[JBoss JIRA] (WFLY-9943) Sometimes WF process does not exit on RHEL 6 (32/64 bit) and IBM JDK 8
by Miroslav Novak (JIRA)
[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFLY-9943?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.... ]
Miroslav Novak closed WFLY-9943.
--------------------------------
Resolution: Cannot Reproduce
Currently this issue cannot be reproduced. Closing it.
> Sometimes WF process does not exit on RHEL 6 (32/64 bit) and IBM JDK 8
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: WFLY-9943
> URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFLY-9943
> Project: WildFly
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: Server
> Affects Versions: 12.0.0.Final
> Environment: RHEL 6 32/64 bit
> IBM SDK 8.0.5.10:
> {code}java version "1.8.0_161
> Java(TM) SE Runtime Environment (build 8.0.5.10 - pxi3280sr5fp10-20180214_01(SR5 FP10))
> IBM J9 VM (build 2.9, JRE 1.8.0 Linux x86-32 20180208_378436 (JIT enabled, AOT enabled)
> OpenJ9 - 39bb844
> OMR - c04ccb2
> IBM - 2321a81)
> JCL - 20180209_01 based on Oracle jdk8u161-b12
> {code}
> Reporter: Miroslav Novak
> Assignee: Jason Greene
> Attachments: pstack.txt
>
>
> Sometimes happens that WF12 process does not exit when :shutdown CLI operation called and hangs indefinitely. This happens only RHEL 6 (32/64 bit) with IBM SDK8.
> Calling kill -3 does not create any javacore dump and only output could be gathered from pstack (attached). It indicates that JVM shutdown thread is hanging on:
> {code}
> Thread 25 (Thread 0xb7792b70 (LWP 25507)):
> #0 0x00bd4424 in __kernel_vsyscall ()
> #1 0x00b2243c in pthread_cond_wait@(a)GLIBC_2.3.2 () from /lib/libpthread.so.0
> #2 0x004f8b1f in monitor_wait_original () from /qa/tools/opt/ibm-java-i386-sdk-8.0-5.10/jre/lib/i386/default/libj9thr29.so
> #3 0x004f9957 in omrthread_monitor_wait () from /qa/tools/opt/ibm-java-i386-sdk-8.0-5.10/jre/lib/i386/default/libj9thr29.so
> #4 0x0033e217 in protectedDestroyJavaVM () from /qa/tools/opt/ibm-java-i386-sdk-8.0-5.10/jre/lib/i386/default/libj9vm29.so
> #5 0x0042cf6e in omrsig_protect () from /qa/tools/opt/ibm-java-i386-sdk-8.0-5.10/jre/lib/i386/default/libj9prt29.so
> #6 0x0033db93 in DestroyJavaVM () from /qa/tools/opt/ibm-java-i386-sdk-8.0-5.10/jre/lib/i386/default/libj9vm29.so
> #7 0x00815999 in DestroyJavaVM () from /qa/tools/opt/ibm-java-i386-sdk-8.0-5.10/jre/lib/i386/default/libjvm.so
> #8 0x00528649 in JavaMain () from /qa/tools/opt/ibm-java-i386-sdk-8.0-5.10/jre/bin/../lib/i386/jli/libjli.so
> #9 0x00b1ebc9 in start_thread () from /lib/libpthread.so.0
> #10 0x001fc04e in clone () from /lib/libc.so.6
> {code}
> There are other 24 threads which might be blocking this thread or a dead lock. This appears to be problem in IBM SDK 8 in combination RHEL 6 GLIBC_2.3.2 library.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.5.0#75005)
8 years, 3 months
[JBoss JIRA] (DROOLS-2342) Update Kie Navigator to the new git/rest structure
by Andrej Podhradsky (JIRA)
[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/DROOLS-2342?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugi... ]
Andrej Podhradsky commented on DROOLS-2342:
-------------------------------------------
Thanks [~tfernand] for the pull request. Note that before adding this bug fix in the Devstudio Integration Stack, we need to implement a backward compatibility with the older versions.
> Update Kie Navigator to the new git/rest structure
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: DROOLS-2342
> URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/DROOLS-2342
> Project: Drools
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: eclipse plugin
> Affects Versions: 7.5.0.Final
> Environment: 7.7.0-SNAPSHOT
> Reporter: Tomas David
> Assignee: Tiago Bento
> Fix For: 7.8.0.Final
>
>
> Drools eclipse plugin contains Kie Navigator tool which uses git structure and rest calls to connect to kie-wb. According to changes made in kie-wb 7.7.0 the tooling should be updated.
