[JBoss JIRA] (SWSQE-200) B12 OpenShift Cluster is flaky
by Guilherme Baufaker Rêgo (JIRA)
[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/SWSQE-200?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.... ]
Guilherme Baufaker Rêgo updated SWSQE-200:
------------------------------------------
Priority: Minor (was: Blocker)
> B12 OpenShift Cluster is flaky
> ------------------------------
>
> Key: SWSQE-200
> URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/SWSQE-200
> Project: Kiali QE
> Issue Type: QE Task
> Reporter: Kevin Earls
> Assignee: Guilherme Baufaker Rêgo
> Priority: Minor
>
> I'm opening this mostly as a placeholder, and will update it as I get more information on the problems I've been experiencing. Since I've been using B12 I've been experiencing more frequent failures than on other clusters, including minishift on my laptop and the CNCF CI Jenkins. Here are a couple of instances:
> 1. Deploying ElasticSearch along with the Jaeger Production templates requires allocating 2G or memory, even though the default 512M works fine elsewhere. This can be seen in the Jaeger Standalone Performance tests job here: https://jenkins-jaeger-test.openshift3.jonqe.lab.eng.bos.redhat.com/job/J... . If you run the job without changing the ES_MEMORY parameter to 2Gi it will fail.
> 2. I have a set of smoke tests for Red Hat productized artifacts for the Jaeger Java client which are run using the Jaeger all-in-one template. It's fairly simple, but on B12 deployment of the Jaeger all-in-one images fails on every other build. I've made a copy of the job here: https://jenkins-jaeger-test.openshift3.jonqe.lab.eng.bos.redhat.com/job/F... and its history should be clear.
> So far I have not been able to get any useful information about why this is failing. In the OpenShift console it looks like Jaeger has started correctly. There are no errors in the logs, nor any to be found under monitoring. But if you click on the Jaeger link, you get the message "Application is not available . The application is currently not serving requests at this endpoint. It may not have been started or is still starting."
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.5.0#75005)
8 years, 2 months
[JBoss JIRA] (WFLY-10339) Broadcast/discovery-group resources have ambiguous requirement specs
by Jeff Mesnil (JIRA)
[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFLY-10339?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin... ]
Jeff Mesnil commented on WFLY-10339:
------------------------------------
[~pferraro] thanks for looking at it.
I agree that we can split the resources as they have quite different cap/reqs.
Could I suggest that we keep the <broadcast|discovery>-group for the JGroups implementation (which is the default we use)?
The socket-based version would be named socket-broadcast-group as you suggest.
Note that this has an impact on the legacy messaging migration. if the socket version is used, the migrated add operation will have to use the new resource name at https://github.com/wildfly/wildfly/blob/f4b6b3afdea148862a28b34082c8dd215....
Please note that I am about to revert the management version bump of the messaging-activemq subsystem as there has been no management changes between WildFly 12 and 13.
If you plan to do that *before* WildFly 13, please tell me so that I cancel the revert.
thanks!
> Broadcast/discovery-group resources have ambiguous requirement specs
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: WFLY-10339
> URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFLY-10339
> Project: WildFly
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: JMS
> Affects Versions: 12.0.0.Final
> Reporter: Paul Ferraro
> Assignee: Jeff Mesnil
>
> Currently, the broadcast/discovery-group resources have messy requirement specs, as the capabilities that they require are dependent whether or not the jgroups-cluster attribute is defined.
> I suggest splitting these resources into 2:
> {code}/subsystem=messaging-activemq/server=*/jgroups-broadcast-group=*{code}
> {code}/subsystem=messaging-activemq/server=*/jgroups-discovery-group=*{code}
> which requires clustering capabilities
> and
> {code}/subsystem=messaging-activemq/server=*/socket-broadcast-group=*{code}
> {code}/subsystem=messaging-activemq/server=*/socket-discovery-group=*{code}
> which requires a socket-binding capability.
