, 2017 Week 36-37, 2017 Week 38-39, 2017 Week 40-41-42, 2017 Week 43-44, 2017 Week 45-46, 2017 Week 47-48, 2017 Week 49-50, 2017 Week 51-52, 2018 Week 01-02, 2018 Week 03-04, 2018 Week 05-06, 2018 Week 07-08, 2018 Week 09-10, 2018 Week 11-12 (was: 2017 Week 24-25, 2017 Week 26-27, 2017 Week 28-29, 2017 Week 30-31, 2017 Week 32-33, 2017 Week 34-35, 2017 Week 36-37, 2017 Week 38-39, 2017 Week 40-41-42, 2017 Week 43-44, 2017 Week 45-46, 2017 Week 47-48, 2017 Week 49-50, 2017 Week 51-52, 2018 Week 01-02, 2018 Week 03-04, 2018 Week 05-06, 2018 Week 07-08, 2018 Week 09-10) > DMN Editor > ---------- > > Key: DROOLS-1946 > URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/DROOLS-1946 > Project: Drools > Issue Type: Feature Request > Components: DMN Editor > Reporter: Michael Anstis > Assignee: Michael Anstis > Labels: UX > Fix For: 7.7.0.Final > > > Place holder for all DMN Editor related activities -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.5.0#75005)

8 years, 3 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss JIRA] (SWSQE-57) [QE] - SWS-170 - Embedded Jaeger UI

by Hayk Hovsepyan (JIRA)

[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/SWSQE-57?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.s... ] Hayk Hovsepyan updated SWSQE-57: -------------------------------- Team: Jupiter (was: Jupiter) Sprint: (was: SWS QE Sprint 2) > [QE] - SWS-170 - Embedded Jaeger UI > ----------------------------------- > > Key: SWSQE-57 > URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/SWSQE-57 > Project: Swift Sunshine QE > Issue Type: Task > Reporter: Hayk Hovsepyan > Assignee: Michael Foley > > Look into Dev Task/Story https://issues.jboss.org/browse/SWS-170 -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.5.0#75005)

8 years, 3 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss JIRA] (ELY-1418) CLIENT_CERT without users certificates database

by Martin Choma (JIRA)

[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/ELY-1418?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.s... ] Martin Choma commented on ELY-1418: ----------------------------------- Can we discuss this again? We know we are missing this feature compared to legacy. People start to look for this feature in Elytron [1]. But I see on PR comment there are some design doubts. Can we revise them? [1] https://developer.jboss.org/thread/277414 > CLIENT_CERT without users certificates database > ----------------------------------------------- > > Key: ELY-1418 > URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/ELY-1418 > Project: WildFly Elytron > Issue Type: Feature Request > Components: HTTP > Affects Versions: 1.2.0.Beta7 > Reporter: Jan Kalina > Assignee: Jan Kalina > > CLIENT_CERT http-authentication-mechanism currently requires to provide security-realm, which will contain identity for given certificate and will verify X509Evidence for it. This does not provide replacement for legacy truststore auth, which allows to use only CA certificate to authenticate users by certificates signed by CA, without any database of them. > Analysis document: > https://developer.jboss.org/wiki/AnalysisDesign-CLIENTCERTWithoutUsersCer... -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.5.0#75005)

8 years, 3 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss JIRA] (ELY-1291) Coverity static analysis: Non-Serializable SecurityIdentity is contained in Serializable ElytronAccount

by Jan Kalina (JIRA)

[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/ELY-1291?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.s... ] Jan Kalina reassigned ELY-1291: ------------------------------- Assignee: Jan Kalina > Coverity static analysis: Non-Serializable SecurityIdentity is contained in Serializable ElytronAccount > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: ELY-1291 > URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/ELY-1291 > Project: WildFly Elytron > Issue Type: Bug > Reporter: Martin Choma > Assignee: Jan Kalina > > Coverity static analysis found Serializable ElytronAccount contains non-Serializable SecurityIdentity. > https://scan7.coverity.com/reports.htm#v23632/p12664/fileInstanceId=86223... > Please resolve this inconsistent situation. > By dev feedback SecurityIdentity can't be made Serializable. Rework to remove SecurityIdentity from ElytronAccount was suggested. > {code:title=hipchat.log} > [3:23 PM] Martin Choma: Shouldn't be SecurityIdentity Serializable? - because of HttpSession replication? > [3:23 PM] Darran Lofthouse: No it can't be > [3:24 PM] Darran Lofthouse: it is backed by implementation as well as state > [3:25 PM] David M. Lloyd: right it would essentially be a security hole to be able to deserialize an identity > [3:26 PM] David M. Lloyd: among other problems > [3:26 PM] Darran Lofthouse: on the far side we restore the identity instead of deserializing it > [3:31 PM] Martin Choma: I got it. Thing is static analyzer is complaining elytron-web ElytronAccount (Serializable class) is referencing SecurityIdentity, but probably problem is ElytronAccount does not have to be mark as Serializable, right? > [3:34 PM] Darran Lofthouse: @MartinChoma we may be able to re-work that and remove the reference to SI > {code} -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.5.0#75005)

8 years, 3 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss JIRA] (ELY-1418) CLIENT_CERT without users certificates database

by Martin Choma (JIRA)

[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/ELY-1418?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.s... ] Martin Choma updated ELY-1418: ------------------------------ Forum Reference: https://developer.jboss.org/thread/277414 > CLIENT_CERT without users certificates database > ----------------------------------------------- > > Key: ELY-1418 > URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/ELY-1418 > Project: WildFly Elytron > Issue Type: Feature Request > Components: HTTP > Affects Versions: 1.2.0.Beta7 > Reporter: Jan Kalina > Assignee: Jan Kalina > > CLIENT_CERT http-authentication-mechanism currently requires to provide security-realm, which will contain identity for given certificate and will verify X509Evidence for it. This does not provide replacement for legacy truststore auth, which allows to use only CA certificate to authenticate users by certificates signed by CA, without any database of them. > Analysis document: > https://developer.jboss.org/wiki/AnalysisDesign-CLIENTCERTWithoutUsersCer... -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.5.0#75005)

8 years, 3 months

1
0
0 / 0

2026

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

jboss-jira March 2018