> The rest api and the git structure changed. and the kie navigator doesn't work.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.5.0#75005)
8 years, 3 months
[JBoss JIRA] (WFLY-6412) Timer fails if transaction isolation set to SERIALIZABLE on Oracle 11g
by Maxim Karavaev (JIRA)
[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFLY-6412?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.... ]
Maxim Karavaev commented on WFLY-6412:
--------------------------------------
Hi [~swd847]!
I suppose, that the problem is much deeper.
Oracle DB doesn't have AUTOCOMMIT option at ALL!!! So the client should manage his transactions every time manually. I do not see any TX management over a connection in the method
{code}
org.jboss.as.ejb3.timerservice.persistence.database.DatabaseTimerPersistence#persistTimer
{code}
That's mean, that finishing timer invocation will not be persisted ( or it will be in some serendipitous cases when the same connection will be used in the method _shouldRun_, where TX is managed)
Right now (I've tried to make it work in WF11 and WF12) persistent Timer logic doesn't work reliably with the Oracle DB.
> Timer fails if transaction isolation set to SERIALIZABLE on Oracle 11g
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: WFLY-6412
> URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFLY-6412
> Project: WildFly
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: EJB
> Affects Versions: 8.2.0.Final, 10.0.0.Final
> Environment: Linux, JDK8, Oracle DB 11g
> Reporter: Gábor Péntek
> Assignee: Stuart Douglas
> Fix For: 11.0.0.Alpha1
>
>
> If the transaction isolation level is set to SERIALIZABLE if one node aquires the row lock via the
> UPDATE JBOSS_EJB_TIMER..
> the other nodes throw an
> ORA-08177: can't serialize access for this transaction
> exception.
> The timer thats row threw the exception never runs any more, not even in case the other nodes were shut down.
> The serialization exception is also thrown upon server/application startup sometimes.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.5.0#75005)
8 years, 3 months
[JBoss JIRA] (DROOLS-2425) [DMN Designer] Undo of relation column deletion is not proper
by Jozef Marko (JIRA)
[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/DROOLS-2425?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugi... ]
Jozef Marko commented on DROOLS-2425:
-------------------------------------
[~manstis] well, just to give more context, I am trying to test (unfortunately manually) things, I think could be affected by changes in the given PR. Would you like to see my "acceptance test" immediately when I file jira?
> [DMN Designer] Undo of relation column deletion is not proper
> -------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: DROOLS-2425
> URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/DROOLS-2425
> Project: Drools
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: DMN Editor
> Affects Versions: 7.8.0.Final
> Reporter: Jozef Marko
> Assignee: Michael Anstis
> Priority: Minor
> Attachments: Screenshot from 2018-03-27 12-12-05.png, Screenshot from 2018-03-27 12-14-47.png, Screenshot from 2018-03-27 12-14-55.png
>
>
> This issue was spotted during DROOLS-2392 review.
> In special cases undo of delete relation column is not proper.
> h2. Acceptance test
> # Steps to reproduce fixed (/)
> # Deletion is undone properly
> ## Deletion of con. entry (/)
> ## Deletion of Dec. table row (/)
> ## Deletion of Dec. table column (x)
> ## Deletion of Relation column
> ## Deletion of Relation row
> ## Deletion of Function parameter
> # Clear of expression type is undone properly
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.5.0#75005)
8 years, 3 months
[JBoss JIRA] (WFLY-10172) Add support for JSR-375 EE Security as required for Java EE 8
by Stuart Douglas (JIRA)
[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFLY-10172?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin... ]
Stuart Douglas moved EAP7-980 to WFLY-10172:
--------------------------------------------
Project: WildFly (was: EAP 7 Planning Pilot)
Key: WFLY-10172 (was: EAP7-980)
Issue Type: Feature Request (was: Requirement)
Workflow: GIT Pull Request workflow (was: EAP Agile Workflow 2.0)
Component/s: Security
(was: Security)
Target Release: (was: 7.2.0.GA)
> Add support for JSR-375 EE Security as required for Java EE 8
> -------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: WFLY-10172
> URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFLY-10172
> Project: WildFly
> Issue Type: Feature Request
> Components: Security
> Reporter: Stuart Douglas
> Assignee: Stuart Douglas
> Labels: JavaEE8
>
> This depends on EAP7-649
> In general at the outset this RFE should be the minimal required on top of EAP7-649 to be compliant with EE security most likely using a much from the RI as possible meaning this feature should be more about integration. If issues are found using the RI we can always choose to address those later.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.5.0#75005)
8 years, 3 months
[JBoss JIRA] (SWSQE-116) Reinstall openshift production cluster
by Guilherme Baufaker Rêgo (JIRA)
[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/SWSQE-116?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.... ]
Guilherme Baufaker Rêgo edited comment on SWSQE-116 at 4/4/18 4:38 PM:
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
For 1,2 and 3, we have viet quickstart script that I've updated to Openshift 3.9 (I don't have too much experience using kickstart so I might need some help with RHEL with quickstart)
I think SWSQE-111 can solve item 4.