> This results in clearer requirement specs - which helps simplify the introspection of this subsystem for provisioning purposes.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.5.0#75005)
8 years, 2 months
[JBoss JIRA] (WFCORE-3786) ManagementAuthenticationUsersTestCase fails on latest JDKs
by Petr Kremensky (JIRA)
[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFCORE-3786?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugi... ]
Petr Kremensky commented on WFCORE-3786:
----------------------------------------
I can confirm we see this too with jdk1.8.0_b17x. This also causes running the tests of {{WildFly Test Suite: Integration - Elytron}} to fail with:
{noformat}
[ERROR] Failed to execute goal org.wildfly.plugins:wildfly-maven-plugin:1.2.1.Final:execute-commands (default) on project wildfly-ts-integ-elytron: Failed to execute commands: See /home/pkremens/devel/wildfly/testsuite/integration/elytron/target/wildfly-plugin.log for full details of failure.
[ERROR] Caused by: java.io.IOException: Invalid secret key format"}},
[ERROR] "rolled-back" => true,
[ERROR] "response-headers" => {"process-state" => "reload-required"}
[ERROR] }
{noformat}
{noformat}
{
"outcome" => "failed",
"failure-description" => {"WFLYCTL0080: Failed services" => {"org.wildfly.security.credential-store.cred-store-default" => "WFLYELY00004: Unable to start the service.
Caused by: org.wildfly.security.credential.store.CredentialStoreException: ELY09514: Unable to initialize credential store
Caused by: java.io.IOException: Invalid secret key format"}},
"rolled-back" => true,
"response-headers" => {"process-state" => "reload-required"}
}
{noformat}
> ManagementAuthenticationUsersTestCase fails on latest JDKs
> ----------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: WFCORE-3786
> URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFCORE-3786
> Project: WildFly Core
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: Security
> Reporter: Richard Opalka
> Assignee: Darran Lofthouse
> Fix For: 5.0.0.Beta2
>
>
> I downloaded both jdk1.8.0_b171 & jdk1.8.0_b172.
> When running whole WFCORE test suite on them
> I'm getting InvalidUserStore exception in
> ManagementAuthenticationUsersTestCase
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.5.0#75005)
8 years, 2 months
[JBoss JIRA] (WFCORE-3839) Cannot read-identity of filesystem-realm if change level attribute later
by Martin Choma (JIRA)
[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFCORE-3839?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugi... ]
Martin Choma commented on WFCORE-3839:
--------------------------------------
Does this prevent changing attribute manually in standalone.xml? Do we have such creation only attributes in model now?
> Cannot read-identity of filesystem-realm if change level attribute later
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: WFCORE-3839
> URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFCORE-3839
> Project: WildFly Core
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: Security
> Reporter: Claudio Miranda
> Assignee: Darran Lofthouse
>
> Add filesystem-realm, add a identity, then change the levels to 3, the previously added identity cannot be recovered anymore. This is due to the directory structure previously created. Perhaps, the levels attribute should be set at creation time only ?
> {code}
> [standalone@localhost:9990 /] /subsystem=elytron/filesystem-realm=file_realm1:add(path=file_realm)
> {"outcome" => "success"}
> [standalone@localhost:9990 /] /subsystem=elytron/filesystem-realm=file_realm1:add-identity(identity=user1)
> {"outcome" => "success"}
> [standalone@localhost:9990 /] /subsystem=elytron/filesystem-realm=file_realm1:read-identity(identity=user1)
> {
> "outcome" => "success",
> "result" => {
> "name" => "user1",
> "attributes" => undefined
> }
> }
> [standalone@localhost:9990 /] /subsystem=elytron/filesystem-realm=file_realm1:write-attribute(name=levels,value=3)
> {
> "outcome" => "success",
> "response-headers" => {
> "operation-requires-reload" => true,
> "process-state" => "reload-required"
> }
> }
> [standalone@localhost:9990 /] reload
> [standalone@localhost:9990 /] /subsystem=elytron/filesystem-realm=file_realm1:read-identity(identity=user1)
> {
> "outcome" => "failed",
> "failure-description" => "WFLYELY01002: Identity with name [user1] not found.",
> "rolled-back" => true
> }
> {code}
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.5.0#75005)
8 years, 2 months