Any other thoughts [~fbrychta]?
was (Author: gbaufake):
For 1,2 and 3, we have @viet quickstart script that I've updated to Openshift 3.9 (I don't have too much experience using kickstart so I might need some help with RHEL with quickstart)
I think SWSQE-111 can solve item 4.
Any other thoughts [~fbrychta]?
> Reinstall openshift production cluster
> --------------------------------------
>
> Key: SWSQE-116
> URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/SWSQE-116
> Project: Kiali QE
> Issue Type: Task
> Reporter: Filip Brychta
> Assignee: Guilherme Baufaker Rêgo
>
> Currently there are following problems with our OS cluster:
> * docker on nodes is using loopback devices which is strongly discouraged for production use
> * small partition for imagefs and nodefs which is causing issues "The node was low on resource: imagefs"
> * different root passwords
> We need to:
> # investigate recommended partitioning for production OS clusters (also think about RAID versions available on each blade)
> # reinstall RHELs with recommended partitions
> # Configuring Docker Storage as described in https://docs.openshift.com/container-platform/3.9/install_config/install/...
> # install OS 3.9
> # create mojo documentation
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.5.0#75005)
8 years, 3 months
[JBoss JIRA] (SWSQE-116) Reinstall openshift production cluster
by Guilherme Baufaker Rêgo (JIRA)
[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/SWSQE-116?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.... ]
Guilherme Baufaker Rêgo edited comment on SWSQE-116 at 4/4/18 4:38 PM:
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
For 1,2 and 3, we have @viet quickstart script that I've updated to Openshift 3.9 (I don't have too much experience using kickstart so I might need some help with RHEL with quickstart)
I think SWSQE-111 can solve item 4.
Any other thoughts [~fbrychta]?
was (Author: gbaufake):
For 1,2 and 3, we have Viet's quickstart script that I've updated to Openshift 3.9 (I don't have too much experience using kickstart so I might need some help with RHEL with quickstart)
I think SWSQE-111 can solve item 4.
Any other thoughts [~fbrychta]?
> Reinstall openshift production cluster
> --------------------------------------
>
> Key: SWSQE-116
> URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/SWSQE-116
> Project: Kiali QE
> Issue Type: Task
> Reporter: Filip Brychta
> Assignee: Guilherme Baufaker Rêgo
>
> Currently there are following problems with our OS cluster:
> * docker on nodes is using loopback devices which is strongly discouraged for production use
> * small partition for imagefs and nodefs which is causing issues "The node was low on resource: imagefs"
> * different root passwords
> We need to:
> # investigate recommended partitioning for production OS clusters (also think about RAID versions available on each blade)
> # reinstall RHELs with recommended partitions
> # Configuring Docker Storage as described in https://docs.openshift.com/container-platform/3.9/install_config/install/...
> # install OS 3.9
> # create mojo documentation
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.5.0#75005)
8 years, 3 months
[JBoss JIRA] (SWSQE-116) Reinstall openshift production cluster
by Guilherme Baufaker Rêgo (JIRA)
[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/SWSQE-116?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.... ]
Guilherme Baufaker Rêgo commented on SWSQE-116:
-----------------------------------------------
For 1,2 and 3, we have Viet's quickstart script that I've updated to Openshift 3.9 (I don't have too much experience using kickstart so I might need some help with RHEL with quickstart)
I think SWSQE-111 can solve item 4.
Any other thoughts [~fbrychta]?
> Reinstall openshift production cluster
> --------------------------------------
>
> Key: SWSQE-116
> URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/SWSQE-116
> Project: Kiali QE
> Issue Type: Task
> Reporter: Filip Brychta
> Assignee: Guilherme Baufaker Rêgo
>
> Currently there are following problems with our OS cluster:
> * docker on nodes is using loopback devices which is strongly discouraged for production use
> * small partition for imagefs and nodefs which is causing issues "The node was low on resource: imagefs"
> * different root passwords
> We need to:
> # investigate recommended partitioning for production OS clusters (also think about RAID versions available on each blade)
> # reinstall RHELs with recommended partitions
> # Configuring Docker Storage as described in https://docs.openshift.com/container-platform/3.9/install_config/install/...
> # install OS 3.9
> # create mojo documentation
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.5.0#75005)
8 years, 3 months